Transperineal rectovesical fistula ligation in laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal pull-through for high anorectal malformations

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty-Surgical procedures and outcomes: A literature review

Anorectal malformation includes various types of anomalies. The goal of definitive surgery is achievement of fecal continence. Twenty years have passed since laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was reported by Georgeson. Since LAARP is gaining popularity, its long-term outcomes should be evaluated. Presently, there is no evidence regarding the optimal method of ligating and dividing the fistula correctly and creating the pull-through canal accurately. Rectal prolapse and remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) tend to develop more often in LAARP patients than in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) patients; however, robust evidence is not available. Prolapse may be prevented by suture fixation of the rectum to the presacral fascia; however, if prolapse occurs, the indication, timing, and the best method for surgical correction remain unclear. Most patients with ROOF are asymptomatic, and there is controversy regarding the indications for ROOF resection. This article aimed to detail the various modifications of the LAARP procedures reported previously and to describe the surgical outcomes, particularly focusing on rectal prolapse, ROOF, and fecal continence, by reviewing the literature. Functional outcomes after LAARP were almost similar to those noted after PSARP, and we have demonstrated that LAARP is not inferior to PSARP with respect to fecal continence. Although there is controversy regarding the application of LAARP for recto-bulbar cases, we believe that LAARP is still evolving, and we can achieve better outcomes by improving the procedure.

The position of the anal dimple in newborns and infants with anorectal malformations and its correlation with the normal anal position

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The anal position index (API) defines the normal anal position as the ratio of fourchette-anal distance to fourchette-coccyx distance for females and the scrotum-anal distance to scrotum-coccyx distance for males. In this study, measurement of the API in newborns and infants with anorectal malformations (ARM), using the center of the midline anal dimple (AD) to represent the center of the proposed neoanus, was performed to assess whether or not the AD was located in a significantly abnormal position as correlated with the normal anal position.

METHODS

The cases comprised 65 consecutive newborn and infants with ARM, divided into 2 age-based groups (Group A: 1st day to 1month; Group B: 1-12months), without sacral or significant perineal abnormalities. Controls included an equal number of age and gender matched patients admitted for other conditions. The characteristics of the AD ('well developed' or 'moderately developed') as well as those of the midline perineal raphé in males and the perineal groove in females were also recorded.

RESULTS

Combining both age groups, the mean API±SD was 0.41±0.012 in male cases and 0.53±0.07 in male controls (p value 0.003). The corresponding values for female cases and controls were 0.31±0.09 and 0.36±0.07 respectively (p = 0.040). In male newborns, the API in cases was significantly lower than the API in controls (p<0.001). Combining both males and female newborns, the differences between the API in cases and controls was also statistically significant (p<0.001). In older boys as well as in girls from both age groups, apart from cases of persistent cloaca, the API was lower in cases than in controls, especially in boys, although the difference was not statistically significant. On comparing the API in individual male ARM with that in male controls, cases of rectobulbar urethral fistula (RBUF) and rectovesical fistula had a statistically significant lower API (p<0.001). In the 4 cases of persistent cloaca, the mean API (0.40±0.1) was higher than the mean API in female controls and the AD was well developed with a well-delineated, narrow perineal groove. The majority (53/65; 81.53%) of patients had a 'well developed' AD. Twelve patients (18.47%) had a 'moderately developed' AD including 10 females and 2 males. There were 15 patients with a depressed AD (anal fossette); of these 12 (80%) were females. All boys had a well delineated perineal raphé in contrast to 10 girls (29.4% of total female ARM) who had a poorly delineated midline perineal groove.

CONCLUSIONS

During definitive surgery for ARM, if the AD is taken as the site of the proposed neoanus, the neoanal position is likely to be anterior to the normal anal position in both males and females and especially so in males. Overall, girls with ARM appear to be more likely to have a relatively poorly developed and/ or depressed AD and a poorly delineated perineal groove.

TYPE OF STUDY

Clinical Research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic approach in the management of anorectal malformations

Seventeen years have passed since the first description of the laparoscopic approach for anorectal malformation and approximately 68 articles have been published on the subject. In this review article, we aim to describe the advantages as well as the indications and contraindications of this approach when dealing with each specific type of anorectal malformation, according to what has been described in the literature and to our own experience. The ideal and undisputable indication for laparoscopy remains for cases in which the abdomen needs to be entered to repair the malformation. Only 10% of male patients with anorectal malformation are born with a recto-bladder neck fistula that requires an abdominal approach, this represents an ideal indication for laparoscopy. In females, only the complex cloacae with a common channel length greater than 3 cm are the ones that require a laparotomy; they represent about 30% of the cloacae. However, the repair of this type of cloacae also requires sophisticated and technically demanding maneuvers that have never been done laparoscopically. In cases of recto-urethral prostatic fistulas the malformation can be repaired either way: laparoscopically or posterior sagitally. In all other malformations: recto-perineal fistula, recto-urethral bulbar fistula, anorectal malformation without fistula, rectal atresia, recto-vestibular fistula; no justification for laparoscopy could be found; and in some cases, laparoscopy is contraindicated. In the published reports, there is no evidence supporting the idea that laparoscopic repair results in better functional results when compared with non-laparoscopic operation; there is a tendency to omit information relevant to bowel control such as the characteristics of the sacrum and the presence or absence of tethered cord; and most authors do not compare results between comparable malformations.

