1
|
Morarasu S, Clancy C, Gorgun E, Yilmaz S, Ivanecz A, Kawakatsu S, Musina AM, Velenciuc N, Roata CE, Dimofte GM, Lunca S. Laparoscopic versus open resection of primary colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:90. [PMID: 37017766 PMCID: PMC10076361 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combined resection of primary colorectal cancer and associated liver metastases is increasingly common. This study compares peri-operative and oncological outcomes according to surgical approach. METHODS The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search was performed for all comparative studies describing outcomes in patients that underwent laparoscopic versus open simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumours and liver metastases. Data was extracted and analysed using a random effects model via Rev Man 5.3 RESULTS: Twenty studies were included with a total of 2168 patients. A laparoscopic approach was performed in 620 patients and an open approach in 872. There was no difference in the groups for BMI (mean difference: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.63-0.70, p = 0.91), number of difficult liver segments (mean difference: 0.64, 95% CI:0.33-1.23, p = 0.18) or major liver resections (mean difference: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.69-1.35, p = 0.83). There were fewer liver lesions per operation in the laparoscopic group (mean difference 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13-0.79, p = 0.007). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter length of stay (p < 0.00001) and less overall postoperative complications (p = 0.0002). There were similar R0 resection rates (p = 0.15) but less disease recurrence in the laparoscopic group (mean difference: 0.57, 95% CI:0.44-0.75, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Synchronous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancers and liver metastases is a feasible approach in selected patients and does not demonstrate inferior peri-operative or oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Morarasu
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | - Cillian Clancy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Main Campus, Cleveland, USA
| | - Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Main Campus, Cleveland, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Shoji Kawakatsu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ana Maria Musina
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | - Natalia Velenciuc
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | - Cristian Ene Roata
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | - Gabriel Mihail Dimofte
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| | - Sorinel Lunca
- 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania
- Grigore T, Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vreeland TJ, Collings AT, Ozair A, Adams AM, Dirks R, Kushner BS, Sucandy I, Morrell D, Whiteside J, Ansari MT, Cloyd J, Cleary SP, Ceppa E, Abou-Setta AM, Alseidi A, Awad Z, Ayloo S, Buell J, Orthopoulos G, Richardson W, Sbayi S, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Slater BJ, Pryor AD, Jeyarajah DR. SAGES/AHPBA guidelines for the use of minimally invasive surgery for the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2508-2516. [PMID: 36810687 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09895-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) occur in roughly half of patients with colorectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become an increasingly acceptable and utilized technique for resection in these patients, but there is a lack of specific guidelines on the use of MIS hepatectomy in this setting. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding the decision between MIS and open techniques for the resection of CRLM. METHODS Systematic review was conducted for two key questions (KQ) regarding the use of MIS versus open surgery for the resection of isolated liver metastases from colon and rectal cancer. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Additionally, the panel developed recommendations for future research. RESULTS The panel addressed two KQs, which pertained to staged or simultaneous resection of resectable colon or rectal metastases. The panel made conditional recommendations for the use of MIS hepatectomy for both staged and simultaneous resection when deemed safe, feasible, and oncologically effective by the surgeon based on the individual patient characteristics. These recommendations were based on low and very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS These evidence-based recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of CRLM and highlight the importance of individual considerations of each case. Pursuing the identified research needs may help further refine the evidence and improve future versions of guidelines for the use of MIS techniques in the treatment of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amelia T Collings
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Faculty of Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Alexandra M Adams
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - David Morrell
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jake Whiteside
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eugene Ceppa
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ziad Awad
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Joseph Buell
- Division of Surgery, Mission Healthcare System, HCA Healthcare, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Georgios Orthopoulos
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Worcester, USA
| | | | - Samer Sbayi
- Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo City, Japan
| | - Horacio Asbun
- Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bethany J Slater
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ozair A, Collings A, Adams AM, Dirks R, Kushner BS, Sucandy I, Morrell D, Abou-Setta AM, Vreeland T, Whiteside J, Cloyd JM, Ansari MT, Cleary SP, Ceppa E, Richardson W, Alseidi A, Awad Z, Ayloo S, Buell JF, Orthopoulos G, Sbayi S, Wakabayashi G, Slater BJ, Pryor A, Jeyarajah DR. Minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for the resection of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7915-7937. [PMID: 36138246 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09612-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While surgical resection has a demonstrated utility for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), it is unclear whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or an open approach should be used. This review sought to assess the efficacy and safety of MIS versus open hepatectomy for isolated, resectable CRLM when performed separately from (Key Question (KQ) 1) or simultaneously with (KQ2) the resection of the primary tumor. