Laparoscopic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypass in super obese patients

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical treatment for super obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >or=50 kg/m2) has been a challenge and debate for most bariatric surgeons. To compare the outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (HALGB) in super obese patients (BMI >or=50 kg/m2) to morbidly obese patients (BMI <50 kg/m2).

METHODS

A total of 295 patients who underwent HALGB from October 2003 to December 2005 were studied. These patients included 177 with a BMI of <or=49 kg/m2 (morbidly obese) and 118 with a BMI of >or=50 kg/m2 (super-obese). The patient demographics, complications, and outcomes were examined. Additionally, the 12-month postoperative outcomes included the percentage of excess weight loss and improvement of co-morbidities.

RESULTS

The patient age and gender were similar between the 2 groups. The super-obese patients had significantly more co-morbidities and required a greater number of medications. A significant difference was found in 3 early postoperative complications, with super-obese patients experiencing more wound infections (P = .039), nausea/vomiting (P = .003), and pulmonary failure (P = .010). Logistic regression analysis found, after controlling for significant risk factors, that the difference in the incidence of nausea/vomiting was still significant (odds ratio 14.33, 95% confidence interval 1.73-118.60, P = .01). Morbidly obese patients had a significantly greater percentage of excess weight loss at 12 months postoperatively compared with the super-obese patients (80% versus 55%, respectively, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

HALGB is a safe and effective procedure in the super obese but with less favorable outcomes compared with those for morbidly obese patients regarding the percentage of excess weight loss.

Comparing outcomes of hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have compared open versus hand-assisted and open versus total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This study compared hand-assisted and total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery performed at 2 institutions by 2 surgeons, each specializing in 1 of the techniques.

METHODS

Gastric bypass operations (n = 272) were evaluated from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. The comparisons between the hand-assisted (n = 149) and laparoscopic (n = 123) approach were done using the median test, t test, chi-square analysis, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 43.9 years, and 84% (229 of 272) of the patients were women. The average body mass index was 48.8 kg/m2. No significant difference was found between the hand-assist and laparoscopic groups in age, gender, preoperative body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, or operative time. No significant difference was found in the mortality rate between the hand-assist (2 of 149, 1.3%) and laparoscopic (1 of 123, 0.8%) groups. Also, no significant difference was found in the incidence of leaks, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, wound infection, bowel obstruction, incisional hernia, fistula, persistent vomiting, or reoperation between the 2 procedures. A significant difference was found in the length of stay, with a median of 3 days for the hand-assist group and 2 days for the laparoscopic group (P <.001), and hemorrhage requiring transfusion, which occurred in 1 (.7%) of 149 hand-assist patients and 7 (5.7%) of 123 laparoscopic patients (P = .025). The percentage of excess weight loss 6 months after surgery was also similar between the two groups, at 50.2% and 52.1% for the hand-assist and laparoscopic groups, respectively (P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have found that both hand-assist and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be accomplished with similar perioperative risks and outcomes, including weight reduction. The choice between the 2 procedures depends on surgeon preference.

Simulated hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in microgravity

INTRODUCTION

Previous simulation and porcine experiments aboard the reduced gravity program KC-135 turbojet have demonstrated that microgravity surgery is feasible. Ideally, surgical care in spaceflight will incorporate recent advances in care while remaining easy enough for a crew medical officer (CMO) lacking surgical proficiency or extensive surgical experience to perform. As a minimally invasive surgical technique, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) benefits the patient via smaller incisions, less pain, and faster recovery than traditional open surgery. HALS also helps less experienced laparoscopic surgeons perform laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

An inexpensive inanimate surgical simulator was constructed to evaluate the usefulness of HALS in microgravity. This simulator was utilized during brief periods of microgravity provided by parabolic flight on the KC-135. The simulator was successfully used by both a physician-astronaut and an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Task completion included simulated surgery with exploration of the intestines and ligation of the appendix.

RESULTS

Simulated HALS was successfully performed in microgravity. HALS effectively contained operative equipment and small amounts of introduced fluids within the simulated abdominal cavity. Astronaut and surgeon experience suggest that HALS could facilitate minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in microgravity.

DISCUSSION

HALS holds promise as a surgical approach in microgravity, particularly as space travel extends beyond low earth orbit. HALS provides the benefits of MIS, facilitates MIS surgery by less surgically proficient or experienced CMOs, and contains equipment and fluid within the operative field. Simulation provides an easy, cost-effective platform to evaluate medical technology for space flight as well as a method to train CMOs on-orbit.

