Retreatment Rates Among Endometriosis Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy or Laparoscopy

Observational pilot study on the influence of an app-based self-management program on the quality of life of women with endometriosis

PURPOSE

Endometriosis can significantly impair the quality of life of those affected. Multimodal self-help measures are recommended but often difficult to access. Smartphone apps have been shown to improve the quality of life for other conditions with chronic pain. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is evidence of beneficial effects of the smartphone app "Endo-App®" and whether a multicenter randomized controlled trial should be planned to substantiate these effects.

METHODS

In a sample of N = 106 women affected by endometriosis the present study determined the influence of the use of Endo-App® on their quality of life. Among others, the validated questionnaire Endometriosis Health Profile from Oxford University was used for this purpose.

RESULTS

The use of Endo-App® lead to a highly significant improvement in quality of life already after 2 weeks. A statistically significant change was found for nine out of ten measured variables of quality of life. A series of further analyses validated that the measured positive effects were not due to other confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the results indicate that the quality of life of women with endometriosis improved by the digital self-management tool Endo-App®. More studies are needed to further explore the influence of the app on quality of life and as confirmatory evidence of beneficial effects. For this purpose, a randomized controlled trial should be conducted over a longer period of time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under the registration number NCT05528601 on August 18, 2022. It was retrospectively registered.

Acupuncture for pain and pain-related disability in deep infiltrating endometriosis

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in relieving symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain and dyschezia) intensity, improving functional disability, reducing the number of days per months of dysmenorrhea, the frequency and the efficacy of analgesic use in deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The safety profile was also evaluated.

Methods

The study sample was 34 patients with DIE; for 2 months (T-2, T-1) the women recorded diary notes on the numbers of days of menstruation, the presence, intensity, and disability related to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and dyschezia. They then received a total of 15 acupuncture treatments over 6 months (T1-T6; once a week for 12 weeks, then once a month for 3 months).

Results

Dysmenorrhea intensity was decreased during treatment. A decrease of at least 50% in number of days of dysmenorrhea, and a decrease in moderate-to-severe disability starting from T1 to T6 was recorded for 58.6% of patients. Dyspareunia intensity steadily decreased starting at T2; the percentage of women with moderate-to-severe disability declined from 73.3% at T-2, to 36.9% at T3, T4, and T5. A decrease in pelvic pain score was noted starting at T1; the percentage of disability decreased from 83.3% at T-2 to 33.3% at T3 and T6. The intensity of dyschezia decreased from T-2 to T3 and T4 and then increased slightly. Analgesic drug use was lower during treatment and its efficacy appeared to be greater.

Conclusions

The limitations notwithstanding our study-findings show that acupuncture was safe and effective in reducing pain intensity and symptoms-related disability. Larger-scale studies are needed to compare acupuncture and pharmacotherapy for endometriosis-related pain.

Total or Subtotal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the review was to evaluate and compare outcomes after total or subtotal hysterectomy in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WoS). The first aim of the study was to compare outcomes after total and subtotal hysterectomy in women with endometriosis, and the second aim was to compare the two procedures in women with adenomyosis. Publications that reported short- and long-term outcomes after total and subtotal hysterectomy were included in the review. The search was not subject to any limitation in terms of time or method.

RESULTS

After screening 4948 records, we included 35 studies published from 1988 to 2021; the studies were based on various methodologies. With regard to the first aim of the review, we found 32 eligible studies and divided these into the following four categories: postoperative short- and long-term outcomes, recurrence of endometriosis, quality of life and sexual function, and patient satisfaction after total or subtotal hysterectomy in women with endometriosis. Five investigations were deemed eligible for the second aim of the review. No differences were seen in terms of postoperative short- and long-term outcomes after subtotal or total hysterectomy in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation or removal of the cervix in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis appears to have no effect on short- or long-term outcomes, recurrence of endometriosis, quality of life and sexual function, or patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, we lack randomized blinded controlled trials on these aspects. Such trials will be needed to enhance our comprehension of both surgical approaches.

