Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign disease

Cutaneous Metastasis after Surgery, Injury, Lymphadenopathy, and Peritonitis: Possible Mechanisms

Cutaneous metastases from internal malignancies are uncommon. Umbilical metastasis, also known as Sister Joseph nodule (SJN), develops in patients with carcinomatous peritonitis or superficial lymphadenopathy, while non-SJN skin metastases develop after surgery, injury, and lymphadenopathy. In this review, the possible mechanisms of skin metastases are discussed. SJNs develop by the contiguous or lymphatic spread of tumor cells. After surgery and injury, tumor cells spread by direct implantation or hematogenous metastasis, and after lymphadenopathy, they spread by extranodal extension. The inflammatory response occurring during wound healing is exploited by tumor cells and facilitates tumor growth. Macrophages are crucial drivers of tumor-promoting inflammation, which is a source of survival, growth and angiogenic factors. Angiogenesis is promoted by the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which also mediates tumor-associated immunodeficiency. In the subcutaneous tissues that surround metastatic lymph nodes, adipocytes promote tumor growth. In the elderly, age-associated immunosuppression may facilitate hematogenous metastasis. Anti-VEGF therapy affects recurrence patterns but at the same time, may increase the risk of skin metastases. Immune suppression associated with inflammation may play a key role in skin metastasis development. Thus, immune therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors reactivating cytotoxic T-cell function and inhibiting tumor-associated macrophage function, appear promising.

A case report of wound site seeding following cholecystectomy for dysplastic gallbladder

Wound site metastasis following cholecystectomy is an uncommon but well recognised complication following laparoscopic surgery for unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. We describe a case of implantation of dysplastic cells with subsequent malignant transformation at the incision site 3 years post-cholecystectomy for an inflamed gallbladder. Histopathological examination of this tumour confirmed adenocarcinoma of pancreatobiliary origin, possibly secondary to gallbladder cells implantation and subsequent carcinomatous change. Unlike previously reported cases, the present case has two unique features: Firstly, the histology of the resected gallbladder at the initial operation was that of a low-grade dysplasia and not carcinoma; and secondly, there was a long interval between initial surgery and subsequent development of the wound site tumour. This case highlights that careful handling of the specimen tissue intraoperatively is paramount as cells implanted in the wound site can survive and undergo malignant transformation. All new masses occurring along the surgical wound site should be followed up and investigated to exclude implanted tumours.

Prognosis of incidental gallbladder carcinoma is not influenced by the primary access technique: analysis of 837 incidental gallbladder carcinomas in the German Registry

BACKGROUND

The use of the laparoscopic approach (LC) for gallbladder carcinoma and incidental gallbladder carcinomas (IGBC) remains controversial. However, recent studies suggest that LC has no adverse effects relative to the open approach. A definitive conclusion regarding the safety of LC that is based on data from a large patient cohort is needed.

METHODS

To draw a definite conclusion about the safety of LC in IGBC, data from the 837 patients with IGBC [registered in the German Registry (GR)] were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 837 patients, 492 underwent LC, 200 underwent open surgery (OC), and 142 initially underwent LC, but the approach was converted to OC. The 5-year survival rates of the three groups indicated that LC was associated with significantly better survival. LC was not associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with T1, T2, or T3 stage disease or in patients who underwent immediate radical re-resection (IRR; n = 330). LC was associated with a significant survival benefit in the 490 patients who did not undergo IRR. LC was comparable with OC in terms of overall recurrence rates and the rate of accidental intraoperative perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

The GR data, which relate to a large homogenous patient cohort, showed that when other potential influencing factors, e.g., IRR were eliminated, the primary access technique had no effect on prognosis. Stage-adjusted therapy should always be performed irrespective of the primary access technique.

