1
|
Cho S, Goff BA, Berry DL. Multilevel Determinants of Palliative Care Referral in Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Scoping Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e58-e69. [PMID: 37726027 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Receipt of palliative care (PC) has long been suggested in practice for patients with advanced cancer for improved quality of life, mood, and prolonged survival. However, PC referrals in women with ovarian cancer remain suboptimal. OBJECTIVE To consolidate existing literature on the multiple factors associated with PC referrals in women with advanced ovarian cancer and to better understand the contextual factors of PC referrals and frame receipt of PC using a socioecological model. METHODS A search of scientific databases was conducted, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO. Key search terms included "ovarian cancer" and "palliative care," and later refined to include advanced stages of the diagnosis. The reviewed articles included a focus on advanced ovarian cancer and reported demographic, medical/clinical, support, or system-level factors examined in the PC referral process. RESULTS Thirteen articles focused on the factors directly associated with PC referrals. Factors were categorized into different socioecological levels: tumor-level, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental. Factors included tumor characteristics, age, marital status, medical condition, performance status, psychosocial status, support system, provider, and infrastructure. The patient's medical condition was the major component considered in PC referral and care transition. CONCLUSION Various factors in the socioecological framework suggest that the decision for PC referral could be multifactorial and influenced by factors beyond the medical condition and status. Future research should aim to understand the impact of various socioecological factors on PC referral and examine PC referral experiences from the patient's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Cho
- University of Washington School of Nursing (S.C.), Seattle, WA.
| | - Barbara A Goff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.A.G.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Donna L Berry
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics (D.L.B.), University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fotopoulou C, Eriksson AG, Yagel I, Chang SJ, Lim MC. Surgery for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:46-54. [PMID: 38091202 PMCID: PMC10858815 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01480-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review evidence around the value and challenges of surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC). Both cytoreductive and palliative aspects will be addressed RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective and retrospective evidence demonstrates a significantly longer remission derived from the combination of surgical and systemic modalities as opposed to systemic treatment alone in carefully selected ROC-patients who have relapsed more than 6 months from the end of their 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this benefit appears to be limited when total macroscopic tumor clearance is not achieved. Selection algorithms to identify optimal surgical candidates are of paramount importance to prevent surgical morbidity without the equivalent oncological benefit. In the palliative setting, the risks and benefits of salvage surgery need to be counterbalanced with the advances of conservative techniques for optimal care. Well-defined selection algorithms to identify those who will benefit from surgery in the relapsed setting appear to be the key to oncologic and surgical success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Ane Gerda Eriksson
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Itai Yagel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Shiba Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Suk-Joon Chang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer and Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Rare & Pediatric Cancer Branch and Immuno-Oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsunoda AT, Ribeiro R, Reis RJ, da Cunha Andrade C, Moretti Marques R, Baiocchi G, Fin F, Zanvettor PH, Falcao D, Batista TP, Azevedo B, Guitmann G, Pessini SA, Nunes JS, Campbell LM, Linhares JC, Carneiro V, Coimbra F. Surgery in ovarian cancer - Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus. BJOG 2018; 125:1243-1252. [PMID: 29900651 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Surgical management in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a significant impact in overall survival and progression-free survival. The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) supported a taskforce of experts to reach a consensus: experienced and specialised trained surgeons, in cancer centres, provide the best EOC surgery. Laparoscopic and/or radiological staging prognosticates the possibility of complete cytoreduction (CC0) and helps to reduce unnecessary laparotomies. Surgical techniques were reviewed. Multidisciplinary input is essential for treatment planning. Quality assurance criteria are proposed and require national consensus. Genetic testing is mandatory. This consensus states the final recommendations from BSSO for management of EOC. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus for surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Tsunoda
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil.,Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.,Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - R Ribeiro
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - R J Reis
- Hospital Erasto Dorneles e Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Brazilian Lutheran University, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Cem da Cunha Andrade
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Paulo Prata Medical University, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | - G Baiocchi
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, AC Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - F Fin
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Hospital São Vicente, Curitiba, Brazil.,Faculdade Evangélica de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - P H Zanvettor
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Aristides Maltez Hospital, Salvador, Brazil.,AMO Clinic, Salvador, Brazil
| | - D Falcao
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Aristides Maltez Hospital, Salvador, Brazil
| | - T P Batista
- Surgery Department, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil
| | - Brb Azevedo
- Hospital São Vicente, Curitiba, Brazil.,Instituto de Hemato Oncologia do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - G Guitmann
- Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Americas Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - S A Pessini
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J S Nunes
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil.,Instituto de Oncologia do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - J C Linhares
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil.,Instituto de Oncologia do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - V Carneiro
- Hospital de Câncer de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira NeoH - Núcleo Especializado em Oncologia e Hematologia D'OR, Recife, Brazil
| | - Fjf Coimbra
- AC Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, Brazil.,Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology 2016/2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|