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies published during January 2000-September 2020. Two independent reviewers screened literature for eligibility, extracted data from included studies, and assessed internal validity using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD). RESULTS From 2304 publications, 35 studies were included for meta-analysis. For staged resections, three RCTs and 20 observational studies were included. Data from RCTs indicated MIS having similar disease-free survival (DFS) at 1-year (RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.70-1.50), overall survival (OS) at 5-years (RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.84-1.28), fewer complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.38-1.00), and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (MD -6.6 days, 95%CI -10.2, -3.0). For simultaneous resections, 12 observational studies were included. There was no evidence of a difference between MIS and the open group for DFS-1-year, OS-5-year, complications, R0 resections, blood transfusions, along with lower blood loss (MD -177.35 mL, 95%CI -273.17, -81.53) and shorter LOS (MD -3.0 days, 95%CI -3.82, -2.17). CONCLUSIONS Current evidence regarding the optimal approach for CRLM resection demonstrates similar oncologic outcomes between MIS and open techniques, however MIS hepatectomy had a shorter LOS, lower blood loss and complication rate, for both staged and simultaneous resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Ozair
- Faculty of Medicine, King George's Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India
| | - Amelia Collings
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alexandra M Adams
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Centre, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bradley S Kushner
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David Morrell
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Timothy Vreeland
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Centre, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jake Whiteside
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eugene Ceppa
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ziad Awad
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Subhashini Ayloo
- Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joseph F Buell
- Division of Surgery, Mission Healthcare System, HCA Healthcare, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Georgios Orthopoulos
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Samer Sbayi
- Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo City, Japan
| | - Bethany J Slater
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aurora Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - D Rohan Jeyarajah
- Department of Surgery, TCU School of Medicine, and Methodist Richardson Medical Center, 2805 East President George Bush Highway, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic, hybrid, and open resection in colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a propensity score-matched study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8867. [PMID: 35614070 PMCID: PMC9132984 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12372-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic, hybrid, and open resection for colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 647 patients with simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases between January 2006 and December 2018 at three tertiary referral hospitals. Patient’s baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathological examination results, liver-specific recurrence rate and survivals were compared between the propensity score-matched groups. Forty-two and 81 patients were selected for the laparoscopic vs. hybrid groups, and 48 and 136 patients for laparoscopic vs. open groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had fewer wound complications (2.1 vs. 13.2%; p = 0.028) than the open group, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the hybrid and open groups (8 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001 for both). The 5-year liver-specific recurrence rates were 38.7% and 46.0% in the laparoscopic and hybrid groups, respectively (p = 0.270), and 34.0% and 37.0% in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively (p = 0.391). Simultaneous laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer and liver metastases can be performed safely with significantly enhanced postoperative recovery and comparable long-term outcomes compared to hybrid and open resection.
Collapse
|
5
|
Russolillo N, Gentile V, Ratti F, Ardito F, Serenari M, Lombardi R, Jovine E, Cescon M, Giuliante F, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A. Incidence and predictors of textbook outcome after simultaneous liver and rectal surgeries for Stage IV rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:50-58. [PMID: 34523208 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Textbook outcome (TO) is a new surgical quality measure that combines structure, process and surgical outcomes into a single element. Our study aimed to determine the incidence of TO after simultaneous rectal and liver surgery and to use the achievement of TO as a tool to identify the best candidates for these complex procedures. METHODS In total, 256 patients who underwent simultaneous liver and rectal surgery for Stage IV rectal cancer between January 2004 and August 2019 at five tertiary centres were enrolled. TO was defined as a lack of complication, prolonged length of stay, readmission and death. RESULTS Mortality rate at 90 days and major morbidity rate were 2.3% and 15.6%, respectively. An overall TO was achieved in 59% of the patients, which is associated with significantly improved overall (median TO 86.3 months vs. no TO 37.4 months) and disease-free (median TO 70.6 months vs. no TO 24.9 months) survival. On multivariate analysis the presence of multi-comorbidities (OR 3.073) was associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving TO. Left lateral sectionectomy/limited resection was a protective factor (OR 0.416). CONCLUSION TO was achieved in six of 10 patients undergoing simultaneous resections for rectal cancer and liver metastases. Achieving a TO is strongly associated with improved long-term survival. The best candidates for these procedures were patients without multiple comorbidities and those treated with left lateral sectionectomy/limited resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Gentile
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Foundation 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli', Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Elio Jovine