Psychological interventions improve quality of life despite persistent pain in endometriosis: results of a 3-armed randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Despite standard medical treatment endometriosis is often associated with disabling pain and poor quality of life (QoL). Studies indicate that psychological interventions (PIs) may improve pain and QoL, yet studies on the effects of PIs for women with endometriosis are sparse and limited by low-quality study designs. Therefore, this study aimed, in a rigorous three-armed design, to evaluate the effect of PIs on chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and QoL in women with endometriosis.

METHODS

This three-armed parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial included fifty-eight endometriosis patients reporting severe CPP [≥ 5 for pain intensity measured on a 0-10-point numeric rating scale (NRS)]. Patients were randomly assigned to (1) Specific mindfulness- and acceptance-based psychological intervention (MY-ENDO), (2) Carefully matched non-specific psychological intervention (Non-specific), or (3) A wait-list control group (WL). The primary outcome was pelvic pain intensity/unpleasantness measured on NRS. Secondary outcomes included endometriosis-related quality of life, workability, pain acceptance, and endometriosis-related symptoms. Differences in outcomes between groups at post-treatment follow-up were analyzed using mixed linear models. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Compared to WL, psychological intervention (MY-ENDO + Non-specific) did not significantly reduce pain. However, psychological intervention did significantly improve the QoL-subscales 'control and powerlessness', 'emotional well-being', and 'social support' as well as the endometriosis-related symptoms 'dyschezia' and 'constipation'. MY-ENDO was not superior to Non-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with endometriosis may have significant and large effects of psychological intervention on QoL despite an ongoing experience of severe CPP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

12 April 2016, clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02761382), retrospectively registered.

Maintenance Therapy for Preventing Endometrioma Recurrence after Endometriosis Resection Surgery-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of different hormone therapies in preventing postoperative endometrioma recurrence.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE, COCHRANE and Embase electronic databases were searched from inception to 30 April 2021.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies including reproductive age women with endometriosis undergoing ovarian cystectomy or excision of endometriotic lesions compared the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy [gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)] and postoperative maintenance hormone interventions for more than one year [i.e., oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), dienogest (DNG), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNGIUS)] on endometrioma recurrence .

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

Data collection and analysis of the data were independently performed by two reviewers. A total of 11 studies were included, of which 2 were RCTs, and 9 were cohort studies. There were 2394 patients with 6 interventions (cases: 1665, 69.6%) and expectant management (cases: 729, 30.4%). Relative treatment effects were estimated using network meta-analysis (NMA) and ranked in descending order. The clinical effectiveness of these drugs (versus expectant management) was as follows: GnRHa plus DNG [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.27], surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA)= 94.0; DNG (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.32), SUCRA= 69.7; GnRHa plus OCP (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64), SUCRA= 63.4; GnRHa plus LNGIUS (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66), SUCRA= 59.4; and OCP (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.36), SUCRA= 43.6. The effectiveness of GnRHa (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.12-1.89), SUCRA= 17.3 was not significantly different from that of controls.

CONCLUSION

In NMA, combined postoperative adjuvant therapy and longer maintenance hormone treatment are better than a single agent in preventing postoperative endometrioma recurrence. GnRHa plus DNG maintenance treatment might be the most effective intervention. Large-scale RCTs of these agents are still required.

REGISTRATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Date of PROSPERO registration: 17 April 2021.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021247291.

Treatment patterns in women seeking care for endometriosis at an endometriosis center

Objective:

To determine the clinical characteristics and prior medical and surgical treatments in women undergoing surgical excision of endometriosis for pelvic pain at a single institution.

Methods:

In this retrospective cohort study we identified 140 women with pathology-proven endometriosis who completed a preoperative standardized pain form and underwent surgery at an endometriosis center. Women were stratified into three groups for analysis: no prior surgery, 1 prior surgery, and 2+ prior surgeries.

