The learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and changes in indications: one institutions's experience with 2,650 cholecystectomies

Comparative Analysis of Learning Curves in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review

Robotic surgery has undergone much development and increased use over the years; it has offered many benefits for the operating surgeon compared to the more restrictive nature of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) which is the current standard of care. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have attempted to draw a comparison between the two in terms of the cases required for the learning curve to be achieved. The systematic review was performed at Barts Cancer Institute. A search of Cochrane, PubMed and Embase was made on 15 March 2024. Screening and risk of bias were done by two reviewers. Screening was done via the eligibility criteria by two reviewers. Data collection was done using Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, USA) and information was double-checked by another reviewer and transferred into a tabulated format. Seventeen studies were included, with the learning curve reported in 14 studies. The cases required to achieve the learning curve for multiport robotic cholecystectomy (MRC) ranged from 16 to 134 and for single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC), it ranged from 10 to over 102 cases. Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) was from 7 to 200. The improvement in operating times was measured in very different ways and was reported in 10 of the 17 studies. The studies that were available had a high level of heterogeneity making it difficult for comparisons to be made between studies. Several studies included only one surgeon resulting in the sample size of surgeons being too small and vulnerable to bias. As robotic surgery is still relatively novel, higher-quality studies have to be made in order for more conclusive conclusions to be made on the benefits of the learning curve of MRC and SSRC.

Assessing trainee impact on operative time for common general surgical procedures in ACS-NSQIP

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of surgical trainee involvement on operative time for common surgical procedures. Laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open inguinal hernia repair comprise 17.7% of the total cases sampled in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. These cases are commonly performed by residents at varying levels of surgical training.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was performed using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2005 through 2008 selecting patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open inguinal hernia repair. The primary outcome was operative time and predictive variables were resident involvement and training level. Linear regression analysis was used to compare operative times between cases performed by an attending alone and those assisted by junior (postgraduate year 1-2) or senior (postgraduate year 3-5) trainees, adjusting for patient and operative factors.

RESULTS

A total of 115,535 surgical cases were included, with 65,364 (59%) performed with junior or senior surgical residents. Resident participation was associated with higher operative times with no significant differences between the junior and senior cohorts; this effect persisted after controlling for potential confounding factors. Operative time increased by 16.6 minutes (95% confidence interval, 16.2-17.0) for junior residents and also by 16.6 minutes (95% confidence interval, 16.2-16.9) for senior residents.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical trainees' participation in common surgical procedures is associated with an increase in total operative time, with no difference between trainee seniority levels. This finding may be significant in assessing the impact of residency training programs on hospital efficiency.

Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique

BACKGROUND

Interest in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has expanded, and the first experiences with patients using different techniques have been reported. However, no work has addressed the learning process or the limitations of the procedures. The relation between inexperience and complications became a major concern after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. This study investigates the learning process for a new technique using specially designed instruments in an ex vivo model before clinical application.

METHODS

Specially designed instruments and a single-port technique using the Tuebingen Trainer were used to evaluate instrument and surgeon performance (learning curve) in terms of time and errors. A total of 90 procedures performed by three surgeons were evaluated. Group and individual learning curves were plotted.

RESULTS

All the surgeons showed a reduction in both mean cholecystectomy time (subject A: 27.2 vs 16.6 min; subject B: 21.4 vs 19.22 min; subject C: 21 vs 19.7 min) and mean errors (subject A: 2.8 vs 1.6; subject B: 3.5 vs 2.6; subject C: 3.5 vs 2). A plateau was reached after approximately 15 procedures. Group learning curve analysis showed a significant reduction in time between the first group (mean, 24.97 +/- 5.8 min) and last group (mean, 19.30 +/- 3.09 min; F[1,28] = 11.83; p = 0.001) for 15 procedures, as well as reduced technical errors in the fifth group, from 3.7 +/- 1.65 to 1.6 +/- 1.04 (F[1,28] = 8.90; p < 0.01), demonstrating a learning effect. The number of optic and access port position changes were recorded, setting a standard for normal instrument performance.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the tasks of cholecystectomy can be learned safely in a reasonable number of simulations with the new instruments. Although this is a new technique, prior laparoscopic surgery experience is helpful. The technique offers an advantage over those using flexible endoscopes.

