Vaginohysteroscopy, a patient-friendly technique for outpatient hysteroscopy: experience of the first 100 cases

A novel technique of vagino-hysteroscopy using alginate gel interface: A proof of concept study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the feasibility of vagino-hysteroscopy using alginate gel Interface (VAGI) with conventional vaginoscopic hysteroscopy (CVH).

METHODS

Thirty women undergoing diagnostic vagino-hysteroscopy were randomly allocated into Group I (VAGI): Alginate occluder was used at introitus to facilitate hydrodistension during hysteroscopy; or Group II: Underwent no-touch hysteroscopy. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as successful visualization of uterine cavity. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hydrostatic pressures for optimum visualization, pain experienced by patient on visual analog scale, maneuverability and surgeon satisfaction. Data analysis was performed using χ² and Fisher exact tests for qualitative variables and Student t test for quantitative variables.

RESULTS

VAGI was significantly better than CVH (80% vs. 33.3%; relative risk 8, P = 0.025). With VAGI, optimum visualization was achieved at significantly lower pressures at all levels (vagina, P = 0.034; cervix, P = 0.01; uterus, P < 0.001), in less time (P = 0.007), and using less irrigation fluid (P < 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher for VAGI (P = 0.009). Subgroup analysis showed higher likelihood of success of VAGI in women who were premenopausal (P = 0.015), younger than 45 years (P = 0.024), and had a history of vaginal birth (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

VAGI is quicker to perform and provides optimum visualization at much lower pressures than CVH. Use of alginate is patient friendly and yields higher surgeon satisfaction rate.

Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases

Laparoscopy has rapidly emerged as the preferred surgical approach in a number of different diseases because it ensures correct diagnoses and appropriate treatment. The use of mini-instruments (5 mm or less in diameter) and, when possible, the reduction of the number of trocars used might be its natural evolution. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a gold standard technique. The aim of the present work is to illustrate the results of the prospective experience of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (5 mm MLC) performed at our institution. Between August 2005 and July 2010 a total of 932 patients (mean age 45 years) underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Amongst them, 887 (95.1%) were operated on with a 5 mm-three trocar approach and in the remaining 45 cases (4.8%) a 3 mm trocar was used. The primary endpoint was the feasibility rate of the techniques. Secondary endpoints were safety and the impact of the techniques on duration of laparoscopy. In two cases conversion to laparotomy was necessary. We needed to add a fourth-5 mm trocar in the 10.7% of the cases (95 patients) in the 5 mm MLC. There were two cases of redo-laparoscopy in this group due to bile leakage from the cystic duct in one case, and to bleeding from the gallbladder bed in the other. Minor occurrence ranged as high as 2.1% in the 5 mm-MLC group, while it was nil in the 3 mm-MLC patients. The present experience shows that the 5 mm-three trocars MLC is a safe, easy, effective and reproducible approach to gallbladder diseases. Such features make the technique a challenging alternative to conventional laparoscopy both in the acute and the scheduled setting. We consider the 3 mm-MLC approach suitable only in selected cases, young and thin patients, due to the fragility of the smaller instruments.

Minilaparoscopic colorectal resection: a preliminary experience and an outcomes comparison with classical laparoscopic colon procedures

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has rapidly emerged as the preferred surgical approach for a number of different diseases because it allows for a correct diagnosis and proper treatment. However, it is not being applied in a widespread manner for the management of benign or malignant colorectal disease. Its natural evolution seems to be the development of mini-instruments and optics (diameter, </=5 mm). This study aimed to illustrate retrospectively the results of an initial minilaparoscopic colorectal surgery experience at two different institutions.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2006, a total of 517 patients underwent a laparoscopic colon procedure. Among them, 161 (31.1%) underwent surgery with mini-instruments. The primary end point was the feasibility rate for minilaparoscopic colon resection. The secondary end points were safety and the impact of the technique on the duration of laparoscopy.

RESULTS

No conversion to classical laparoscopy and eight cases converted to the open approach were registered. The rate for major complications was 3.1%, whereas the rate for minor complications ranged as high as 11.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if limited by its retrospective design, the reported experience shows that minilaparoscopic surgery may be a safe and effective approach to colon pathology. The described features make minilaparoscopy a challenging alternative to laparoscopy for colon disease. If proven to be cost effective without undue risk, as long as adequate training is obtained and proper preparation is observed, minilaparoscopy may become a standard surgical approach for selected patients.

The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? : A single-center review of a 15-year experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has been practiced more and more in the management of abdominal emergencies. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control 5-year experience of laparoscopic versus open surgery for abdominal emergencies carried out at our institution, especially with regard to whether our attitude toward use of this procedure has changed as compared with the beginning of our laparoscopic emergency experience (1991-2002).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2007 a total of 670 patients underwent emergent and/or urgent laparoscopy (small bowel obstruction, 17; gastroduodenal ulcer disease, 16; biliary disease, 118; pelvic disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP), 512; colonic perforations, 7) at the hands of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy

RESULTS

The conversion rate was 0.15%. Major complications ranged as high as 1.9% with no postoperative mortality. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 98.3% of the cases, and all such patients were treated successfully by laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that laparoscopy is not an alternative to physical examination/good clinical judgment or to conventional noninvasive diagnostic methods in treating the patient with symptoms of an acute abdomen. However it must be considered an effective option in treating patients in whom these methods fail and as a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal emergencies.