Surgical Management of Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Comparative Study Between Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery

Minimally Invasive versus Open Ureteral Reimplantation in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

 We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) in children.

METHODS

 Literature searches were conducted to identify studies that compared MIS (laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation or robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation) and OUR in children. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, success rate, postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, wound infection, and overall postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

 Among the 7,882 pediatric participants in the 14 studies, 852 received MIS, and 7,030 received OUR. When compared with the OUR, the MIS approach resulted in shorter hospital stays (I 2 = 99%, weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.22 to -1.41; p < 0.001), less blood loss (I 2 = 100%, WMD -12.65, 95% CI -24.82 to -0.48; p = 0.04), and less wound infection (I 2 = 0%, odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). However, no significant difference was found in operative time and secondary outcomes such as postoperative UTI, urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, and overall postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

 MIS is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical procedure in children when compared with OUR. Compared with OUR, MIS has a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less wound infection. Furthermore, MIS is equivalent to OUR in terms of success rate and secondary outcomes such as postoperative UTI, urinary retention, postoperative hematuria, and overall postoperative complications. We conclude that MIS should be considered an acceptable option for pediatric ureteral reimplantation.

Pneumovesicoscopic Transvesical Ureteric Reimplantation for the Correction of Congenital Lower Ureteric Anomalies in Children: A Regional Arabian Gulf Multicenter Retrospective Experience

OBJECTIVE

To report and compare the outcomes of 3 different techniques of pneumovesicoscopic ureteric reimplantation applied in children.

METHODS

The study included 178 renal units in 105 patients who underwent pneumovesicoscopic reimplantation between January 2016 and October 2021. Presentation, indication for surgery, surgical technique, operative time, operative details, days of hospitalization and catheterization, and outcome were retrieved from patients' electronic records.

RESULTS

The collected data was revised, coded, tabulated, and fed into the computer using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 25). Data were presented, and the appropriate statistical analysis was performed according to the type of data obtained for each parameter.

CONCLUSION

The pneumovesicoscopic approach to ureteric reimplantation is not inferior to the data reported in the literature for open approach in terms of success rate (94%). In addition, pneumovesicoscopy permits the evaluation of the trigonal anatomy in situ, which can have a significant impact on the selection of the most appropriate surgical technique.

The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux

INTRODUCTION

"Subureteric Teflon INGection" (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the injection site. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder is a rare cause of ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.

RESULTS

1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were flank pain and urinary tract infection (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.

CONCLUSION

Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic treatment of primary intermediate and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children in a long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an important minimally invasive surgical approach in patients undergoing surgical treatment of VUR. In our past experience, we observed that a bulking agent mound sagittal diameter of 10 mm is the main predictor of effectiveness of the procedure. Moreover we noticed that the use of intraoperative ultrasound, allows the surgeon to better identify the site, volume and shape of the bulking agent injected, finally reducing operative time.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate if the intraoperative ultrasound assistance could definitively improve effectiveness of the endoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared two series treated with endoscopic procedures for intermediate and high grade primary VUR, respectively without (series A) and with (series B) intraoperative ultrasound (IO-US). In all patients VCUG was performed to assess VUR grade and to verify resolution or VUR downgrading during the follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 177 ureteric units were treated. Endoscopic procedures globally were effective in 68/96 ureters (70.8 %) in series A and in 68/81 ureters (83.9 %) in series B. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed comparing the series with regard to VUR grades, but a significant difference is shown (p < 0.05) when grouping grades III-V VUR. No significance in differences of volume injected were detected, but operative time was significantly lower in series B (27.5 min vs 19.6 min, p < 0.05). Mean sagittal mound diameter measured during cystoscopy in series B was 10.45 mm (range 8.5-14.2 mm).

DISCUSSION

The intraoperative ultrasound assistance during endoscopic treatment of VUR could represent a valid tool for surgeons to better identify location, volume and shape of the bulking agent. Furthermore, the use of an objective parameter of evaluation of the implant can overcome the subjective intraoperative evaluation of the implant itself, improving results for experienced surgeons and reducing the learning-curve for inexperienced ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of endoscopic injection of bulking-agent can be improved with intraoperative ultrasound, allowing at the same time a significant reduction of operative time.

Correlation between FLACC scale score and analgesic requirement in children undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery

Postoperative pain presents several challenges in pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery. The Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale is a valid scale for pediatric postoperative pain. The aim of our study was to assess postoperative pain using FLACC scale and to analyze the correlation between FLACC scale score and analgesic requirement in children underwent Minimally Invasive Surgery. We retrospectively analyzed data of 153 children aged 2 months-3 years who underwent Minimally Invasive Surgery in our unit from January 2019 and December 2019. Postoperative pain assessment was established using FLACC scale. In each patient were analyzed the correlation between FLACC score and analgesic requirement. Pain evaluation was assigned immediately after surgery and at 15 and 60 minutes. 36.6% of patients (56 children) were asleep so considered pain free; 21.6% of patients (33 children) had a FLACC score more than 7 so they required analgesics and the pain assessment 15 and 60 minutes after was significantly lower. 41.8% of patients (64 children) had a postoperative FLACC score less than 3, so they didn't require any analgesic treatment. On the basis of our results, we recommend FLACC scale for postoperative pain assessment in children underwent MIS aged 2 months-3 years. FLACC scale is an effective and precise scale in detection of postoperative analgesic requirement in children and it could be extended in different age groups with further research.

Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature

In the last 20 years, endoscopic injection (EI) has affirmed as a valid alternative to open surgery for management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study aimed to investigate and discuss some debated aspects such as indications, bulking agents and comparison, techniques of injection and comparison, predictive factors of success, use in specific situations. EI is minimally invasive, well accepted by patients and families, with short learning curve and low-morbidity profile. It provides reflux resolution rates approaching those of open reimplantation, ranging from 69 to 100%. Obviously, the success rate may be influenced by several factors. Recently, it is adopted as first-line therapy also in high grade reflux or complex anatomy such as duplex, bladder diverticula, ectopic ureters. The two most used materials for injection are Deflux and Vantris. The first is absorbable, easier to inject, has lower risk of obstruction, but can lose efficacy over time. The second is non-absorbable, more difficult to inject, has higher risk of obstruction, but it is potentially more durable. The two main techniques are STING and HIT. To date, the ideal material and technique of injection has not yet clearly established, but the choice remains dependent on surgeon's preference and experience.

Current trends in 2021 in surgical management of vesico-ureteral reflux in pediatric patients: results of a multicenter international survey on 552 patients

BACKGROUND

The selection of best surgical approach for treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) in the pediatric population remains debated. This study aimed to report the results of a multicenter survey about the current trends in surgical management of pediatric VUR.

METHODS

An online questionnaire-based survey was performed, with participation of six international institutions. All children (age <18 years) affected by primary III-V grade VUR, who were operated over the last 5 years, were included. The incidence of each VUR intervention, patients' demographics and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients (331 girls), with a median age of 4.6 years (range 0.5-17.6), were included. Deflux^® injection (STING) was the most common technique (70.1%). The multicenter success rate after single treatment was significantly lower after STING (74.4%) compared with the other treatments (P=0.001). Persistent VUR rate was significantly higher after STING (10.8%) compared with the other treatments (P=0.03). Choosing endoscopy over surgery mean reducing Clavien Dindo grade 2 complications by 5% but increasing redo procedure rate by 7%. STING was the most cost-effective option.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey confirmed that the choice of the technique remains based on surgeon's preference. Deflux^® injection currently represents the first line therapy for primary VUR in children and the role of surgical ureteral reimplantation is significantly reduced. STING reported acceptable success rate, less postoperative complications and lower costs but higher failure and re-operation rates and related costs compared with the other surgical approaches. The adoption of laparoscopy and robotics over open reimplantation remains still limited.

Pediatric robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) in simple and complex ureter anatomy: Report of a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (REVUR) is a well established approach for surgical treatment of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). However, further evidence is needed to confirm its efficacy even in case of complex anatomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to further confirm the evidence that REVUR is safe and effective in both simple and complex ureter anatomy.

STUDY DESIGN

The charts of all patients with VUR, who received REVUR in 6 different institutions over a 5-year period, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with both simple and complex ureter anatomy were included. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and post-operative results were assessed. VUR resolution was defined as either being resolved VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) or clinically without symptoms during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with median age of 6.9 years (range 4.5-12), receiving REVUR in the study period, were included. Eighteen (31.6%) patients had complex anatomy and included prior failed endoscopic injection (n = 13), complete ureteral duplication (n = 2), periureteral diverticulum (n = 2), ectopic megaureter requiring dismembering (n = 1). The median operative time was 155 min for unilateral and 211.5 min for bilateral repairs. The clinical + radiographic VUR resolution rate was 96.5%. Post-operative complications (Clavien 2) included urinary retention following bilateral repair (n = 5, 8.7%), febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 6, 10.5%) and gross hematuria (n = 3, 5.2%). Comparative analysis between simple and complex cases showed that REVUR was faster in simple cases in both unilateral [p = 0.002] and bilateral repair [p = 0.001] and post-operative urinary retention was more frequent in simple cases [p = 0.004] and in patients with pre-operative bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) [p = 0.001] (Table).

DISCUSSION

This series confirmed that the robot-assisted technique was feasible even in cases with complex anatomy using some technical refinements, that justified the longer operative times in both unilateral and bilateral cases. An interesting finding of this study was the correlation emerged between BBD and risk of post-operative urinary retention and VUR persistence. Our results also excluded any significant correlation between complex cases and risk of post-operative urinary retention. The main study limitations included the retrospective and nonrandomized design, the small number of cases and the arbitrary definition of complex anatomy.

CONCLUSION

REVUR was safe and effective for management of VUR in both simple and complex ureter anatomy. Complex REVUR required slightly longer operative times, without significant differences in post-operative mordidity and success rates. Aside from complex anatomy, BBD emerged as the main risk factor associated with surgical failure and post-operative morbidity.

Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation after Failed Open Surgery: Incorporating the Psoas Hitch Maneuver for Sufficient Tunnel Length

BACKGROUND

 Failure after open ureteral reimplantation has been reported to occur in 2 to 7% of cases. While a second open reconstructive surgery is appropriate in most cases, there are data suggesting similar outcomes utilizing the laparoscopic approach. The objective of this study is to describe a modification and report our experience with laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed open reimplantation reinforced with a psoas hitch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed open surgery between September 2012 and April 2018 at three different academic centers was performed. Patient demographics, surgical indications, complications, and outcomes were reviewed. Either ipsilateral ureteral reimplantation with a combined intravesical and extravesical approaches or a cross-trigonal extravesical approach was utilized, depending on the length of the ureter. In all cases, a psoas hitch was performed to gain a longer submucosal tunnel and relieve tension, thus facilitating an efficient antireflux mechanism.