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Foundation 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli', Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sena G, Picciariello A, Marino F, Goglia M, Rocca A, Meniconi RL, Gallo G. One-Stage Total Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis. Is It Safe and Feasible? Front Surg 2021; 8:752135. [PMID: 34869559 PMCID: PMC8637405 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.752135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver is the main target organ for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. It is estimated that ~25% of CRC patients have synchronous metastases at diagnosis, and about 60% of CRC patients will develop metastases during the follow up. Although several teams have performed simultaneous laparoscopic resections (SLR) of liver and colorectal lesions, the feasibility and safety of this approach is still widely debated and few studies on this topic are present in the literature. The purpose of this literature review is to understand the state of the art of SLR and to clarify the potential benefits and limitations of this approach. Several studies have shown that SLR can be performed safely and with short-term outcomes similarly to the separated procedures. Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resections combine the advantages of one stage surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Several reports compared the short-term outcomes of one stage laparoscopic resection with open resections and showed a similar or inferior amount of blood loss, a similar or lower complication rate, and a significant reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery respect to open surgery but much longer operating times for the laparoscopic technique. Few retrospective studies compared long term outcomes of laparoscopic one stage surgery with the outcomes of open one stage surgery and did not identify any differences about disease free survival and the overall survival. In conclusion, hepatic and colorectal SLR are a safe and effective approach characterized by less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery of intestinal function, and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, laparoscopic approach is associated to lower rates of surgical complications without significant differences in the long-term outcomes compared to the open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Sena
- Department of Vascular Surgery, "Pugliese-Ciaccio" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Marino
- Unit of Surgery, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis," Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | - Marta Goglia
- Department of General Surgery, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio," University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Roberto L Meniconi
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Verslype C, D'Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:732-757. [PMID: 34322201 PMCID: PMC8299931 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i7.732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For well-selected patients and procedures, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become the gold standard for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) when performed in specialized centers. However, little is currently known concerning patient-related and peri-operative factors that could play a role in survival outcomes associated with LLR for CRLM. AIM To provide an extensive summary of reported outcomes and prognostic factors associated with LLR for CRLM. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library using the keywords "colorectal liver metastases", "laparoscopy", "liver resection", "prognostic factors", "outcomes" and "survival". Only publications written in English and published until December 2019 were included. Furthermore, abstracts of which no accompanying full text was published, reviews, case reports, letters, protocols, comments, surveys and animal studies were excluded. All search results were saved to Endnote Online and imported in Rayyan for systematic selection. Data of interest were extracted from the included publications and tabulated for qualitative analysis. RESULTS Out of 1064 articles retrieved by means of a systematic and grey literature search, 77 were included for qualitative analysis. Seventy-two research papers provided data concerning outcomes of LLR for CRLM. Fourteen papers were eligible for extraction of data concerning prognostic factors affecting survival outcomes. Qualitative analysis of the collected data showed that LLR for CRLM is safe, feasible and provides oncological efficiency. Multiple research groups have reported on the short-term advantages of LLR compared to open procedures. The obtained results accounted for minor LLR, as well as major LLR, simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and liver resection, LLR of posterosuperior segments, two-stage hepatectomy and repeat LLR for CRLM. Few research groups so far have studied prognostic factors affecting long-term outcomes of LLR for CRLM. CONCLUSION In experienced hands, LLR for CRLM provides good short- and long-term outcomes, independent of the complexity of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Frederiek Nuytens
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Verslype C, D'Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases — short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i7.557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
9
|
The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1247-1265. [PMID: 34089501 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
At the time of diagnosis synchronous colorectal cancer, liver metastases (SCRLM) account for 15-25% of patients. If primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases are resectable, good results may be achieved performing surgical treatment incorporated into the chemotherapy regimen. So far, the possibility of simultaneous minimally invasive (MI) surgery for SCRLM has not been extensively investigated. The Italian surgical community has captured the need and undertaken the effort to establish a National Consensus on this topic. Four main areas of interest have been analysed: patients' selection, procedures, techniques, and implementations. To establish consensus, an adapted Delphi method was used through as many reiterative rounds were needed. Systematic literature reviews were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses instructions. The Consensus took place between February 2019 and July 2020. Twenty-six Italian centres participated. Eighteen clinically relevant items were identified. After a total of three Delphi rounds, 30-tree recommendations reached expert consensus establishing the herein presented guidelines. The Italian Consensus on MI surgery for SCRLM indicates possible pathways to optimise the treatment for these patients as consensus papers express a trend that is likely to become shortly a standard procedure for clinical pictures still on debate. As matter of fact, no RCT or relevant case series on simultaneous treatment of SCRLM are available in the literature to suggest guidelines. It remains to be investigated whether the MI technique for the simultaneous treatment of SCRLM maintain the already documented benefit of the two separate surgeries.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pan L, Tong C, Fu S, Fang J, Gu Q, Wang S, Jiang Z, Juengpanich S, Cai X. Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:251. [PMID: 32958079 PMCID: PMC7507629 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It has been demonstrated that simultaneous resection of both primary colorectal lesion and metastatic hepatic lesion is a safe approach with low mortality and postoperative complication rates. However, there are some controversies over which kind of surgical approach is better. The aim of study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgeries and open surgeries for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM). Methods A systemic search of online database including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed until June 5, 2019. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were synthesized by using STATA, version 15.0. Cumulative and single-arm meta-analyses were also conducted. Results It contained twelve studies with 616 patients (273 vs 343, laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, respectively) and manifested latest surgical results for the treatment of CRC and SCRLM. Among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries, they had lower rates of postoperative complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028), less intraoperative blood loss (weight mean difference (WMD) = − 113.31, 95% CI: − 189.03 to − 37.59, P = 0.003), less time in the hospital and recovering after surgeries (WMD = − 2.70, 95% CI: − 3.99 to − 1.40, P = 0.000; WMD = − 3.20, 95% CI: − 5.06 to − 1.34, P = 0.001), but more operating time (WMD = 36.57, 95% CI: 7.80 to 65.35, P = 0.013). Additionally, there were no statistical significance between two kinds of surgical approaches in disease-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, cumulative meta-analysis indicated statistical difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery in terms of morbidity was firstly detected in the 12th study in 2018 (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028) as the 95% CI narrowed. Conclusion Compared with open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries are safer (postoperative complications and intraoperative blood loss) and more effective (length of hospital stay and postoperative stay), and it can be considered as the first option for management of SCRLM in high-volume laparoscopic centers. Trial registration CRD42020151176
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Pan
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Chenhao Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Shaoxing, 312000, China
| | - Siyuan Fu
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Jing Fang
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Qiuxia Gu
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Shufeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Zhiyu Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Sarun Juengpanich
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China.,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China. .,Zhejiang Province Medical Research Center of Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Diseases, Hangzhou, 310016, China. .,Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kabir T, Syn N, Goh BKP. Current status of laparoscopic liver resection for the management of colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:526-539. [PMID: 32655931 PMCID: PMC7340801 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2020.02.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide. The commonest site of spread is the liver, with up to 40% of patients developing colorectal liver metastasis (CLRM) during the course of their lifetime. Significant advances in surgical techniques, as well as breakthroughs in chemotherapy and biologic agents, have resulted in dramatic improvements in prognosis. A multimodal approach comprising of liver resection coupled with systemic therapy offers these patients the best chance of cure. The arrival of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) within the last 3 decades has added a whole new dimension to the management of this condition. Today, CLRM is one of the most frequent indications for LLR globally. Meta-analyses of retrospective studies and two randomized trials have demonstrated superior short-term outcomes following LLR, with no differences in mortality rates. Oncologically, R0 resection rates are comparable to the open approach, while overall and disease-free survival rates are also similar. As surgeons gain confidence, boundaries are pushed even further. High-volume centers have published their early experiences with complex LLR of recurrent CLRM as well as totally laparoscopic synchronous resection of CRC and liver metastases, with very encouraging results. In the presence of extensive bilobar CLRM, two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) and associating liver partition with portal vein ligation (ALPPS) may be adopted to augment an inadequate future liver remnant to facilitate metastasectomy. Interestingly, the adoption of LLR for these techniques also seem to confer additional benefits. Despite the plethora of advantages, LLR comes with its own unique set of limitations such as a steep learning curve and high cost. The surgical world eagerly awaits the results of prospective trials currently underway in order to further advance the management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K. P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shin Y, Rhu J, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW, Kwon CHD. Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for liver cavernous hemangioma: A single-institutional comparative study. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2020; 24:137-143. [PMID: 32457257 PMCID: PMC7271101 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.2.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims While minimal invasive surgery has become popular, the feasibility of laparoscopy for liver cavernous hemangioma has not been shown. Methods Patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver cavernous hemangioma from January 2008 to February 2019 at the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. Patients who underwent trisectionectomy were excluded. Background characteristics, along with operative and postoperative recovery, were compared between the laparoscopy and open surgery groups. Results Forty-three patients in the laparoscopy group and 33 patients in the open surgery group were compared. The differences in the background characteristics were presence of symptoms (14.6% in laparoscopy vs. 57.1% in open, p<0.001) and tumor location (right, left and both side p=0.017). The laparoscopy group had smaller blood loss (p=0.001), lesser blood transfusion requirements (p=0.035), lower level of post-operative total bilirubin, prothrombin time (INR) (p=0.001, 0.003 each), shorter hospital stay (p=0.001), earlier soft diet start (p<0.001), earlier drain removal (p<0.001) and shorter amount and duration of additional pain control (p=0.001, p=0.017 each). There was no significant difference in complication after surgery between two groups (p=0.721). All the patients showed pathologic report of benign hemangioma regardless of type of surgery (100%). Almost every patients reported no symptom or relief of symptom in both groups (97.7%, 93.9% each). Conclusions Laparoscopic liver resection for liver cavernous hemangioma can be safely performed with improved postoperative recovery. However, surgery for liver cavernous hemangioma should be conducted with informed consent of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younghuen Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Araujo RLCD, Figueiredo MN, Sanctis MAD, Romagnolo LGC, Linhares MM, Melani AGF, Marescaux J. Decision making process in simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Review of literature. Acta Cir Bras 2020; 35:e202000308. [PMID: 32490901 PMCID: PMC7251979 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020200030000008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The benefits of laparoscopic approaches to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) separately are well established. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged. The objective of this review with practical reports is to discuss technical aspects required for patient selection to perform simultaneous laparoscopic approaches for CRC and CRLM. Methods: Literature review of oncological factors associated with patient selection for surgical treatment of CRLM and the use of laparoscopy in those cases, and report of technical aspects for simultaneous CRC and CRLM approaches. Results: Simultaneous laparoscopic resection has been successful in many series of selected patients, although it seems to be safer to perform minor and major liver resection with non-extended colorectal resections, and to avoid two high-risk procedures at the same time. Conclusions: Simultaneous CRC and CRLM resections seem to be safe when patients are carefully selected, also considering the risk of recurrence concerning oncologic outcomes. The pre-planning of simultaneous resection is mandatory to plan trocar positioning, procedure sequencing, and patient position.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, Sutcliffe RP. A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1214-1224. [PMID: 32312592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence of pairwise meta-analysis of Robotic Hepatectomy (RH) vs Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (LH) and RH vs Open Hepatectomy (OH) is inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this study, was to compare the outcomes of RH, LH and OH by performing a network meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the following databases: Pubmed, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane library. Cost-effectiveness and survival benefits were selected as primary outcomes. RESULTS The cost was less in OH compared to both minimally invasive procedures, LH demonstrated lower cost compared to RH, but the differences were not statistically significant. Both the RH and LH cohorts demonstrated significantly lower estimated blood loss, reduced major morbidity rate and shorter length of stay compared to OH cohort. The LH and OH cohorts demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and duration of clamping compared to the RH cohort. The LH cohort included significantly smaller tumours compared to the OH cohort. CONCLUSION The present network meta-analysis, demonstrated that both RH and LH in malignant and benign conditions were associated with lower morbidity rates, shorter hospital stay and the procedure related costs were statistically nonsignificant between RH, LH and OH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, Yun SH, Cho YB, Huh JW, Park YA, Heo JS, Kim JM. Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open technique for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases with propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:4772-4780. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07253-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
16
|
Ciria R, Ocaña S, Gomez-Luque I, Cipriani F, Halls M, Fretland ÅA, Okuda Y, Aroori S, Briceño J, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Hilal MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:349-360. [PMID: 30989374 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06774-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach to liver resection has experienced exponential growth in recent years. However, evidence-based guidelines are needed for its safe future progression. The main aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS To identify all the comparative manuscripts between laparoscopic and open liver resections for CRLM, all published English language studies with more than ten cases were screened. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, 3 specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients undergoing minor-only, major-only and synchronous resections. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology and Newcastle-Ottawa Score. RESULTS From the initial 194 manuscripts identified, 21 were meta-analysed, including results from the first randomized trial comparing open and laparoscopic resections of CRLM. Five of these were specific to patients undergoing a synchronous resection (399 cases), while six focused on minor (3 series including 226 cases) and major (3 series including 135 cases) resections, respectively. Thirteen manuscripts compared 2543 cases but could not be assigned to any of the above sub-analyses, so were analysed independently. The majority of short-term outcomes were favourable to the laparoscopic approach with equivalent rates of negative resection margins. No differences were observed between the approaches in overall or disease-free survival at 1, 3 or 5 years. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver resection for CRLM offers improved short-term outcomes with comparable long-term outcomes when compared to open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, CIBER-ehd, 14004, Cordoba, Spain.
| | - Sira Ocaña
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Irene Gomez-Luque
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, CIBER-ehd, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark Halls
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Yukihiro Okuda
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, CIBER-ehd, 14004, Cordoba, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Unit of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Javier Briceño
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, CIBER-ehd, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjorn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bizzoca C, Delvecchio A, Fedele S, Vincenti L. Simultaneous Colon and Liver Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Single Center Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:934-942. [PMID: 30925103 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The one-stage approach for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous liver metastases (SLM) has demonstrated advantages, when feasible, in terms of oncological radicality and reduction in sanitary costs. The simultaneous laparoscopic approach to both colon cancer and liver metastases joins the advantages of mini-invasiveness to the one-stage approach. Methods: During the period from February 2011 to July 2017, a single surgeon performed 17 laparoscopic colorectal operations with simultaneous liver resection for CRC with SLM. Colorectal procedures included 9 rectal resections, 6 left colectomies, and 2 right colectomies. Associated hepatic resections included 1 left hepatectomy, 1 right posterior sectionectomy, 2 segmentectomies, and 13 wedge resections. We analyzed retrospectively the patient's short-term outcome and operative and oncologic results. Results: There was no conversion to open surgery. Six patients (35%) had minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I-II), whereas only 2 patients (12%) had major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV) and no mortality occurred. The median time of discharge was 8.6 (range 5-36) days. We obtained 94% of R0 resection margin on the liver specimen and 100% of negative distal and circumferential margin in case of rectal resection. An average of 20 lymphnodes were retrieved in the colorectal specimen. Conclusions: Simultaneous mini-invasive colorectal and liver resection is a challenging but feasible procedure. The advantages of treating primary cancer and metastases in the same recovery justify the morbidity rate, especially because the most of the complications are minor and no cases of mortality occurred. Further experience is needed to better understand how to reduce the morbidity rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Bizzoca