Randomized clinical trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has increased in popularity since the introduction of the laparoscopic procedure, but this approach requires extensive surgical skill and the learning curve is steep. The present study examined the suitability of hand-assisted laparoscopy for RYGBP.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, 50 patients (median age 38 years, body mass index 45 kg/m(2)) were randomized to either hand-assisted (n = 25) or open (n = 25) RYGBP. The hand-assisted device was introduced through a right subcostal incision. Laparoscopic staplers were also used in the open group, allowing a short upper midline incision. The gastrojejunostomy was made by means of a circular stapler and the Roux limb placed behind the colon and excluded stomach.

RESULTS

The postoperative outcome, with respect to morphine consumption, complications, hospital stay (6 days) and weight loss, was similar in the two groups. The operating time was significantly longer in the hand-assisted group (150 versus 85 min; P < 0.001) but there was no conversion to open operation. One patient in the hand-assisted group was reoperated owing to leakage and one patient developed an incisional hernia after open RYGBP.

CONCLUSION

The hand-assisted technique was feasible and allowed good working conditions in all patients. However, the postoperative outcome was excellent in both groups and there was no advantage to the hand-assisted technique.

Evolution of the laparoscopic gastric bypass

Obesity is recognized as a health problem of epidemic proportions. Surgical intervention for the treatment of obesity is a well-studied and effective method. Various procedures have been utilized over the past decades. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has emerged over the last 20 years and is currently the most commonly offered surgical treatment. Within the last decade, advances in laparoscopic technology and surgical experience have allowed the application of laparoscopic techniques to the surgical treatment of obesity. Many centers and individuals have developed excellent techniques through experience over time as well as improvements in instrumentation. Hand-assisted laparoscopy was reported as a technique, but has mostly fallen out of favor. Currently, laparoscopic application of adjustable gastric band and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are widely used throughout the United States. Data have been generated to demonstrate the improvement in surgical outcomes associated with minimally invasive surgical techniques for the surgical treatment of obesity. Further advances will allow continued improvement in patient outcomes utilizing a variety of minimally invasive surgical approaches to the treatment of this difficult disease.

Application of laparoscopy for bariatric surgery in adolescents

An epidemic increase in adolescent obesity in the United States has resulted in significant obesity-related comorbidities, previously seen only in adults. Although bariatric surgery is an acceptable alternative for weight loss in severely obese adults, no conclusions have been made about the appropriateness of bariatric surgery for individuals younger than 18 years old. Nonetheless, bariatric surgery is increasingly being performed on adolescents with clinically severe obesity and experience suggests that it is effective and safe. Application of the principles of adolescent growth, development, and compliance is essential to avoid adverse physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes following bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery should be part of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of adolescents with clinically severe obesity and should be performed by specialists dedicated to pediatric care, in institutions capable of meeting the guidelines for surgical treatment outlined by the American Society of Bariatric Surgery.

Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity

Weight loss programs, diets, and drug therapy have not shown long-term effectiveness in treating morbid obesity. A 1992 statement from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference affirmed the superiority of surgical over nonsurgical approaches to this condition. Bariatric surgical procedures work in 1 of 2 ways: by restricting a patient's ability to eat (restrictive procedures) or by interfering with ingested nutrient absorption (malabsorptive procedures). Many of these procedures can be performed by a laparoscopic approach, which has been shown to reduce operative morbidity. In the United States, the primary operative choice for morbidly obese patients has recently shifted from vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). VBG, a purely restrictive procedure, has fallen into disfavor because of inadequate long-term weight loss. RYGBP combines restriction and malabsorption principles, and has been shown to induce greater weight loss than VBG. Other procedures currently being offered include laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), including the duodenal switch (BPD-DS) variation; and distal gastric bypass (DGBP). Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with the LAP-BAND system (INAMED Health, Santa Barbara, CA), a restrictive procedure involving placement of a silicone band around the upper stomach, was introduced in the early 1990s and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States in June 2001. Outside the United States, LAP-BAND surgery is the most commonly performed operation for severe obesity. The BPD, BPD-DS, and DGBP are all malabsorptive procedures offered primarily by laparotomy. They have been shown to induce good long-term weight loss but have a higher rate of adverse nutritional complications. Many safe and effective surgical options for severe obesity are available. More scientific appraisals comparing different procedures and open and laparoscopic approaches are needed.

Evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a procedure that is being performed with increasing frequency. It is an advanced laparoscopic procedure with a steep learning curve. With experience, it can be performed in a reasonable amount of time with minimal morbidity.

METHODS

We first performed minimally invasive gastric bypass with the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) technique. After significant experience with HALS, we changed our approach to completely laparoscopic (LS). Our technique for all cases involves a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy with a 25-mm anvil passed transgastrically.

RESULTS

From June 1998 to January 2002, 304 patients underwent minimally invasive gastric bypass. Our first 81 cases were with HALS, and the rest were LS. The incidence of early major and minor perioperative complications for the entire series was 5.6% and 7.9%, respectively. Early reoperation (less than 30 days) was required in 4.6% of all patients. There was 1 leak (1.2%) in the HALS group and 4 anastomotic leaks (1.8%) in the LS group. Other measured outcomes were similar in each group with the exception of wound hernia (16% HALS vs 0.9% LS). Weight loss after 1 year was 44% for HALS and 56% for LS. We have not had any deaths in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

HALS may have certain advantages in selected patients and early in a surgeon's experience with minimally invasive gastric bypass. With experience, good results are possible with either approach.

Internal Hernia Formation after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

There is mounting concern that internal hernia formation after laparoscopic Roux- en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity remains unrecognized until complications develop. In this report we present our experience with this complication. Out of 100 patients who underwent LRYGB we identified five patients who were diagnosed with postoperative internal hernia formation. The medical records and operative details of these patients were reviewed. Of the five patients four were female and the average age was 36 years (range 30–43). All Roux limbs were placed in a retrocolic position. The average time interval to presentation was 104 days (range 4–305). All patients had abdominal pain and four patients experienced vomiting. One patient had obstipation. Only one patient had fever (38.1° C) and the highest white cell count was 14,500. The average loss in body-mass index was 5.21 kg/m2 (range 2.5–14.8). Plain abdominal films revealed dilated bowel in the upper abdomen in three patients. Contrast bowel series was diagnostic in only one patient. One patient had a CT scan, which was diagnostic of small bowel obstruction. All patients underwent operative reduction of the internal hernia; two of these were completed laparoscopically. All hernias had occurred at the mesocolic window and were caused by sutures that had pulled through tissue at the dorsal and lateral aspect of the initial repair. One patient had a nonviable segment of small bowel. There were no deaths. Patients who undergo LRYGB are at a 5 per cent risk for developing small bowel obstruction secondary to internal hernia formation at the mesocolic window. Clinical evaluation and traditional study modalities may not be effective diagnostic tools. A high index of suspicion and low threshold to explore these patients may be the best way to avoid serious sequelae. Modification of operative techniques may reduce the occurrence of internal hernia formation.

Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity

Minimally invasive approaches to bariatric surgery offer significant advantages over those of open surgery. The potential of laparoscopic approaches to reduce the morbidity of these operations may exceed that of laparoscopic cholecystecomy and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication because the access incisions for open bariatric operations have relatively greater potential for harming the morbidly obese patient. Early results of laparoscopic VBG suggest a significant decrease in perioperative morbidity compared to the open approach, with similar weight-loss results. LGB may have the lowest perioperative morbidity and mortality of all current bariatric operations. However, the reoperation rate for device-related complications or failure of the patient to lose sufficient weight appears significant. Long-term esophageal motility also remains questionable for the LGB. It is hoped that the FDA trial will address many of the issues regarding LGB. Results of Lap RYGBP are accumulating and appear promising. The early experience suggests that it is technically feasible and safe in the hands of surgeons who have appropriate training. It is associated with low perioperative morbidity, short hospital stay, and rapid recovery compared to expected results of open RYGBP. Weight loss for Lap RYGBP after 5 years is excellent. It is, however, a technically formidable operation requiring long operating times and a steep learning curve. Early results indicate that technical complications may be greater than those experienced with open RYGBP because of the learning curve. Lap RYGBP is a promising bariatric procedure with potentially significant advantages over open RYGBP. Thus, for patients in the United States, Lap RYGBP may become the preferred weight-reduction procedure. The value of hand-assisted bariatric procedures and laparoscopic malabsorption procedures must await further study.