Results:

The most common treatments used prior to seeking care were hormonal contraceptives (51.6%) and surgery (46.1%). More than half of women were diagnosed with pelvic floor dysfunction at time of presentation or prior to consultation. There was a significant relationship between an increasing number of surgeries (none vs 1 vs 2+) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist use (19.0% vs 27.5% vs 56.0%, p = 0.003). Though not significant, a trend was noted between increasing surgeries and opioid use (20.6% vs 30.0% vs 40.0%, p = 0.17). There was a statistically significant relationship between multiple surgeries and illicit drug use ( p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Patients with pelvic pain and endometriosis who have undergone multiple surgeries are more likely to have used GnRH agonists and report illicit drug use prior to presenting to specialized care.

Dysmenorrhea and Endometriosis in Transgender Adolescents

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To study the presentation of dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in transmasculine adolescents and review their treatment outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective review.

SETTING

Boston Children's Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Transmasculine persons younger than 26 years old who were diagnosed with dysmenorrhea and treated between January 1, 2000 and March 1, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

An electronic medical record review of the clinical characteristics, transition-related care, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Dysmenorrhea was diagnosed in 35 transmasculine persons. Mean age was 14.9 years ± 1.9 years. Twenty-nine (82.9%) were diagnosed after social transition. Twenty-three of 35 (65.7%) were first treated with combined oral contraceptives, but 14/23 (61%) discontinued or transitioned to alternative therapy. Twelve patients with dysmenorrhea alone initiated testosterone treatment, and 4/12 (33.3%) experienced persistent symptoms. Seven of 35 patients with dysmenorrhea (20.0%) were laparoscopically evaluated for endometriosis, and it was confirmed in all seven. Six had stage I disease, and one had stage II. Three of the 7 (42.9%) were diagnosed after social transition, with one diagnosed 20 months after initiating testosterone treatment. Their endometriosis was treated with combined oral contraceptives, danazol, or progestins; four experienced suboptimal response during treatment with these therapies alone. Two of those with suboptimal response subsequently resolved their dysmenorrhea when using testosterone. Five patients with endometriosis initiated testosterone treatment, and of the 5 (40%) experienced persistent symptomatology with combined testosterone and progestin therapies.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize endometriosis in transmasculine persons. Evaluation for endometriosis was underutilized in transmasculine persons with dysmenorrhea, despite those who underwent laparoscopic evaluation and had disease confirmation. Although testosterone treatment can resolve symptoms in some, others might require additional suppression. Endometriosis should be considered in transmasculine persons with symptoms even when they are using testosterone.

A Clinician's Guide to the Treatment of Endometriosis with Elagolix

Pain associated with endometriosis is a considerable burden for women, permeating all aspects of their lives, from their ability to perform daily activities to their quality of life. Although there are many options for endometriosis-associated pain management, they are often limited by insufficient efficacy, inconvenient routes of administration, and/or intolerable side effects. Elagolix, a nonpeptide, small-molecule gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, is the first new oral therapy to be approved for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain in the United States in more than a decade. Modulation of estradiol with elagolix is dose dependent and ranges from partial to full suppression. Clinical evidence has shown that elagolix at both approved doses (150 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily) is effective for reducing symptoms of pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia), improving quality of life, and decreasing use of rescue analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or opioids). The availability of two dosing options allows for individualization of treatment based on baseline clinical factors and response to therapy. Elagolix is well tolerated, with less pronounced hypoestrogenic effects compared with GnRH agonists. This review provides an overview of elagolix, highlighting currently available treatment options and the application of this new treatment for women with endometriosis-associated pain.

Effect of hysterectomy on pain in women with endometriosis: a population-based registry study

OBJECTIVE

To assess pain symptoms before and after hysterectomy in women with endometriosis.

DESIGN

A population-based registry study.

SETTING

Sweden.

POPULATION

Women aged 18-45 years who underwent hysterectomy for endometriosis between 2010 and 2015.

METHODS

Pain symptoms before hysterectomy and 12 months after surgery were collected from the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). Pain symptoms were also assessed by follow-up surveys after a median follow-up period of 63 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pelvic or lower abdominal pain after hysterectomy.