- General Surgery "Balestrazzi" Polyclinics of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Machairas N, Merath K, Cerullo M, Hasemaki N, Prodromidou A, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Laparoscopic synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2018; 119:30-39. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Department of SurgeryWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Division of Surgical OncologyJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Department of SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurham North Carolina
| | - Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
- Department of SurgeryWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Division of Surgical OncologyJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
| | - Nikolaos Machairas
- Third Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical SchoolAthens Greece
| | - Katiuscha Merath
- Department of SurgeryWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Division of Surgical OncologyJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
| | - Marcelo Cerullo
- Department of SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurham North Carolina
| | - Natasha Hasemaki
- Third Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical SchoolAthens Greece
| | - Anastasia Prodromidou
- Third Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical SchoolAthens Greece
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of SurgeryWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Division of Surgical OncologyJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of SurgeryWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
- Division of Surgical OncologyJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. World J Surg 2018; 42:2930-2937. [PMID: 29426971 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4531-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While minimal invasive surgery is becoming popular in liver resection, right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is still considered as a difficult procedure. We summarize the clinical data and investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparing its outcomes with those of open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 191 patients who underwent RPS for HCC during January 2009 to August 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 53 patients in LRPS group were matched to 97 patients in ORPS group. RESULTS There was no statistical difference in preoperative data. While operation time was significantly longer in LRPS group (381.1 ± 118.7 vs. 234.4 ± 63.7 min, P < 0.001), transfusion rate (13.2 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.061) and complication rate (9.4 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.709) were not statistically different between groups. Clustered Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for matched paired data showed no difference in both disease-free survival (P = 0.607) and overall survival (P = 0.858). CONCLUSIONS In HCC, LRPS can be performed safely compared to ORPS, regarding the operative outcome, patient recovery, and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ivanecz A, Krebs B, Stozer A, Jagric T, Plahuta I, Potrc S. Simultaneous Pure Laparoscopic Resection of Primary Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Single Institution Experience with Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Radiol Oncol 2017. [PMID: 29520205 PMCID: PMC5839081 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2017-0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of pure laparoscopic and open simultaneous resection of both the primary colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM). Patients and methods From 2000 to 2016 all patients treated by simultaneous resection were assessed for entry in this single center, clinically nonrandomized trial. A propensity score matching was used to compare the laparoscopic group (LAP) to open surgery group (OPEN). Primary endpoints were perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Of the 82 patients identified who underwent simultaneous liver resection for SCLM, 10 patients underwent LAP. All these consecutive patients from LAP were matched to 10 comparable OPEN. LAP reduced the length of hospital stay (P = 0.044) and solid food oral intake was faster (P = 0.006) in this group. No patient undergoing the laparoscopic procedure experienced conversion to the open technique. No difference was observed in operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, narcotics requirement, clinical risk score, resection margin, R0 resections rate, morbidity, mortality and incisional hernias rate. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of the 3-year OS rate (90 vs. 75%; P = 0.842) and DFS rate (60 vs. 57%; P = 0.724). Conclusions LAP reduced the length of hospital stay and offers faster solid food oral intake. Comparable oncologic and survival outcomes can be achieved. LAP is beneficial for well selected patients in high volume centers with appropriate expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Bojan Krebs
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Andraz Stozer
- Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tomaz Jagric
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Irena Plahuta
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Stojan Potrc
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xu X, Guo Y, Chen G, Li C, Wang H, Dong G. Laparoscopic resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a case controlled study. MINIM INVASIV THER 2017; 27:209-216. [PMID: 28925798 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1378236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM), relative to open surgery. METHODS Between 1 January 2009 and 20 April 2014, 20 of 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic simultaneous colorectal cancer and SCRLM resections were matched with 20 of 29 patients who underwent an open approach, based on prognostic propensity scores. Perioperative results and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable in demographics, cancer characteristics, surgery characteristics, and chemotherapy treatment. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. The estimated blood loss and postoperative stay were significantly greater in the open group than in the laparoscopic group (all, p < .05). All other perioperative results and postoperative complications were similar between the two groups, as well as three-year overall and disease-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative complications and survival rates of patients given laparoscopic simultaneous colorectal cancer and SCRLM resections were similar to those treated with an open approach, but with greater short-term benefits. Laparoscopy in this setting by an experienced surgical team appears safe and effective, and is a feasible alternative to an open approach for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Xu
