Potential Strategies to Increase Gynecologic Oncologist Treatment for Ovarian Cancer

Exploring global barriers to optimal ovarian cancer care: thematic analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the barriers to ovarian cancer care, as reported in the open ended responses of a global expert opinion survey, highlighting areas for improvement in global ovarian cancer care. Potential solutions to overcome these barriers are proposed.

METHODS

Data from the expert opinion survey, designed to assess the organization of ovarian cancer care worldwide, were analyzed. The survey was distributed across a global network of physicians. We examined free text, open ended responses concerning the barriers to ovarian cancer care. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze, and report meaningful patterns within the data.

RESULTS

A total of 1059 physicians from 115 countries completed the survey, with 438 physicians from 93 countries commenting on the barriers to ovarian cancer care. Thematic analysis gave five major themes, regardless of income category or location: societal factors, inadequate resources in hospital, economic barriers, organization of the specialty, and need for early detection. Suggested solutions include accessible resource stratified guidelines, multidisciplinary teamwork, public education, and development of gynecological oncology training pathways internationally.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides an international perspective on the main barriers to optimal ovarian cancer care. The themes derived from our analysis highlight key target areas to focus efforts to reduce inequalities in global care. Future regional analysis involving local representatives will enable country specific recommendations to improve the quality of care and ultimately to work towards closing the care gap.

Doubling down on the future of gynecologic oncology: The SGO future of the profession summit report

The original vision of the field of gynecologic oncology was to establish a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with gynecologic cancers. Fifty years later, scientific advances have markedly changed the overall practice of gynecologic oncology, but the profession continues to struggle to define its value-financial and otherwise. These issues were examined in full at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Future of the Profession Summit and the purpose of this document is to summarize the discussion, share the group's perceived strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for gynecologic oncologists, further educate members and others within the patient care team about the unique role of gynecologic oncologists, and plan future steps in the short- and long- term to preserve the subspecialty's critical mission of providing comprehensive, longitudinal care for people with gynecologic cancers.

Collaborating with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program to Increase Receipt of Ovarian Cancer Care from a Gynecologic Oncologist

Background: Treatment by a gynecologic oncologist is an important part of ovarian cancer care; however, implementation strategies are needed to increase care by these specialists. We partnered with National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs in Iowa, Michigan, and Rhode Island in a demonstration project to deepen the evidence base for promising strategies that would facilitate care for ovarian cancer by gynecologic oncologists. Methods: Five main implementation strategies (increase knowledge/awareness; improve models of care; improve payment structures; increase insurance coverage; enhance workforce) were identified in the literature and used to develop initiatives. Specific activities were chosen by state programs according to feasibility and needs. Results: Activities included: (1) qualitative interviews with patients to determine barriers to receipt of specialized care; (2) development of patient/provider educational materials; (3) creation of patient/provider checklists to facilitate appropriate referrals; (4) expansion of a toll-free patient navigation hotline for ovarian cancer patients; (5) training of the health care workforce. The programs developed resources (educational handouts, toolkits, 2 webinars, 2 podcasts); trained 167 medical and nursing students during 8 Survivors Teaching Students® workshops; and conducted 3 provider education sessions reaching 362 providers in 45 states. Evaluations showed increases in providers' knowledge, awareness, abilities, and intentions to refer ovarian cancer patients to a gynecologic oncologist. Conclusion: The state program resources we discussed are available for other cancer control programs interested in initiating or expanding activities to improve access/referrals to gynecologic oncologists for ovarian cancer care. They serve as a valuable repository for public health professionals seeking to implement similar interventions.

A Clinical Diagnostic Value Analysis of Serum CA125, CA199, and HE4 in Women with Early Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the value of combined detection of serum CA125, CA199, and HE4 in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Methods

Relevant articles retrieved from PubMed, Elsevier Science, Springer, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were screened strictly according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included literature published from January 2005 to December 2021. (2) Serum HE4, CA125, CA199, and their combination for ovarian cancer diagnostic tests were studied, and healthy subjects or patients with the benign disease were taken as a control group. (3) Pathological tissue diagnosis as the gold standard. (4) Complete original data can be obtained. (5) The sample size was ≥20. (6) Language is limited to Chinese and English. Data features and QUADAS table were extracted from the included literature, and QUADAS evaluation tool detail table was used for the included study. Conduct quality evaluation. Statistical analysis was carried out using meta-disc software version 1.4. Appropriate effect model was selected to merge the effect size, and the forest maps of merge sensitivity, merge specificity, and merge likelihood ratio were obtained.

Results

The results of meta-analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in diagnostic specificity analysis of CA125 (OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.58, 2.32), P < 0.00001, I² = 67%, Z = 6.58); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of CA125 (OR = 2.50, 95% CI (1.73, 3.62), P < 0.00001, I² = 0%, Z = 4.90); diagnostic specificity analysis of CA199 (OR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.60, 2.44), P < 0.00001, I² = 89%, Z = 6.35); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of CA199 (OR = 1.92, 95% CI (1.46, 2.52), P < 0.00001, I² = 73%, Z = 4.70); diagnostic specificity analysis of HE4 (OR = 2.08, 95% CI (1.65, 2.63), P < 0.00001, I² = 73%, Z = 6.19); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of HE4 (OR = 2.37, 95% CI (1.87, 3.00), P < 0.00001, I² = 83%, Z = 7.19).

Conclusion

In the clinical assisted diagnosis of ovarian cancer, combined detection of CA125, CA199, and HE4 has the stronger discriminant ability and higher accuracy than single detection of CA125, which can improve the diagnostic efficiency.