1
|
Hu Y, Wang W, Jiang Y, Wang X, Peng X, Xin M, Zhao J. Factors associated with family decision-making self-efficacy among family members of patients with advanced cancer in mainland China. Palliat Support Care 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38736428 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951524000658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In Chinese culture, family members are the main decision maker on end-of-life (EoL) issues for patients with advanced cancer. Yet little is known about Chinese families' confidence in making EoL decisions and its associated factors. This study aims to investigate the status and associated factors of Chinese family members' confidence in making EoL decisions for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS This cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of 147 family members of patients with stage III or stage IV cancer from a tertiary cancer center in Guangzhou, China. The questionnaires included demographic information of patients and their family members, patients' EoL preferences, and the Chinese version of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy (FDMSE) Scale. RESULTS A total of145 family members (98.64%) completed the questionnaires. The average score of FDMSE was 3.92 ± 0.53. A multiple regression analysis showed that the factors associated with FDMSE included patients' duration of disease, health insurance, participation in EoL decision-making, the expression of unfilled wishes, and family members' employment status. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Chinese family members were not confident enough in making EoL decisions for patients with advanced cancer. It is recommended to develop cultural-tailored advanced care planning models to clarify patient preferences and to enhance the family members' self-efficacy in making EoL decisions with or for patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangfan Hu
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenxia Wang
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yali Jiang
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xixi Wang
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuelan Peng
- Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingzhu Xin
- Nursing Department, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juanjuan Zhao
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wall NR, Fuller RN, Morcos A, De Leon M. Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5070. [PMID: 37894437 PMCID: PMC10605341 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PCa) remains a formidable global health challenge, with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. While advancements in pharmacology have led to improved outcomes for various cancers, PCa continues to exhibit significant health disparities, disproportionately affecting certain populations. This paper explores the intersection of pharmacology and anthropology in understanding the health disparities associated with PCa. By considering the socio-cultural, economic, and behavioral factors that influence the development, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of PCa, pharmacologic anthropology provides a comprehensive framework to address these disparities and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan R. Wall
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Ryan N. Fuller
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Ann Morcos
- Division of Biochemistry, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA; (R.N.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Marino De Leon
- Division of Physiology, Department of Basic Science, Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teteh DK, Love M, Ericson M, Chan M, Phillips T, Toor A, Ferrell B, Erhunmwunsee L, Montgomery SB, Sun V, Kim JY. Social determinants of health among family caregiver centered outcomes in lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:2824-2835. [PMID: 37324097 PMCID: PMC10267915 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death globally. Both lung cancer patients and family caregivers (FCGs) have unmet quality of life (QOL) needs. An understudied topic in lung cancer research is the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) on QOL outcomes for this population. The purpose of this review was to explore the state of research on SDOH FCGs centered outcomes in lung cancer. Methods The databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and American Psychological Association (APA) PsycInfo were searched for peer-reviewed manuscripts evaluating defined SDOH domains on FCGs published within the last ten years. The information extracted using Covidence included patients, FCGs and study characteristics. Level of evidence and quality of articles were assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale. Results Of the 344 full-text articles assessed, 19 were included in this review. The social and community context domain focused on caregiving stressors and interventions to reduce its effects. The health care access and quality domain showed barriers and underuse of psychosocial resources. The economic stability domain indicated marked economic burdens for FCGs. Four interconnected themes emerged among articles on the influence of SDOH on FCG-centered outcomes in lung cancer: (I) psychological well-being, (II) overall quality of life, (III) relationship quality, and (IV) economic hardship. Notably, most participants in the studies were White females. The tools used to measure SDOH factors included primarily demographic variables. Conclusions Current studies provide evidence on the role of SDOH factors on lung cancer FCGs' QOL. Expanded utilization of validated SDOH measures in future studies would provide greater consistency in data, that could in turn inform interventions to improve QOL. Further research focusing on the domains of education quality and access and neighborhood and built environment should be carried out to bridge gaps in knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dede K. Teteh
- Department of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Madeleine Love
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marissa Ericson
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marissa Chan
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tanyanika Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aroona Toor
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Betty Ferrell
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Loretta Erhunmwunsee