- a Department of General Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China
| | - Yulin Guo
- a Department of General Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China.,b Department of General Surgery , The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University , Dalian , Liaoning , China
| | - Guijin Chen
- a Department of General Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China.,c Department of General Surgery , Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Area Command of Chinese PLA , Guangzhou , China
| | - Chen Li
- a Department of General Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China
| | - Hongguang Wang
- d Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China
| | - Guanglong Dong
- a Department of General Surgery , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xie SM, Xiong JJ, Liu XT, Chen HY, Iglesia-García D, Altaf K, Bharucha S, Huang W, Nunes QM, Szatmary P, Liu XB. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:1012. [PMID: 28432295 PMCID: PMC5430829 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00978-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) on oncological outcomes for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CCLM) remain inconclusive. Major databases were searched from January 1992 to October 2016. Effects of LLR vs OLR were determined. The primary endpoints were oncological outcomes. In total, 32 eligible non-randomized studies with 4697 patients (LLR: 1809, OLR: 2888) were analyzed. There were higher rates of clear surgical margins (OR: 1.64, 95%CI: 1.32 to 2.05, p < 0.00001) in the LLR group, without significant differences in disease recurrence, 3- or 5-year overall survival(OS) and disease free survival(DFS) between the two approaches. LLR was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (WMD: −147.46 [−195.78 to −99.15] mL, P < 0.00001) and fewer blood transfusions (OR: 0.41 [0.30–0.58], P < 0.00001), but with longer operation time (WMD:14.44 [1.01 to 27.88] min, P < 0.00001) compared to OLR. Less overall morbidity (OR: 0.64 [0.55 to 0.75], p < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD: −2.36 [−3.06 to −1.66] d, p < 0.00001) were observed for patients undergoing LLR, while there was no statistical difference in mortality. LLR appears to be a safe and feasible alternative to OLR in the treatment of CCLM in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Ming Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Cheng du, China.,People's Hospital of Deyang, Deyang, China
| | - Jun-Jie Xiong
- Departments of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xue-Ting Liu
- Department of gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong-Yu Chen
- Departments of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Daniel Iglesia-García
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kiran Altaf
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shameena Bharucha
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Wei Huang
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Quentin M Nunes
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Peter Szatmary
- Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Xu-Bao Liu
- Departments of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morel P, Jung M, Cornateanu S, Buehler L, Majno P, Toso C, Buchs NC, Rubbia-Brandt L, Hagen ME. Robotic versus open liver resections: A case-matched comparison. Int J Med Robot 2017; 13. [PMID: 28058770 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most hepatic resections are currently performed using an open approach. Robotic surgery might enable the transition of these procedures to minimally invasive surgery. METHODS Pre-, peri- and post-operative data of all patients who underwent a liver resection from 2009/2012 to 2001/2015, were collected prospectively. All robotic resection patients were matched 1:1 to patients who underwent open surgery. Pre- and perioperative data, up to 30 days, were analyzed. RESULTS Sixteen robotic and open hepatic resections were identified. Fewer complication events and shorter lengths of stay (LOS, 7.9 versus 11 days, P = 0.0603) were observed for robotic resections. Length of stay in the intermediate care unit (IMC) was shorter after the robotic procedure (10 h vs 16.6 h, P = 0.0699). Operating room (OR) time was significantly longer in the robotic resection cohort (352.8 vs 239.6 min, P = 0.0215). All tumor margins were negative. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary comparison demonstrates the general feasibility of minor robotic liver resection in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Morel
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Minoa Jung
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sorina Cornateanu
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Leo Buehler
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Majno
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas C Buchs
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laura Rubbia-Brandt
- Division of Pathology, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Monika E Hagen
- Division of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of worldwide literature on laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and compare short-term outcomes against open liver resections (OLR) by meta-analyses. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA There are no updated pooled data since 2009 about the current status and short-term outcomes of LLR worldwide. PATIENTS AND METHODS All English language publications on LLR were screened. Descriptive worldwide data and short-term outcomes were obtained. Separate analyses were performed for minor-only and major-only resection series, and series in which minor/major resections were not differentiated. Apparent case duplications were excluded. RESULTS A set of 463 published manuscripts were reviewed. One hundred seventy-nine single-center series were identified that accounted for 9527 LLR cases worldwide. Minor-only, major-only, and combined major-minor series were 61, 18, and 100, respectively, including 32, 8, and 43 comparative series, respectively. Of the total 9527 LLR cases reported, 6190 (65%) were for malignancy and 3337 (35%) were for benign indications. There were 37 deaths reported (mortality rate = 0.4%). From the meta-analysis comparing case-matched LLR to OLR (N = 2900 cases), there was no increased mortality and significantly less complications, transfusions, blood loss, and hospital stay observed in LLR vs OLR. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest review of LLR available to date with over 9000 cases published. It confirms growing safety when performed in selected patients and by trained surgeons, and suggests that LLR may offer improved patient short-term outcomes compared with OLR. Improved levels of evidence, standardized reporting of outcomes, and assuring proper training are the next challenges of laparoscopic liver surgery.
