Intestinal Malrotation and Volvulus in Neonates: Laparoscopy Versus Open Laparotomy

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in small infants with midterm follow-up

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (LL) for intestinal malrotation (IM) in small infants.

METHODS

All patients aged < 6 months with IM who underwent Ladd's procedures between January 2012 and December 2019 were enrolled. The perioperative demographics and midterm follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and compared between patients who underwent LL and open Ladd's operation (OL).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled for analysis. The baseline characteristics were well matched in the two groups. The rate of volvulus was similar in the two groups (76.2% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.81). Two cases in the LL group were converted to OL due to intraoperative bleeding and intestinal swelling. The operative time (ORT) was not significantly different between the two groups (73.8 ± 18.7 vs. 66.8 ± 11.6 min, P = 0.76). Compared to the OL group, the LL group had a shorter time full feed (TFF) (3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 7.3 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.03) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (PHS) than the OL group (5.5 ± 1.6 vs. 11.3 ± 2.7 days, P = 0.02). The rate of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups (9.5% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.47). The LL group had a lower rate of adhesive obstruction than the OL group, but the difference was not significant (0.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.09). One patient suffered recurrence in the LL group, while 0 patients suffered recurrence in the OL group (4.8% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.07). The rate of reoperation in the two groups was similar (4.8% vs. 8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LL procedure for IM in small infants was a safe and reliable method that had a satisfactory cosmetic appearance and shorter TFF and PHS than OL.

Adult Midgut Malrotation With Chronic Volvulus With Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) Thrombosis: A Recherche

Intestinal malrotation is primarily a surgical condition of neonates due to abnormal intestinal rotation during fetal development. Usually, the presentation is immediately after birth. Adult midgut malrotation is rare and primarily detected at laparotomy or incidental radiological imaging for various conditions. We report a sporadic case of a 35-year-old male who presented to the surgical outpatient department (OPD) complaining of dull aching abdominal pain after taking meals for two months. He was able to tolerate a liquid diet only and able to carry out his routine work comfortably. In imaging studies, it was found to be a case of midgut malrotation with volvulus and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis with collaterals without features of intestinal obstruction. The patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and a midgut volvulus was identified with Ladd's bands. He underwent exploratory laparotomy with Ladd's procedure. Postoperatively symptoms were resolved, and the patient was discharged in stable condition. If intestinal malrotation presents in adults, it is challenging to diagnose it as it presents with atypical symptoms like chronic vague abdominal pain and weight loss. Often radiological correlation is essential to diagnose such patients. For surgical intervention, a laparoscopic approach is considered better in expert hands. Even though the disease has a chronic course, a high index of suspicion should arise when treating such cases of intestinal malrotation in an adult male. Timely surgery can do miracles and prevent catastrophic complications.

Recurrent caecal volvulus in an adult: Should we practice coecopexy systematically at neonatal age for incomplete common mesentery? A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Malrotation is usually revealed early in infancy and or later in childhood, even more unusually in adulthood. This disorder is treated through Ladd's procedure. Literature is limited on the long-term outcomes of this approach, especially into adulthood.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 33 years male with a history of a laparotomy as a new born for a bowel obstruction secondary to malrotation, presenting with an obstruction and colonic volvulus. Laparotomy reveals a volvulus of the coecum secondary to a failure of the coecum to attach during surgery performed at neonatal age.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

For a patient operated on during the neonatal period for intestinal malrotation, the examination for sub occlusive episodes should suggest a recurrence of malrotation such as coecal volvulus, and the possibility of technical malfunction during the previous procedure. This reflection leads us to consider the necessity of performing coecopexy systematically during the first surgery.

CONCLUSION

Ladd's technique is the surgical treatment of the incomplete common mesentery. The fixation of the coecum could be done in a systematic way to prevent a possible coecal volvulus which can be responsible for digestive necrosis and often even a fulminant evolution.