RESULTS

 Seventeen patients underwent a laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed open surgery. Median age at second surgery was 106 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 53-122.5). Ipsilateral ureteral reimplantation with a combined intravesical and extravesical approaches was performed in 11 cases and cross-trigonal extravesical approach in 6 cases. Median ureteral diameter before the redo surgery was 16 mm (IQR: 14.5-18.5) and after surgery was 6 mm (IQR: 3.5-8.5) (p < 0.001). Postoperative mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan showed a nonobstructive pattern and stable renal function in all cases.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with incorporation of a psoas hitch after failed open reimplantation is safe and effective.

Comparative study of open, laparoscopic and endoscopic treatments of intermediate grade vesicoureteral reflux in children

BACKGROUND

Low-grade vesicoureteral-reflux (VUR) are rather treated by endoscopic injection, whereas open or laparoscopic procedures are mainly performed for high-grade VURs. Management of intermediate grades is controversial and no study focused on grade III to date. This study aims to compare the results of open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic approaches in children with grade III VUR.

METHODS

A multicenter comparative retrospective study included children with grade III VUR operated for febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) from 2007 to 2016. Children without UTI, with reflux of other grades, neurological bladder, duplex system, posterior urethral valves, and bladder exstrophy were excluded. Success was defined as no recurrence of febrile UTI and was presented as event-free survival curves.

RESULTS

Out of 806 children operated of VUR, 171 met the inclusion criteria (114 females). Seventy-seven children (45%) underwent an open Cohen procedure, 35 (21%) a laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir and 59 (34%) a submucosal endoscopic injection according to the centers' preference. The mean follow-up was 64 months (24-132). Groups were not different for age, sex, and circumcision status. Compared to Cohen procedure, recurrences of febrile UTI were more frequent after laparoscopic treatment (p = 0,02, 8/35) and endoscopic treatment (p = 0.001, 16/59). Redosurgery was also more frequent after laparoscopy (n = 2) and endoscopic injection (n = 14) than after open surgery (n = 0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Recurrent febrile UTIs and redosurgery are more frequent after endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures in grade III VUR than open reimplantation. Whether the lower morbidity of laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches balances the risk of recurrent febrile UTI remains to be determined for intermediate grade reflux.

A systematic review & meta-analysis comparing outcomes of endoscopic treatment of primary vesico ureteric reflux in children with polyacrylate poly alcohol copolymer versus dextranomer hyaluranic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of bulking agents for vesico ureteric reflux (VUR). In this meta-analysis we have compared the outcomes of endoscopic treatment with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA).

METHODS

A systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2020 was conducted covering databases like PUBMED, MEDLINE etc. for (endoscopic treatment) AND (VUR) AND (PPC OR DxHA) AND (recurrence OR complications). PRISMA guidelines were followed and only comparative studies were included. Outcomes were early success defined as absence of VUR in voiding cystourethrogram at 3-months followup, urinary tract infections (UTI) and occurrence of vesico-ureteric-junction obstruction (VUJO). Risk of bias was analysed with Robvis tool and odds-ratios were compared with Revman-3.0.

RESULTS

Among nine studies (heterogeneity; I 2 69-79%) all cleared the risk of bias assessment. There was no significant difference in high grade VUR (p = 0.94) between PPC (40%) and DxHA (43%). Success rate after single injection was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) at 86% (477/555) for PPC vs 69% (474/685) for DxHA. UTI rate between PPC (12%) and DxHA (14.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). VUJO rate between PPC (3.9%) and DxHA (0.8%) was also not significantly different (p = 0.47). Significantly lesser volume (p = 0.02) was used for PPC (0.7 ml) compared to DxHA (0.9 ml).

CONCLUSION

Reflux resolution was significantly higher with PPC than DxHA. Postinjection UTI/VUJO incidence was not significantly different between them. Limitation of this meta-analysis was heterogeneity & small number of articles. Further studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic and open surgery in ureteral reimplantation: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

To compare the efficacy and safety between open ureteral replantation (OUR), laparoscopic ureteral replantation (LUR) and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation (RALUR). This review produced by the R3.5.0 software with "gemtc" program package and JAGS3.4.0 software based on the Bayesian model. A comprehensive search was done in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, Cnki, CBM and WANFANG DATA. Studies that compared OUR, LUR OR RALUR were selected. Summary of Conclusions by ranking of Outcomes. A total of 3949 patients from 29 studies were included. The success rate in OUR, LUR and RALUR was 97.72%, 94.68% and 95.82%. The OR (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR was 0.76 (0.42,1.7) and 0.76 (0.30, 2.6), respectively, compared with OUR. The rate of complications in OUR, LUR and RALUR was 12.78%, 7.94% and 16.32%. The OR (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR was 0.28 (0.16, 0.48) and 0.61 (0.24,1.3), respectively, compared with OUR. The MD (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR for operation time was 22 (2,40) and 46 (7.5,84), respectively, compared with OUR. The MD (95% CI) of LUR and RALUR for hospital stay was - 3.6 (- 4.5, - 2.7) and - 1.1 (- 2.9, 0.58), respectively, compared with OUR. There is no significant difference in the success rates of OUR, LUR, and RALUR. RALUR and OUR has similar complication rates and time of hospital stay, while LUR has fewer complications and faster time to discharge compared to RALUR and OUR. The operative time of OUR is significantly less compared to LUR and RALUR.

