Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases

No. 193-Laparoscopic Entry: A Review of Techniques, Technologies, and Complications

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications.

OPTIONS

The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems.

OUTCOMES

Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy.

EVIDENCE

English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications.

VALUES

The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT.

OneShot-M: A New Device for Close Laparoscopy Pneumoperitoneum

INTRODUCTION

The induction of pneumoperitoneum is the first and most critical phase of laparoscopy, due to the significant risk of serious vascular and visceral complications. The closed technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum could lead to several surgical complications. The present study aimed to overcome the complications associated with the insertion of Veress needle, improving its use, and facilitating the rapid creation of pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

Thirty large white female pigs were enrolled in our study. A common plunger was modified in order to allow the passage of a 15-cm long Veress needle. This method was applied to 26 laparoscopic procedures (26 pigs) of several specialist branches.

RESULTS

OneShot-M close laparoscopy pneumoperitoneum creation device allowed us to obtain pneumoperitoneum quickly in all attempts, without any intraoperative and postoperative complications related to the use of the Veress needle.

CONCLUSION

The use of the proposed device showed an induction time as quick as the standard laparoscopic closed abdominal entry. The patented device is cheap and allows a safe abdominal entry. In addition, abdominal entry is much faster than the classic open technique.

Trocar Injuries in 17,446 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass-a Nationwide Survey from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry

BACKGROUND

Although, the vast majority of bariatric procedures worldwide are performed laparoscopically, there is no consensus on the best technique to enter the first trocar, a potentially dangerous maneuver. Three principally different techniques exist: initial pneumoperitoneum by Verres needle, open Hasson technique, and direct placement of an optical trocar. In this nationwide survey, we have studied the presently used technique to place the first trocar and identified any intraabdominal injuries in 2012-2014.

METHODS

A questionnaire concerning techniques for placing the first trocar and identified intraabdominal injuries was sent to all 41 centers performing laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in Sweden. Total number of procedures were collected from the national quality registry, Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg), also searched for reports on intraabdominal injuries.

RESULTS

During the present study period, 17,446 LRYGBs were performed. Twelve intraabdominal injuries (0.07 %) were found: bleedings from the omentum, small bowel mesentery and liver (n = 8), and gastric or small bowel perforation (n = 4). The injuries were evenly distributed between the Veress technique and direct placement of an optical trocar, while no injuries occurred with the Hasson technique. Concerning placement of the first trocar, initial pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle was most common (59 %), followed by direct placement of an optical trocar (30 %). This indicates a switch from 2009-2010 (Veress 45 % and optical trocar 45 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve intraabdominal injuries (0.07 %) were found in this nationwide survey. The most common technique for placing the first trocar had switched from directly placing an optical trocar to prior establishment of pneumoperitoneum.

A multicentric prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Kii® Fios® First Entry Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic surgery has evolved as an important field of surgery due to its clear benefits when compared to open laparotomy surgery. However, specific complications of laparoscopic surgery have been reported, of which the majority are complications associated with first entry to the abdominal cavity. The emergence of bariatric surgery, combined with the special considerations of the abdominal wall and cavity of obese patients, leads to seeking new modalities of access to the abdominal cavity in this specific population.Kii Fios First Entry Bladeless Trocar (Applied) is a new device that may allow surgeons to facilitate the creation of pneumoperitoneum. This prospective multicenter nonrandomized trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Kii Fios First Entry Bladeless Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

METHODS

In the period between December 2013 and June 2014, 588 patients were included by 18 surgeons from several French hospitals to undergo laparoscopic surgery using Kii Fios First Entry Trocar as a first-entry trocar. The surgeons filled out a questionnaire assessing the safety and efficacy of the trocar for every patient.

RESULTS

There were no mortality and no major complications. However, 11 cases (1.87%) of minor complications (liver and greater omentum injuries) were reported. The surgeons reported successful entry in less than 1 min for 70.58% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Kii Fios First Entry Trocar (Applied) is a safe and efficient method to establish first entry in laparoscopic bariatric surgery when all the recommendations are followed and respected.