RESULTS

The study included 137 women. The proportion of women experiencing pain of any severity decreased by 28% after hysterectomy (P < 0.001). The proportion of women with severe pain symptoms decreased by 76% after hysterectomy (P < 0.001). The majority of women (84%) were satisfied with the surgical result. Presence of severe pain symptoms after the hysterectomy was associated with less satisfaction (P < 0.001). Pain symptoms after surgery, patient satisfaction and the patient's perceived improvement were not significantly different between women whose ovarian tissue was preserved and women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a significant, long-lasting reduction in pain symptoms after hysterectomy among women with endometriosis. Hysterectomy, with the possibility of ovarian preservation, may be a valuable option for women with endometriosis who suffer from severe pain symptoms.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Hysterectomy is a valuable option for women with endometriosis and severe pain symptoms.

National Patterns of Emergency Department Use for Women with Endometriosis, 2006-2015

Introduction: Endometriosis is a burdensome chronic condition for which conservative management is often recommended when indicated. Nonetheless, some women seek care for endometriosis in the emergency department (ED). We evaluated trends in ED visits for endometriosis from 2006 to 2015. Materials and Methods: Nationally representative estimates of ED visits for endometriosis by women aged 18-49 were extracted from the Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample into three cohorts by calendar years 2006-2007, 2010-2011, and 2014-Q3 2015. Visits with a principal diagnosis code of endometriosis (International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification, code 617.x) were included. Patient and hospital characteristics were compared across cohorts using analysis of variance. Trends in the proportion of ED visits ending in inpatient admission and in mean charges (2015 USD) were assessed using generalized linear models controlling for patient and hospital characteristics. Results: The annual number of ED visits nationally was stable at ∼15,000 visits per year during 2006-2015. From 2006-2007 to 2014-2015, the composition of ED visits shifted away from private pay (42.0% vs. 35.3%) and uninsured (23.6% vs. 16.6%) to Medicaid (26.7% vs. 40.1%) and became more concentrated in metro-teaching hospitals (33.9% vs. 51.9%) (p < 0.001 for all). Inpatient admission rates declined from 20.1% to 9.2% (p < 0.001). Mean ED charges increased from $2458 to $4953 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: During 2006-2015, the number of ED visits for endometriosis remained stable, the inpatient admission/transfer rate declined by half, and mean charges per visit doubled.

National trends in inpatient endometriosis admissions: Patients, procedures and outcomes, 2006-2015

INTRODUCTION

Despite guidance towards minimally invasive, outpatient procedures for endometriosis, many patients nonetheless receive inpatient care. Our objective was to assess trends in patient and hospital characteristics, surgical complications and hospital charges for women with an endometriosis-related inpatient admission in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Visits were stratified into three time-period-defined cohorts (2006-2007, 2010-2011, and 2014 through the first three quarters of 2015). Visits were included if the patient was aged 18-49 years and the primary diagnosis code was for endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 617.xx). We evaluated counts of inpatient admissions and rates of patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis code for endometriosis decreased by 72.8% from 2006 to 2015. At the same time, among those admitted for inpatient care for endometriosis, the proportions who had Medicaid insurance and multiple documented comorbidities increased. From 2006 to 2015, mean total hospital charges increased by 75% to $39,662 in 2015 US dollars, although average length of stay increased by <1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis decreased over the past decade, while surgical complications and associated hospital charges increased. The share of patients with multiple comorbidities increased and an increasing proportion of inpatient endometriosis admissions were covered by Medicaid and occurred at urban teaching hospitals. These findings suggest a demographic shift in patients receiving inpatient care for endometriosis towards more complex, vulnerable patients.

Rethinking endometriosis care: applying the chronic care model via a multidisciplinary program for the care of women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic, painful disease without a cure. Due largely to chronic pain, endometriosis can lead to significant physical, mental, relationship, and financial burdens. Within the conventional single provider model of care—in which the patient is primarily taken care of by her physician and complementary strategies based on psychology, nutrition, pain medicine, pelvic physical therapy, and so on may not be readily available in a coordinated manner—most women with endometriosis live with unresolved pain and the consequences of that pain. We therefore propose that there is an urgent need to search for alternative models of care. In the current paper, we discuss our experiences with an model of care in which we adopt a long-term, patient-focused, and multidisciplinary chronic care model for women with endometriosis. Our objective is to improve long-term clinical outcomes for women with endometriosis. For geographical areas and healthcare systems in which it is feasible, we propose consideration of this multidisciplinary model of care as an alternative to the single provider model and offer guidance for those considering establishment of such a program. We also initiate a conversation about which clinical outcomes pertaining to endometriosis are important and should be tracked to assess the efficacy and value of multidisciplinary and other endometriosis healthcare models.