Surgical management of vesicoureteral junction obstruction (VUJO) in children: A comparative study between transvesicoscopic Cohen reimplantation and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (TU-LESS) Lich-Gregoir techniques

BACKGROUND

There are many reports on the application of minimally invasive technology in the correction of children's VUJO, but there is no report on the treatment of children's VUJO by the TU-LESS Lich-Gregoir method. We aimed to comparatively analyze the therapeutic outcomes of transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation Cohen procedure (TUR-C) and TU-LESS surgery Lich-Gregoir procedure (TU-LESS-LG) in pediatric VUJO.

METHODS

The data of 49 children with VUJO admitted from January 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on different surgical methods, they were divided into the TUR-C group (23 cases) and the TU-LESS-LG group (26 cases). The demographic characteristics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, the recovery of renal function, and the improvement of hydronephrosis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in demographic characteristics and preoperative data between the two groups. The TU-LESS-LG group was superior to the TUR-C in terms of average operation time and postoperative hospital stay. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery of renal function, and improvement of hydronephrosis.

CONCLUSION

The two surgical methods can achieve a similar curative effect in the treatment of VUJO. The TU-LESS-LG has more advantages in operation time, postoperative hospital stays, the wider age selection range of cases, megaureter tapering, and cosmetic incision, but the operation is more difficult.

Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the outcomes of extravesical (EVUR) and intravesical (IVUR) ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) via systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature review from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane since inception to March 2022 was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies (OCS) comparing outcomes between EVUR and IVUR.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, comprising 577 patients (778 ureters) operated by EVUR and 395 patients (635 ureters) by IVUR. Pre-operative VUR grade, postoperative VUR persistence and hydronephrosis was not statistically significant. EVUR had shorter operative time [mean differences (MD) -22.91 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), -44.53 to -1.30, P = 0.04] and hospital stay (MD -2.09 days; 95% CI, -2.82 to -1.36, P < 0.00001) compared to IVUR. Bilateral EVUR had higher risk of postoperative acute urinary retention (ARU) (8.1%) compared to bilateral IVUR (1.7%) (OR = 4.40; 95% CI, 1.33-14.58, P = 0.02). No patient undergoing unilateral EVUR or IVUR experienced ARU.

CONCLUSION

Both EVUR and IVUR are equally effective in correcting primary VUR. Operative time and hospital stay are shorter after EVUR compared to IVUR. However, bilateral EVUR is associated with higher risk of postoperative ARU.

Effectiveness and risks of endoscopic management compared to vesicoureteral reimplantation in patients with high-grade vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review and network meta-analysis

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic management compared to ureterovesical reimplantation in pediatric patients with high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in terms of urinary tract infection. We performed a network meta-analysis. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CENTRAL. We included clinical experiments, quasi-experiments, and cohorts studies. The population was men and women between 1 month and 15 years old. Patients had primary high-grade VUR diagnosed by voiding cystourethrography. The interventions were subureteric bulking agent endoscopic injection (polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, collagen, Dx/Ha, and PPC) vs vesicoureteral reimplantation (Cohen, Politano-Leadbetter, Glenn-Anderson, and Lich-Gregoir), and the primary outcome was urinary infections. Nine studies accomplished the inclusion criteria (seven observational and two clinical experiments). A total of 1448 renal units underwent surgical treatments for the correction of high-grade VUR. Regarding the primary outcome, we compared Dx/Ha with Cohen, Lich-Gregoir, and PPC, finding an RD of -0.02 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.06), RD of -0.02 (95%CI -0.10 to 0.07), and an RD of -0.03 (- 0.13 to 0.07), respectively.Conclusion: Our study showed that there were no differences in UTI episodes after VUR correction in patients undergoing endoscopic management compared with vesicoureteral reimplantation. What is Known: • Primary vesicoureteral reflux is one of the most common congenital anomalies of the urinary tract. • The clinical practice guidelines recommend the surgical management of patients with high-grade VUR. What is New: • There were no differences in UTI episodes after VUR correction in patients undergoing endoscopic management compared with vesicoureteral reimplantation.

Comparison of Subureteral Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid and Lich-Gregoir Ureteral Reimplantation in the Treatment of Pediatric Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: The gold standard of surgical intervention of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is open ureteral reimplantation with high success and low complication rates. However, in recent years, endoscopic injection, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA), has become an effective therapy for VUR. It is noted that limited prospective randomized trials compare the different surgical techniques of especially endoscopic injection versus open procedures. We aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic injection of Dx/HA and Lich-Gregoir open technique of ureteral reimplantation for grades III and IV primary VUR in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2018, 60 pediatric patients with grades III and IV primary VUR were included in a prospective randomized trial. Thirty cases with 45 refluxing ureters managed by endoscopic injection of Dx/HA comprised group A. Open Lich-Gregoir technique used in the other 30 cases with 48 refluxing ureters composed of group B. Renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography, and renal scintigraphy were used for follow-up. The surgical success rate, cost-effectiveness, and occurrence of complications were evaluated and compared in both groups. Results: Sixty pediatric patients with 93 refluxing ureters (41 females and 19 males) were included in the trial. The mean follow-up for all patients was 17.7 ± 7.1 months. Overall reflux resolution was 80% (36/45) of the ureters in group A after a single injection and 93.75% (45/48) of the ureters in group B. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant concerning clinical or anatomical preoperative factors and surgical success rate. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time and hospital stay. Conclusion: This comparative study demonstrated a high success rate of open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir) procedure over the endoscopic injection of Dx/HA therapy to manage primary VUR grades III-IV. Clinical Trial Number: NCT04798443.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography with Regard to the Further Therapy Regime and Patient Outcome-A Single-Center Experience in an Interdisciplinary Uroradiological Setting

