Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery: Importance of Patient's Selection and Preoperative Workup

Predictability of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Explantation: A Nomogram-based Scoring Tool from an Experienced Quaternary Center

BACKGROUND

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) explantation is an uncommon occurrence, and there are limited studies characterizing factors predictive for explanation. The aim of this study was to create a nomogram to aid in determining the probability of explantation in patients before undergoing MSA implantation.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery between February 2015 and May 2023. All patients who underwent MSA-related procedures were included. Patients were divided into two groups, explant group and non-explant group, and differences were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent risk factors for predicting MSA explantation, and a nomogram-based scoring tool was developed.

RESULTS

There were 227 patients (134 females; 93 males) with a mean age of 51.4 years. The explant group included 28 patients (12.3%), whereas the non-explant group included 199 patients (87.7%). Patient sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, preoperative testing results, and surgical history were included in our analysis. The multivariable regression model resulted in 4 significant variables that were included in the nomogram. These included preoperative DeMeester score, preoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, preoperative distal contractile integral (DCI) value on manometry, and body mass index (BMI). Based on these variables, a scoring nomogram was developed with values from 0 to 18.

CONCLUSION

Our data was used to develop a scoring calculator capable of predicting the probability of MSA explantation. This scoring tool can guide preoperative patient selection and treatment decisions.

The Impact of Obesity on Reflux Recurrence Following Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently seen in the Western population. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) is effective in managing this condition. Obesity is strongly associated with GERD, and with the rising rate of obesity, there is, therefore, a concurrently increasing frequency of LARS performed. We aim to review the outcomes of LARS in patients with obesity, including the recurrence of GERD symptoms and peri-operative complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for articles from June 1992 to June 2022. The literature was reviewed for outcomes of LARS in patients with obesity (BMI≥30). Eligibility criteria included specific BMI, study design, type of surgery, and outcomes. The recurrence of symptoms and peri-operative complications were assessed. Thirty-one studies were thoroughly reviewed. Nine studies (five retrospective and four prospective) were selected for meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow, which included 1,499 patients with obesity and 5,521 without. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was the most common procedure performed. The recurrence of symptoms was significantly lower in patients without obesity (p=0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without obesity in peri-operative complications, re-intervention, and early return to theatres. A higher recurrence rate of GERD symptoms post-LARS was reported in patients with obesity. Further research is required to decrease such risks and propose different methods, such as weight loss prior to surgery or Roux-en-Y (R&Y) gastric bypass. Risks and benefits should be considered by clinicians prior to offering LARS to patients with obesity.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: long-term clinical outcomes

Persistent symptoms despite adequate Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) treatment are described in up to 40% of patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). The efficacy of Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery (LARS) in PPI non-responder patients is still unclear. This observational study aims to report the long-term clinical outcomes and predictors of dissatisfaction in a cohort of refractory GERD patients submitted to LARS. Patients with preoperative refractory symptoms and objective GERD evidence submitted to LARS between 2008 and 2016 were included in the study. Primary endpoint was overall satisfaction with the procedure, secondary endpoints were long-term GERD symptom relief and endoscopic findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare satisfied and dissatisfied patients, in order to identify preoperative predictors of dissatisfaction. A total of 73 refractory GERD patients who underwent LARS were included in the study. At a mean follow-up of 91.2 ± 30.5 months, the satisfaction rate was 86.3%, with a statistically significant reduction in typical and atypical GERD symptoms. Causes of dissatisfaction were severe heartburn (6.8%), gas bloat syndrome (2.8%), and persistent dysphagia (4.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that a number of Total Distal Reflux Episodes (TDRE) > 75 was a predictive factor of long-term dissatisfaction after LARS while a partial response to PPI was a protective factor against dissatisfaction. LARS guarantees a high level of long-term satisfaction for selected refractory GERD patients. An abnormal TDRE at 24 h-multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and the lack of response to preoperative PPI were predictors of long-term dissatisfaction.

Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m²) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.

Does weight gain, throughout 15 years follow-up after Nissen laparoscopic fundoplication, compromise reflux symptoms control?

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is defined by the abnormal presence of gastric content in the esophagus, with 10% incidence in the Western population, being fundoplication one treatment option.

Aim:

To evaluate the early (six months) and late (15 years) effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication, the long term postoperative weight changes, as well as the impact of weight gain in symptoms control.

Methods:

Prospective study of 40 subjects who underwent laparoscopic Nissen’s fundoplication. Preoperatively and early postoperatively, clinical, endoscopic, radiologic, manometric and pHmetric evaluations were carried out. After 15 years, clinical and endoscopic assessments were carried out and the results compared with the early ones. The presence or absence of obesity was stratified in both early and late phases, and its influence in the long-term results of fundoplication was studied, measuring quality of life according to the Visick criteria.

Results:

The mean preoperative ages, weight, and body mass index were respectively, 51 years, 69.67 kg and 25.68 kg/m². The intraoperative and postoperative complications rates were 12.5% and 15%, without mortality. In the early postoperative period the symptoms were well controlled, hernias and esophagitis disappeared, the lower esophageal sphincter had functional improvement, and pHmetry parameters normalized. In the late follow-up 29 subjects were assessed. During this period there was adequate clinical control of reflux regardless of weight gain. In both time periods Visick criteria improved.

Conclusion:

Fundoplication was safe and effective in early and late periods. There was late weight gain, which did not influence effective symptoms control.

Adverse effect of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy depends on tumor size in patients with cervical cancer

Purpose

The study aimed to explore the survival outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer (CC) patients treated with laparoscopic/abdominal radical hysterectomy (LRH/ARH).

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis involving women who had undergone LRH/ARH for CC in early stage during the 2013–2015 period in West China Second University Hospital. The survival outcomes and potential prognostic factors were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis, respectively.

Results

A total of 678 patients were included in our analysis. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the ARH (n=423) and LRH (n=255) groups achieved no significant differences (p=0.122, 0.285, respectively). However, in patients with a tumor diameter >4 cm, the OS of the LRH group was significantly shorter than that of the ARH group (p=0.017). Conversely, in patients with a tumor diameter ≤4 cm, the LRH group had a significantly longer OS than the ARH group (p=0.013). The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histology, parametrial invasion, and pelvic lymph node invasion were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS, whereas surgical method was not a statistically significant predictor of OS (p=0.806) or PFS (p=0.236) in CC patients.

Conclusion

LRH was an alternative to ARH for surgical treatment of CC patients with a tumor diameter ≤4 cm. However, for the patients with a tumor diameter >4 cm, priority should be given to ARH.

Does DeMeester score still define GERD?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) clinical presentation may encompass a myriad of symptoms that may mimic other esophageal and extra-esophageal diseases. Thus, GERD diagnosis by symptoms only may be inaccurate. Upper digestive endoscopy and barium esophagram may also be misleading. pH monitoring must be added often for a definitive diagnosis. The DeMeester score (DMS) is a composite score of the acid exposure during a prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring that has been used since 1970s to categorize patients as GERD+ or GERD-. We showed in this review that DMS has some limitations and strengths. Although there is not a single instrument to precisely diagnose GERD in all of its variances, pH monitoring analyzed at the light of DMS is still a reliable method for scientific purposes as well as for clinical decision making. There are no data that show that acid exposure time is superior-or for that matter inferior-as compared to DMS.