Diagnosis and management of intestinal rotational abnormalities with or without volvulus in the pediatric population

Intestinal malrotation is a congenital anomaly that can be associated with midgut volvulus, requiring an emergent operation in order to maintain blood supply to the compromised intestine. It results from an abnormal rotation of the intestines, leading to three types of malrotation. Non-rotation is complete failure of the intestines to rotate, while the most common configuration is associated with the cecum in the mid-upper abdomen, close to a malpositioned duodenal-jejunal (DJ) flexure. This configuration has a narrow mesentery that has a high risk of volvulus. The final form of malrotation is incomplete rotation, where the DJ flexure and cecum are malpositioned, but the mesentery is not narrowed. The benefits of performing a Ladd's procedure for these individuals is controversial. Workup for malrotation should be considered in all patients who present with abdominal pain/distention and bilious emesis. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study is 93-100% sensitive and will show a corkscrew appearance when a volvulus is present. While the basic tenets of the Ladd's procedure have not changed and include detorsion of a volvulus, adhesiolysis of Ladd's bands and broadening of the mesentery, how this is accomplished and in whom are controversial. Laparoscopic Ladd's is associated with shorter hospital stays but also has a higher incidence of recurrent volvulus compared to an open approach. Patients with heterotaxy syndrome also represent a controversial group with some studies showing no difference in post-operative complications despite a higher mortality due to underlying cardiac disease, while other studies show a low incidence of volvulus and question the need for Ladd's in those who are asymptomatic. This review highlights the major aspects of diagnosing and treating malrotation, including the pathophysiology, workup, surgical options and areas of controversy.

Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

 Despite its wide acceptance, the superiority of laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery has remained controversial. There is still a call for well-founded evidence. We reviewed the literature on studies published in the last three decades and dealing with advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy compared to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open abdominal procedures in children were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Reports on upper and lower gastrointestinal as hepatobiliary surgery and on surgery of pancreas and spleen were included. Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery were analyzed for different types of procedures. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

 A total of 239 studies dealing with 19 types of procedures and outcomes in 929,157 patients were analyzed. We identified 26 randomized controlled trials (10.8%) and 213 comparative studies (89.2%). The most frequently reported advantage of laparoscopy was shorter hospital stay in 60.4% of studies. Longer operative time was the most frequently reported disadvantage of laparoscopy in 52.7% of studies. Clavien-Dindo grade I to III complications (mild-moderate) were less frequently identified in laparoscopic compared to open procedures (80.3% of studies). Grade-IV complications (severe) were less frequently reported after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis and more frequently after laparoscopic Kasai's portoenterostomy. We identified a decreased frequency of reporting on advantages after laparoscopy and increased reporting on disadvantages for all surgery types over the decades.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic compared with open pediatric surgery seems to be beneficial in most types of procedures. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. However, the number of reports on disadvantages increased during the past decades.

Laparoscopic vs open Ladd's procedure for malrotation in neonates and infants: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure for malrotation in children is still a controversial approach. Although some retrospective studies have compared the outcomes of the two types of procedure with inconsistency outcomes. Currently, there are few large-scale studies on laparoscopic treatment in malrotation with neonates and infants. We did a study based on propensity score matching to compare the effects of the two kinds of approach in neonates and infants. To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopy and open Ladd’s procedure by the propensity score-matching (PSM) to enhance the validity of the comparison.

Methods

A total series of 143 cases of intestinal malrotation without intestinal necrosis was included in the study during the 8 years from January 2012 to January 2020, including 68 cases of open Ladd’s procedure and 75 cases of laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure including five cases of transfer laparotomy. By a propensity score 1:1 matching, 62 patients were stratified for each group.

Results and conclusion

There was no significant difference in volvulus degree, weight and gender between the two groups (p > 0.05). Laparoscopic surgery took more time than open surgery (105.9 min vs 70.6 min, p < 0.05), but it had less hospital stay (12.4 days vs 14.6 days, p < 0.05) or less incision infection (0 vs 6, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of first defecation, blood loss, time of full feeding and reoperation (p > 0.05). The cosmetic effect of laparoscopic surgery is better than that of open surgery. Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure is a safe approach. It can reduce the length of hospital stay and incision infection, but the operation time was extended, the other complications are similar compared with open procedure for intestinal malrotation in neonates and infants.