Background and Objectives: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) describes a common pediatric anomaly in pediatric urology with a prevalence of 1-2%. In diagnostics, in addition to the gold standard of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), contrast-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS) offers a radiation-free procedure, which, despite its advantages, is not yet widely used. In the present single-center study, subsequent therapeutic procedures and outcomes after ceVUS of 49 patients were investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of ceVUS with the intention of broader clinical implementation. Materials and Methods: Between 2016 and 2020, 49 patients were retrospectively included and received a ceVUS to evaluate VUR. With a distribution of 47:2 (95.9%), a clear female predominance was present. The age of the patients varied between 5 months and 60 years at the time of ceVUS. All examinations were all performed and subsequently interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Results: Compared to intraoperative findings, ceVUS shows a sensitivity of 95.7% with a specificity of 100%. Allergic reactions to the contrast medium could not be observed. Conclusion: With its high sensitivity and intraoperative validation, ceVUS offers an excellent alternative to VCUG, the gold standard in the diagnosis of VUR. In addition, ceVUS is a radiation-free examination method with a low risk profile that offers an exceptional diagnostic tool in the diagnostic clarification of recurrent urinary tract infections with the suspected diagnosis of VUR and should also be included in the consideration of a diagnosis next to the established VCUG, especially in younger children.

Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux: What Have We Learned Over the Last 20 Years?

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is associated with increased risks of urinary tract infection, renal scarring and reflux nephropathy. We review advancements over the last two decades in our understanding and management of VUR. Over time, the condition may resolve spontaneously but it can persist for many years and bladder/bowel dysfunction is often involved. Some factors that increase the likelihood of persistence (e.g., high grade) also increase the risk of renal scarring. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is generally considered the definitive method for diagnosing VUR, and helpful in determining the need for treatment. However, this procedure causes distress and radiation exposure. Therefore, strategies to reduce clinicians' reliance upon VCUG (e.g., after a VUR treatment procedure) have been developed. There are several options for managing patients with VUR. Observation is suitable only for patients at low risk of renal injury. Antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of UTIs, but drawbacks such as antibiotic resistance and incomplete adherence mean that this option is not viable for long-term use. Long-term studies of endoscopic injection have helped us understand factors influencing use and the effectiveness of this procedure. Ureteral reimplantation is still performed commonly, and robot-assisted laparoscopic methods are gaining popularity. Over the last 20 years, there has been a shift toward more conservative management of VUR with an individualized, risk-based approach. For continued treatment improvement, better identification of children at risk of renal scarring, robust evidence regarding the available interventions, and an improved VUR grading system are needed.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of laparoscopic extravesical versus trans vesicoscopic ureteric reimplantation

OBJECTIVE

When considering treatment for vesico ureteric reflux via inimally invasive surgery there is a dilemma to choose between laparoscopic extravesical (LEVUR) and transvesicoscopic (TVUR) ureteric reimplantation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we have analyzed the articles on LEVUR and TVUR and compared the outcomes.

METHODS

We searched the databases to identify all papers pertaining to TVUR and LEVUR in the pediatric population. Duplicate publications, review articles, incomplete articles and robotic assistance were excluded. Systematic review was performed to identify patient data, reflux grades, laterality, duration of surgery, time to discharge, success rate and complications. Meta-analysis of heterogeneity was reported with I 2 statistics. Once heterogeneity was found low, the pooled outcomes were compared with students t test and Fishers exact test, wherever appropriate.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 45 articles, 23 articles were included (13 articles on TVUR and 10 articles on LEVUR). The I 2 statistics for TVUR and LEVUR showed low heterogeneity with I 2 of 0% (95% C.I 0-37%) and 25% (95% C.I 0-64%) respectively. With low heterogeneity both were suitable to be considered to have been conducted under similar conditions with possibility of using fixed effect model. The percentage of Grade 5 VUR was significantly higher (p = 0.001; X 2) in TVUR (11.9%) compared to LEVUR (2.2%). The proportion of bilateral reimplantation was significantly higher (p = 0.001; X 2) in TVUR compared to LEVUR (summary table). The success rate of LEVUR was significantly higher at 96.7% compared to TVUR at 93.7% (p = 0.007 X 2). Unilateral/Bilateral TVUR took significantly longer duration of surgery (155/194 min vs 107/161 min) compared to LEVUR (p = 0.001; Fishers). The mean (s.d) time to discharge was longer at 3.2 (1.6) days for TVUR compared to 1.6 (0.4) days for LEVUR (p = 0.001; Fishers). The complication rate was comparable, 7.35% for TVUR and 5.35% for LEVUR (p = 0.167; X 2).

DISCUSSION

In this meta-analysis we found that LEVUR had shorter operating time, higher success, and shorter hospital stay compared to TVUR. A probable explanation could be higher number unilateral VURs and lower number of grade 5 VUR cases in LEVUR group. Both the techniques had comparable overall complication rate: LEVUR had more post-operative urinary retention while TVUR had more port-related problems.

Brazilian consensus on vesicoureteral reflux-recommendations for clinical practice

Introduction

Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) is characterized by a retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the ureters and kidneys. It is one of the most common urinary tract anomalies and the major cause of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the first years of life. If not properly diagnosed and treated can lead to recurrent UTI, renal scar and, in severe cases, to end stage renal disease. Despite recent advances in scientific and technological knowledge, evaluation and treatment of VUR is still controversial and there is still considerable heterogeneity in evaluation methods and therapeutic approaches. The aim of the present consensus is to give a practical orientation on how to evaluate and treat VUR.