Safe and easy access technique for the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Access-related injuries are still an important consideration and may increase morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to present in detail a safe and easy technique for open insertion of the first trocar.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This technique has been used routinely in the vast majority of laparoscopic procedures at first author's department since 1998. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively for the 11-year period of January 2005 through December 2015. The primary site of access is the umbilicus, but this technique can be used for all insertion points.

RESULTS

A total of 2579 laparoscopic surgical interventions were performed. The abdominal access was established in 2252 patients in open and in 321 cases with blind puncture using a Veress needle. There were three cases (0.9 %) of accidental injuries with blind puncture and two cases (0.09 %) with open technique. Injuries sustained with open technique injuries were less severe and immediately discernable. None of the patients were converted to open technique.

CONCLUSION

The method can be used easily and rapidly, even in obese patients. It is safer than blind puncture and reduces costs.

Modified Open Laparoscopy Using a 5-mm Laparoscope

BACKGROUND

In an effort to minimize injuries associated with closed laparoscopic entry, many surgeons use a 10-mm standard open laparoscopy technique. Disadvantages of this open technique are that it requires a larger incision, fascial sutures, and does not always achieve an airtight seal. Although 5-mm laparoscopics with excellent optics are available, little has been written about open techniques using them.

TECHNIQUE

We report a modified 5-mm open laparoscopy technique without fascial sutures. The fascia is elevated with small Kocher forceps and incised in the midline. The peritoneum is bluntly perforated with a hemostat-directed cephalad, and a blunt trocar with a sleeve is inserted in this direction. After rotating the sleeve toward the pelvis, a 5-mm laparoscope is placed into the abdomen before insufflation.

EXPERIENCE

We have performed approximately 350 laparoscopies with only one major complication of a perforated transverse colon densely adherent beneath the umbilicus in a woman without previous abdominal surgery. Minor carbon dioxide leakage was uncommon and no wound infections or hernias occurred.

CONCLUSION

This 5-mm modified open laparoscopic entry technique minimizes some of the disadvantages associated with conventional open and closed 10-mm laparoscopic techniques while avoiding blind placement of sharp instruments into the peritoneal cavity.

Access-related complications - an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs

In order to investigate incidence rates and types of access-related complications that may occur during laparoscopic hernioplasty, we carried out a systematic analysis of our collected results. The aim was to identify risk factors and to develop useful modifications of the surgical technique and the instrumentation used. Since we first introduced laparoscopic hernioplasty in our clinic, we have carried out standardised, prospective documentation of relevant data from all consecutive operations in an electronic database. We performed a systematic analysis of access-related complications and their possible influencing factors, taking into special account the type of instruments used, port-site and prior intra-abdominal operations. Between April 1993 and March 2000, 4857 consecutive patients received a total of 6023 laparoscopic hernia repairs. In 510 patients three-edged, sharp trocars were used and in 4347 patients conical obturators were used to insert the port. The incidence of access-related complications was 0.9% (44/4857) in the total collection (incision hernias 0.5%, bleeding from abdominal-wall vessels 0.2%, bowel injury 0.06%, wound infections 0.06%). Injuries to intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal vessels were not observed. A differentiated analysis of the various trocar types, taking into consideration the number of inserted ports, showed that for incisions outside the linea alba the incidence of bleeding from abdominal-wall vessels was 12 times higher (0.7%, 7/1020 versus 0.06%, 5/8694). The incidence of incision hernias increased significantly (1.2%, 12/1020 versus 0.02%, 2/8694; p = 0.03) when three-edged trocars were used, as opposed to conical obturators. Our results demonstrate that, outside the linea alba, three-edged trocars should no longer be used for portinsertion. The results of our differentiated analysis of laparoscopic hernia repairs, taking into account the type of obturator, the port-site and number of ports inserted, also can be applied to other laparoscopic operations.

Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications.

OPTIONS

The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems.

OUTCOMES

Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy.

EVIDENCE

English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications.

