Pediatric Robotic Pyeloplasties: Initial Experience at a Single Center

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty (RALP)

INTRODUCTION

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the English-language literature on surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children was performed without time filters using the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in July 2020 according to the PRISMA statement recommendations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 58 studies were selected for qualitative analysis, 46 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Nearly all studies included were observational and retrospective, either cohort or case-control. The quality of evidence was assessed using Modified Newcastle Ottawa Scoring, with the majority of studies scoring medium or high quality. The mean success rate was 95.4% (CI 91.0-99.3%), over a wide age range. There was a noticeable heterogeneity in reported follow up length and definitions of success rate. The majority of studies reported length of stay of ~1 day. The mean overall complication rate was 12%. For studies that reported complication rate by grade, the mean low Clavien grade (grade 2 or less) complication rate was 9.3% and the mean high Clavien grade (grade 3 or more) complication rate was 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assisted surgery is technically feasible and has been shown to achieve very favorable outcomes for pyeloplasty in children. The evidence however is mostly retrospective and from single sites, which introduces potential biases. Further research is needed to further elucidate RALP benefits compared to the open and laparoscopic approach. As a RCT may not be practical in this space, perhaps a prospective multi-institutional design with a uniform reporting system of pediatric RALP is the next step to define its benefits and limits.

Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons

Introduction: The widespread use of robotic surgery has provided surgeons a high-quality and alternative method to perform pyeloplasty. Indeed, robot-assisted technology has made it a lot easier to obtain the advanced technical skills required to perform this procedure. The learning curve (LC) reflects the increase in learning as a function of experience. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) represents a well-standardized and reproducible procedure with an LC that allows reliable results to readily be obtained. The aim of our study was to compare the RALP LC of senior versus junior surgeons. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all of the RALP procedures performed at three pediatric surgery centers between November 2007 and November 2018. Three senior surgeons and 4 junior surgeons performed the robotic procedures. Neither the senior nor the junior surgeons had previous experience with robotic surgery; they had experience with conventional laparoscopic procedures but not with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The primary metric that we selected to evaluate competence acquisition was a composite outcome defined by a combination of operative time (OT), complications, and surgical success. The complications were rated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification expressed by a complication factor; surgical success was expressed as a success factor, and we used a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to determine the LC. The CUSUM method, through its multioutcome approach, is a very effective way to evaluate LCs. Results: Between November 2007 and November 2018, 3 senior surgeons and 4 junior surgeons performed 88 RALP procedures. The included patients had a median age of 6.1 years (range 7 months-16 years). The median duration of follow-up was 6.4 years (range 14 months-12 years). The median OT was 198.86 minutes (range 106-335 minutes). By CUSUM analysis of the composite outcome, we found that despite the junior surgeons having performed fewer procedures than the senior surgeons, their LCs exhibited an earlier inflection point (Fig. 1) followed by a constant rate of improvement in proficiency, thus indicating a more rapid learning process. The median composite scores for the senior surgeons and the junior surgeons were 299 (range 210-370) and 193 (range 131-255), respectively, after seven procedures. Conclusion: Assuming proper exposure to robotics and an adequate case volume, we demonstrated that junior surgeons can readily achieve comparable levels of expertise compared with senior practitioners in the field of pediatric RALP. It can be assumed that the LC in robotic pyeloplasty is not only directly influenced by the individual surgical experience but also by the experience of the surgical team.