Methods

The board of Pediatric Urology of the Brazilian Society of Urology joined a group of experts and reviewed all important issues on Vesicoureteral Reflux evaluation and treatment and elaborated a draft of the document. On November 2017 the panel met to review, discuss and write a consensus document.

Results and Discussion

Vesicoureteral Reflux is a common and challenging problem in children. Children presenting with Vesicoureteral Reflux require careful evaluation and treatment to avoid future urinary tract infections and kidney scars. The panel addressed recommendations on up to date choice of diagnosis evaluation and therapies.

Do Volume of Injection and Learning Curve Influence the Results of Endoscopic Correction of Vesicoureteric Reflux Using Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid? A Single Surgeon Experience

Background: Available reports regarding the technical factors for successful endoscopic treatment (ET) of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer are inconclusive. We studied single-surgeon data to evaluate the association of injected volume and surgeon experience with success after ET for VUR. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight children (87 ureters) with grades 2-4 primary VUR were included. Success was defined as complete resolution of reflux on follow-up imaging. Volume of injection between success and failed groups was analyzed; volume of injection was further studied using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Patients were then divided into two groups: group 1 (early experience) and group 2 (later experience). Both groups were compared for age, grade of reflux, volume of injection, and success. Results: Overall success of one injection was 76%. The mean volume of injection was significantly larger in successful ureters than failed ureters (P = .008). On ROC analysis, the volume of 0.75 mL (area under curve 0.747, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.89) had a good discriminative ability to predict success of the injection procedure. Furthermore, a volume cutoff of 0.8 mL demonstrated significant influence on success (success 14/25 ureters for <0.8 mL and 36/42 ureters for 0.8 mL or more volume of injection, P = .0097), whereas no difference in success was observed with a cutoff volume of 0.9 mL (P = .2480). When the patients were divided into two groups based on surgeon experience, group 2 demonstrated better success than group 1 (84% versus 65%, P = .04). Both groups were comparable for age (P = .09), grade of reflux (0.46) and the median volume of injection was similar (0.8 mL) in both the groups. Conclusions: We found that a minimal volume of 0.75 mL dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection may be required to achieve success of ET in moderate grade primary VUR. Success also improved with increasing surgeon experience.

Comparison of Cohen and Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation in the surgical management of primary unilateral vesicoureteral reflux in children

OBJECTIVE

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. Various intravesical and extravesical techniques have been described for the surgical correction of VUR. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open intravesical and extravesical procedures for unilateral primary VUR in children.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and August 2018, 38 children with primary VUR who underwent open ureteral reimplantation surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The Cohen (intravesical) and the Lich-Gregoir (extravesical) approach were grouped as groups A and B, respectively. The groups were compared for age, gender, preoperative reflux grade, presence of lower urinary tract symptoms, operation time, discomfort and pain, analgesic requirements, duration of hematuria, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. All the parameters were statistically compared.

RESULTS

There were 38 patients in this study. Group A had 18 patients, and group B had 20 patients. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group B than in group A. The mean hospital stay was also shorter in group B. The urethral foley stay period was 4.7±0.9 days 2±0 days (p = 0.000*), respectively, for group A and B. Macroscopic hematuria was seen in group A. The objective pain scale was worse after intravesical surgery. Analgesic requirements were higher in group A (p =0.131).

CONCLUSION

Intravesical and extravesical ureteroneocystostomy methods are equally successful and feasible in the treatment of primary unilateral VUR. The Cohen technique is associated with a longer and more painful hospital stay, gross hematuria, and longer operative time, compared to the Lich-Gregoir technique.

Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for correction of primary and secondary megaureters: Preliminary report of a new simplified technique

PURPOSE

To describe a simplified surgical technique for the treatment of primary and secondary obstructed megaureters in children by laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEUR) and evaluate the short-term outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective study of children with primary and secondary megaureters treated at our institution between 2016 and 2018 by LEUR. A transperitoneal approach was used in all cases. The distal ureter was transected at the level of the stenosis. Detrusor muscle fibers were divided to expose bladder mucosa. The distal ureter was introduced into the bladder to create a valve-like mechanism. The ureter was fixed to the bladder mucosa by four stitches. We analyzed indications for surgery, complications and outcomes. Definition of success was relieved of obstruction and absence of VUR.

RESULTS

Six patients with a mean age of 28.83 months (SD: 21.4) underwent LEUR. Indications for surgery were: infection [2], obstruction [2], decrease in renal differential function [1] and increase in hydronephrosis [1]. There were no intraoperative complications. Resolution of hydronephrosis, obstruction and VUR was achieved in all cases. Mean follow-up was 13 months (SD: 6.67).

CONCLUSION

LEUR for the correction of primary and secondary megaureters by this new technique is safe. The most important advantage is that this technique is simpler and more easily reproducible than conventional LEUR. However, long-term follow-up is required.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective, observational.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

[Advances in surgical repair of ureteral injury]

