1
|
Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030591. [PMID: 36765547 PMCID: PMC9913127 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Experiencing pain and insufficient relief can be devastating and negatively affect a patient's quality of life. Developments in oncology such as new treatments and adjusted pain management guidelines may have influenced the prevalence of cancer pain and severity in patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients in the 2014-2021 literature period. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were evaluated and assessed on methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed on the pooled prevalence and severity rates. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore differences between treatment groups. We identified 10,637 studies, of which 444 studies were included. The overall prevalence of pain was 44.5%. Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 30.6% of the patients, a lower proportion compared to previous research. Pain experienced by cancer survivors was significantly lower compared to most treatment groups. Our results imply that both the prevalence of pain and pain severity declined in the past decade. Increased attention to the assessment and management of pain might have fostered the decline in the prevalence and severity of pain.
Collapse
|
2
|
Guthrie DM, Williams N, Beach C, Buzath E, Cohen J, Declercq A, Fisher K, Fries BE, Goodridge D, Hermans K, Hirdes JP, Seow H, Silveira M, Sinnarajah A, Stevens S, Tanuseputro P, Taylor D, Vadeboncoeur C, Martin TLW. A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266569. [PMID: 35390091 PMCID: PMC8989210 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Individuals receiving palliative care (PC) are generally thought to prefer to receive care and die in their homes, yet little research has assessed the quality of home- and community-based PC. This project developed a set of valid and reliable quality indicators (QIs) that can be generated using data that are already gathered with interRAI assessments—an internationally validated set of tools commonly used in North America for home care clients. The QIs can serve as decision-support measures to assist providers and decision makers in delivering optimal care to individuals and their families.
Methods
The development efforts took part in multiple stages, between 2017–2021, including a workshop with clinicians and decision-makers working in PC, qualitative interviews with individuals receiving PC, families and decision makers and a modified Delphi panel, based on the RAND/ULCA appropriateness method.
Results
Based on the workshop results, and qualitative interviews, a set of 27 candidate QIs were defined. They capture issues such as caregiver burden, pain, breathlessness, falls, constipation, nausea/vomiting and loneliness. These QIs were further evaluated by clinicians/decision makers working in PC, through the modified Delphi panel, and five were removed from further consideration, resulting in 22 QIs.
Conclusions
Through in-depth and multiple-stakeholder consultations we developed a set of QIs generated with data already collected with interRAI assessments. These indicators provide a feasible basis for quality benchmarking and improvement systems for care providers aiming to optimize PC to individuals and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn M. Guthrie
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Nicole Williams
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Beach
- Integrated Community Services, Fraser Health, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emma Buzath
- Provincial Palliative and-End-of-Life Care, Seniors Health and Continuing Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joachim Cohen
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anja Declercq
- LUCAS – Center for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- CESO – Center for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kathryn Fisher
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brant E. Fries
- Department of Health Management and Policy and Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Donna Goodridge
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kirsten Hermans
- LUCAS – Center for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John P. Hirdes
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Silveira
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | | | - Susan Stevens
- Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deanne Taylor
- Research Department, Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
- Rural Coordination Centre of BC, Penticton, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Vadeboncoeur
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Roger Neilson House, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy Lyn Wityk Martin
- Provincial Palliative and-End-of-Life Care, Seniors Health and Continuing Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hirdes JP, Morris JN, Perlman CM, Saari M, Betini GS, Franco-Martin MA, van Hout H, Stewart SL, Ferris J. Mood Disturbances Across the Continuum of Care Based on Self-Report and Clinician Rated Measures in the interRAI Suite of Assessment Instruments. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:787463. [PMID: 35586405 PMCID: PMC9108209 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.787463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mood disturbance is a pervasive problem affecting persons of all ages in the general population and the subset of those receiving services from different health care providers. interRAI assessment instruments comprise an integrated health information system providing a common approach to comprehensive assessment of the strengths, preferences and needs of persons with complex needs across the continuum of care. