Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using only conventional instruments: an initial report

Cosmetic outcomes of infraumbilical, supraumbilical, and transumbilical entry routes in laparoscopic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine which of the umbilical entry routes for intraperitoneal access has a better cosmetic result.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). In total, 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were included. A vertical or transverse umbilical incision is appropriately made for the trocar to be inserted, and an infraumbilical, supraumbilical, or transumbilical route was preferred for initial intraperitoneal access. Demographic data of patients, body mass indices, entry point of the trocars (infraumbilical-transumbilical-supraumbilical), type of incision (vertical-transverse), duration of the operation, and scar properties at postoperative week 12 were prospectively collected and analyzed. The Vancouver scar scale was used to evaluate the cosmetic results.

RESULTS

Cosmetic results did not differ statistically between the transumbilical-infraumbilical-supraumbilical groups. The variables, such as vascularity, height, and total score, of the Vancouver scar scale were significantly higher in patients who had transverse incisions. There was no statistically significant effect of using a Veress needle with the cosmetic results. There was no statistically significant correlation between age, gravida, body mass indices, skin thickness, time of entry, duration of the operation, and cosmetic results in terms of vascularity, height, and total score.

CONCLUSION

During laparoscopic surgery, each patient should be assessed individually for the satisfaction of the patient and, thereby, of the surgeon in terms of cosmetic outcomes. Vertical incision offers superior cosmetic effects than transverse incision. Further research is required to define long-term scar-related outcomes of the laparoscopic intraperitoneal access techniques.

Single incision multiport versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A matched comparison

Background:

The popularity of single-incision procedures is on the rise as wound cosmesis is increasingly being seen as an important body image-related outcome. In this study, we assess the potential benefits of single-incision multiport laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (S-TEP) without using specialised ports or instruments and compare the same with the conventional laparoscopic TEP (C-TEP) surgery in terms of operative time, post-operative pain, complications, cost and cosmesis.

Materials and Methods:

This is a prospective case-matched study of the patients undergoing S-TEP versus C-TEP from June 2014 to December 2015.

Results:

Each group had 36 patients. The two groups were comparable in the clinical characteristics. The mean duration of surgery for a unilateral hernia in C-TEP and S-TEP was 45.13 ± 10.58 min and 72.63 ± 15.23 min, respectively. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain was significantly higher in S-TEP group at post-operative day (POD) 0 and 1. However, at POD 7, there was no significant difference between the groups. At 1^st and 6-week post-surgery, the cosmetic results were significantly better in S-TEP group as compared to C-TEP, however, at 6 months, the scar was highly acceptable in both treatment groups.

Conclusion:

S-TEP, using conventional laparoscopic instruments, is safe and feasible even in resource challenged setting. However, there is a need to review the indications and advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, as no difference in cosmetic outcome by VAS score in S-TEP versus conventional laparoscopic arm seen by the end of 1 month.

Single incision laparoscopic TAPP with standard laparoscopic instruments and suturing of flaps: A continuing study

BACKGROUND:

Single incision laparoscopic surgery, especially transumbilical, should be the closest to replicate the minimal access results achieved by natural orifice endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This study of single incision transabdominal preperitoneal (SITAPP) inguinal hernia repair is a continuing study exploring the peroperative variables and short and long term complications of this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

All the 183 patients were operated by the same surgeon through a horizontal transumbilical incision positioned across the lower third of the umbilicus. Port access was through three separate transfacial punctures. Routine rigid instruments were used and the peritoneal flaps were either tacked or sutured into place. Patients with irreducible hernia and obstructed hernia were included, while those with strangulated hernia were excluded.

RESULTS:

All the patients were male with an average age of 41.4 years. Twenty four patients had bilateral hernia, 15 patients had irreducible and 6 patients had obstructed hernia. The mean operating time was 38.3 mins for unilateral hernias completed with tackers and 42.8 mins in those with intracorporeal suturing. The corresponding operating time for bilateral hernias was 53.2 and 62.7 minutes. There was minimal serous discharge from the umbilicus in 8 patients, port site infection in 1 patient and recurrence in 2 patients over a 36 months period.

CONCLUSIONS:

SITAPP for groin hernias, performed with conventional instruments is feasible, easy to learn, has a very high patient acceptance and is cosmetically superior to conventional TAPP. The use of tackers reduces the operating time significantly.

Adnexal Masses Treated Using a Combination of the SILS Port and Noncurved Straight Laparoscopic Instruments: Turkish Experience and Review of the Literature

Objective. To report our experience treating adnexal masses using a combination of the SILS port and straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments. Study Design. This prospective feasibility study included 14 women with symptomatic and persistent adnexal masses. Removal of adnexal masses via single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a combination of the SILS port and straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments was performed. Results. All of the patients had symptomatic complex adnexal masses. Mean age of the patients was 38.4 years (range: 21–61 years) and mean duration of surgery was 71 min (range: 45–130 min). All surgeries were performed using nonroticulating straight laparoscopic instruments. Mean tumor diameter was 6 cm (range: 5–12 cm). All patient pathology reports were benign. None of the patients converted to laparotomy. All the patients were discharged on postoperative d1. Postoperatively, all the patients were satisfied with their incision and cosmetic results. Conclusion. All 14 patients were successfully treated using standard, straight nonroticulating laparoscopic instruments via the SILS port. This procedure can reduce the cost of treatment, which may eventually lead to more widespread use of the SILS port approach. Furthermore, concomitant surgical procedures are possible using this approach. However, properly designed comparative studies with single port and classic laparoscopic surgery are urgently needed.

A novel procedure for introducing a large gauze into the corporeal cavity by using a slim trocar (the Tornado gauze procedure)

INTRODUCTION

When a large gauze is needed during a single-incision surgery or reduced port surgery using slim (5-mm) trocars, the operation needs to be interrupted to introduce the gauze via an incision or to change to a large trocar. We describe here a novel procedure for introducing a large gauze into the corporeal cavity by using a slim trocar, called the "Tornado gauze procedure" (TGP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Commercially packed Trox(®) (Osaki Medical, Nagoya, Japan) gauze (30×150 mm, 4-ply) and a specially ordered precision stainless steel tube (Smart introducer; Kinugawa Factory, Kyoto, Japan) are used for the TGP. The gauze is screwed into the Smart introducer. When the surgeon needs a gauze, a Smart introducer with a gauze is set into the 5-mm trocar; then, the 5-mm grasper is used to push the gauze into the corporeal cavity with small screwing-in movements. The gauze is also gently removed from the corporeal cavity through a 5-mm trocar.

RESULTS

This procedure efficiently and safely introduced the gauze for hemostasis, blunt dissection, suction filtering, and organ retraction without interrupting the pneumoperitoneum to introduce the gauze in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs, and appendectomy, with good visualization and adequate working space. The rhythm of surgery remains undisturbed with the use of the TGP, even in a high-risk and high-stress situation. The port's valves were not disabled during surgery, and no procedure-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TGP is expected to be helpful to surgeons and enhance the safety of laparoscopic surgeries involving the use of slim trocars.