Multicenter retrospective comparative study of laparoscopically assisted and conventional anorectoplasty for male infants with rectoprostatic urethral fistula

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was expected to achieve better fecal continence than conventional procedures. However, the issue of which approach is better remains controversial. We compared outcomes between the conventional procedure and LAARP in male infants with rectoprostatic urethral fistula.

METHODS

Institutes belonging to the Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies (JSGA) were invited to participate. Subjects were male infants with rectoprostatic urethral fistula treated by the conventional approach (abdominoperineal pull-through and PSARP) or LAARP between 2000 and 2006. Medical charts and operative records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (conventional: 36, LAARP: 45) were enrolled from 15 centers. In both groups, the mean Kelly score was 5. The total score of the scoring system was newly developed by the Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. Follow-up Project (5-15 points) was 10.7 and 12.1 in the conventional group and the LAARP group, respectively (p=0.07). The incidence of failed rectoanal anastomosis, mucosal prolapse, and anal stenosis was comparable in both groups. Posterior urethral diverticula were detected on cystourethrograms in 7% and 11% (p=1.0) and on MRI in 0% and 34% (p=0.02) of the conventional and the LAARP groups, respectively. Overall, 94% of diverticula were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal continence and complication rates after LAARP were comparable to those observed after the conventional method. Posterior urethral diverticula were detected more frequently after LAARP.

Combined laparoscopic and modified posterior sagittal approach saving the external sphincter for rectourethral fistula: an easier and more physiologic approach

AIM

To present surgical technique and results of combined laparoscopic and modified posterior sagittal approach (PSAP) saving the external sphincter in the management of rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

The operation was started by a laparoscopic approach to dissect around the rectal pouch and separate the rectal pouch from the upper urethra. The PSAP saving the external sphincter was added to completely separate the rectal pouch from the urethra. The fistula was divided and closed. The rectal pouch was then pulled through a tunnel created at the center of the external sphincter and an anoplasty was performed.

RESULTS

From September 2011 to September 2012, 19 patients were operated on using the same technique. Mean age of patients was 4.0 ± 1.8 months. Rectourethral fistula was located in the prostatic urethra in 15 patients and in the bulbar urethra in 4 patients. The mean operative time was 82 ± 13 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative perforation of the posterior wall of the rectum happened in one patient and required a second laparoscopic operation. Follow-up after closure of colostomy from 1 month to 7 months revealed all patients were able to pass stool spontaneously. All patients could urinate easily. No urethral fistula or diverticulum was detected on voiding cysto-urethrography.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined laparoscopic and PSAP saving the external sphincter is the easier and more physiologic approach to manage rectourethral fistula with fewer complications.

Laparoscopy and its use in the repair of anorectal malformations

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy has been used for the treatment of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in an attempt to be less invasive and with the hope that it would result in a better functional outcome. There remains a significant debate about whether these expectations have been fulfilled.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with ARM for whom laparoscopy was used were retrospectively reviewed. Six were operated on primarily by the authors, and 11 cases were referred after a laparoscopic repair performed elsewhere. In addition, a literature review was performed looking for evidence of less invasiveness and improved functional results in patients operated on laparoscopically.

RESULTS

The diagnosis was imperforate anus with a rectobladder neck fistula in our 6 cases with the fistula ligated laparoscopically in each case. In 1 patient, the malformation was repaired entirely using laparoscopic technique. The other 5 patients had a laparoscopically assisted repair because we had to open the abdomen to taper a dilated rectum in 2, mobilize a very high rectum in 2, and take down a distal colostomy stoma in 1. Eleven patients were referred with a variety of problems after a laparoscopic repair done elsewhere for rectal stricture (5), rectal prolapse (4), recurrent rectourethral fistula (3), rectal mislocation (3), failed attempted repair leading to fecal incontinence (1), and a posterior urethral diverticulum (1). Our literature review included 47 references (involving 323 patients) published between 1998 and 2010. All studies showed that laparoscopic repair of ARMs is feasible. The review, however, did not provide evidence of less invasiveness or improved functional results.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy for ARM is a less invasive procedure when compared with those operations that would have previously required a laparotomy (rectobladder neck fistula). In cases of rectoprostatic fistulae, the laparoscopic approach is feasible and avoids a lengthy posterior sagittal incision. There is no evidence that the laparoscopic approach is a less invasive procedure for other types of ARMs. In cases of rectobulbar fistula, congenital anal stenosis, perineal fistula, ARM without fistula, the evidence suggests that it may be lead to more complications. There is no evidence in the literature demonstrating better functional results in cases of ARM operated on laparoscopically.