Two-Stage Thoracoscopic Repair of Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia Using Internal Traction Is Safe and Feasible

Retrospective analysis of early neurodevelopmental outcomes after esophageal atresia repair at a single institution: short-gap vs. long-gap defect

Background

With increased survival of infants born with esophageal atresia (EA), there is a knowledge gap regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes. We aimed to quantify the frequency of (1) documented developmental delay, and (2) implementation of early intervention services in the first and the second year of life following repair of short- and long-gap EA.

Method

We retrospectively analyzed term-born (n = 44) and premature infants (n = 26) following EA repair at a single institution (2009-2020). Infants with anomalies associated with known neurological disorders were excluded. Clinical data was obtained from the electronic medical record, and presented as means and percentages. Developmental delay included clinically documented motor, speech/language, and cognitive delays that were stratified according to a surgical group: short- and long-gap EA.

Results

Nearly half of short-gap (24/54; 44%) and most of long-gap EA patients (12/16; 75%) had documented developmental delay in the first year of life that persisted into the second year of life [52% [28/54] short-gap; 69% [11/16] long-gap EA]. Developmental delay was noted irrespective of gestational age at birth, co-existing cardiac anomalies, or presence of cranial/brain findings on imaging. By age 2, 70% (38/54) of short-gap and 69% (11/16) of long-gap EA patients had received early intervention.

Interpretation

Infants born with EA are at high-risk for developmental delay. Early neurodevelopmental assessments and intervention is recommended for EA patients.

Staged thoracoscopic internal traction approach for early repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF)

BACKGROUND

Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) can complicate the management of esophageal atresia (EA) with or without a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). This series describes a short interval, staged, thoracoscopic internal traction approach for LGEA with distal TEF to manage complex anastomotic tension or an anatomically impossible esophageal anastomosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review (2018-2024) was performed across four tertiary centers to identify patients with LGEA and distal TEF, managed with a staged, thoracoscopic internal traction approach. In the first stage, the TEF was ligated and internal traction sutures were placed between esophageal pouches. In the second stage, patients underwent primary anastomosis. Short and long-term complications and outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

In total, seven patients were treated with this approach. Gestational ages ranged from 33 to 39 weeks. The average age at the initial surgery was 2.3 days, and the average age at definitive anastomosis was 15.9 days. There were no cases of leak or esophageal dehiscence. Gastroesophageal reflux was a common post-operative complication, occurring in 85.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary internal traction sutures allow for a minimally invasive, safe repair of LGEA with distal TEF, under decreased tension. This technique reduces operative time, and potential complications associated with other long-gap anastomotic techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Recent Advances in the Genetic Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Review

Infants born with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula, a complex congenital malformation occurring in 1/2500-4000 live births, may suffer threats to their cardiac, respiratory, and digestive health in addition to anomalies that may exist in the genitourinary and musculoskeletal systems. Optimal care for these patients throughout their lives is best achieved through a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach that our health care system is not always well-equipped to provide. This review, though not exhaustive, highlights the components of care that pertain to initial surgical reconstruction and subsequent diagnosis and management of the complications that are most frequently encountered. Authors from among the many specialties involved in the care of these patients summarize the current best practice with attention to the most recent advances. Assessment and improvement of quality of life and transition to adult specialists as children grow to adulthood is also reviewed.

Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia Repair Using Staged Thoracoscopic Internal Traction: The First Kazakhstan Experience

Introduction: The treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains an important issue for pediatric surgeons. There are several methods of treating LGEA with various advantages and disadvantages. Thoracoscopic esophageal elongation using internal traction sutures has been developed more recently. Therefore, we wanted to report on our first experience in treating such pathology using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Objective: To share our first experience in the treatment of LGEA using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Methods: Three children with LGEA were treated at the University Medical Center "National Scientific Center for Maternal and Child Health" in the Pediatric Surgery Department, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, using the method of staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Results: At the age of 3-4 months, 3 patients were operated on successfully using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. In any case, converting to an open thoracotomy was not needed and no anastomotic leakage was observed. In 2 cases, stenosis occurred that was treated by dilatation at least twice, 1 child had no stenosis. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic internal traction technique for LGEA was performed for the first time in Kazakhstan that showed its safety and possible future use in the surgical treatment of this congenital malformation.