Recurrence of cholangiogenous carcinoma in port-sites two years after laparoscopic removal of noncancerous gallbladder

We present a unique case of carcinoma diagnosed in port-site, two years after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign cholecystitis. Analysis of morphology and cytokeratin profile (CK19+ and CK20+/-) of resected port-site tumor allows us to establish the diagnosis of tubular carcinoma with probable cholangiogenic origin. The primary carcinoma was not diagnosed in archival gallbladder tissue, despite repeated histological examination. No other primary tumor was identified during follow-up. Patient history and histological/immunohistochemical picture of the recurrent tumor suggested that primary carcinoma was probably located in the gallbladder, but was not detected during initial and repeated histological examinations of postoperative specimen. The patient is still alive, 12 months after the first port-site recurrence and 36 months after initial laparoscopy.

Port site metastasis of ovarian carcinoma remote from laparoscopic surgery for benign disease

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic surgical procedures has continued to expand due to the many advantages that this surgical approach offers. However, as we continue to realize the benefits and expand the scope of laparoscopic procedures, new complications may occur.

CASE

This is the case of a 77-year-old gravida 2 para 2 who underwent exploratory laparotomy and surgical staging with optimal cytoreduction for Stage IIIC papillary serous ovarian carcinoma in February 1998. Her past surgical history was significant for total abdominal hysterectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy in 1955 for symptomatic leiomyomata and for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in July 1997. After initial platinum-based chemotherapy, she presented with an enlarging nodule at the right upper quadrant laparoscopic port site. Fine needle aspiration confirmed recurrent papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. After a discussion of her options, she elected to undergo surgical resection with postoperative salvage chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Port site recurrences have been previously reported in patients who underwent initial surgical evaluation for ovarian carcinoma utilizing the laparoscopic approach. However, it is unusual for recurrent cancer to appear in port sites or operative incisions not related to the initial cancer surgery. This report serves to caution the gynecologic oncologist that the first evidence of recurrence may be at a laparoscopic port site from prior benign gynecologic or nongynecologic surgery.

Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been associated with less postoperative pain, an early return of bowel function, a shorter period of hospitalization and disability, and better cosmetic results. However, the application of laparoscopic techniques to the curative resection of colorectal cancer is still controversial, owing to reports of cancer recurrence at the port site wounds. The accumulation of numerous such reports in a relatively short period raised concern that there might be an extraordinary high rate of port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This concern has led to intense clinical and basic research aimed at determining the incidence and causes of wound recurrence and developing preventative measures to address this problem. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear whether port site metastasis is really an inherent drawback to laparoscopic cancer surgery.

METHODS

In this review of the literature on port site metastasis, we gathered data from clinical series of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. We eliminated series of <50 patients, since they may be flawed by the learning curve required for this technically demanding procedure.

RESULTS

The rate of port site recurrences in the 1737 patients who participated in these series was 1%. Although the methods and criteria for patient selection in these studies varied, this figure appears to be comparable to the incidence reported for other malignancies and for laparotomies performed to treat colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that wound recurrence may actually be the result of an unfortunate learning curve, rather than an inherent concern. However, we must await the final results of large randomized studies before drawing any definitive conclusions.

Intraperitoneal macrophages and tumor immunity: A review

The macrophage (Mphi) is considered the first line of defense in immune response to foreign invaders. Increasing evidence suggests that Mphi(s) also play an important role against neoplastic cells. Mphi(s) exposed to supraphysiologic concentrations of CO(2) are suppressed. As surgeons apply newer minimally invasive techniques to oncologic therapies, it is important to evaluate the impact of these techniques on host-tumor interactions. We review the current understanding of Mphi biology with specific attention on cytotoxicity in addition to tumor immunity. Although systemic immune function is better preserved after laparoscopy than laparotomy, peritoneal Mphi(s) show reduced function after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum than exposure to air. Mphi(s) have shown cytotoxicity to syngeneic cancer cells and may play an important role in tumor surveillance. The impairment in Mphi function after CO(2) exposure may have an effect on outcome after oncologic surgery. In our understanding, Mphi(s) help destroy neoplastic cells. As CO(2) impairs Mphi activity, laparoscopy may significantly alter the host-tumor interaction.