[Twelve years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

We studied developments in indication, operation time, conversion rate, morbidity, and mortality from the beginning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Between 1990 and 2002 we prospectively evaluated 4498 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (CE), of whom 79% were treated laparoscopically (lap). In 6.6%, the procedure had to be converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (con), and 14% were performed open from the beginning (open). During the above time period, the rate of open CE decreased steadily (49% in 1990 to 7.2% in 2002). The average operation time of lap CE remained constant with an average of 74 min (range 20-330). The conversion rate decreased in spite of broader indication for lap CE in even more complicated gallstone diseases, from an initial 9.4% to 2.5%. Among intraoperative complications in lap and con, bile duct lesions remained constant with 5/3856 (0.1%), bleeding which led to conversion decreased from 1.9% to 0.3%, and the rate of gall bladder perforation increased from 12% to 20.5%. Thirty-day morbidity was 2% in lap CE, 5% in con, and 11.5% in open. The mortality was 0% in lap, 0.7% in con, and 1% in open.

CONCLUSION

Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy the indication for this minimal-invasive operation steadily increased, the conversion-rate decreased and the complication-rate could be held low. Even with fast laparoscopic experience 7% of all cholecystectomies are technically difficult and remain to be carried out primarily in an open technique. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the therapy of gallstone disease.

Does the Complication Rate Increase in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has replaced open cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Despite the well-accepted success of LC in chronic cholecystitis, the efficacy of this technique has been subject to some debate in acute cholecystitis (AC). This study was designed to evaluate our institution's experience with LC for AC and chronic symptomatic calculous cholecystitis (CC), based on complication and conversion rates to open surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 1158 patients with LC from September 1991 to December 2001 were analyzed. The parameters of age, gender, early and late complication rates, and conversion rates from LC to open cholecystectomy were compared in patients with AC and CC.

RESULTS

During the study period, LC was performed in 1158 patients. Of these, 162 patients had AC (group 1) and 996 patients had CC (group 2). The conversion rates were 4.3% (7/162) in group 1 and 2.4% (24/996) in group 2. The complication rates were not significantly different (5.6% in group 1, 5.1% in group 2, P > 0.05). Difficulty in dissection around Calot's triangle and obscure anatomy were the main reasons for conversion to conventional open surgery. The mortality rate was 1.2% in group 1 and 0.01% in group 2.

CONCLUSION

LC appears to be a reliable, safe, and effective treatment modality for AC and CC. The surgical approach should be performed carefully because of the spectrum of potential hazards of the laparoscopic procedure. Conversion and complication rates are similar in both AC and CC groups, and improve as surgeons gain experience.

Robotics and general surgery

Robotics are now being used in all surgical fields, including general surgery. By increasing intra-abdominal articulations while operating through small incisions, robotics are increasingly being used for a large number of visceral and solid organ operations, including those for the gallbladder, esophagus, stomach, intestines, colon, and rectum, as well as for the endocrine organs. Robotics and general surgery are blending for the first time in history and as a specialty field should continue to grow for many years to come. We continuously demand solutions to questions and limitations that are experienced in our daily work. Laparoscopy is laden with limitations such as fixed axis points at the trocar insertion sites, two-dimensional video monitors, limited dexterity at the instrument tips, lack of haptic sensation, and in some cases poor ergonomics. The creation of a surgical robot system with 3D visual capacity seems to deal with most of these limitations. Although some in the surgical community continue to test the feasibility of these surgical robots and to question the necessity of such an expensive venture, others are already postulating how to improve the next generation of telemanipulators, and in so doing are looking beyond today's horizon to find simpler solutions. As the robotic era enters the world of the general surgeon, more and more complex procedures will be able to be approached through small incisions. As technology catches up with our imaginations, robotic instruments (as opposed to robots) and 3D monitoring will become routine and continue to improve patient care by providing surgeons with the most precise, least traumatic ways of treating surgical disease.