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to create new mood scales for use with the full suite of interRAI assessments including a composite version with both clinician-rated and self-reported items as well as a self-report only version. METHODS We completed a cross-sectional analysis of 511,641 interRAI assessments of Canadian adults aged 18+ in community mental health, home care, community support services, nursing homes, palliative care, acute hospital, and general population surveys to develop, test, and refine new measures of mood disturbance that combined clinician and self-rated items. We examined validity and internal consistency across diverse care settings and populations. RESULTS The composite scale combining both clinician and self-report ratings and the self-report only variant showed different distributions across populations and settings with most severe signs of disturbed mood in community mental health settings and lowest severity in the general population prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The self-report and composite measures were strongly correlated with each other but differed most in populations with high rates of missing values for self-report due to cognitive impairment (e.g., nursing homes). Evidence of reliability was strong across care settings, as was convergent validity with respect to depression/mood disorder diagnoses, sleep disturbance, and self-harm indicators. In a general population survey, the correlation of the self-reported mood scale with Kessler-10 was 0.73. CONCLUSIONS The new interRAI mood scales provide reliable and valid mental health measures that can be applied across diverse populations and care settings. Incorporating a person-centered approach to assessment, the composite scale considers the person's perspective and clinician views to provide a sensitive and robust measure that considers mood disturbances related to dysphoria, anxiety, and anhedonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Hirdes
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Margaret Saari
- SE Research Centre, SE Health and Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gustavo S Betini
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | - Hein van Hout
- Department of General Practice and Medicine for Older Persons, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shannon L Stewart
- Faculty of Education, Western University (Canada), London, ON, Canada
| | - Jason Ferris
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yorganci E, Sampson EL, Gillam J, Aworinde J, Leniz J, Williamson LE, Cripps RL, Stewart R, Sleeman KE. Quality indicators for dementia and older people nearing the end of life: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:3650-3660. [PMID: 34331704 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robust quality indicators (QIs) are essential for monitoring and improving the quality of care and learning from good practice. We aimed to identify and assess QIs for the care of older people and people with dementia who are nearing the end of life and recommend QIs for use with routinely collected electronic data across care settings. METHODS A systematic review was conducted, including five databases and reference chaining. Studies describing the development of QIs for care of older people and those with dementia nearing the end of life were included. QIs were categorized as relating to processes or outcomes, and mapped against six care domains. The psychometric properties (acceptability, evidence base, definition, feasibility, reliability, and validity) of each QI were assessed; QIs were categorized as robust, moderate, or poor. RESULTS From 12,980 titles and abstracts screened, 37 papers and 976 QIs were included. Process and outcome QIs accounted for 780 (79.7%) and 196 (20.3%) of all QIs, respectively. Many of the QIs concerned physical aspects of care (n = 492, 50.4%), and very few concerned spiritual and cultural aspects of care (n = 19, 1.9%). Three hundred and fifteen (32.3%) QIs were robust and of those 220 were measurable using routinely collected electronic data. The final shortlist of 71 QIs came from seven studies. CONCLUSIONS Of the numerous QIs developed for care of older adults and those with dementia nearing the end of life, most had poor or moderate psychometric properties or were not designed for use with routinely collected electronic datasets. Infrastructure for data availability, combined with use of robust QIs, is important for enhancing understanding of care provided to this population, identifying unmet needs, and improving service provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Yorganci
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Juliet Gillam
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Javiera Leniz
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lesley E Williamson
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel L Cripps
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seow H, Stevens T, Barbera LC, Burge F, McGrail K, Chan KKW, Peacock SJ, Sutradhar R, Guthrie DM. Trajectory of psychosocial symptoms among home care patients with cancer at end-of-life. Psychooncology 2020; 30:103-110. [PMID: 33007119 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding the end-of-life psychosocial needs of cancer patients at home is a knowledge gap. This study describes the trajectory of psychosocial symptoms in the last 6 months of life among cancer decedents who were receiving home care. METHODS Observational population-based cohort study of cancer decedents who were receiving home care services between 2007 and 2014. Decedents had to have at least one home care assessment in the last 6 months of life for inclusion. Outcomes were the presence of psychosocial symptoms (i.e., anxiety, loneliness, depression, social decline, caregiver distress, and cognitive decline) at each week before death. RESULTS Our cohort included 27,295 unique cancer decedents (30,368 assessments), of which 58% died in hospital. Fifty-six percent were older than 74, and 47% were female. The prevalence of all symptoms increased approaching death, except loneliness. Social decline (48%-78%) was the most prevalent psychosocial symptom, though loneliness was reported in less than 10% of the cohort. Caregiver distress rose over time from 15%-27%. A third of the cohort reported issues with cognitive impairment. Multivariate regression showed that physical symptoms such as uncontrolled pain, impairment in independent activities of daily living, and a high level of health instability all significantly worsened the odds of having a psychosocial symptom in the last 3 months of life. CONCLUSION In this large home care cancer cohort, trajectories of psychosocial symptoms worsened close to death. Physical symptoms, such as uncontrolled pain, were associated with having worse psychosocial symptoms at end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Stevens
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa C Barbera
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kimberlyn McGrail
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn M Guthrie