VALUES

The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: 1. Left upper quadrant (LUQ, Palmer's) laparoscopic entry should be considered in patients with suspected or known periumbilical adhesions or history or presence of umbilical hernia, or after three failed insufflation attempts at the umbilicus. (II-2 A) Other sites of insertion, such as transuterine Veress CO(2) insufflation, may be considered if the umbilical and LUQ insertions have failed or have been considered and are not an option. (I-A) 2. The various Veress needle safety tests or checks provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veress needle. It is therefore not necessary to perform various safety checks on inserting the Veress needle; however, waggling of the Veress needle from side to side must be avoided, as this can enlarge a 1.6 mm puncture injury to an injury of up to 1 cm in viscera or blood vessels. (II-1 A) 3. The Veress intraperitoneal (VIP-pressure </= 10 mm Hg) is a reliable indicator of correct intraperitoneal placement of the Veress needle; therefore, it is appropriate to attach the CO(2) source to the Veress needle on entry. (II-1 A) 4. Elevation of the anterior abdominal wall at the time of Veress or primary trocar insertion is not routinely recommended, as it does not avoid visceral or vessel injury. (II-2 B) 5. The angle of the Veress needle insertion should vary according to the BMI of the patient, from 45 degrees in non-obese women to 90 degrees in obese women. (II-2 B) 6. The volume of CO(2) inserted with the Veress needle should depend on the intra-abdominal pressure. Adequate pneumoperitoneum should be determined by a pressure of 20 to 30 mm Hg and not by predetermined CO(2) volume. (II-1 A) 7. In the Veress needle method of entry, the abdominal pressure may be increased immediately prior to insertion of the first trocar. The high intraperitoneal (HIP-pressure) laparoscopic entry technique does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. (II-1 A) 8. The open entry technique may be utilized as an alternative to the Veress needle technique, although the majority of gynaecologists prefer the Veress entry. There is no evidence that the open entry technique is superior to or inferior to the other entry techniques currently available. (II-2 C) 9. Direct insertion of the trocar without prior pneumoperitoneum may be considered as a safe alternative to Veress needle technique. (II-2) 10. Direct insertion of the trocar is associated with less insufflation-related complications such as gas embolism, and it is a faster technique than the Veress needle technique. (I) 11. Shielded trocars may be used in an effort to decrease entry injuries. There is no evidence that they result in fewer visceral and vascular injuries during laparoscopic access. (II-B) 12. Radially expanding trocars are not recommended as being superior to the traditional trocars. They do have blunt tips that may provide some protection from injuries, but the force required for entry is significantly greater than with disposable trocars. (I-A) 13. The visual entry cannula system may represent an advantage over traditional trocars, as it allows a clear optical entry, but this advantage has not been fully explored. The visual entry cannula trocars have the advantage of minimizing the size of the entry wound and reducing the force necessary for insertion. Visual entry trocars are non-superior to other trocars since they do not avoid visceral and vascular injury. (2 B).

An open access technique to create pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

An open access technique might reduce severe vascular and visceral injuries. An open access technique through the umbilical cicatrix tube has been developed as a routine method with the goal to be easy, safe and used by all surgeons in patients without a previous midline incision.

AIM

To evaluate the open technique in a prospective study in 100 consecutive laparoscopic operations regarding time for entrance, surgeons experience and BMI of the patients.

METHODS

A midline incision from the linea alba up into the inverted umbilicus was performed in the cicatrix tube and the peritoneum was penetrated allowing air to flow into the abdominal cavity followed by a blunt trocar insertion.

RESULTS

Time for access was median 93 seconds. Entrance time in patients with BMI >30 (n=18) was 100 sec and with BMI <30 it was 90 sec (p = 0.71). The median time for consultants was 88 sec and for residents 120 sec (p = 0.003). No gas leakage was seen. Prolonged time for access was seen in three patients; two equipment failures and one obese patent.

CONCLUSION

The open access technique is applicable in all patients without a former midline incision. It is fast, easy to learn with very few associated problems.

