1
|
Adumala A, Palat G, Vajjala A, Brun E, Segerlantz M. Oral Methadone versus Morphine IR for Patients with Cervical Cancer and Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. Indian J Palliat Care 2023; 29:200-206. [PMID: 37325268 PMCID: PMC10261940 DOI: 10.25259/ijpc_58_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives In India, cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women and makes up for up to 29% of all registered cancer in females. Cancer-related pain is one of the major distressing symptoms for all cancer patients. Pain is characterised as somatic or neuropathic, and the total pain experience is often mixed. Conventional opioids are the backbone of analgesic treatment but are most often not sufficient in alleviating neuropathic pain, common in cervical cancer. Accumulating evidence of the advantage of methadone compared to conventional opioids, due to agonist action at both μ and q opioid receptors, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist activity and the ability to inhibit the reuptake of monoamines has been demonstrated. We hypothesised that, with these properties', methadone might be a good option for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with cervical cancer. Material and Methods Patients with cervical cancer stages ll-lll were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. A comparison was made between methadone versus immediate release morphine (IR morphine), with increasing doses until pain was controlled. Inclusion-period was from October 3rd to December 31st 2020, and the total patient-study period was 12 weeks. Pain intensity was assessed according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique (DN4). The primary objective was to determine whether methadone was clinically superior versus noninferior to morphine as an analgesic for the treatment of cancer related neuropathic pain in women with cervical cancer. Results A total of 85 women were included; five withdrew and six died during the study period, leaving 74 patients completing the study. All participants showed a reduction in mean values of NRS and DN4 from the time of inclusion and to the end of the study period, for IR morphine and methadone 8.4-2.7 and 8.6-1.5, respectively (P < 0.001). The DN4 score mean reduction for Morphine and Methadone were 6.12-1.37 and 6.05-0, respectively (P < 0.001). Side effects were more common in the group of patients receiving IR morphine compared to the patients treated with methadone. Conclusion We found that Methadone had a superior analgesic effect with good overall tolerability compared with morphine as a first-line strong opioid for the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Adumala
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, MNJ Institute of Oncology and RCC, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Gayatri Palat
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, MNJ Institute of Oncology and RCC, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Archana Vajjala
- Pain Relief and Palliative Care Society, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Eva Brun
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skånes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mikael Segerlantz
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Institute for Palliative Care, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ding H, Song Y, Xin W, Sun J, Zhong L, Zhou Q, He C, Gong L, Fang L. Methadone switching for refractory cancer pain. Palliat Care 2022; 21:191. [PMID: 36324113 PMCID: PMC9628261 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01076-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methadone is commonly considered an alternative opioid treatment for refractory cancer pain. This study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost of methadone in the treatment of refractory cancer pain. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted in patients who used methadone for refractory cancer pain from April 2016 to December 2020 at a cancer specialized hospital. Pain control, evaluated via pain score and breakthrough pain frequency, and adverse events of methadone were compared with analgesic regimens prior to methadone administration. The factors potentially affecting the switching outcome were analyzed via multivariate analysis. Moreover, the cost of pain control was estimated. RESULTS Ninety patients received methadone for poor pain control (74.4%), intolerable adverse events (10.0%), or both (15.6%) after prior opioid treatments. Sixty-four patients (71.1%) were successfully switched to methadone with median pain score significantly decreased from 4.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001) and median daily frequency of breakthrough pain from 3.0 to 0.0 (p < 0.001) at a maintained median conversion ratio of 6.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-10.0] to prior opioid treatment. Similar adverse event profiles of constipation, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were observed between methadone and prior opioid regimens. The median daily cost of analgesic regimens was significantly reduced from $19.5 (IQR: 12.3-46.2) to $10.8 (IQR: 7.1-18.7) (p < 0.01) after switching to methadone. The 3-day switch method significantly improved the rate of successful switching compared with the stop and go method (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.30-8.76, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Methadone is an effective, safe, and cost-saving treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiying Ding
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yu Song
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenxiu Xin
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China ,grid.417397.f0000 0004 1808 0985Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, China
| | - Like Zhong
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China ,grid.417397.f0000 0004 1808 0985Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, China
| | - Qinfei Zhou
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Rare Cancer & Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoneng He