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Virginia Sun
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jae Y. Kim
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bechthold AC, Azuero A, Pisu M, Pierce JY, Williams GR, Taylor RA, Wells R, Curry K, Reed RD, Harrell ER, Gazaway S, Mollman S, Engler S, Puga F, Bakitas MA, Dionne-Odom JN. The Project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized controlled trial: study protocol for a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers. Trials 2022; 23:452. [PMID: 35655285 PMCID: PMC9161197 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Family caregivers play a vital, yet stressful role in managing the healthcare needs and optimizing the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, from the time they are newly diagnosed until end of life. While early telehealth palliative care has been found to effectively support family caregivers, little work has focused on historically under-resourced populations, particularly African American and rural-dwelling individuals. To address this need, we developed and are currently testing Project ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) Cornerstone, a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for family caregivers of African American and rural-dwelling patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Methods This is a 2-site, single-blind, hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial of the Cornerstone intervention versus usual care. Cornerstone is a multicomponent intervention based on Pearlin’s Stress-Health Process Model where African American and/or rural-dwelling family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer (target sample size = 294 dyads) are paired with a lay navigator coach and receive a series of six, brief 20–60-min telehealth sessions focused on stress management and coping, caregiving skills, getting help, self-care, and preparing for the future/advance care planning. Subsequent to core sessions, caregivers receive monthly follow-up indefinitely until the patient’s death. Caregiver and patient outcomes are collected at baseline and every 12 weeks until the patient’s death (primary outcome: caregiver distress at 24 weeks; secondary outcomes: caregiver: quality of life and burden; patient: distress, quality of life, and healthcare utilization). Implementation costs and the intervention cost effectiveness are also being evaluated. Discussion Should this intervention demonstrate efficacy, it would yield an implementation-ready model of early palliative care support for under-resourced family caregivers. A key design principle that has centrally informed the Cornerstone intervention is that every caregiving situation is unique and each caregiver faces distinct challenges that cannot be addressed using a one-size-fits all approach. Hence, Cornerstone employs culturally savvy lay navigator coaches who are trained to establish a strong, therapeutic alliance with participants and tailor their coaching to a diverse range of individual circumstances. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04318886. Registered on 20 March, 2020. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery C Bechthold
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andres Azuero
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine, UAB School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Grant R Williams
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Richard A Taylor
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rachel Wells
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kayleigh Curry
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rhiannon D Reed
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Erin R Harrell
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | - Shena Gazaway
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sarah Mollman
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Sally Engler
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Frank Puga
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Marie A Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.,Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pop RS, Payne S, Tint D, Pop CP, Mosoiu D. Instruments to assess the burden of care for family caregivers of adult palliative care patients. Int J Palliat Nurs 2022; 28:80-99. [PMID: 35446673 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.2.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A primary caregiver shares the illness experience of the patient and undertakes vital care work, alongside managing the patient's emotions, and is actively involved in care process without being paid. When faced with the palliative care patient's needs, caregivers are affected on multiple levels (physical, psychological and socio-economic), thereby experiencing a moderate or severe burden of care. AIM To identify assessment instruments for the burden of care for family caregivers that are suitable to be used in clinical practice. METHOD A narrative review was conducted using an electronic search in Pubmed, PsychINFO, CINAHL of articles published in English between 2009-2019, using the search terms: 'caregiver/family, caregiver/carer and burden and palliative care/hospice/end of life'. An assessment grid was developed to appraise the clinical use of identified instruments. RESULTS Of the 568 articles identified, 40 quantitative studies were selected using 31 instruments to measure the caregiver burden of cancer, noncancer and terminally ill patients. Most instruments 23 (74.11%) evaluate the psycho-emotional and, 22 (70.96%) the social domain, 12 instruments (38.7%) focused on the physical domain, three (9.67%) on the spiritual field and six instruments (19.35%) on economic aspects. For the multidimensional instruments, the assessment grid scored highest for the Burden Scale for Family Caregiver (BSFC). CONCLUSION The BSFC is the tool that seems to meet the most requirements, being potentially the most useful tool in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodica Sorina Pop
- Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Sheila Payne
- Professor, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Diana Tint
- Professor, Transilvania University, Faculty of Medicine, Brasov, Romania
| | | | - Daniela Mosoiu