Cost–effectiveness of elagolix versus leuprolide acetate for treating moderate-to-severe endometriosis pain in the USA

Aim: To assess the cost–effectiveness of elagolix versus leuprolide acetate in women with moderate to severe endometriosis pain. Methods: A Markov model was developed. The efficacy of leuprolide acetate was derived from statistical prediction models using elagolix trial data. Model inputs were extracted from Phase III clinical trials and published literature. Results: Compared with leuprolide acetate, elagolix generated positive net monetary benefit (NMB) assuming a payer's willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per quality-adjusted life year over a 1-year time horizon: US$5660 for elagolix 150 mg and US$6443 for elagolix 200 mg. The 2-year NMBs were also positive. Conclusion: Elagolix was cost effective versus leuprolide acetate in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis pain over 1- and 2-year time horizons. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action

Endometriosis can have a profound impact on women's lives, including associated pain, infertility, decreased quality of life, and interference with daily life, relationships, and livelihood. The first step in alleviating these adverse sequelae is to diagnose the underlying condition. For many women, the journey to endometriosis diagnosis is long and fraught with barriers and misdiagnoses. Inherent challenges include a gold standard based on an invasive surgical procedure (laparoscopy) and diverse symptomatology, contributing to the well-established delay of 4-11 years from first symptom onset to surgical diagnosis. We believe that remedying the diagnostic delay requires increased patient education and timely referral to a women's healthcare provider and a shift in physician approach to the disorder. Endometriosis should be approached as a chronic, systemic, inflammatory, and heterogeneous disease that presents with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or infertility, rather than focusing primarily on surgical findings and pelvic lesions. Using this approach, symptoms, signs, and clinical findings of endometriosis are anticipated to become the main drivers of clinical diagnosis and earlier intervention. Combining these factors into a practical algorithm is expected to simplify endometriosis diagnosis and make the process accessible to more clinicians and patients, culminating in earlier effective management. The time has come to bridge disparities and to minimize delays in endometriosis diagnosis and treatment for the benefit of women worldwide.

Treatment Patterns, Complications, and Health Care Utilization Among Endometriosis Patients Undergoing a Laparoscopy or a Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Claims Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hysterectomy and laparoscopy are common surgical procedures used for the treatment of endometriosis. This study compares outcomes for women who received either procedure within the first year post initial surgery.

METHODS

The study used data from the Truven Health MarketScan claims databases from 2004 to 2013 to identify women aged 18-49 years who received an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy. Patients were excluded if they did not have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year before through 1 year after their endometriosis-related procedure, if they were diagnosed with uterine fibroids prior to or on the date of surgery (i.e., index date), or if they had a hysterectomy prior to the index date. The descriptive analyses examined differences between patients with an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy in regard to medications prescribed, complications, and hospitalizations during the immediate year post procedure.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 24,915 women who underwent a hysterectomy and 37,308 who underwent a laparoscopy. Results revealed significant differences between the cohorts, with women who received a laparoscopy more likely to be prescribed a GnRH agonist, progestin, danazol, or an opioid analgesic in the immediate year post procedure compared to women who underwent a hysterectomy. In contrast, women who underwent a hysterectomy generally had higher complication rates. Index hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) were higher for women who had a hysterectomy, while post-index hospitalization rates and LOS were higher for women who had a laparoscopy. For both cohorts, post-procedure complications were associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates and longer LOS.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated significantly different 1-year post-surgical outcomes for patients who underwent an endometriosis-related hysterectomy relative to a laparoscopy. Furthermore, the endometriosis patients in this analysis had a considerable risk of surgical complications, subsequent surgeries, and hospital admissions, both during and after their initial therapeutic laparoscopy or hysterectomy.

FUNDING

AbbVie.