Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization: A Nationwide Analysis

Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated With Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

FAVOR III China (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) reported improved clinical outcomes in quantitative flow ratio (QFR) relative to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but the clinical impact of QFR-guided PCI according to sex remains unknown.

Objectives

The authors sought to compare sex differences in the 2-year clinical benefits of a QFR-guided PCI strategy and to evaluate the differences in outcomes between men and women undergoing contemporary PCI.

Methods

This study involved a prespecified subgroup analysis of the FAVOR III China trial, in which women and men were randomized to a QFR-guided strategy or a standard angiography-guided strategy. Sex differences in clinical benefit of the QFR guidance were analyzed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization within 2 years.

Results

A total of 1,126 women and 2,699 men were eligible and the occurrence of 2-year MACE was similar between women and men (10.3% vs 10.5%; P = 0.96). Compared with an angiography-guided strategy, a QFR-guided strategy resulted in a 7.9% and 9.7% reduction in PCI rates in men and women, respectively. A QFR-guided strategy resulted in similar relative risk reductions for 2-year MACE in women (8.0% vs 12.7%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.90) and men (8.7% vs 12.4%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54-0.87) (Pinteraction = 0.61). Furthermore, QFR values were not significantly different between men and women with various angiographic stenosis categories.

Conclusions

A QFR-guided PCI strategy resulted in improved MACE in both men and women at 2 years compared with an angiography-guided PCI strategy. The FAVOR III China Study [FAVOR III China]; (NCT03656848).

Impact of Sex Differences on the Outcomes of Coronary Invasive Physiological Assessment: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Brazilian Population

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; the sum of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates) according to interventional strategies guided by invasive physiological methods in both sexes in a Brazilian population during long-term follow-up for an average of 2 years.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included 151 consecutive patients (232 lesions) between January 2018 and January 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the female group (FG), comprising 59 patients with 88 lesions, and the male group (MG), comprising 92 patients with 144 lesions.

Results

The FG had a greater mean age (FG: 67.96 ± 13.12 vs. MG: 62.36 ± 12.01 years, p = 0.009) and lower mean creatinine clearance (FG: 79.35 ± 38.63 vs. MG: 92.02 ± 38.62 mL/min, p = 0.02) than did the MG. The percentage of lesions in the left main coronary artery was higher in the FG than in the MG (12.5% vs. 2.78%, p = 0.006). The mean follow-up time was longer in the MG than in the FG (795.61 ± 350 vs. 619.19 ± 318 days, respectively; p = 0.001). MACE occurred in 11.86% and 13.04% of patients in the FG and MG, respectively (p = 0.850). Secondary outcomes, such as death, reinfarction, and the need for new revascularization, showed no significant between-sex differences.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the safety of invasive physiological methods to determine coronary revascularization in both male and female patients in a Brazilian population, as evidenced by the low rates of adverse cardiac events and death after a long-term follow-up.

Factors Influencing Functional Coronary Artery Ischemia: A Gender-Specific Predictive Model

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore factors that impact functional coronary artery ischemia (FCAI) and develop a gender-specific prognostic model that could serve as a benchmark for predicting FCAI in clinical practice.

Methods

A cumulative total of 330 patients were enrolled comprising 634 main and branch coronary, consisting of 179 men (359 coronary arteries) and 151 women (275 coronary arteries). Based on the computed tomography-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), the coronary arteries of male and female patients were classified into the non-ischemic group (CT-FFR ≥ 0.80) and the ischemic group (CT-FFR < 0.80). We screened for factors related to the CT-FFR values of the coronary arteries in male and female patients and developed corresponding gender-specific models.

Results

In male patients, the correlation between FCAI and several indicators, including white blood cell (WBC) count, left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions, pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI), and the degree of coronary artery stenosis, was found to be statistically significant. A predictive model was developed using these factors, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.812, with a P value of < 0.001 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.767 to 0.857. This model demonstrated superior predictive capability compared to any individual indicators mentioned above. Significant correlations with FCAI were observed in female patients for hemoglobin (Hb), systolic blood pressure (SBP), FAI, and the degree of coronary artery stenosis. The predictive model, derived from these factors, exhibited robust performance with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.818, a P value of < 0.001, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.764 to 0.872.

Conclusion

Gender disparities exist in the factors affecting FCAI, underscoring the need for a gender-specific predictive model to enhance the precision of FCAI prediction.