Outcomes for Ladd's procedure: Does approach matter?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure has been proven safe and effective for the treatment of malrotation. However, the nationwide utilization and outcomes of elective Ladd's procedure are largely unknown.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014 was used to identify patients 0-18 years (excluding newborns) with malrotation who underwent elective Ladd's procedure. Demographics, hospital factors, and outcomes were compared by approach (laparoscopic vs. open) using standard statistical tests and propensity score (PS) matched analysis. Results were weighted for national estimates.

RESULTS

1343 patients (44% male) underwent elective Ladd's procedure via laparoscopic (22%) or open (78%) approach. Laparoscopic approach was more common in large hospitals (26% vs. 16%), patients >13 years (30% vs. 20%), and those with higher income (29% vs. 16%), all p < 0.001. Following PS matching, compared to the laparoscopic approach, open Ladd's was associated with index hospital length of stay > 7 days (20% vs. 8%), more post-operative gastrointestinal dysfunction (12% vs. < 1%), and more nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea (16% vs. 6%), all p < 0.001. The overall readmission rates within 30 days and the year of index operation were 8% and 15%, respectively. In the matched cohort, those undergoing laparoscopic Ladd's were less likely to be readmitted than those with the open approach (7% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) and experienced less gastrointestinal issues on readmission (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.002). There were similar rates of post-operative small bowel obstruction (< 3% vs. < 3%, p = 0.840) and volvulus (0% vs. < 1%, p = 0.136). Redo Ladd's procedure was performed in less than 4% of readmissions and all occurred within 5 days of initial hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Ladd's procedures in the U.S. are being performed open, despite comparable outcomes following a laparoscopic approach. Readmission rates are similar with either approach, and the rate of redo Ladd's procedure is lower than previously reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Ladd's Procedure for Intestinal Malrotation in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: To compare clinical outcomes in infants and children with intestinal malrotation who were treated by laparoscopic or open Ladd's. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for studies comparing laparoscopy with open Ladd's for intestinal volvulus through January 5, 2021. Search terms were confined to Title/Abstract: "Intestinal Volvulus" OR "Intestinal malrotation" AND "Laparoscopy" AND "Laparotomy." Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing laparoscopy with open Ladd's in neonates, infants, or children were included. Outcomes evaluated included operative time, time to full feeds, length of hospital stay, rate of conversion, reoperation, overall postoperative complications, postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction, and postoperative volvulus. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables; pooled mean differences (MDs) were measured for continuous variables. Results: Fourteen studies were included, comprising 444 patients who underwent laparoscopic approach and 1422 patients who underwent open procedure. Laparoscopy group had shorter operative time (MD = -14.44 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.79 to -8.09, P < .00001), hospital stay (MD = -4.57 days, 95% CI = -7.58 to -1.56, P = .003), and time to full feeds (MD = -3.00 days, 95% CI = -3.80 to -2.19, P < .00001). Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure had less overall postoperative complications (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.19-0.65, P = .0009), less postoperative adhesive small bowl obstruction (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.74, P = .005), and more postoperative volvulus (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.23-7.13, P = .02). There was no difference in incidence of reoperation rate (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.96-4.33, P = .06). Conclusion: Laparoscopic procedure is superior to open Ladd's in operative time, hospital stay, time to full feeds, overall postoperative complication, and postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction. However, more RCTs with adequate follow-up are needed to overcome the limitations of our study.

A Rare Case of Chronic Suppurative Appendicitis in Neonatal Presenting as Intestinal Malrotation