- Associate Professor, Transilvania University, Faculty of Medicine, Brasov, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dijkman BL, Luttik ML, Van der Wal-Huisman H, Paans W, van Leeuwen BL. Factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: A scoping review. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 13:391-397. [PMID: 34776380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Many older patients with cancer depend on their family members for care and support and involve their family members in treatment decision-making in different stages of the cancer trajectory. Although family involvement is advocated in person-centered care, little is known about family involvement in decision-making specifically for older patients, and evidence-based strategies are scarce. The aim of this scoping review is to provide deeper understanding of factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer. Four databases were searched for quantitative-, qualitative- and mixed-method empirical studies describing factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Three independent researchers reviewed the papers for eligibility and quality and contributed to the data extraction and analysis. Twenty-seven papers were included, sixteen quantitative studies, nine qualitative studies and two mixed-method studies. Five categories of factors influencing family involvement emerged: 1) patient characteristics, 2) family member characteristics, 3) family system characteristics, 4) physician's role and 5) cultural influences. These factors affect the level of family control in decision-making, treatment choice, decision agreement, and levels of stress and coping strategies of patients and family members. This review reveals a complex interplay of factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer that is rooted in characteristics of the family system. The findings underscore the need for development and implementation of evidence-based strategies for family involvement in treatment decision-making as part of patient-centered care for older patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bea L Dijkman
- Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, P.O.Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Groningen University, University Medical Center Groningen, PO box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Marie Louise Luttik
- Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, P.O.Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke Van der Wal-Huisman
- Department of Surgery, Groningen University, University Medical Center Groningen, PO box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Wolter Paans
- Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, P.O.Box 3109, 9701, DC, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, Groningen University, University Medical Center Groningen, PO box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A psychometric evaluation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale among surrogate decision-makers of the critically ill. Palliat Support Care 2021; 18:537-543. [PMID: 31699176 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951519000907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to report the psychometric properties, in terms of validity and reliability, of the Unconscious Version of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale (FDMSE). METHODS A convenience sample of 215 surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation was recruited from four intensive care units at a tertiary hospital. Cross-sectional data were collected from participants between days 3 and 7 of a decisionally impaired patient's exposure to acute mechanical ventilation. Participants completed a self-report demographic form and subjective measures of family decision-making self-efficacy, preparation for decision-making, and decisional fatigue. Exploratory factor analyses, correlation coefficients, and internal consistency reliability estimates were computed to evaluate the FDMSE's validity and reliability in surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. RESULTS The exploratory factor analyses revealed a two-factor, 11-item version of the FDMSE was the most parsimonious in this sample. Furthermore, modified 11-item FDMSE demonstrated discriminant validity with the measures of fatigue and preparation for decision-making and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency reliability estimates. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS This is the first known study to provide evidence for a two-factor structure for a modified, 11-item FDMSE. These dimensions represent treatment and palliation-related domains of family decision-making self-efficacy. The modified FDMSE is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to measure family decision-making self-efficacy among surrogate decision-makers of the critically ill.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ejem D, Steinhauser K, Dionne-Odom JN, Wells R, Durant RW, Clay OJ, Bakitas M. Exploring Culturally Responsive Religious and Spirituality Health Care Communications among African Americans with Advanced Heart Failure, Their Family Caregivers, and Clinicians. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:1798-1806. [PMID: 34182804 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Religion and spirituality (R/S) impact how African Americans (AAs) cope with serious illness, yet are infrequently addressed in patient-clinician communication. Objectives: To explore AAs with advanced heart failure and their family caregivers' (FCGs) preferences about R/S in patient-clinician communication. Methods: An embedded qualitative interview within a parent randomized trial about the role of R/S in the illness experience and in clinician interactions with patients and FCGs in a Southern U.S. state. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using constant comparative analysis to identify emergent themes. Results: AA participants (n = 15) were a mean age of 62 years, were female (40%), and had >high school diploma/GED (87%). AA FCGs (n = 14) were a mean age of 58; were female (93%); had >high school diploma/General Education Development (GED) (93%); and were unemployed (86%). Most (63%) were patients' spouses/partners. All patients and FCGs were Protestant. Participants reported the critical role of R/S in living with illness; however, patients' and FCGs' perspectives related to inclusion of R/S in health care communications differed. Patients' perspectives were as follows: (1) R/S is not discussed in clinical encounters and (2) R/S should be discussed only if patient initiated. FCGs' perspectives about ideal inclusion of R/S represented three main diverging themes: (1) clinicians' R/S communication is not a priority, (2) clinicians should openly acknowledge patients' R/S beliefs, and (3) clinicians should engage in R/S conversations with patients. Conclusion: Key thematic differences about the role of R/S in illness and preferences for incorporating R/S in health care communications reveal important considerations about the need to assess and individualize this aspect of palliative care research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Ejem