Ureteral injury can be classified as iatrogenic or traumatic, which represents a rare but challenging field of reconstructive urology. Due to their close proximity to vital abdominal and pelvic organs, the ureters are highly susceptible to iatrogenic injury, while ureteral injury caused by external trauma is relatively rare. The signs of ureteric injury are difficult to identify initially and often present after a delay. The treatment of ureteral injury, which is depended on the type, location, and degree of injury, the time of diagnosis and the patient's overall clinical condition, ranges from simple endoscopic management to complex surgical reconstruction. And long defect of the ureter presents much greater challenges to urologists. Ureterotomy under endoscopy using laser or cold-knife is available for the treatment of 2-3 cm benign ureteral injuries or strictures. Pyeloplasty is an effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and some improved methods showed the possibility of repairing long-segment (10-15 cm) stenosis. Proximal and mid-ureteral injuries or strictures of 2-3 cm long can often be managed by primary ureteroureterostomy. When not feasible due to ureteral defects of longer segment, mobilization of the kidney should be considered, and transureteroureterostomy is alternative if the proximal ureter is of sufficient length. And autotransplantation or nephrectomy is regarded as the last resorts. Most of the injuries or strictures are observed in the distal ureter, below the pelvic brim, and are usually treated with ureteroneocystostomy. A non-refluxing technique together with a ureteral nipple or submucosal tunnel method, is preferable as it minimizes vesico-ureteral reflux and the risk of infection. In order to cover a longer distance, ureteroneocystostomy in combination with a psoas hitch (covering 6-10 cm of defect) or a Boari flap (covering 12-15 cm) is often adopted. Among various ureteral replacement procedures, only intestinal ureteral substitution, which includes ileal ureter, appendiceal interposition and reconfigured colon substitution, has gained wide acceptance when urothelial tissue is insufficient. Ileal ureter can be used to replace the ureter of >15 cm defect and even to replace the entire unbilateral ureter or bilateral ureter. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques are increasingly being employed for ureteral reconstruction and adopted with encouraging results.

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted repair of retrocaval ureter in children: a multi-institutional comparative study with open repair

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to report a multi-institutional experience with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted repair of retrocaval ureter in children and to compare outcome of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open repair.

METHODS

The records of all children, who underwent MIS and open repair of retrocaval ureters in six international pediatric urology units over a 5-year period, were retrospectively collected. Data were grouped according to the operative approach: a laparoscopic group (G1) included five patients, a robotic-assisted group (G2) included four patients, and an open group (G3) included three patients. The groups were compared in regard to operative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

At follow-up, all patients (one G1 patient after redo-surgery) reported complete resolution of symptoms and radiologic improvement of hydronephrosis and obstruction. In regard to postoperative complications, one G1 patient developed stenosis of anastomosis and needed re-operation with no further recurrence (IIIb Clavien). G2 reported the lowest average operative time (135 min) compared to G1 (178.3 min) and G3 (210 min). MIS (G1-G2) reported a significantly better postoperative outcome compared to open repair (G3) in terms of analgesic requirements, hospitalization, and cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

The study outcomes suggest that MIS should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter because of the minimal invasiveness and the better cosmetic outcome compared to open surgery. Furthermore, our results showed that robotic-assisted reconstruction was technically easier, safer, and quicker compared to laparoscopic repair, and for these reasons, it should be preferentially adopted, when available.

Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children

INTRODUCTION

Various intravesical and extravesical techniques have been described for the surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Among those techniques Cohen (intra-vesical) and Lich-Gregoir (extra-vesical) are the most commonly used ones. However, there are limited studies that compare those two surgical techniques in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes of the open intravesical and extravesical procedures for unilateral primary VUR in children.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 118 consecutive children with primary VUR who underwent open ureteral reimplantation surgery by single surgeon from January 2011 to October 2015 at our institution. Among them, intravesical reimplantation was group A, and extravesical reimplantation procedure was group B. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of both groups, including age, sex, preoperative reflux grade, presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), operative time, postoperative complications and hospitalization period. Success of surgery was defined as the resolution of the VUR as determined by voiding cystourethrography 6 -12 months after surgery. All the parameters were statistically compared.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were found eligible for the study. In 23 cases intravesical (group A) and in 35 cases extravesical (group B) procedure were performed. The operative time in group A was significantly higher than group B (110.3±16.9 and 87±29.8 min, respectively, p = 0.002). The mean hospital stay was also longer in group A (2.8±0.8 and 1.2±0.6 days, respectively, p = 0.007). The ureteral catheterization periods were 14.1±6.1 days for group A and there was no ureteral catheter placement in group B. The success rate of the two groups were comparable (100% vs 94.9%, p = 0.513). No intraoperative complications were detected in either group. The number of febrile urinary tract infections were similar between the groups after a mean follow up of 18.2 months (p = 0.746).

DISCUSSION

Our results confirmed that both Cohen and Lich-Gregoir procedures had equivalent success and complication rates. Lich-Gregoir technique was found superior to Cohen technique in terms of hospital stay and operative time. Moreover, it avoids the necessity of urethral and ureteral stenting which probably might increase the comfort of the patients postoperatively. The main limitations of our study are unrecorded pain scores and amount of analgesics taken the after surgery and retrospective analysis of the data.

CONCLUSION

Both the open intravesical and extravesical ureteroneocystostomy procedures are equally effective in the treatment of primary unilateral VUR. Any of the techniques can be opted by the surgeons depending on their surgical experience.

Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy

Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR). Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14-147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15-110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly (p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity.

Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) for unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux in children: results of a multicentric international survey

PURPOSE

This multicentric international retrospective study aimed to report the outcome of robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (REVUR) in patients with unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR).

METHODS

The medical records of 55 patients (35 girls, 20 boys) underwent REVUR in four international centers of pediatric robotic surgery for primary unilateral VUR were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' average age was 4.9 years. The preoperative grade of reflux was III in 12.7%, IV in 47.3% and V in 40%. Twenty-six patients (47.3%) presented a loss of renal function preoperatively and 10 (18.1%) had a duplex system.

