Development of a Proxy Quality-of-Life Rating Scale for the End-of-Life Care of Pediatric Cancer Patients Evaluated from a Nurse's Perspective

Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for pediatric oncology: An international mixed methods Delphi study

INTRODUCTION

Nursing-sensitive indicators (NSIs) measure factors influencing nursing care quality and patient outcomes. Established NSIs reflect general and select specialty nursing practices. However, a core set of NSIs for international pediatric oncology nursing practice does not currently exist. Without valid and reliable quality indicators, the impact of nursing care on children and adolescents with cancer cannot be effectively measured and improved. The purpose of this study was to develop a preliminary core set of NSIs for international pediatric oncology nursing that would be important, actionable, and feasible to measure across varied resource settings and countries.

DESIGN/METHODS

A multiphase sequential mixed methods research design, intersected with a classical Delphi method, was utilized. Through purposive snowball sampling, 122 expert pediatric oncology nurses from 43 countries participated. Round One: Panelists identified five potential NSIs and constructs. Open-ended responses were coded and categorized through descriptive content analysis and integrated into the next round. Round Two: Panelists selected their top 10 NSIs and constructs and ranked them by importance to patient care quality. Mean importance scores were calculated through reverse scoring; the top 10 NSIs and constructs were integrated into the next round. Round Three: Panelists ranked the top 10 NSIs and constructs by order of importance for this particular population, then rated each NSI/Construct for actionability and feasibility of measurement by Likert-scale. Rounds Two and Three were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Mixed methods meta-inferences were derived from the integration of Rounds One and Three findings.

RESULTS

Eighty-five (70%) panelists from 38 countries completed all Delphi survey rounds. The preliminary core set of NSIs and constructs identified by the expert panel, and ranked in order of importance, were as follows: safe chemotherapy administration and handling, infection prevention/control, pediatric oncology nursing orientation program, early warning score system/recognition of patient deterioration, chemotherapy/biotherapy education/course, pain assessment/management, symptom assessment/management, patient and family education, palliative/end of life care, and continuing nursing education/competency. All NSIs and constructs were rated as actionable; all but palliative/end of life care were rated as feasible to measure. Each of the 10 NSIs and constructs were nominated in Round One by at least one expert panelist from low- and middle-income and high-income countries, and at least one panelist from the Americas.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary core NSIs and constructs provide insight into common attributes of international pediatric oncology nursing practice that are important, actionable, and feasible for quality measurement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NSIs have the potential to drive quality improvement, guide comparison with other institutions, promote knowledge-sharing, and advance pediatric oncology nursing outcomes around the world. These NSIs and constructs may also be relevant to other pediatric and adult oncology settings.

Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools

BACKGROUND

The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child's life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided.

AIM

To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools.

DESIGN

Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000-June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the 'dying' phase of illness (defined as the last month of life).

RESULTS

From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as 'proxy' assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.

The Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network: A national Healthcare Learning Collaborative

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

Although multiple national organizations have created consensus guidelines and metrics for pediatric palliative care (PPC), standardized implementation and measurement has been challenging. In 2016, 6 PPC physician-experts in program development and quality improvement (QI) formed a healthcare learning collaborative network entitled the Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network (PPIN).

METHODS

The primary drivers identified were 1) Feasibility of a national learning network demonstrated through the completion of one small QI project, 2) Standard education in QI methodology and 3) Salient pediatric palliative care operational, clinical and satisfaction metrics clearly defined.

RESULTS

PPIN now includes146 members representing 51 organizations. In 2019 the group completed a national collaborative QI project focused on pain assessment at the time of initial consult, demonstrating a national increase in pain assessment from 75.8% to >90% over 12 months. PPIN has hosted two national QI workshops training more than 50 PPC clinicians in QI, with a 2-hour webinar provided in 2020 due to COVID. Monthly calls since 2017 provide QI methods "refreshers", share local works in progress, and provide infrastructure for future collaborative projects.

CONCLUSIONS

PPIN has become a sustainable organization which improves the quality of PPC through focus on national QI methods training, successful collaborative projects, and the creation of a learning and peer support community with regular calls. With the advent of the Palliative Care Quality Collaborative in 2020, PPIN provides critical educational and organizational infrastructure to inform ongoing quality efforts in PPC, now and in the future.