Neonatal appendicitis (NA) is an extremely rare acute abdomen condition, moreover, if it is a chronic suppurative one. The definite risk factor of NA is barely unknown. The signs and symptoms are often nonspecific and appear after perforation occurs. Most of the cases were found unexpectedly during surgery suspected as other diagnoses. A 7-day-old male neonate presenting lethargic and hypoglycemia since 1 st day of life. Patient drunk breast milk right after since he was born. Meconium was produced <24 h. On the 3 rd day of hospitalization, he experienced bilious vomiting and abdominal distension, so nasogastric tube was installed. Physical examination revealed decreased bowel sound. Investigation showed leucocytosis, slightly increased procalcitonin and abdominal X-ray showed that gas distribution lasted until third part of duodenum followed by minimal gas distribution in the distal part of duodenum. The patient was suspected as distal duodenum stenosis or proximal jejunum. Intraoperatively, it was found that there was second part duodenum malrotation and open Ladd’s procedure was done. During Ladd’s procedure, a perforated appendix was also found. The histopathology result revealed that it was a chronic suppurative appendicitis. Patient was discharged in good condition 20 days after surgery. NA is a rare condition with nonspecific signs and symptoms which was usually found accidentally during surgery suspected as other diagnoses.

Midgut malrotation: a rare presentation of bowel obstruction in the adult

Intestinal malrotation is a rare congenital abnormality. Usually, patients with malrotation of the intestine present in the neonatal period or the first year of life while some may remain asymptomatic and present later in childhood or adulthood. The diagnosis is usually delayed due to the sequence of events being that of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms, which culminates in either adhesive bowel obstruction or volvulus. A 59-year-old male diagnosed with a large, incarcerated, right inguinoscrotal hernia underwent emergency laparotomy, which revealed midgut malrotation and small bowel obstruction due to Ladd bands. A modified Ladd’s procedure and right inguinal herniorrhaphy was performed.

A case of midgut volvulus related to adult intestinal malrotation found with weight loss after streptococcus infection: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

The incidence of intestinal malrotation is 1 in 6000 births, and 90% of cases occur within the first year of life. Adult cases are rare, with a reported incidence of 0.2%-0.5% of all cases. The significance of reporting this case is to recognize that some adult-onset cases require surgery even in the absence of intestinal necrosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 36-year-old man was infected with streptococcus and treated with antibiotics. He developed appetite loss and his weight decreased 12 kg in 4 months. His abdomen was flat and soft with no tenderness. A computed tomography scan showed that the horizontal duodenal leg was not anchored to the retroperitoneum. Rotation of the mesentery, which was wrapped around the superior mesenteric artery in a clockwise direction, was observed, suggesting midgut volvulus. We performed emergency surgery and Ladd's procedure.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

A previous study reported that the most common symptom in the chronic course of intestinal malrotation was abdominal pain in 41.2% of cases, and weight loss was observed in only 2.6% of patients. The high degree of intestinal adhesion suggests that repeated torsion and release and the development of collateral vessels may have contributed to the asymptomatic course.

CONCLUSION

Adult-onset intestinal malrotation should be considered as a differential diagnosis in the presence of weight loss and gastrointestinal symptoms. The timing of surgery is still controversial. In chronic cases, severe adhesion might be expected and laparoscopic surgery should be considered carefully.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of intestinal malrotation in children

BACKGROUND

The safety of the laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of intestinal malrotation.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study included pediatric cases of intestinal malrotation operated on between 2005 and 2016.

RESULTS

This study included 227 children with a median age of 17 days (0-17.2 years), including 161 with a midgut volvulus. Forty-six(20.3%) procedures were started by laparoscopy and 181(79.7%) by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was more frequent for elective surgery (45.9%) than for emergency procedures (10.8%, p < 0.001). Conversions were significantly more frequent during emergency procedures (66.7% vs 17.9%)(p = 0.001). Considering only 61 elective surgeries, the mean hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopy (5.3 days +/-5.2 vs 10.1 days +/-13, p = 0.01), the overall complication rate was comparable (15.8% vs 21.7%, p = 0.7) but post-operative volvulus was significantly more frequent after laparoscopy (13% vs 0%, p = 0.04). Outcomes of the two approaches were not significantly different after 166 emergency procedures.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy can be performed by experienced team for the treatment of selected cases of intestinal malrotation. Conversion to open surgery should be done with a low threshold, as the rate of volvulus recurrence is concerning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic Ladd Procedure for Malrotation in Newborns and Infants

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic approach for malrotation has become more popular for neonates and in cases with volvulus, but its safety and efficacy remains controversial. This study reviewed laparoscopy outcomes in neonate/infant malrotation.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed and Lilacs databases were reviewed. Data from studies published in English/Spanish between 1995 and 2019 were collected. Results are presented as percentages and means/medians; logistic regression was used to study possible associations.