Feasibility of delayed anastomosis for long gap esophageal atresia in the neonatal period using internal traction and indocyanine green-guided near-infrared fluorescence

INTRODUCTION

Management of neonates with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging situations facing pediatric surgeons. Delayed anastomosis after internal traction for esophageal lengthening was reported as a useful technique for long gap cases. Additionally, the use of near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) has gained popularity in pediatric surgery, especially for blood perfusion validation. We report a novel technique for safe and secure anastomosis for LGEA in the neonatal period using internal traction and ICG-guided NIR fluorescence.

PATIENT AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

A pregnant woman with polyhydramnios was admitted to the department of obstetrics in our hospital. At 29 weeks of gestation, ultrasound showed mild polyhydramnios and absence of the fetal stomach. A male neonate was born at 38 weeks of gestation with 21 trisomy. EA (Gross type A) was diagnosed based on an X-ray study that showed the absence of gastric bubble with a nasogastric tube showing the "coil-up" sign. Thoracoscopic internal traction and laparoscopic gastrostomy were performed on day 4 after birth. We confirmed the distance between the upper pouch and lower pouch on X-ray. On day 16 after birth, thoracoscopic anastomosis was performed. We successfully performed esophageal anastomosis without tearing the esophageal wall. Blood perfusion of the upper and lower pouch was validated after anastomosis using ICG-guided NIR fluorescence.

CONCLUSION

Delayed anastomosis for LGEA in the neonatal period using internal traction and ICG-guided NIR fluorescence is safe and feasible.

Biomechanics of esophageal elongation with traction sutures on experimental animal model

Esophageal elongation is one of the methods of long gap esophageal atresia treatment. The aim of the study was to determine the best type of traction suture for esophageal lengthening on an animal model. White Pekin Duck’s esophagi were used as a model (fresh-frozen and thawed). The esophagus was cut in half, then both ends were sutured together and extended on a tensiometer. Tested sutures involved simple suture, suture aided by a single or double clip, and suture aided by pledget (10 samples each). Constant and 2 methods of intermittent traction were also compared. The histological study showed similarities between duck’s and newborn’s esophagus. The highest maximal force was achieved with pledget suture (F = 8.59 N ± 1.45 N), then with double clip (F = 5.74 N ± 1.29 N) and the lowest with single suture (F = 3.80 N ± 0.54 N) (p < 0.001). Pledget suture also allowed for the greatest elongation (p < 0.01). Intermittent traction results in better elongation at the same breaking strength as constant traction (p < 0.05) if traction is maintained during breaks. Reinforced sutures (pledget or double clip) should be taken into consideration in internal traction. When performing traction sutures, it is worth step by step carefully tightening the sliding knot in short periods before its final binding.

Oesophageal lengthening by traction in oesophageal atresia: The UK experience

AIMS

Preliminary reports suggest a promising role for oesophageal lengthening by traction (OLBT) in long gap oesophageal atresia (LGOA). Nevertheless, these encouraging results originate from specialist centres, and real-world experience is unquantified. We report the first multicentre, nationwide study of OLBT.

METHODS

Cumulative experience of OLBT was recorded through a questionnaire sent to all UK paediatric surgery centres. OLBT was defined as "any attempt to increase oesophageal length using tension sutures". Contributors submitted all cases of attempted OLBT, regardless of outcome. Demographics, surgical detail, and outcomes were analysed with summary statistics.