Robotic Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hiatal Hernia: Initial Experience and Outcome

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, associated with sliding or large paraesophageal hiatal hernia, represents a common clinical presentation. The repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias is still a challenge in minimally invasive surgery. Between March 2014 and August 2016, 50 patients (18 males and 32 females) underwent robotic fundoplication (17 sliding and 33 paraesophageal hernias). The mean age of the patients was 58 years. Biosynthetic mesh was used in 28 patients with paraesophageal hernia. The mean operative time was 115 minutes (90–132) in the sliding hiatal hernia group, whereas it was 200 minutes (180–210) in the paraesophageal hiatal hernia group. The mean hospital stay was 36 hours (24–96). Eight patients experienced mild dysphagia which resolved after four weeks. No postoperative dysphagia was recorded at 30-month median follow-up. We experienced one recurrence in the sliding hernia group and two recurrences in the paraesophageal hernia group, with two patients treated robotically. Robotic fundoplication in treating sliding hiatal hernia is feasible and safe but is more challenging in the large paraesophageal group. Improved patient outcomes hinge on the operative technique used and increasing surgeon experience. The increased dexterity that robotic surgery affords enables the esophageal surgeon to more adeptly apply the traditional principles of laparoscopic fundoplication.

Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may present with a variety of symptoms, including heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, chronic cough, laryngitis, or even asthma. Therefore, the clinical presentation of GERD varies among individuals and conversely symptoms not always correspond to the presence of actual reflux. For that reason, the diagnosis poses certain challenges to the physician. To overcome these challenges, a thorough clinical examination followed by objective functional testing could improve diagnostic accuracy. In addition, a proper evaluation of patients with GERD can help in identifying those who will likely benefit the most from an antireflux procedure. The diagnostic work-up of these patients should include: symptomatic evaluation, upper endoscopy, barium swallow, high-resolution manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. Once a proper diagnosis of GERD is achieved, antireflux surgery is an excellent option for patients with partial control of symptoms with medication, for patients who do not want to be on long-term medical treatment (compliance/cost), or when complications of medical treatment occur.

Paraesophageal Hernia and Reflux Prevention: Is One Fundoplication Better than the Other?

BACKGROUND

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is one of the most debated in surgery. Trends regarding indications, approach (open, laparoscopic, thoracoscopic), sac excision, mesh placement, and routine performance of fundoplication have changed over time. Today, most surgeons tend to perform a laparoscopic PEH repair that entails the excision of the sac, liberal use of a mesh to buttress the hiatus, and the addition of an anti-reflux procedure. Nevertheless, very little has been written on which type of fundoplication should be performed in these patients. Therefore, the goal of our study was to provide an evidence-based overview of which type of fundoplication should be performed during a PEH repair and the role of preoperative function tests in the decision-making METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochran, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases for papers published between 1996 and 2016 pertaining to the surgical treatment of PEH. We hand-searched the bibliographies of included studies and we excluded all reviews and case reports. We selected clinical studies and technical reports. We only considered papers stating rationales for the type of fundoplication performed.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 24 articles: 17 clinical studies and 7 technical reports. In five of the clinical studies, a fundoplication was added only to patients with reflux symptoms. In all clinical studies, the most performed procedure was a total fundoplication (Nissen or Nissen-Rossetti), whereas a partial fundoplication (Toupet more frequently than Dor) or no fundoplication was reserved to those with impaired esophageal motility. All seven technical reports recommended a tailored approach and suggested adding a partial fundoplication (mainly Toupet) when the manometric findings showed esophageal dismotility.

CONCLUSION

The argument of whether or not a fundoplication should be added to a PEH repair in patients without evidence of reflux still persists. However, this review highlights that, when a fundoplication is performed, a tailored approach based on preoperative function tests is almost always preferred.

Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may present with heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, chronic cough, laryngitis, or even asthma. The clinical presentation of GERD is therefore varied and poses certain challenges to the physician, especially given the limitations of the diagnostic testing.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation of patients with suspected GERD might be challenging. It is based on the evaluation of clinical features, objective evidence of reflux on diagnostic testing, correlation of symptoms with episodes of reflux, evaluation of anatomical abnormalities, and excluding other causes that might account for the presence of the patient's symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic evaluation should include multiple tests, in addition to a thorough clinical examination.