Factors associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP) is becoming a common approach for treatment of morbid obesity. We analyzed preoperative factors that may be associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic GBP.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective study evaluates 150 consecutive laparoscopic GBP procedures performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative factors were grouped into three categories: 1) patient-specific (gender, age, abdominal surgical history, smoking), 2) obesity-specific (body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, sleep apnea), and 3) procedure-specific (operative experience of the surgeon [75 cases or less versus more than 75 cases]). Length of operation (240 minutes or less versus more than 240 minutes), postoperative complications (yes versus no), major complications (yes versus no), reoperation (yes versus no), and length of hospital stay (4 days or less versus more than 4 days) were the operative outcomes considered. In this series all patients who had a major complication required a reoperation. Data were analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Operative experience of surgeon (75 cases or less) was associated with lengthy operative time (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 8.3), major complications (AOR, 15.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 143.0), and a lengthy (more than 4 days) hospital stay (AOR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 18.0). Higher patient age (50 years or more) was associated with more postoperative complications (AOR, 11.4; 95% CI, 3.0 to 43.1) and major complications (AOR, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 48.7). Male gender also was associated with more postoperative complications (AOR 5.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 23.1). Obesity-related comorbidities, body mass index, past abdominal surgical history, and smoking had no statistical association with operative outcomes in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an association of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic GBP with the age and gender of the patient and the operative experience of the surgeon. An operative experience of more than 75 laparoscopic GBP cases was associated with decreases in operative time, length of hospital stay, and number of major complications.

When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify the learning curve in laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of the evidence using a defined search strategy (PubMed, Medline, OVID, Embase, ERIC, Cochrane databases) was performed. Studies without statistical evaluation of the learning curve and opinion articles were excluded. The authors analysed 7 common laparoscopic procedures: cholecystectomy, fundoplication, colectomy, herniorrhaphy, splenectomy, appendicectomy, and pyloromyotomy. The "initial" and "late" stages of experience were compared with regards to the following outcome measures: operating time, conversion rate, complication rate, and length of stay in hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 3,641 articles were reviewed, of which, 37 (25,777 patients) fulfilled the entry criteria (5 in children). In all articles, the definition of proficiency was subjective, and the number of operations required to reach it was highly variable. There were improvements in all 4 outcome measures for cholecystectomy, fundoplication, colectomy, herniorrhaphy, and splenectomy between the "initial" and "late" experience. No data were available for the learning curves in appendicectomy or pyloromyotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of procedures required to reach proficiency in laparoscopic surgery has not been defined clearly. These findings are important for training, ethical and medico-legal issues.

Conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution from 1993 and current state

The definition of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that make LC difficult to perform and determine ways to avoid conversion, based on our series. All patients who underwent LC or open cholecystectomy (OC) between January 1993 and December 2001 in our division of general surgery were the subject matter of this study. Preliminary decisions regarding LC or OC were avoided. Our experience (1993-2001) was based on 1360 consecutive elective LC procedures in 381 male and 979 female patients. The mean age of the patients at operation was 53 years (range, 17-84). The median operating time was 55 minutes (range, 35-180). The overall conversion rate was 1.8%. Indications for conversion included surgical difficulty during the laparoscopic procedure and anesthesia issues. The conversion rate has decreased to less than 1% in recent years. There were no mortalities, and the postoperative complication rates were low. The mean hospital stay of the patients was 2.6 days. In conclusion, based on our experience, we suggest limiting OC to patients with proven contraindications to LC (i.e., Mirizzi syndrome or systemic illness incompatible with pneumoperitoneum), attempting LC in all other cases, and considering cholecystostomy and delayed LC as an alternative to conversion during difficult LC.

Lateral approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the previously operated abdomen

BACKGROUND

In the past, prior abdominal surgery was often felt to be a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The presence of adhesions precludes using a simple paraumbilical open approach for insufflation and initial trocar insertion because of an increased risk of bowel perforation and the difficulty in obtaining adequate exposure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report 32 consecutive patients with previous upper midline incisions who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholangiography and describe the technique and lateral positioning to facilitate this approach.

RESULTS

In our series, there were no complications. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days, and the conversion rate to an open procedure was 3%: one patient who had had 22 previous abdominal operations.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with the patient in the lateral position is safe and effective for patients who have had previous midline incisions.