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alsabbagh MW, Kueper JK, Wong ST, Burge F, Johnston S, Peterson S, Lawson B, Chung H, Bennett M, Blackman S, McGrail K, Campbell J, Hogg W, Glazier R. Development of comparable algorithms to measure primary care indicators using administrative health data across three Canadian provinces. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1340. [PMID: 33644408 PMCID: PMC7893851 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Performance measurement has been recognized as key to transforming primary care (PC). Yet, performance reporting in PC lags behind even though high-performing PC is foundational to an effective and efficient health care system. OBJECTIVES We used administrative data from three Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia, to: 1) identify and develop a core set of PC performance indicators using administrative data and 2) examine their ability to capture PC performance. METHODS Administrative data used included Physician Billings, Discharge Abstract Database, the National Ambulatory Care and Reporting System database, Census and Vital Statistics. Indicators were compiled based on a literature review of PC indicators previously developed with administrative data available in Canada (n=158). We engaged in iterative discussions to assess data conformity, completeness, and plausibility of results in all jurisdictions. Challenges to creating comparable algorithms were examined through content analysis and research team discussions, which included clinicians, analysts, and health services researchers familiar with PC. RESULTS Our final list included 21 PC performance indicators pertaining to 1) technical care (n=4), 2) continuity of care (n=6), and 3) health services utilization (n=11). Establishing comparable algorithms across provinces was possible though time intensive. A major challenge was inconsistent data elements. Ease of data access, and a deep understanding of the data and practice context, was essential for selecting the most appropriate data elements. CONCLUSIONS This project is unique in creating algorithms to measure PC performance across provinces. It was essential to balance internal validity of the indicators within a province and external validity across provinces. The intuitive desire of having the exact same coding across provinces was infeasible due to lack of standardized PC data. Rather, a context-tailored definition was developed for each jurisdiction. This work serves as an example for developing comparable PC performance indicators across different provincial/territorial jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - ST Wong
- University of British Columbia
| | | | - S Johnston
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - W Hogg
- University of Ottawa, Montfort Hospital Research Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seow H, Tanuseputro P, Barbera L, Earle C, Guthrie D, Isenberg S, Juergens R, Myers J, Brouwers M, Sutradhar R. Development and Validation of a Prognostic Survival Model With Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e201768. [PMID: 32236529 PMCID: PMC7113728 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Existing prognostic cancer tools include biological and laboratory variables. However, patients often do not know this information, preventing them from using the tools and understanding their prognosis. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prognostic survival model for all cancer types that incorporates information on symptoms and performance status over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a retrospective, population-based, prognostic study of data from patients diagnosed with cancer from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, in Ontario, Canada. Patients were randomly selected for model derivation (60%) and validation (40%). The derivation cohort was used to develop a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model with baseline characteristics under a backward stepwise variable selection process to predict the risk of mortality as a function of time. Covariates included demographic characteristics, clinical information, symptoms and performance status, and health care use. Model performance was assessed on the validation cohort by C statistics and calibration plots. Data analysis was performed from February 6, 2018, to November 6, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Time to death from diagnosis (year 0) recalculated at each of 4 annual survivor marks after diagnosis (up to year 4). RESULTS A total of 255 494 patients diagnosed with cancer were identified (135 699 [53.1%] female; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]). The cohort decreased to 217 055, 184 822, 143 649, and 109 569 patients for each of the 4 years after diagnosis. In the derivation cohort year 0, and the most common cancers were breast (30 855 [20.1%]), lung (19 111 [12.5%]), and prostate (18 404 [12.0%]). A total of 47 614 (31.1%) had stage III or IV disease. The mean (SD) time to death in year 0 was 567 (715) days. After backward stepwise selection in year 0, the following factors were associated with increased risk of death by more than 10%: being hospitalized; having congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or dementia; having moderate to high pain; having worse well-being; having functional status in the transitional or end-of-life phase; having any problems with appetite; receiving end-of-life home care; and living in a nursing home. Model discrimination was high for all models (C statistic: 0.902 [year 0], 0.912 [year 1], 0.912 [year 2], 0.909 [year 3], and 0.908 [year 4]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The model accurately predicted changing cancer survival risk over time using clinical, symptom, and performance status data and appears to have the potential to be a useful prognostic tool that can be completed by patients. This knowledge may support earlier integration of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Barbera
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Craig Earle
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Guthrie
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarina Isenberg
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosalyn Juergens
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Myers
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa Brouwers