RESULTS

The response rate was 23/26 centres. Eleven centres reported using OLBT in 22 patients (2003-2020) with 117 LGOA treated by other means. One patient died from complications of cardiac surgery and was excluded. OLBT enabled oesophageal anastomosis in 16 (76%), of which 2 died of complications of surgery, and another died of unrelated disease. Of the survivors, 7 required oesophageal dilatation 2-14 times. Oesophageal anastomosis was not achieved in 5 (24%) patients. All had pouch leak or disruption pre- or peri-operatively and underwent cervical oesophagostomy with subsequent gastric pull-up. One patient required dilatation of the oesophagogastric anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

OLBT is being carried out in the UK in a limited number of centres in a minority of patients. These data suggest OLBT enables oesophageal anastomosis in 76% of infants with LGOA. Oesophageal pouch leak or disruption was common to all instances of failure to anastomose. Our findings will inform discussions between surgeons and families of babies born with LGOA.

Thoracoscopic intraoperative esophageal close technique for long-gap esophageal atresia

Long-gap esophageal atresia (EA) remains a challenging operative procedure. Several techniques have been reported to resolve the problem of distance between the proximal and distal esophagus. We report a thoracoscopic intraoperative esophageal close technique for long-gap EA. A female neonate was born at 39 weeks of gestation with long-gap EA (five vertebrae). The patient underwent thoracoscopic esophageal anastomosis after esophageal elongation. Careful dissection of the proximal and distal esophagus was performed; however, the distance between them was still long. Extra-thoracic traction sutures were placed at the upper esophagus. Then, a Neraton catheter was inserted trans-orally and the upper esophagus was pushed and opened. An internal traction suture was placed between the Neraton catheter and lower esophagus. The gap between the proximal and distal esophagus could be approximated by pulling the Neraton catheter. Esophageal anastomosis was performed successfully. Our thoracoscopic intraoperative esophageal close technique was simple and useful.

Contemporary outcomes of the Foker process and evolution of treatment algorithms for long-gap esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

Esophageal growth using the Foker process (FP) for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) has evolved over time.

METHODS

Contemporary LGEA patients treated from 2014-2020 were compared to historical controls (2005 to <2014).

RESULTS

102 contemporary LGEA patients (type A 50%, B 18%, C 32%; 36% prior anastomotic attempt; 20 with esophagostomy) underwent either primary repair (n=23), jejunal interposition (JI; n = 14), or Foker process (FP; n = 65; 49 primary [p], 16 rescue [r]). The contemporary p-FP cohort experienced significantly fewer leaks on traction (4% vs 22%), bone fractures (2% vs 22%), anastomotic leak (12% vs 37%), and Foker failure (FP→JI; 0% vs 15%), when compared to historical p-FP patients (n = 27), all p ≤ 0.01. Patients who underwent a completely (n = 11) or partially (n = 11) minimally invasive FP experienced fewer median days paralyzed (0 vs 8 vs 17) and intubated (9 vs 15 vs 25) compared to open FP patients, respectively (all p ≤ 0.03), with equivalent leak rates (18% vs 9% vs 26%, p = 0.47). At one-year post-FP, most patients (62%) are predominantly orally fed.

CONCLUSION

With continued experience and technical refinements, the Foker process has evolved with improved outcomes, less morbidity and maximal esophageal preservation.

The left-sided repair: An alternative approach for difficult esophageal atresia repair

PURPOSE

We describe a left-sided approach for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) repair in patients who have a large leftward upper pouch and no significant tracheomalacia, or as a salvage strategy after prior failed right-sided repairs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent repair via traction induced growth (Foker procedure [FP]) from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Surgical technique and post-operative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 47 LGEA patients, 18 (38%) were approached via the left side - 94% had a left aortic arch, and 22% had prior attempts at a right-sided anastomosis. More left-sided patients underwent minimally invasive repair (39% vs 7%, p = 0.007) and internal traction (50% vs 10%, p = 0.002) compared to right-sided patients. On multivariate analysis, internal traction was associated with a decreased length of paralysis (p<0.01); length of intubation and hospital stay were similar between groups. Anastomotic leak (17% vs 20%, p = 0.80) and stricture resection (6% vs 24%, p = 0.12) rates were similar. No left-sided FP patient required additional surgery for tracheomalacia, while six right-sided patients required intervention.