Optical trocars - types, indications, clinical experiences

Since blind insertion of the Veress needle or the first trocar may cause serious complications, many surgeons prefer to perform a minilaparotomy to safely create the pneumoperitoneum. Optical trocars provide a third option, combining the advantages of the Veress needle with those of the Hasson trocar. We describe the optical trocars provided by two major producers of disposable laparoscopic instruments and report on our experience in using one of those trocars in over 500 operations without a single complication. In our opinion, optical trocars are safe and easy to handle, and offer several advantages over the use of the Veress needle and the minilaparotomy.

Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute

PURPOSE

Bile duct injury (BDI) represents the most serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this retrospective single-institution study was to evaluate the real incidence of BDI during laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy (OC) in a tertiary academic center in Athens, Greece.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and December 2001, 3637 patients underwent cholecystectomy in our department; as LC in 2079 patients (LC group) and as OC in 1558 patients (OC group). All the LCs were performed or supervised by five staff surgeons and all the OCs were performed or supervised by another five staff surgeons.

RESULTS

There were 13 BDIs associated with LC (0.62%) and 6 associated with OC (0.38%) (P = 0.317). There was one death associated with BDI after LC. Only two (15.4%) of the BDIs associated with LC occurred within the proposed learning curve limit of 50 LCs per individual surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and is not associated with a higher incidence of BDI than OC. Moreover, we did not find that the learning curve for LC affected BDI occurrence.

Complete Evidence Regarding Major Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopic Access

Recent reports by the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register for New interventions and Procedures (ASERNIP-S) and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) concluded that insufficient evidence is available to assess the safety of the open versus closed laparoscopy in regard to major vascular and visceral injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the relative safety of open and closed laparoscopy with respect to rates of major vascular and visceral injuries. A combined prospective/retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of 5900 open laparoscopies was performed. A meta-analysis of all reported series of open and closed laparoscopy was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE search engines to compare major vascular and visceral injury rates. Medicolegal and manufacturer device reports were also reviewed. The case series of 5900 open laparoscopies reported a single visceral injury and no major vascular injuries. The meta-analysis revealed 336 major vascular injuries in 760,890 closed laparoscopies, a mean rate of 0.044%, 1 injury per 2272 cases, compared with 0 injuries in 22,465 open laparoscopies (P = 0.003). Visceral injuries occurred more frequently, 515 injuries in 760,890 closed laparoscopies (mean rate, 0.07) and 11 injuries in 22,465 open laparoscopies (mean rate, 0.05; P = 0.18). Medicolegal and device reports revealed a further 647 major vascular injuries and 500 major visceral injuries. In contrast to the conclusion formed by the RANZCOG and ASERNIP-S, the available evidence shows that open laparoscopy eliminates the risk of major vascular injury and reduces the rate of major visceral injuries. Open laparoscopy using the Hasson cannula should be the preferred method of peritoneal access.

Efeitos do pneumoperitônio com ar e CO2 na gasometria de suínos

OBJETIVO: O pneumoperitônio produz várias alterações na fisiologia humana. Algumas destas alterações, como hipercapnia e acidose, dependem ou são agravadas com o uso de CO2, tendo maior repercussão em pacientes com problema cardio-respiratório. A necessidade de uma melhor alternativa para insuflação da cavidade; a observação de que as cirurgias abertas, assim como as laparoscópicas com suspensão mecânica, são realizadas na presença de Ar ambiente; e a escassez de trabalhos testando o Ar em substituição ao CO2 para insuflação da cavidade, foram motivos para a realização deste trabalho. MÉTODOS: Vinte (0) suínos anestesiados foram submetidos a pneumoperitônio com 1 hora de duração. Os animais foram distribuídos em 4 grupos de 5 animais: Grupo A1 - Pneumoperitônio de Ar a 10 mmHg; Grupo A - Pneumoperitônio de Ar a 16 mmHg; Grupo B1 - Pneumoperitônio de CO2 a 10 mmHg; Grupo B - Pneumoperitônio de CO2 a 16 mmHg. O pneumoperitônio foi realizado pela técnica aberta com trocater de Hasson. Através de um cateter venoso central colhe-se amostra de sangue para exame de gasometria em 3 momentos. RESULTADOS: A análise da gasometria venosa não revelou alterações significativas entre os grupos em relação a PaO2 e a saturação do O2. Nos Grupos A1, A e B1 não foram observadas alterações no equilíbrio ácido-básico. No Grupo B após uma hora de pneumoperitônio houve nítida tendência a hipercapnia e acidose. CONCLUSÃO: O ar, com a técnica aberta de pneumoperitônio foi uma opção segura para insuflação de cavidade em procedimentos laparoscópicos diagnósticos de suínos.

