Technical Standardization of Laparoscopic Direct Hernia Repair in Pediatric Patients

Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) Approach for Anatomical Repair of Direct Inguinal Hernia in Children, Could it Be the New Standardized Approach?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of direct inguinal hernia in the pediatric population is relatively low and is usually discovered intraoperatively, rendering it unfamiliar to most pediatric surgeons. The traditional approach involves directly addressing the peritoneal defect, which includes dissecting the sac and repairing the peritoneum, reinforced with the umbilical ligament. In this paper, we present our experience with a novel approach to anatomical repair utilizing a non-mesh transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach.

METHODS

This a retrospective case series of direct inguinal hernia that were operated laparoscopically using the novel approach of repair from January 2018 to January 2024. Data were analyzed for demographics, presentation, type of defect, operative time, complications, and recurrence. The new approach utilizes the pre-peritoneal approach to delineate the exact facial defect then, primary anatomical repair is established using 2/0 non-absorbable braided sutures. Finally, closure of the peritoneum was performed using running 4/0 absorbable sutures. This is a retrospective case series of direct inguinal hernias that were operated on laparoscopically using the novel repair approach from January 2018 to January 2024. Data were analyzed for demographics, presentation, type of defect, operative time, complications, and recurrence. The new approach employs the pre-peritoneal approach to accurately delineate the fascial defect, followed by primary anatomical repair using 2/0 non-absorbable braided sutures. Finally, the peritoneum is closed using running 4/0 absorbable sutures.

RESULTS

Data from nine cases were included. Six cases were on right side, and three cases were on left side. Patients were predominantly boys (8 boys and 1 girl). The mean age at operation was 25.1 months (range:11 month to 5 years). Four patients had previous indirect inguinal hernia repair on the same side. The mean operative time was 34 ± 9 min. No intraoperative complications occurred. The median follow up period was 24 months with no recurrence was detected in any of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The non-mesh TAPP approach offers excellent exposure of the fascial structures, facilitating accurate identification and repair of the defect. Despite being technically demanding, it allows for the establishment of a robust anatomical repair. No recurrences occurred in the study group; however, a longer follow up and a larger sample are needed to provide more reliable evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele in pediatric patients in laparoscopic era

The surgical repair of inguinal hernia and hydrocele is one of the most common operations performed in pediatric surgery practice. This article reviews current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele based on the recent literature and the authors׳ experience. We describe the principles of clinical assessment and anesthetic management of children undergoing repair of inguinal hernia, underlining the differences between an inguinal approach and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Other points discussed include the current management of particular aspects of these pathologies such as bilateral hernias; contralateral patency of the peritoneal processus vaginalis; hernias in premature infants; direct, femoral, and other rare hernias; and the management of incarcerated or recurrent hernias. In addition, the authors discuss the role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of an inguinal hernia and hydrocele, emphasizing that the current use of MIS in pediatric patients has completely changed the management of pediatric inguinal hernias.

Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: a systematic review

AIM

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical conditions in infants and children. However, considerable debate exists regarding the role of laparoscopic hernia repair (herniorrhaphy) (LH) and its benefits over conventional open hernia repair (herniorrhaphy) (OH). The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature to determine the outcome of LH compared with OH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed on all studies published during the last 20 years, reporting on outcomes of OH and LH, in terms of operative time, recurrence rate and other complications, finding of rare hernias, and incidence of contralateral patency. The chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the results of the study.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies matched our inclusion criteria. As for operative time, in unilateral inguinal hernia repair, there was no significant difference between LH and OH (P=.33). In contrast, in bilateral disease, LH is faster than OH (P=.01). As for the recurrence rate, no significant difference was observed between the two techniques (P=.66), whereas the rate of other complications was significantly higher for OH compared with LH (P=.001). Laparoscopy has the advantage to identify and treat rare hernias (direct, femoral, "en pantalon") that are never reported in articles focused on inguinal OH. In laparoscopic series, in the case of unilateral hernia, the incidence of contralateral patency varied between 19.9% and 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, it seems that LH is faster than OH for bilateral hernias, whereas there is no significant difference in terms of operative time for unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Recurrence rate is similar for both techniques. As for other complications such as wound infections, it is higher for OH compared with LH, especially in infants. A prospective comparative study is necessary on this topic to strongly support the results of our systematic review.