CONCLUSION

Left-sided FP can be considered for LGEA patients with a large leftward upper pouch or as a salvage pathway after a failed right chest approach, with similar outcomes to the right-sided approach.

Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair: Outcomes Analysis Between Primary and Staged Procedures

PURPOSE

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is analyzed in this systematic review that compares outcomes between primary and staged repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed/Embase databases were reviewed for articles on thoracoscopic repair of EA, and articles were selected for primary and staged repairs. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative parts of the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles identified between 1999 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and offered 776 patients for this analysis. Primary repairs were performed in n=703 and staged repairs in n=73. Comparative analysis showed that esophageal anastomosis was performed using absorbable suture in 88% primary and 78% staged repairs. Anastomotic leak rates were comparable between primary n=65/696 (9%) and staged repairs n=8/73 (11%). The re-fistulation rate was 2% in primary and 1% in staged repairs. There was no difference between suture material and re-fistulation (P>0.05; NS). In primary repairs, nonabsorbable sutures were found to be associated with more leaks than absorbable sutures (P<0.05*). The conversion rate was similar between 2 approaches; primary n=49/680 (7%) and staged n=6/73 (8%); P>0.05. No significant differences were found in the rate of anastomosis strictures between primary n=135/703 (19%) and staged repair n=21/73 (29%); P>0.05. The overall mortality was n=20/703 (3%) in primary and n=1/73 (1%) in staged repairs; P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful thoracoscopic primary- and staged-EA repairs have been reported with low rate of complications. Outcomes between primary and staged repairs do not show significant differences with regards to re-fistulation, anastomotic leaks, conversion rates, and mortality.

Thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates: A short-term comparative study

PURPOSE

Esophageal atresia with or without a tracheo-esophageal fistula is a challenging anomaly in neonates. Thoracoscopic repair is gaining popularity now in pediatric surgery community. The present study aims at comparing the short term outcomes of thoracoscopy versus classic thoracotomy for repair of such conditions.

METHODS

Thirty neonates with tracheoesophageal fistula were randomly divided into two equal groups (n=15) after excluding patients with birth weight <2000g, multiple associated anomalies and cardiorespiratory instability. One group had conventional open repair while the other had thoracoscopic repair. Demographic data, intraoperative result and post-operative findings were recorded and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar results regarding demographic and patients' characteristics. Thoracoscopic repair had relatively longer, yet non-significant operative time but with highly significant difference in preserving azygos vein. There was low conversion rate with thoracoscopy (6.66%). Open repair resulted in a longer hospital stay (11.73±5.68 vs 9.2±2.95). Complication rate was comparable in both groups; however, thoracoscopy was associated with better cosmetic results as reported by parents and surgeons (p=0.00).

CONCLUSION

Compared to thoracotomy, thoracoscopic repair offers a less invasive, effective and safe technique with similar short term outcomes, but with superior cosmetic results and better ability to spare azygos vein.

TYPE OF STUDY

Therapeutic/Treatment study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) require emergency surgery in the neonatal period to prevent aspiration and respiratory compromise. Surgery was once exclusively performed via thoracotomy; however, there has been a push to correct this anomaly thoracoscopically. In this study, we compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of both techniques. A systematic review and meta-analyses was performed. A search strategy was developed in consultation with a librarian which was executed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception until January 2017. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. 48 articles were included. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in our primary outcome of total complication rate (OR 0.98, [0.29, 3.24], p = 0.97). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.55, [0.72, 3.34], p = 0.26), formation of esophageal strictures following anastomoses that required one or more dilations (OR 1.92, [0.93, 3.98], p = 0.08), need for fundoplication following EA repair (OR 1.22, [0.39, 3.75], p = 0.73)-with the exception of operative time (MD 30.68, [4.35, 57.01], p = 0.02). Considering results from thoracoscopy alone, overall mortality in patients was low at 3.2% and in most cases was due to an associated anomaly rather than EA repair. Repair of EA/TEF is safe, with no statistically significant differences in morbidity when compared with an open approach.Level of evidence 3a systematic review of case-control studies.

