Hemodynamic Effects of Thoracoscopic Surgery in Neonates with Cardiac Anomalies

Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review

Worldwide, 150 children are born each day with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a diaphragmatic defect with concomitant abnormal lung development. Patients with CDH with large defects are particularly challenging to treat, have the highest mortality, and are at significant risk of long-term complications. Advances in prenatal and neonatal treatments have improved survival in high-risk patients with CDH, but surgical treatment of large defects lacks standardization. Open repair by an abdominal approach has long been considered the traditional procedure, but the type of defect repair (patch or muscle flap) and patch material (non-absorbable, synthetic or absorbable, biological) remain subjects of debate. Increased experience and improved techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have expanded selection criteria for thoracoscopic defect repair in cardiopulmonary stable patients with small defects. However, the application of MIS to repair large defects remains controversial due to increased recurrence rates and unknown long-term effects of perioperative hypercapnia and acidosis resulting from capnothorax and reduced ventilation. Current recommendations on the surgical management rely on cohort studies of varying patient numbers and data on the long-term outcomes are sparse. Here, we discuss surgical approaches for diaphragmatic defect repair highlighting advancements, and knowledge gaps in surgical techniques (open surgery and MIS), patch materials and muscle flaps for large defects, as well as procedural adjuncts and management of CDH variants.

Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) require emergency surgery in the neonatal period to prevent aspiration and respiratory compromise. Surgery was once exclusively performed via thoracotomy; however, there has been a push to correct this anomaly thoracoscopically. In this study, we compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of both techniques. A systematic review and meta-analyses was performed. A search strategy was developed in consultation with a librarian which was executed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception until January 2017. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. 48 articles were included. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in our primary outcome of total complication rate (OR 0.98, [0.29, 3.24], p = 0.97). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.55, [0.72, 3.34], p = 0.26), formation of esophageal strictures following anastomoses that required one or more dilations (OR 1.92, [0.93, 3.98], p = 0.08), need for fundoplication following EA repair (OR 1.22, [0.39, 3.75], p = 0.73)-with the exception of operative time (MD 30.68, [4.35, 57.01], p = 0.02). Considering results from thoracoscopy alone, overall mortality in patients was low at 3.2% and in most cases was due to an associated anomaly rather than EA repair. Repair of EA/TEF is safe, with no statistically significant differences in morbidity when compared with an open approach.Level of evidence 3a systematic review of case-control studies.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10-20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.

Experiences and challenges of thorcoscopic lung surgery in the pediatric age group

BACKGROUND

We report a single-center study of minimally invasive thoracoscopic lung surgery with pediatric patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung surgery between 2004 and 2013. The procedures were divided into anatomic and non-anatomical lung resections.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with a mean age of 6.5 years (range: 7 days-17 years) and a mean weight of 11 kg (range: 2.6-56.0 kg) received thoracoscopic lung surgery for tumor metastases (n = 20), sequestration/congenital adenomatoid malformation (19), cysts (12), aspergillomas (7), bullae (5), middle lobe syndrome (3), bronchiectasis (3), emphysema (2), and other reasons (5). Twenty-nine anatomical lung resections (Group I: lobectomies, segmentectomies) and 47 non-anatomical lung resections (Group II: wedge resections, lung tissue-sparing surgery) were performed. In 6 cases, preoperative CT-guided coiling was used to localize the lung lesions. Specimen removal was achieved using a widened (2 cm) trocar site. The operating times of Group I patients were longer compared than those of Group II patients (means: 154 and 68 min, respectively); conversion rates (8 versus 2), chest tube insertion rates (100% versus 51%), and postoperative ventilation (48% versus 13%) also differed.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic anatomical lung resections appear to be safe and effective in infants and children. In congenital lung diseases, the key to success is the intraoperative destruction of space-occupying lesions. Limitations exist in cases with infectious adhesions. Non-anatomical lung resections are technically easier and should remain standard in pediatric surgery. Limitations exist in cases of metastases, which are deep within the parenchyma and are not visible on the lung surface.

Advances in the surgical approach to congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is a birth defect that affects about one in 2500 live births. Although the overall survival has improved over the last several decades thanks to advancements in postnatal resuscitation and intensive care treatment, morbidity and mortality remain high. The surgical management of these infants is far from being standardized, and many aspects are still disputed among experts. The timing of surgical repair remains controversial and the indications for the ideal time for surgery have not been validated. The main novelty in the surgical treatment is related to the use of minimally invasive techniques, although these have been associated with intraoperative blood gas disturbances and higher recurrence rates. Herein, we report and comment on the main controversies of postnatal CDH repair in this rapidly evolving field.