Experience with the Bailez technique for laparoscopic access in children

PURPOSE

We describe a variation of the Hasson technique for laparoscopic access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All laparoscopic procedures performed in children and completed between September 1999 and May 2002 at 2 institutions were reviewed retrospectively. All access to the peritoneal cavity was accomplished in the same manner using the following approach-a small semicircumferential incision was made in the inferior part of the umbilicus, and the umbilical skin was dissected to expose the area of the umbilical scar where the peritoneum and the skin meet. At this point the peritoneum was opened under direct vision without an incision. A blunt trocar was then easily introduced into the peritoneal cavity without forceful manipulation. The rest of the procedure was accomplished as usual.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven laparoscopic procedures were completed in 77 patients (mean age 4.8 years, range 1 month to 17.75 years). Patient weight ranged from 8 to 66 kg. The procedures included diagnostic laparoscopy for undescended testis (52), varicocelectomy (11), nephrectomy (6), nephroureterectomy (1) and others (7). All attempts were successful. Mean followup was 15.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important advantage of this technique is that it offers easy and safe access to the peritoneal cavity even in obese individuals. In addition, this access is rapidly accomplished and offers good cosmetic results.

Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

A systematic review was conducted to determine which of the methods of obtaining peritoneal access and establishing pneumoperitoneum is the safest and most effective.

METHODS

Studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified from six bibliographic databases up to May 2002, the internet, hand-searches and reference lists. They were critically appraised using a validated checklist and data were extracted using standardized protocols.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of prospective, non-randomized studies of open versus closed (needle/trocar) access indicated a trend during open access towards a reduced risk of major complications (pooled relative risk (RR(p)) 0.30, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.09 to 1.03). Open access was also associated with a trend towards a reduced risk of access-site herniation (RR(p) 0.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.04 to 1.03) and, in non-obese patients, a 57 per cent reduced risk of minor complications (RR(p) 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.92) and a trend for fewer conversions to laparotomy (RR(p) 0.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.04 to 1.17). Data on major complications in studies of direct trocar versus needle/trocar access were inconclusive. Minor complications in randomized controlled trials were fewer with direct trocar access (RR(p) 0.19, 95 per cent c.i. 0.09 to 0.40), predominantly owing to a reduction in extraperitoneal insufflation.

CONCLUSION

The evidence on the comparative safety and effectiveness of the different access methods was not definitive, but there were trends in the data that merit further exploration.

A survey of entry techniques and complications of members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society

OBJECTIVE

To identify various aspects of laparoscopic entry technique and visceral injury experienced by members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society (AGES).

DESIGN

A retrospective mailed survey.

SAMPLE

All members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society (AGES).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Numbers of bowel and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries experienced, entry techniques utilised, alternative entry sites.

RESULTS

Of the respondents, 73% use a Veress needle entry. In subjects with an increased risk of peri-umbilical adhesions 83% of respondents use an alternate site of entry, 66% of which use Palmer's point. Sixty-four per cent of respondents had experienced one or more bowel injuries, 21% had experienced major retroperitoneal vascular injury, 33% of respondents had no plan in place for the management of vascular injury and 51% of respondents would alter their clinical practice if accepted entry technique guidelines were available.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of respondents use the Veress needle method of entry, have had at least one entry-related bowel injury and use Palmer's point as an alternative entry site in high-risk subjects. The majority of subjects would alter their clincal practice if accepted entry technique guidelines were available.