RESULTS

Nineteen papers offered 99 neonates/infants with median age and weight of 10.5 days and 3.5 kg, respectively. Ladd's procedure was performed in 95 (96%) patients and bands' division in 4 (4%); appendectomy was not included in 16 (16.2%) patients, and cecopexy was not performed in all cases. Volvulus was reported in 39 (39.4%) patients. There were 11 conversions (11.1%) and 10 recurrences of symptoms (10.1%) that required reintervention. An association was found between volvulus and recurrence (P = .05) and the need for conversion (P < .01). There were 10 (10.1%) minor complications and no mortality. The median follow-up was 10 months.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic approach to malrotation is feasible and safe in hemodynamically stable neonates/infants without intestinal necrosis and is associated with 11% conversion rate and 10% reinterventions. The presence of volvulus is associated with recurrence and conversion. Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure with appendectomy and without cecopexy is the commonly practiced approach that is associated with minor complications.

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure in neonates: A simple landmark detorsion technique

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of our simple landmark technique for laparoscopic detorsion and the Ladd's procedure (lap-Ladd) for malrotation with midgut volvulus in neonates and to identify the risk factors for reoperation after the lap-Ladd.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 42 patients after lap-Ladd for malrotation between April 2017 and June 2019. Information regarding patient status and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients had volvulus (73.8 %), while 11 patients did not (26.2%). The median age and weight between the two groups at operation were 9 days (range, 3-28 days), 3.2 kg (range, 2-8 kg) and 6 days (range, 2-11), 2.9 kg (range, 2-3.8 kg), respectively. The operative time was significantly shorter in patients with volvulus compared to those without (60 vs 105 min, P = 0.002). Two cases were converted to open surgery because of ischemic changes of the total small intestine during surgery. Reoperation was required in two patients with volvulus (due to adhesive small bowel obstruction and recurrent volvulus). There was no significant predictive factor for reoperation after the lap-Ladd procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our simple landmark lap-Ladd procedure demonstrated feasibility and good short-term outcomes in neonates with malrotation, regardless of the presence or absence of volvulus.

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure for malrotation in infants and children is still a controversial approach

BACKGROUND

Open Ladd's procedure is the gold standard for the correction of intestinal malrotation and laparoscopic approach remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate our experience in laparoscopic management of malrotation.

METHODS

Single center retrospective study including patients who underwent a laparoscopic assessment of intestinal malrotation with correction if appropriate between 2007 and 2017.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (median age 7 months) had a laparoscopic assessment with and without correction of malrotation. Forty-five (69%) were symptomatic, including 16 (25%) with a midgut volvulus. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 55 (86%) patients in 110 min (30-190). Conversions happened more frequently at the beginning of the experience. With a follow-up of 12.5 months (8 days-5.3 years), morbidity rate was 15% and 4 (6%) patients underwent a redo surgery, all in the first 5 months after surgery, compared with 3/53 (6%) in a contemporaneous group undergoing open Ladd's.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series reported so far of the laparoscopic management of malrotation. Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is reliable but still exposes to open conversion which may be in part owing to a learning curve. A low conversion threshold is important in cases with volvulus. The redo rate is similar to that of the open procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective comparative treatment study.

Transumbilical minilaparotomy in low-birthweight newborns for complicated conditions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to examine the outcome of transumbilical minilaparotomy for infants and compare the results between normal birthweight (NBW) and low birthweight (LBW).

METHODS

Between July 2010 and March 2017, infants who underwent abdominal surgery through transumbilical minilaparotomy were enrolled. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups, NBW and LBW. Complexity was defined as complicated conditions other than intestinal atresia and malrotation.

