Lymphography Prior to Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocelectomy to Prevent Postoperative Hydrocele

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic ICG-fluorescence lymphatic-sparing palomo varicocelectomy: a comparative retrospective study of techniques and outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare techniques and outcomes of robotic-assisted varicocelectomy (RAV) and laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV).

METHODS

The medical records of 40 patients, who received RAV and LV over a 2-year period, were retrospectively analyzed. Palomo lymphatic-sparing varicocelectomy using ICG fluorescence was adopted in all cases. Three 5-mm trocars were placed in LV, whereas four ports, three 8-mm and one 5-mm, were placed in RAV. The spermatic vessels were ligated using clips in LV and ligatures in RAV. The two groups were compared regarding patient baseline and operative outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients, with median age of 14 years (range 11-17), had left grade 3 varicocele according to Dubin-Amelar. All were symptomatic and 33/40 (82.5%) presented left testicular hypotrophy. All procedures were completed without conversion. The average operative time was significantly shorter in LV [20 min (range 11-30)] than in RAV [34.5 min (range 30-46)] (p = 0.001). No significant differences regarding analgesic requirement and hospitalization were observed (p = 0.55). At long-term follow-up (30 months), no complications occurred in both groups. The cosmetic outcome was significantly better in LV than RAV at 6-month and 12-month evaluations (p = 0.001). The total cost was significantly lower in LV (1.587,07 €) compared to RAV (5.650,31 €) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RAV can be safely and effectively performed in pediatric patients, with the same excellent outcomes as conventional laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopy has the advantages of faster surgery, smaller instruments, better cosmesis and lower cost than robotics. To date, laparoscopy remains preferable to robotics to treat pediatric varicocele.

Indigo carmine dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy in children

The ideal method for varicocelectomy in children remains controversial. We present our experience with dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) in children, which overcomes the limitations of previously described techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five consecutive LSLVs were performed over a period of three years on children with a mean age of twelve years. The varicocele grade was three in one case and grade 2 in four cases, respectively. A left subdartos injection of 2 ml of Indigo carmine dye was done using a 25-gauge needle at ten minutes before an operation. A scrotal injection of lymphatic dye was utilized to spare at least one lymphatic and the remaining spermatic vessels were divided.

RESULTS

Lymphatic-sparing was accomplished in all cases. No peri-operative complication was noted. We spared one lymphatic channel in one patient (20%) and two channels in four patients (80%). There were no cases of hydrocele or residual varicocele.

CONCLUSION

Dye-assisted LSLV is easily accomplished with an excellent surgical outcome and sparing one or two lymphatics appears to be sufficient to avoid secondary hydrocele.

Comparative mid-term results between inguinal herniotomy and single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for pediatric inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Some recent papers have advocated single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and obtained satisfactory results. The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term outcomes of conventional inguinal herniotomy and single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

Between April 2007 and March 2009, 202 records of infants and children with inguinal hernia treated were retrospectively reviewed. Of them, 86 patients were treated by conventional inguinal herniotomy (IH group), and 116 patients by single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with preperitoneal hydrodissection, a totally extraperitoneal enclosing suture and extracorporeal knot tying (LH group). Follow-up data were collected using a telephone questionnaire and last outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 35.7±7.2 months. Both procedures could achieve compete repair without recurrence. Operation time of unilateral repair was significantly longer in the LH group than in the IH group (40.1 vs. 20.0 min; P<0.001); however, operation time of bilateral repairs was comparable in both groups (46.0 vs. 37.5 min; P=0.291). Metachronous hernia developed in 6 of 80 patients (7.5%) initially presenting with unilateral hernia in the IH group and in no patient in the LH group (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Accompanied by the method of preperitoneal hydrodissection and a totally extraperitoneal enclosing suture, single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy would be an effective procedure as conventional inguinal herniotomy. Single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy was associated with long operation time and a reduction in contralateral hernia development. However, every 4 patent processus vaginalis would require intervention to prevent 1 metachronous hernia.

Dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children

INTRODUCTION

The ideal method for varicocelectomy in children remains controversial. We present our experience with dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) in children, which overcomes the limitations of previously described techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive LSLVs were performed on children with a mean age of 15 years over a 4-year period. Varicocele grade was 3 in 21 cases and grade 2 in 4. Indications for intervention were hypotrophy in 12, pain in 11 cases and family preference in 2. A scrotal injection of lymphatic dye was utilized to spare at least one lymphatic and the remaining spermatic vessels were divided.

RESULTS

Lymphatic sparing was accomplished in all cases. Operative time varied from 30 to 140 min (mean 85 ± 26). No perioperative complications were noted. On average follow-up of 13 months a residual varicocele was noted in 2 cases, with no hydrocele and resolution of pain. Mean testicular volume difference diminished from 33% pre to 18% postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This multi-surgeon experience demonstrates that dye-assisted LSLV is easily accomplished with promising results. It appears that preservation of a single spermatic lymphatic vessel is sufficient, although in some cases a second dye injection is required to visualize the lymphatics.

Blue patent lymphography prevents hydrocele after laparoscopic varicocelectomy: 10 years of experience

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy according to the Palomo technique is the most common procedure adopted in children with testicular varicocele. This procedure involves the ligation of the internal spermatic cord and is associated with a 3%-5% incidence of recurrence and up to 30% incidence of hydroceles. We sought to determine the impact of lymphatic preservation on hydrocele formation and the success of varicocelectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 396 patients with a mean age of 13.2 years who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent a lymphatic-sparing (LS) procedure using isosulfan blue scrotal intra-dartoic injection and those who underwent a non-LS (NLS) technique. The incidences of recurrence/persistence and postoperative hydrocele formation requiring surgery or aspiration were analyzed statistically using the chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Of 396 patients, 244 received a laparoscopic LS procedure, and 152 received an NLS operation. The LS patients in whom the lymphatic vessels were not identified (26/244 [10.6%]) were considered NLS repairs. The follow-up was at least 12 months. LS surgery (218 patients) was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative hydrocele (0/218 [0%] versus 18/178 [10.1%]; chi-squared test=25.84, difference statistically significant). There was no significant difference in incidence of persistent or recurrent varicocele requiring reoperation following the initial procedure (5/218 [2.2%] versus 5/178 [2.8%]; chi-squared test=0.41, difference statistically not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic LS varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue is preferable to laparoscopic Palomo repair that does not preserve the lymphatics. It has a significantly lower incidence of postoperative hydroceles and still maintains a low incidence of persistence/recurrence.

Comparing three different surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele

INTRODUCTION

Varicocele is a common disease in adult men that can be treated with one of several surgical methods. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages, and conflicting results have been obtained by different studies. To evaluate the most effective surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele, including minimally invasive procedures, we compared the outcomes of three common surgical approaches in this prospective randomized study.

METHODS

The study included 153 patients with bilateral varicoceles who underwent varicocelectomy. These patients were randomly divided into three equal groups according to surgical approach used - open inguinal, retroperitoneal or laparoscopic. The assessment included operative time, length of hospital stay, clinical outcome and, in cases of infertility, semen analysis. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 8 to 15 months).

RESULTS

The operative time and hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than in the other groups (P < 0.01). Of the 51 cases in each group, there were seven cases (13.73%) of recurrence in the open inguinal group, six cases (11.76%) in the retroperitoneal group, and one case (1.96%) in the laparoscopic group. This lower rate of recurrence was statistically significant in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). Among the three groups, comparisons between preoperative and postoperative semen parameters showed visible improvements in sperm concentration and motility (P < 0.01), but there were no significant differences between the three groups for postoperative changes in semen parameters (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open inguinal and retroperitoneal varicocelectomy, laparoscopic varicolerectomy offers the best outcome.

Management options of varicoceles

Varicocele is one of the most common causes of male infertility. Treatment options for varicoceles includes open varicocelectomy performed at various anatomical levels. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy has been established to be a safe and effective treatment for varicoceles. Robotic surgery has been introduced recently as an alternative surgical option for varicocelectomy. Microsurgical varicocelectomy has gained increasing popularity among experts in male reproductive medicine as the treatment of choice for varicocele because of its superior surgical outcomes. There is a growing volume of literature in the recent years on minimal invasive varicocele treatment with percutaneous retrograde and anterograde venous embolization/sclerotherapy. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and limitations associated with each treatment modality for varicoceles. Employment of these advanced techniques of varicocelectomy can provide a safe and effective approach aiming to eliminate varicocele, preserve testicular function and, in a substantial number of men, increase semen quality and the likelihood of pregnancy.

Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during varicocele surgery: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Hydrocele and testicular edema caused by division of lymphatic vessels during varicocelectomy could lead to decrease in testicular function. In-vivo methylene blue mapping of testicular lymphatic vessels should prevent damage to the lymphatic system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared outcomes for 46 patients who received an intraparenchymal injection of 0.25 ml of vital dye (isosulphan blue) before a laparoscopic or an inguinal/subinguinal spermatic vein ligation with 93 controls in whom no mapping technique was adopted.

RESULTS

Methylene blue mapping of testicular lymphatics reduced the incidence of postvaricocelectomy hydrocele from 6.4% (6/93) to 2.1% (1/46); the incidence of hydrocele was 0% in all cases of successful lymphatic mapping.

CONCLUSION

Mapping of testicular lymphatic drainage with intraparenchymal vital dye is an easy, safe, rapid and cost-free technique. We stress the importance of sparing the lymphatic system to ensure the best andrological outcome.

Lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there a difference?

OBJECTIVES

The ideal operation for the adolescent varicoceles has been debated for many years as new techniques or advances in existing technology develop. It is well acknowledged that the Palomo procedure has a negligible recurrence rate but a very high postoperative hydrocele rate compared with a microscopic varicocelectomy (MV). We sought to determine whether lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) could provide similar negligible recurrence rates as the Palomo approach with the negligible postoperative hydrocele rate seen with MV.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent either an MV (n = 31) or LSLV (n = 28). In the MV group, the artery and the lymphatics were spared, whereas in the LSLV group, the artery and veins were taken en masse. Statistical analysis included paired Student t-test and Chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Preoperative testis volumes were not different nor were the postoperative testis volumes between groups. Mean operating time was significantly longer in the MV than the LSLV group (140 minutes versus 51 minutes, P <0.01). With a mean time since surgery of 2 years, we observed only one patient with a recurrent varicocele (MV group); only one patient developed a hydrocele requiring hydrocelectomy (LSLV group).

CONCLUSIONS

Our early data indicate that LSLV and MV are comparable in preventing varicocele recurrence and formation of hydroceles. The primary difference between the procedures is the surgical time, with the LSLV being much faster to perform.

Safety and efficacy of intratesticular injection of vital dyes for lymphatic preservation during varicocelectomy

PURPOSE

The most common complications of varicocelectomy include failure and hydrocele formation. Various surgical approaches have been used to minimize complications and guarantee durable results. The use of vital dyes to visualize and preserve testicular lymphatics intraoperatively has been proposed to reduce the incidence of hydrocele formation. We investigated the safety of intratesticular injection of various vital dyes and their efficacy in allowing visualization of lymphatics for varicocelectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using general anesthesia, 22 adolescent rats underwent bilateral transscrotal intratesticular injection of methylene blue, isosulfan blue, trypan blue or normal saline. All rats with intratesticular injection of a vital dye underwent immediate exploration of the spermatic cord to observe for visualization of lymphatic vessels. At 3 months all rats were euthanized, and orchiectomy was performed for histological examination.

RESULTS

Spermatic cord lymphatic vessels were variably visualized depending on concentration and volume of the vital dye used. Histological examination of the testicles at 3 months after injection revealed areas with necrosis of seminiferous tubules, thickened tubular basement membranes, interstitial fibrosis and hyalinization, and striking intratubular dystrophic calcification. These pathological changes were present to varying degrees in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although spermatic cord lymphatic channels were successfully visualized to varying degrees, intratesticular injection of vital dyes (and even normal saline) produced pathological changes in all groups, despite variation of concentration, volume and type of vital dye. Intratesticular injection of vital dyes for the visualization of lymphatics during varicocelectomy should be abandoned. Paratesticular injection of vital dyes should be used with caution.