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liyan Gong
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Rare Cancer & Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luo Fang
- grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) , Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China ,grid.417397.f0000 0004 1808 0985Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 310022 Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fürst P. The Use of Low-Dose Methadone as Add-On to Ongoing Opioid Treatment in Palliative Cancer Care—An Underrated Treatment? Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12050679. [PMID: 35629347 PMCID: PMC9143404 DOI: 10.3390/life12050679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of low-dose methadone treatment in palliative cancer care. In Sweden, methadone is quite common in specialized palliative care, where almost a tenth of patients are prescribed this drug. Negative attitudes towards methadone do not seem to prevent it from being used for pain management, and by starting with low doses and then increasing slowly and gradually, methadone can apparently be introduced safely. It is still uncertain whether methadone has a better analgesic effect than other opioids. However, for pain relief in cancer patients with severe and complex cancer-related pain, NMDA receptor inhibition with methadone may, in selected cases, be an attractive alternative, especially in the form of low-dose supplements to other ongoing opioids. Due to long half-life and complex metabolism, the use of methadone requires an experienced physician and solid follow-up. Continuous administration of opioids, including low-dose methadone, has been proven effective and safe in reducing pain in dying patients without increasing the risk of confusion, regardless of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Fürst
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, SE-112 19 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lai G, Aroke EN, Zhang SJ. Rediscovery of Methadone to Improve Outcomes in Pain Management. J Perianesth Nurs 2022; 37:425-434. [PMID: 35396188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Clinically, methadone is most known for its use in the treatment of opioid maintenance therapy. However, methadone's pharmacological profile makes it an excellent analgesic that can enhance acute and chronic pain management. It is a potent μ-receptor agonist with a longer elimination half-life than most clinically used opioids. In addition, methadone inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake, and it is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. These distinct analgesic pathways mediate hyperalgesic, allodynic, and neuropathic pain. Its unique analgesic properties provide several essential benefits in perioperative use, neuropathic pain, cancer, and noncancer pain. Despite these proven clinical utilities, methadone has not been used widely to treat acute and chronic pain in opioid naïve patients. This article describes the unique pharmacology of methadone and provides emerging evidence to support its application in acute and chronic pain management. Pain management options and guidelines for surgical patients on methadone are discussed as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Lai
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Edwin N Aroke
- Nurse Anesthesia Program, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Sarah Jingying Zhang
- Nurse Anesthesiology Program, School of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, CA; Nurse Anesthesia Program, School of Nursing, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Assessment and Management of Acute and Chronic Cancer Pain Syndromes. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151248. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
6
|
Duarte FCN, Ferraro LHDC, Ferreira A, Sakata RK. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Analgesic Effect of the Combination of Methadone With Morphine for Cancer Related Pain. Clin J Pain 2021; 37:664-668. [PMID: 34265791 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES Although opioids play an indispensable role in the management of cancer-related pain, inadequate pain relief still occurs. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of a low dose of methadone with morphine promotes a reduction in opioid consumption; the secondary objectives were if the association promotes lower pain intensity, and adverse effects (AEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS A sample if 41 patients with cancer-related pain in palliative setting were included. Patients were starting the third step of the analgesic ladder, and 1 group (n=21) achieve methadone (2.5 mg/12 h) in combination with morphine/methadone, and another group (n=20) received morphine alone. Both groups could use morphine (5 mg) as needed to maintain pain intensity <4, and adjuvant in stable dose. The following outcomes were evaluated: total morphine dose, pain intensity, and AEs. RESULTS There was no difference in the number of adjuvants, and the dose of morphine used. Pain intensity was significantly lower in the morphine/methadone group after 2 weeks, with no statistically significant difference at other timepoints. There was no difference between groups in the AEs. CONCLUSION Low dose of methadone in combination with morphine provided faster pain control as compared with morphine alone, and although this study was not powered to show differences in AEs, we did not notice a difference.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fürst P, Lundström S, Klepstad P, Strang P. Continuous subcutaneous infusion for pain control in dying patients: experiences from a tertiary palliative care center. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:172. [PMID: 33172459 PMCID: PMC7657347 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00681-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via ambulatory infusion pump (AIP) is a valuable method of pain control in palliative care. When using CSCI, low-dose methadone as add-on to other opioids might be an option in complex pain situations. This study aimed to investigate the effects, and adverse effects, of CSCI for pain control in dying patients, with particular interest in methadone use. METHODS This was an observational cohort study. Imminently dying patients with pain, admitted to specialized palliative inpatient wards and introduced on CSCI, were monitored daily by staff for symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale - IPOS), sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - ECOG) and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method - CAM). RESULTS Ninety-three patients with a median survival of 4 days were included. Of the 47 patients who survived ≥3 days, the proportion of patients with severe/overwhelming pain decreased from 45 to 19% (p < 0.001) after starting CSCI, with only a moderate increase in morphine equivalent daily dose of opioids (MEDD). Alertness was marginally decreased (1 point on the 10-point RASS scale, p = 0.001), whereas performance status and prevalence of delirium, regardless of age, remained unchanged. Both patients with methadone as add-on (MET, n = 13) and patients with only other opioids (NMET, n = 34), improved in pain control (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), despite that MET patients had higher pain scores at baseline (p < 0.05) and were on a higher MEDD (240 mg vs.133 mg). No serious adverse effects demanding treatment stop were reported. CONCLUSIONS CSCI via AIP is an effective way to reduce pain in dying patients without increased adverse effects. Add-on methadone may be beneficial in patients with severe complex pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Fürst
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Staffan Lundström
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pål Klepstad
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,European Palliative Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Peter Strang
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fürst P, Lundström S, Strang P. Methadone in Swedish specialized palliative care-Is it the magic bullet in complex cancer-related pain? PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230845. [PMID: 32275723 PMCID: PMC7147740 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite being associated with dependence and social stigma, methadone is a potential end-of-life option in complex cancer pain. OBJECTIVES To explore attitudes and opinions about methadone and its potential role and current use in complex end-of-life pain. METHODS Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) with physicians in specialized palliative care, transcribed and analyzed with conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS According to the physicians, patients and relatives expressed unexpectedly few negative attitudes, not affecting methadone's use as an analgesic. Complex pain in bone-metastatic cancer of the prostate, breast and kidney, as well as pancreatic cancer and sarcomas were recurrent suggestions of appropriate indications. Most of the informants stated that they applied a mechanism-based treatment and mainly prescribed low-dose methadone as an add-on to an existing opioid therapy to benefit from methadone´s proposed NMDA-receptor inhibiting properties, e.g. in cases with reduced opioid sensitivity. Despite its complex pharmacokinetics with a long half-life, most informants expressed defined strategies to avoid side-effects such as respiratory depression, especially when initiating treatment in the home-care setting. While many palliative care physicians expressed an overly enthusiastic attitude, others stressed the risks of overconfidence, low precision in use, and overlooked treatment options. Besides the obvious physical pain-relieving effects, they stated that effective pain relief could result in a reduced workload and emotional empowerment, both for physicians and staff. CONCLUSION Methadone, especially in the form of low-dose add-on to other opioids is widely advocated in Swedish specialized palliative care as a practical and safe method with rapid onset in complex pain situations at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Fürst
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Staffan Lundström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Strang
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ikegaki J, Kizawa Y. Delirium Prolonged for Three Days after Addition of One Dose of 5 mg Methadone to Ongoing Opioid. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:164. [PMID: 32023198 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Ikegaki
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fürst P, Lundström S, Klepstad P, Strang P. The Use of Low-Dose Methadone as Add-On to Regular Opioid Therapy in Cancer-Related Pain at End of Life: A National Swedish Survey in Specialized Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:226-232. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Per Fürst
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Staffan Lundström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pål Klepstad
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- European Palliative Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Peter Strang