Evaluation of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for the treatment of experimentally induced adhesions in pony foals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of experimentally induced adhesions in foals.

ANIMALS

8 healthy pony foals.

PROCEDURE

Celiotomy was performed and adhesions created at the jejunoileal junction and at sites 0.5 and 1 m proximal to this junction, using a serosal abrasion method. Ten days after celiotomy, exploratory laparoscopy was performed. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed in the treatment group only (4 foals, randomly selected). Thirty days after the exploratory laparoscopy, a final laparoscopic examination was performed, and the foals were euthanatized. The number and characteristics of abdominal adhesions were recorded during laparoscopy 10 and 30 days after celiotomy and during necropsy.

RESULTS

At 30 days after celiotomy, the number of adhesions in the control group was significantly higher than the number in the treatment group. In the control group, all adhesions observed during the exploratory laparoscopy were still evident at the final laparoscopy and necropsy. In the treatment group, adhesions did not form again after separation. During final laparoscopy and necropsy, a focal adhesion between the omentum and site of the initial laparoscope portal was observed in 5 of 8 foals.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The serosal abrasion model is useful for studying abdominal adhesions in foals. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was an effective technique to break down experimentally induced adhesions in the early maturation stage of formation in pony foals. Studies are required to investigate prevention of de novo adhesions at the laparoscope portal sites.

Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent lesions of the intraabdominal organs and vessels caused by trocars and Veress needles are rare but serious complications of laparoscopic surgery. Establishing the pneumoperitoneum is believed to be the most dangerous step.

METHODS

The Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) prospectively collected the data on 14,243 patients undergoing various standard laparoscopic procedures between 1995 and 1997. This database was investigated with special regard to intraabdominal complications caused by trocars and Veress needles.

RESULTS

There were 22 trocar and four needle injuries (incidence, 0.18%). Nineteen lesions involved visceral organs; the remaining seven were vessel injuries. The small bowel was the single most affected organ (six cases), followed by the large bowel and the liver (three cases each). All vascular lesions, except for one laceration of the right iliac artery, occurred as venous bleeding of either the greater omentum or the mesentery. Fourteen trocars were inserted under direct vision. Nineteen trocar injuries were recognized intraoperatively; diagnoses of two small bowel and one bladder injuries were made postoperatively. Needle injuries were all diagnosed intraoperatively. Only five injuries could be repaired laparoscopically; the remaining lesions were repaired openly. Four patients underwent an open reoperation, and another patient needed five reoperations. There was one death (4.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Trocar and needle injuries are rare complications of laparoscopy. However, if not recognized intraoperatively and repaired immediately, they induce increased morbidity and mortality. Both open and closed establishment of the pneumoperitoneum are related to a potential danger of perforating lesions, but inserting the first trocar under direct vision allows early recognition and immediate repair.

A nation's experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Bleeding complications during laparoscopic surgery are rare but probably underreported. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the clinical relevance of bleeding complications and major vascular injuries during standard laparoscopic procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) prospectively collected the data on 14,243 patients undergoing different standard laparoscopic procedures (1995 to 1997). These data were analyzed with special interest in intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications and major vascular injuries.

RESULTS

In all, 331 patients (2.3%) had intraoperative bleeding complications. Whereas 44 patients suffered from an external bleed of the abdominal wall, the bleeding was internal in the remaining 287. Thirty-three patients with internal bleeding required blood transfusion with a mean blood loss of 1,630 mL. Surgical hemostasis was necessary in 68% of external and 91% of internal bleeds. There were 250 patients (1.8%) with postoperative bleeding complications. External bleeding occurred in 143 patients, and 107 patients developed internal bleeding. External bleeding was mainly treated conservatively (92%), whereas 50% of internal bleeds required further surgical intervention. Major vascular injuries occurred in 12 patients (incidence 0.08%) with open treatment being necessary in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding complications are, in fact, common during laparoscopic surgery. Meticulous dissection technique, immediate recognition, and adequate surgical treatment are mandatory for their management.