RESULTS

Average robot docking time was 16.2 min (range 5-30). Average total operative time was 92.2 min (range 50-170). No conversions or intra-operative complications were recorded. All patients had a bladder Foley catheter for 24 h post-operatively. Average hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-3). Average follow-up length was 28 months (range 9-60). We recorded three (5.4%) postoperative complications: 1 small urinoma resolved spontaneously (II Clavien) and 2 persistent reflux, only one requiring redo-surgery using endoscopic injection (IIIb Clavien).

CONCLUSION

REVUR is a safe and effective technique for treatment of primary unilateral VUR. The procedure is easy and fast to perform thanks to the 6° of freedom of robotic arms. The learning curve is short and it is useful to begin the robotics experience with a surgeon expert in robotic surgery as proctor on the 2nd robot console. The high cost and the diameter of instruments remain the main challenges of robotics applications in pediatric urology.

Contemporary Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux

CONTEXT

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) remains the most interesting topic of pediatric urology due to the dynamic nature of recent controversial publications. Starting from the need for a diagnosis to the necessity and effectiveness of treatment in preventing scars, VUR remains in the mist. Although recent strong evidence helped as fog lights in this blurriness, more data are required for achieving crystal clearance. This article aims to summarize and discuss the current state of the evidence regarding VUR management.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the main evidence in the literature on the current and contemporary management of VUR in children; to discuss conservative management with continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP), especially its effectiveness and safety; and to review the current evidence regarding contemporary surgical techniques.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a nonsystematic review of the literature using the recent guidelines and PubMed database regarding surveillance, CAP, endoscopic, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted ureteral surgical treatment.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Despite the striking results of previous studies revealing the ineffectiveness of CAP, more recent studies and their two fresh meta-analyses revealed a positive role for CAP in the contemporary management of VUR. One of the most interesting findings is the redundant rising of endoscopic correction and its final settlement to real indicated cases. Patient individualization in the contemporary management of VUR seems to be the keyword. The evidence in the literature showed a safe and effective use of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic reimplantations.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of VUR treatment is to prevent the occurrence of febrile urinary tract infections and formation of scars in the renal parenchyma. The approach should be risk adapted and individualized according to current knowledge. Individual risk is influenced by the presentation age, sex, history of pyelonephritis and renal damage, grade of reflux, bladder bowel dysfunction, and circumcision status.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Vesicoureteral reflux is a nonphysiological reflux of urine from the bladder through the ureters to the kidney. Treatment depends on the presentation of the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Therapeutic options range from watchful waiting to open surgery. This article aims to summarize and discuss the current state of the evidence regarding VUR management.

Laparoscopic vesico-ureteral reimplantation with Lich-Gregoir approach in children: medium term results of 159 renal units in 117 children

PURPOSE

Vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. Surgery is an important part of its management. Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation using the Lich-Gregoir technique is an option for VUR. The aim of this study is to assess short- and medium-term outcomes of this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study including all children with VUR treated by laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation with the Lich-Gregoir technique in University Hospital of Saint-Etienne from August 2007 to May 2016. Surgery was performed after the age of 12 months in cases with repeated urinary tract infection (UTI) and a deterioration of renal function. All patients were followed-up post operatively.

RESULTS

117 children (92 girls, 25 boys) representing 159 renal units were included. The mean age at surgery was 47.1 months (±32.7 months). The mean follow-up was 59.3 months (±31 months). The resolution rate for VUR in terms of no febrile urinary UTIs was 98.3%. The mean operative time was 96 min (±37.7 min) for unilateral procedures and 128 min (±46.1 min) for bilateral procedures. The mean hospital stay was 25.3 h (±6.3 h). There was no difference between males and females regarding age, weight, renal function or follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic reimplantation with Lich-Gregoir technique is an efficient, quick and safe technique for the management of VUR. The success rate is comparable to open techniques with the advantages of laparoscopic approach; this can potentially be performed as a Day Case procedure.

Treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux in infants and children using endoscopic approaches

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) represents one of the most significant risk factors for acute pyelonephritis in children. Endoscopic treatment of VUR dates back to 1981 when Matouschek first described injection of the ureteral orifice in an attempt to correct VUR. In addition, also Politano and colleagues and McDonald described successful correction of reflux using endoscopic techniques. After these reports subureteral Teflon injection (STING) came to be appreciated as a viable new way to less invasively correct one of the most common pediatric urologic problems. The technique is technically easy to perform and is usually performed as an outpatient procedure. It is performed in general anesthesia in children and may require repeat injections, particularly in patients with high-grade reflux. As for endoscopic technique, a main problem existed. The success in children with high grade reflux was less than reported for open or laparoscopic reimplant techniques. However, in the past 10 years, newer products have become available that are changing the indications for endoscopic correction. In these review, we analyzed the papers published in the literature on this topic to give to the readers an updated overview about the results of endoscopic treatment of VUR after 30-years of his first description.

Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEVUR): a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a feasible method for treating ureteral pathology with good preliminary results in the literature. In this study, we review medium term results for laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and discuss current developments of this procedure.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched using relevant key terms to identify reports of paediatric laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEVUR). Literature reviews, case reports, series of <3 children and adult studies (age >20 years) were excluded.

RESULTS

Five studies were assessed, overall, 69 LEVUR were performed in children. Despite different surgical technique, in all case the technique was respected. Patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, radiological imaging, complications, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Median success rate was 96%. Complications were reported in five cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is limited by the data given in the individual series: varied criteria used for patient selection and outcome as well as inconsistent pre- and post-operative imaging data precluded a meta-analysis. But it demonstrates that the laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is an effective procedure with good medium-term results. We believe that in well selected patients this procedure will become an established treatment option.