Collapse
|
25
|
Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Treatment of Colorectal Neoplasm with Synchronous Liver Metastasis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:9328250. [PMID: 27294144 PMCID: PMC4884597 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9328250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. To analyse perioperative and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive simultaneous resection of primary colorectal neoplasm with synchronous liver metastases. Methods. A Medline revision of the current published literature on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted combined colectomy with hepatectomy for synchronous liver metastatic colorectal neoplasm was performed until February 2015. The specific search terms were "liver metastases", "hepatic metastases", "colorectal", "colon", "rectal", "minimally invasive", "laparoscopy", "robotic-assisted", "robotic colorectal and liver resection", "synchronous", and "simultaneous". Results. 20 clinical reports including 150 patients who underwent minimally invasive one-stage procedure were retrospectively analysed. No randomized trials were found. The approach was laparoscopic in 139 patients (92.7%) and robotic in 11 cases (7.3%). The rectum was the most resected site of primary neoplasm (52.7%) and combined liver procedure was in 89% of cases a minor liver resection. One patient (0.7%) required conversion to open surgery. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 18% and 1.3%, respectively. The most common complication was colorectal anastomotic leakage. Data concerning oncologic outcomes were too heterogeneous in order to gather definitive results. Conclusion. Although no prospective randomized trials are available, one-stage minimally invasive approach seems to show advantages over conventional surgery in terms of postoperative short-term course. On the contrary, more studies are required to define the oncologic values of the minimally invasive combined treatment.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ratti F, Catena M, Di Palo S, Staudacher C, Aldrighetti L. Impact of totally laparoscopic combined management of colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases on severity of complications: a propensity-score-based analysis. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:4934-4945. [PMID: 26944725 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4835-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thanks to widespread diffusion of minimally invasive approach in the setting of both colorectal and hepatic surgeries, the interest in combined resections for colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SCLM) by totally laparoscopic approach (TLA) has increased. Aim of this study was to compare outcome of combined resections for SCLM performed by TLA or by open approach, in a propensity-score-based study. STUDY DESIGN All 25 patients undergoing combined TLA for SCLM at San Raffaele Hospital in Milano were compared in a case-matched analysis with 25 out of 91 patients undergoing totally open approach (TOA group). Groups were matched with 1:2 ratio using propensity scores based on covariates representing disease severity. Main endpoints were postoperative morbidity and long-term outcome. The Modified Accordion Severity Grading System was used to quantify complications. RESULTS The groups resulted comparable in terms of patients and disease characteristics. The TLA group, as compared to the TOA group, had lower blood loss (350 vs 600 mL), shorter postoperative stay (9 vs 12 days), lower postoperative morbidity index (0.14 vs 0.20) and severity score for complicated patients (0.60 vs 0.85). Colonic anastomosis leakage had the highest fractional complication burden in both groups. In spite of comparable long-term overall survival, the TLA group had better recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION TLA for combined resections is feasible, and its indications can be widened to encompass a larger population of patients, provided its benefits in terms of reduced overall risk and severity of complications, rapid functional recovery and favorable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Saverio Di Palo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Staudacher
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D. A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:862-75. [PMID: 26092026 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4306-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted liver resection (RALR) was introduced as procedures of overcoming the limitations of traditional laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The aim of this review was to evaluate the surgical results of RALR from all published studies and the results of comparative studies of RALR versus LLR for hepatic neoplasm. METHODS Eligible studies involved RALR that published between January 2001 and December 2014 were reviewed systematically. Comparisons between RALS and LLR were pooled and analyzed by meta-analytical techniques using random- or fixed-effects models, as appropriate. RESULTS In total, 29 studies, involving 537 patients undergoing RALR, were identified. The most common RALR procedure was a wedge resection and segmentectomy (28.67%), followed by right hepatectomy (17.88%), left lateral sectionectomy (13.22%), and bisegmentectomy (9.12%). The conversion and complication rates were 5.59 and 11.36%, respectively. The most common reasons for conversion were bleeding (46.67%) and unclear tumor margin (33.33%). Intracavitary fluid collections and bile leaks (40.98%) were the most frequently occurring morbidities. Nine studies, involving 774 patients, were included in meta-analysis. RALR had a longer operative time compared with LLR [mean difference (MD) 48.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22.49-74.49 min; p = 0.0003]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in blood loss [MD 31.53; 95% CI -14.74 to 77.79 mL; p = 0.18], hospital stay [MD 0.13; 95% CI -0.54 to 0.80 days; p = 0.18], postoperative overall morbidity [odds ratio (OR) 0.76; 95% CI 0.49-1.19; p = 0.23], and surgical margin status (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.33-1.12; p = 0.11); cost was greater than robotic surgery (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION RALR and LLR display similar safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for hepatectomies, but further studies are needed before any final conclusion can be drawn, especially in terms of oncologic and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianguo Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| | - Shuting Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China
| | - Du Chengyou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Colibaseanu DT, Merchea A. Innovative and emerging techniques in laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24:211-2. [PMID: 24684253 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.9997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|