RESULTS

Totally, 16 patients were included. The diagnosis included intestinal atresia (n = 3), meconium peritonitis (n = 4), bowel infarction/necrosis (n = 4), spontaneous intestinal perforation (n = 2), segmental volvulus and necrosis (n = 1), necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 1), and malrotation (n = 1). The median gestational age and body weight were 32 (24-40) weeks and 1731 (560-4200) grams respectively. The median age at operation was 3 (1-41) days. The surgical procedure included primary repair of the intestine (n = 14), ileostomy (n = 1) and Ladd's procedure (n = 1). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage (n = 2), adhesion ileus (n = 1), and missed rectal atresia (n = 1). There was one mortality due to extremely low birthweight and poor lung maturation. Re-operation was required in 3 patients for anastomotic leakage (n = 2) and missed rectal atresia (n = 1). Mean birthweight was 2932 ± 97 and 1263 ± 667 g in NBW (n = 5) and LBW (n = 11), respectively (p < 0.01). Complexity rate was 40% and 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.034). The mean operation time was 139.4 ± 65.8 and 124.3 ± 46.1 min, respectively (p = 0.60). The complicated rate and reoperation rate were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Transumbilical minilaparotomy is technically feasible and an alternative option of minimally invasive surgery for LBW infants and complex conditions.

Reoperation after Ladd's procedure in the neonatal period

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate (1) the indications for reoperation after neonatal Ladd's procedure, (2) the type of reoperation and (3) its outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed all neonatal Ladd's procedures in our hospital from 2003 to 2017 and the outcomes of reoperation in these patients.

MAIN RESULTS

252 neonates had Ladd's procedure: 59 were laparoscopic (23.4%) and 193 open (76.6%). 15 (6.0%) required reoperation with no difference between laparoscopic and open (p = 0.12). Overall, the indications for reoperation were: adhesive intestinal obstruction (n = 10, 4.0%), recurrent midgut volvulus (n = 4, 1.6%), and missed diagnosis of associated anomaly (n = 1, 0.4%). The incidence of recurrent midgut volvulus was higher after laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (3/59; 5.1%) compared to open Ladd's procedure (1/193; 0.5%) (p = 0.04). Adhesive intestinal obstruction developed after both open (8/193, 4.1%) or laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (2/59, 3.3%). The duration of reoperation and the length of post-operative hospital stay were 63.4 ± 27.1 min and 10.1 ± 5.2 days, respectively. After reoperation, there were no post-operative complications. All children were well at follow-up (6 months-14 years).

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure compared to the open Ladd's procedure is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent volvulus. The risk of developing this potentially dangerous complication after laparoscopic Ladd's procedure raises doubts about the effectiveness and safety of the laparoscopic approach in neonates.

Is less more? Laparoscopic versus open Ladd's procedure in children with malrotation

BACKGROUND

With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is increasingly used to treat children with malrotation, yet evidence regarding its safety and efficacy is lacking. We hypothesize that operative and postoperative outcomes with the open technique are superior to the laparoscopic Ladd's procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a 5-y retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Ladd's procedure at our institution from 2010-2015. Exclusion of patients included those with concomitant conditions, such as poor gut perfusion, significant reflux, tracheoesophageal fistula, failure to thrive requiring concomitant gastrostomy, and biliary atresia. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2015, of 130 patients who underwent Ladd's procedure, 77 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-two patients underwent initial open surgery, 15 patients underwent laparoscopy, seven of which were converted to open. Patients undergoing open surgery were younger compared to the laparoscopic groups. Thirty-three of the 77 malrotation patients (43%) presented with volvulus, 27 underwent open surgery, four had laparoscopic converted to open procedures, and two patients underwent laparoscopic Ladd's without incident. Laparoscopy resulted in increased operative time and clinic visits. Patients undergoing laparoscopic to open surgery had longer operative times, time to resume diet, and length of hospital stay. No difference was noted in complications among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although minimally invasive approaches are becoming increasingly used, no evidence supports laparoscopic superiority over open Ladd's procedure. We found that open surgery was associated with shorter operating times and fewer clinic visits. Furthermore, laparotomy remains the favored procedure for patients presenting with volvulus.