1
|
Coombes L, Braybrook D, Harðardóttir D, Scott HM, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Cognitive testing of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (C-POS) with children, young people and their parents/carers. Palliat Med 2024; 38:644-659. [PMID: 38708863 PMCID: PMC11158001 DOI: 10.1177/02692163241248735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (C-POS) is being developed using best methodological guidance on outcome measure development, This recommends cognitive testing, an established method of item improvement, prior to psychometric testing. AIM To cognitively test C-POS within the target population to establish comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, relevance and acceptability. DESIGN Cross-sectional cognitive interview study following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and Rothrock guidance on outcome measure development. Cognitive interviews were conducted using 'think aloud' and verbal probing techniques. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Children 5-⩽17 years old with life-limiting conditions and parents/carers of children with life-limiting conditions were recruited from 14 UK sites. RESULTS Forty-eight individuals participated (36 parents; 12 children) in cognitively testing the five versions of C-POS over two to seven rounds. Content and length were acceptable, and all questions were considered important. Refinements were made to parent/carer versions to be inclusive of non-verbal children such as changing 'share' to 'express' feelings; and 'being able to ask questions' to 'having the appropriate information'. Changes to improve comprehensibility of items such as 'living life to the fullest' were also made. Parents reported that completing an outcome measure can be distressing but this is anticipated and that being asked is important. CONCLUSION Cognitive interviewing has facilitated refinement of the C-POS, especially for non-verbal children who represent a large proportion of those with a life-limiting condition. This study has enhanced the face and content validity of the measure and provided preliminary evidence for acceptability for use in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Coombes
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Hannah May Scott
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Katherine Bristowe
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Lorna K Fraser
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| | - Julia Downing
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
- International Children’s Palliative Care Network, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Myra Bluebond-Langner
- University College London, Louis Dundas Centre for Children’s Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - Fliss EM Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mooney-Doyle K, Pyke-Grimm KA, Lanzel AF, Montgomery KE, Hassan J, Thompson A, Rouselle R, Matheny Antommaria AH. Balancing Protection and Progress in Pediatric Palliative Care Research: Stakeholder Perspectives. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2022057502. [PMID: 36069137 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric palliative care, including end-of-life care, remains a relatively new area of interdisciplinary clinical practice and research. Improving the multifaceted and complex care of children and their families involves research that (1) documents the experiences of children with serious illness, their families, and clinicians; (2) evaluates relationships between contextual factors and health outcomes; and (3) establishes a stronger foundation for child- and family-focused interventions to improve care. Partnership among stakeholders in family-focused research begins from design through conduct of the study. This partnership is the foundation of a dynamic research process that illuminates critical perspectives. We present a hypothetical pediatric palliative study; a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of adolescents and young adults with life-limiting illnesses and their parents after a discussion about an end-of-life decision. Pediatric palliative care researchers, institutional review board leaders, and the parent of a child who died comment on how to balance the obligations to improve clinical care and to protect participants in research. Their recommendations include recruiting a wide range of participants, differentiating emotional responses from harm, approaching potential participants as individuals, and seeking feedback from family advisory boards and designated reviewers with content expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Anisha Thompson
- Emory University Institutional Review Board, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|