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Karen Steinhauser
- Departments of Population Health Sciences, and Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University; Durham VA Adapt Center of Innovation, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Rachel Wells
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Raegan W Durant
- School of Medicine-Division of Preventive Medicine, and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Olivio J Clay
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bakitas M, Cheville AL, Mulvey TM, Peppercorn J, Watts K, Dionne-Odom JN. Telehealth Strategies to Support Patients and Families Across the Cancer Trajectory. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:413-422. [PMID: 34010046 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Effective delivery of cancer care via telehealth requires a planned care system that accounts for myriad patient, provider, and practice/cancer center resources before, during, and after the care episode. Telehealth is broadly defined as a method to have virtual, bidirectional communication between patients and providers. Telehealth can include methods such as audio-only, video-consultation, and tele-monitoring, which can occur in a synchronous, asynchronous, or blended format. The purpose of this review is to present common foundational principles for providing clinical cancer care via telehealth, followed by an overview of three distinct examples of comprehensive telehealth programs that have been developed to meet the needs of patients and families across the cancer trajectory, including survivorship, rehabilitation, and palliative care phases. The programs described are exemplars that were developed and implemented prior to the coronavirus pandemic, so they reflect many years of planning and evidence. Lessons learned include the need for ongoing patient support, clinician training, and cancer health system/practice programmatic considerations such as billing, scheduling, reimbursement, software, and hardware/platform security. Although the COVID-19 pandemic produced an explosive shift in regulations and implementation, sustainability of these changes may not be long-term. Nevertheless, a permanent shift in cancer care to include telehealth is likely here to stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- School of Nursing, Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee MK. Interactions of Spiritual Well-Being, Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151139. [PMID: 33771405 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the relationship of spiritual well-being and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify the role of four different symptoms (ie, appetite loss, dyspnea, pain, and fatigue) in mediating this relationship DATA SOURCES: A total of 132 consecutive patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC from National University Hospital were examined. Symptoms were assessed using the symptom subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30). Spiritual well-being was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being scale. Global QOL was assessed using the item on global health status from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Data of all self-reported surveys were analyzed using serial multiple mediation analysis. CONCLUSION Spiritual well-being directly affected QOL in patients undergoing treatment for NSCLC. In addition, a serial multiple mediation model showed causal relationships of spiritual well-being on appetite loss, appetite loss on dyspnea, dyspnea on pain, pain on fatigue, and fatigue on QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Providing integrated care that considers spiritual well-being may improve the QOL of patients undergoing treatment for NSCLC. Our findings emphasized the need to conduct routine assessments of spiritual well-being and symptoms when characterizing patient QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung Kyung Lee
- College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodi H, Detering K, Sellars M, Macleod A, Todd J, Fullerton S, Waller A, Nolte L. Exploring advance care planning awareness, experiences, and preferences of people with cancer and support people: an Australian online cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3677-3688. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05878-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
12
|
Oechsle K. Current Advances in Palliative & Hospice Care: Problems and Needs of Relatives and Family Caregivers During Palliative and Hospice Care-An Overview of Current Literature. Med Sci (Basel) 2019; 7:medsci7030043. [PMID: 30871105 PMCID: PMC6473856 DOI: 10.3390/medsci7030043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Palliative and hospice care aims to improve quality of life of patients’ relatives, but still little is known about their specific problems and needs. We present a comprehensive literature update. Narrative review to present an expert overview of peer-reviewed, English-written original research publications and reviews on psychosocial and existential problems, supportive needs as well as interventions for relatives during the patients’ disease trajectory published between January 2017 and November 2018. A total of 64 publications were included. Relatives report high rates of psychological and existential distress, burden and psychological morbidity during the total disease trajectory of the patient. In addition, relatives report an alarmingly high number of unmet needs with information being the central issue. Relatives’ problems and needs are part of complex systems influenced by various socio-demographic factors and patient–relatives-interactions and dependency between different psychological phenomena. First support interventions for relatives during disease trajectory have proven feasible and secondary data from randomized studies suggest beneficial effects of providing early palliative care also for relatives. Relatives should be addressed to a still larger extent in the daily practice of palliative and hospice care, thus further research to reveal more detailed systematic information is needed to improve relatives’ psychological burden and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|