A Comparison of Statin Therapies in Hypercholesterolemia in Women: A Subgroup Analysis of the STELLAR Study

Role of glycogen in cardiac metabolic stress

Metabolic stress in the myocardium arises from a diverse array of acute and chronic pathophysiological contexts. Glycogen mishandling is a key feature of metabolic stress, while maladaptation in energy-stress situations confers functional deficits. Cardiac glycogen serves as a pivotal reserve for myocardial energy, which is classically described as an energy source and contributes to glucose homeostasis during hypoxia or ischemia. Despite extensive research activity, how glycogen metabolism affects cardiovascular disease remains unclear. In this review, we focus on its regulation across myocardial energy metabolism in response to stress, and its role in metabolism, immunity, and autophagy. We further summarize the cardiovascular-related drugs regulating glycogen metabolism. In this way, we provide current knowledge for the understanding of glycogen metabolism in the myocardium.

Exploring the Evolution of Statin Pricing in Australia: Observations of Price Disclosure Effects on Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Expenditure

OBJECTIVES

The high cardiovascular disease burden globally and in Australia necessitates attention on statin expenditure, the primary pharmacological intervention for cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) subsidies approved statins for Australians. Managing PBS government expenditure occurs through price control strategies of statutory price decreases upon first generic entry and price disclosure. This study investigates the impact price control measures had on statin price evolution and government expenditure between 2010 and 2022.

METHODS

Prescription and pricing data were obtained from Services Australia Medicare Statistics, and price reduction strategies from the PBS. Summary statistics compared and described statin price, prescription, number of brands, market share, and government expenditure to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin price control timelines.

RESULTS

Statin prices exposed to price control measures decreased irrespective of dosage and correlated with reductions in government expenditure, with a comparison of 2010 and 2022 showing annual statin expenditure declined by AU$833.5 million (83.25%) whereas prescriptions reduced by 3.0 million (15.7%). Effects of price disclosure on atorvastatin and rosuvastatin market share suggest industry-prompted price reductions may arise from market share loss, whereas reasons external to pricing prompted rosuvastatin to gain market share.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited publications on contemporary effects of statin price control measures exist. This investigation found these measures reduced government expenditure for statins by AU$949.1 million, with the price reduction correlating with price control measures. In addition to affirming price control mechanisms remain effective in contemporary times, this investigation provides data for key insights into the Australian statin industry.

Comparative efficacy and safety among high-intensity statins. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: To summarize the evidence in terms of efficacy and safety of head-to-head studies of high-intensity statins regardless of the underlying population. Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effect sizes in randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared high-intensity statins. Results: Based on 44 articles, similar effectiveness was observed across the statins in reducing LDL levels from baseline. All statins were observed to have similar adverse drug reactions (ADRs), although higher dosages were associated with more ADRs. Based on a pooled quantitative analysis of atorvastatin 80 mg versus rosuvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin was statistically more effective in reducing LDL. Conclusion: This review further confirms that high-intensity statins reduce LDL by ≥50%, favoring rosuvastatin over atorvastatin. Additional data are needed to confirm the clinical significance on cardiovascular outcomes using real-world studies.

The Effect of Statins on Clinical Outcome Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Multi-Centric Cohort Study

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by SARS-CoV-2, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), thrombotic complications, and myocardial injury. Statins, prescribed for lipid reduction, have anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and immunomodulatory properties and are associated with reduced mortality rates in COVID-19 patients. Our goal was to investigate the beneficial effects of statins in hospitalized COVID-19 patients admitted to three multi-specialty hospitals in India from 1 June 2020, to 30 April 2021. This retrospective study included 1,626 patients, of which 524 (32.2%) were antecedent statin users among 768 patients (384 statin users, 384 non-statin users) identified with 1:1 propensity-score matching. We established a multivariable logistic regression model to identify the patients’ demographics and adjust the baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics and co-morbidities. Statin users showed a lower mean of white blood cell count (7.6 × 10³/µL vs. 8.1 × 10³/µL, p < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (100 mg/L vs. 120.7 mg/L, p < 0.001) compared to non-statin COVID-19 patients. The same positive results followed in lipid profiles for patients on statins. Cox proportional-hazards regression models evaluated the association between statin use and mortality rate. The primary endpoint involved mortality during the hospital stay. Statin use was associated with lower odds of mortality in the propensity-matched cohort (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.64, p < 0.001). These results support the previous evidence of the beneficial effects of statins in reducing mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

State of the Art Comprehensive Review of Individual Statins, Their Differences, Pharmacology, and Clinical Implications

Statins are currently the primary treatment for hyperlipidemia, particularly for the treatment of high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as many studies have proven benefit in a variety of populations. The benefits of statin treatment for high cholesterol have been proven in many trials. Forefront among different adverse events is statin-induced myopathy, which still eludes complete understanding, and may range anywhere from muscle soreness or fatigue to potentially extremely rare occurrence of rhabdomyolysis.As most adverse events are rare and not life-threatening, in high-risk patients, a high-dose statin should be started initially as data suggests that clinicians rarely up titrate statin therapy after initial prescription leading to under-treatment of many patients requiring high-dose statin therapy. As we will discuss in this paper, musculoskeletal side effects are the main concern and reason for discontinuing statin therapy. The occurrence and true association of other adverse events in patients on statin such as new onset of diabetes, hepatic toxicity, or cognitive impairment are rare, controversial, and not proven. In placebo-controlled studies, abnormal liver function occurs to a similar degree in statin- and placebo-treated patients. This led to FDA removal of the requirement to monitor liver function tests in patients on statin therapy.The combination of statins with other compounds such as ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors has shown some additional benefits in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The goal of this manuscript is to conduct a comprehensive review about most commonly used statins and compare data on their history, structures, benefits, adverse effects, and clinical outcomes.

Rosuvastatin protects isolated hearts against ischemia-reperfusion injury: role of Akt-GSK-3β, metabolic environment, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore

The cardioprotective activity of rosuvastatin (R) is yet to be known. The objective of this study was to research whether R perfusion before global ischemia can mitigate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion damage, considering the metabolic condition in which these effects occur, and to contemplate potential mitochondrial benefits. Protein kinase B (Akt)/glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) are key elements in myocardial injury produced by ischemia-reperfusion. Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 25-min ischemia and 1-h reperfusion in the presence or absence of R, with or without Wortmannin (W), a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt inhibitor. Akt and GSK-3β were measured by Western blot analysis; lactate, glycogen, and G6PDH were determined; and Ca²⁺-induced MPTP opening was evaluated using a spectrophotometric method. Contractility was assessed by left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), and rate-pressure product (RPP), peak rate of contraction and peak rate of relaxation (± dP/dt), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were determined. Tissue samples were extracted to evaluate mitochondrial damage by electron microscopy and to assess infarct size. Statistical analysis employed ANOVA (n = 6/per group). Myocardial infarct size was significantly reduced by R, which also improved cardiac function. MPTP opening was delayed to 300 μM CaCl₂, while use of W resulted in MPTP opening at 200 μM CaCl₂. Electron microscopy showed better mitochondrial preservation with R, which reduced lactic acid production, increased glycogen consumption and G6PDH activity, as well as phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3β. R before ischemia is cardioprotective against ischemic and reperfusion damage, activating Akt and regulating GSK-3β negatively and attenuating the MPTP opening.