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Palliative Medicine, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Methadone has been an unique, versatile, cost effective, synthetic opioid utilized in nociceptive as well as neuropathic pain. Pain and palliative care physicians started accepting methadone in treatment of complex pain associated with advanced cancer and neuropathic pain syndromes in which conventional opioids were no longer effective. The challenge is in accepting methadone as a main stream first line opioid, from being considered as a second line replacement/substitution drug all these years. Methadone has a significant role as opioid rotation in refractory cancer pain, especially when started early leading to successful conversion. Advantages of methadone in paediatric patients with advanced cancer were its safety and efficacy as a first-choice opioid, availability as a liquid formulation and its infrequent dose requirements. Methadone is neither recommended nor justified to be used as an anti-cancer drug and its role as an anti-cancer agent is a misconception. Many guidelines were proposed after 2008 to address methadone safety. Most of them emphasized on prevention of cardiac arrhythmia and association of methadone with QTc prolongation rather than address the real issue. Methadone has been established to be safe when used in opioid naïve patients with careful titration instituted in an ambulatory setting and has equal success in opioid rotation in outpatient setup. Methadone prescription should be carried out by experienced pain and palliative care providers with careful dose titration and clinical monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ramkiran
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Aganampudi, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Raghu S Thota
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, Are M, Bruce JY, Buga S, Chwistek M, Cleeland C, Craig D, Gafford E, Greenlee H, Hansen E, Kamal AH, Kamdar MM, LeGrand S, Mackey S, McDowell MR, Moryl N, Nabell LM, Nesbit S, O'Connor N, Rabow MW, Rickerson E, Shatsky R, Sindt J, Urba SG, Youngwerth JM, Hammond LJ, Gurski LA. Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:977-1007. [PMID: 31390582 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Adult Cancer Pain have undergone substantial revisions focusing on the appropriate and safe prescription of opioid analgesics, optimization of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant medications, and integration of nonpharmacologic methods of cancer pain management. This selection highlights some of these changes, covering topics on management of adult cancer pain including pharmacologic interventions, nonpharmacologic interventions, and treatment of specific cancer pain syndromes. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adult Cancer Pain addresses additional aspects of this topic, including pathophysiologic classification of cancer pain syndromes, comprehensive pain assessment, management of pain crisis, ongoing care for cancer pain, pain in cancer survivors, and specialty consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Swarm
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Judith A Paice
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Doralina L Anghelescu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ellin Gafford
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Heather Greenlee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Susan LeGrand
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | -
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Nina O'Connor
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Jill Sindt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
McPherson ML, Walker KA, Davis MP, Bruera E, Reddy A, Paice J, Malotte K, Lockman DK, Wellman C, Salpeter S, Bemben NM, Ray JB, Lapointe BJ, Chou R. Safe and Appropriate Use of Methadone in Hospice and Palliative Care: Expert Consensus White Paper. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:635-645.e4. [PMID: 30578934 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Methadone has several unique characteristics that make it an attractive option for pain relief in serious illness, but the safety of methadone has been called into question after reports of a disproportionate increase in opioid-induced deaths in recent years. The American Pain Society, College on Problems of Drug Dependence, and the Heart Rhythm Society collaborated to issue guidelines on best practices to maximize methadone safety and efficacy, but guidelines for the end-of-life scenario have not yet been developed. A panel of 15 interprofessional hospice and palliative care experts from the U.S. and Canada convened in February 2015 to evaluate the American Pain Society methadone recommendations for applicability in the hospice and palliative care setting. The goal was to develop guidelines for safe and effective management of methadone therapy in hospice and palliative care. This article represents the consensus opinion of the hospice and palliative care experts for methadone use at end of life, including guidance on appropriate candidates for methadone, detail in dosing, titration, and monitoring of patients' response to methadone therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn A Walker
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; MedStar Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Eduardo Bruera
- Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; F. T. McGraw Chair in the Treatment of Cancer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Akhila Reddy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Judith Paice
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kasey Malotte
- Advanced Practice Pharmacist Supportive Care Medicine Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dawn Kashelle Lockman
- Hospice & Palliative Care, University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; Internal Medicine-Palliative Care Program, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Shelley Salpeter
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Mission Hospice and Home Care, San Mateo, California, USA
| | | | - James B Ray
- University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; Supportive and Palliative Care Consult Service, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Bernard J Lapointe
- Eric M. Flanders Chair in Palliative Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Chief Supportive and Palliative Care Division, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roger Chou
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, OHSU, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Methadone as anticancer treatment: hype, hope, or hazard? Wien Med Wochenschr 2018; 168:159-167. [DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0623-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|