A new esophageal elongation technique for long-gap esophageal atresia: in vitro comparison of myotomy techniques

BACKGROUND

Complications such as stricture, leakage, recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula and mucosal pouch are commonly seen in myotomy techniques used for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treatments. Therefore, we think that there is a clear need for other techniques which would enable us to create more robust and longer esophagus in such cases. In this study, we reviewed multiple V-myotomy (VM) technique and the differences of the said technique with Livaditis circular myotomy (LM) and Kimura spiral myotomy (KM) techniques using literature as an aid.

METHODS

21 esophagus samples from 21 male lambs aged 12 months were used in vitro for the study. All esophageal samples were matched to have a length of 120 mm. Samples were divided into 3 groups of 7 and VM, LM and KM techniques were used in each group, respectively. Post-op esophagus lengths, elongation amount with each incision and perforation pressures were measured.

RESULTS

Post-op esophageal lengths were measured as 227, 210 and 200 mm for VM, LM and KM, respectively. Elongation amount per incision was measured as 5.1, 4 and 3.34 mm, again in previous order of VM, LM, and KM. Finally, perforation pressure following VM, LM, and KM was measured as 460, 400, and 410 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

VM was found to significantly increase total esophagus length and elongation per incision over LM and KM. In addition, VM was also shown to have a higher perforation pressure. Although in vivo live animal studies are required, we can say that VM can be used to create longer and robust esophagus.

Novel thoracoscopic navigation surgery for neonatal chylothorax using indocyanine-green fluorescent lymphography

BACKGROUND

Postoperative chylothorax after surgery for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a rare but serious complication, especially in neonates. This study aimed to identify the thoracic duct and ligate chylous leakage sites, using thoracoscopic navigation of an indocyanine-green (ICG)-based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging system.

METHODS

From November 2014 to April 2017, thoracoscopic intraoperative ICG-NIR imaging was performed in 10 newborns (11 surgeries) with first TEF operation or with persistent postoperative chylothorax after TEF operation. NIR imaging was performed 1h after an inter-toe injection of ICG. Thoracoscopic ligations against the NIR-detected leakage sites were performed with sutures.

RESULTS

The thoracic duct or lymphatic leakage was directly visualized in each patient. In 8 surgeries with first thoracoscopic TEF operation, one case had suspected minor chylous leakage without postoperative chylothorax. Another case with no chylous leakage at the first operation resulted in chylothorax at postoperative day 11. In three neonates with postoperative chylothorax, leakage points were detected near the ablation site of the azygos vein during the first operation. These points were properly ligated, and postoperative chylous leakage ceased with no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic ICG-NIR imaging encourages the repair of refractory chylothorax and seems reliable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of outcomes of thoracoscopic primary repair of gross type C esophageal atresia performed by qualified and non-qualified surgeons

PURPOSE

Although thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become widespread, most studies are based on operations performed by expert surgeons. Therefore, the outcomes of operations performed by non-expert surgeons are not well known. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes based on operator skill level.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics and outcomes of patients with Gross type C esophageal atresia, who underwent primary thoracoscopic repair at our hospital between January 2014 and August 2016. Outcomes of surgeries performed by qualified surgeons, as determined by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery were compared with those of non-qualified surgeons. All operations were performed by or under the supervision of one qualified surgeon.

RESULTS

Nine operations were performed by qualified surgeons and six operations by non-qualified surgeons with >10 years of experience in surgery. None of the patients developed anastomotic leakage or recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the operative time and rate of stricture formation at the beginning of the weaning period were significantly higher in the latter group (P = 0.008 and 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Although supervision of experts would improve results in thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia, the results indicate that good skill is necessary to avoid anastomotic stricture.