- University of Ottawa School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manis DR, McArthur C, Costa AP. Associations with rates of falls among home care clients in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:80. [PMID: 32106824 PMCID: PMC7047389 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1483-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accidental falls among older adults are a leading cause of injury-related hospitalizations. Reducing falls is an ongoing quality improvement priority for home care, given that many home care clients experience falls. In this study, we identify factors associated with the rate of falls among home care clients. METHODS We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study using secondary data from the Hamilton, Niagara, Haldimand, and Brant health region of Ontario, Canada from January 1 - March 31, 2018. We captured person-level characteristics with falls from the Resident Assessment Instrument - Home Care (RAI-HC). Negative binomial regression was used to model the rate of falls. RESULTS Functional characteristics of home care clients had strong, statistically significant associations with the rate of falls. Declines in activities of daily living, assistive device use for locomotion indoors, polypharmacy, and health conditions, such as dizziness or lightheadedness, and parkinsonism, were associated with a higher rate of falls. Males who used assistive devices had a higher rate of falls compared to females; however, males with neurological and cardiovascular health conditions had a decrease in the rate of falls compared to females. Home care clients with parkinsonism who used a cane and took eight or more drugs had stronger associations with an increased rate of falls compared to those who do not have parkinsonism. CONCLUSIONS Functional characteristics, polypharmacy, and health conditions are associated with increased rates of falls among home care clients. Home care clients who are at a greater risk of falls may require environmental adjustments in their home to reduce or eliminate the possibility of falling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek R Manis
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-201, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Caitlin McArthur
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,GERAS Centre for Aging Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Andrew P Costa
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-201, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hirdes JP, van Everdingen C, Ferris J, Franco-Martin M, Fries BE, Heikkilä J, Hirdes A, Hoffman R, James ML, Martin L, Perlman CM, Rabinowitz T, Stewart SL, Van Audenhove C. The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care. Front Psychiatry 2020; 10:926. [PMID: 32076412 PMCID: PMC6978285 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The lives of persons living with mental illness are affected by psychological, biological, social, economic, and environmental factors over the life course. It is therefore unlikely that simple preventive strategies, clinical treatments, therapeutic interventions, or policy options will succeed as singular solutions for the challenges of mental illness. Persons living with mental illness receive services and supports in multiple settings across the health care continuum that are often fragmented, uncoordinated, and inadequately responsive. Appropriate assessment is an important tool that health systems must deploy to respond to the strengths, preferences, and needs of persons with mental illness. However, standard approaches are often focused on measurement of psychiatric symptoms without taking a broader perspective to address issues like growth, development, and aging; physical health and disability; social relationships; economic resources; housing; substance use; involvement with criminal justice; stigma; and recovery. Using conglomerations of instruments to cover more domains is impractical, inconsistent, and incomplete while posing considerable assessment burden. interRAI mental health instruments were developed by a network of over 100 researchers, clinicians, and policy experts from over 35 nations. This includes assessment systems for adults in inpatient psychiatry, community mental health, emergency departments, mobile crisis teams, and long-term care settings, as well as a screening system for police officers. A similar set of instruments is available for child/youth mental health. The instruments form an integrated mental health information system because they share a common assessment language, conceptual basis, clinical emphasis, data collection approach, data elements, and care planning protocols. The key applications of these instruments include care planning, outcome measurement, quality improvement, and resource allocation. The composition of these instruments and psychometric properties are reviewed, and examples related to homeless are used to illustrate the various applications of these assessment systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Hirdes
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Coline van Everdingen
- Psychiatry and Neuropsychology Department, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jason Ferris
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Brant E. Fries
- Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jyrki Heikkilä
- Division of Psychiatry, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Alice Hirdes
- Graduate Program in Health Promotion, Human Development and Society, Lutheran University of Brazil, Canoas, Brazil
| | - Ron Hoffman
- School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Mary L. James
- Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Lynn Martin
- Department of Health Sciences for Lynn Martin, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher M. Perlman
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Terry Rabinowitz
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Shannon L. Stewart
- Faculty of Education, Althouse College, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Chantal Van Audenhove
- LUCAS Center for Care Research and Consultancy & Academic Center for General Practice in the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Currow DC, Soyiri IN. Death Took a Vacation … and It's Almost Over. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:1298-1299. [PMID: 31661391 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David C Currow
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged, and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Ireneous N Soyiri
- Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|