Laparoscopic Appendicostomy Low-Profile Balloon Button for Antegrade Enemas in Children

Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience

BACKGROUND

Reports of technical success, adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy in children are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize technical success, 30-day severe adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy at two centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of hospital course and long-term follow-up (through May 2022) of percutaneous cecostomy tubes placed May 1997 to August 2011 at two children's hospitals was used. Outcomes assessed included technical success (defined as successful tube placement into the colon allowing antegrade colonic enemas), length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, surgery consults, surgical repair, VP shunt infection, ongoing flushes, tube removal, duration between maintenance tube exchanges, and deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 215 procedures were performed in 208 patients (90 institution A, 125 institution B). Tubes were placed for neurogenic bowel (72.1%, n = 155) and functional constipation (27.9%, n = 60). Technical success was 98.1% (211/215) and did not differ between centers (p = 0.74). Surgical repair was required for bowel leakage in 5.1% (11/215) and VP shunt infection was managed in 2.1% (2/95). Compared to functional constipation, patients with neurogenic bowel had higher % tube remaining (65.3% [96/147] versus 25.9% [15/58], p < 0.001) and higher ongoing flushes at follow-up (42.2% [62/147] versus 12.1% [7/58], p < 0.001). Tube removal for dissatisfaction occurred in 15.6% [32/205] and did not differ between groups (p = 0.98). Eight deaths due to co-morbidity occurred after a median of 7.4 years (IQR 9.3) of tube access.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cecostomy is technically successful in the vast majority of patients and provided durable access in most. Bowel leakage and VP shunt infection are uncommon, severe adverse events.

Internal hernia with volvulus after major abdominal reconstructions in pediatric urology - An infrequently reported and potentially devastating complication

INTRODUCTION

Enterocystoplasty (EC), appendico- or ileovesicostomy (APV), and appendicocecostomy (APC) can facilitate continence and prevent renal damage for patients with congenital urologic or bowel disease. Bowel obstruction is a well-documented complication of these procedures, and the etiology of obstruction is variable. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and describe the presentation, surgical findings, and outcomes of bowel obstruction from internal herniation due to these reconstructions.

METHODS

In this single institution retrospective cohort study patients who underwent EC, APV, and/or an APC between 1/2011 and 4/2022 were identified via CPT codes within the institutional billing database. Records for any subsequent exploratory laparotomy during this same timeframe were reviewed. The primary outcome was an internal hernia of bowel into the potential space between the reconstruction and the posterior or anterior abdominal wall.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty seven index procedures were performed in 139 patients. These patients were followed for a median of 60 months (IQR 35-104 months). Nineteen patients underwent a subsequent exploratory laparotomy. The primary outcome occurred in 4 patients (including one patient who received their index procedure elsewhere) for a complication rate of 1% (3/257). The complications occurred between 19 months and 9 years after their index procedure (median 5 years). Patients presented with bowel obstruction; two patients also had sudden pain following an ACE flush. One complication was caused by small bowel and cecum passing around the APC and subsequently volvulizing. A second was caused by bowel herniating behind the EC's mesentery and the posterior abdominal wall. A third was caused by bowel herniating behind the APV mesentery and subsequently volvulizing. The exact etiology of fourth internal herniation is unknown. Of the three surviving patients, all required resection of ischemic bowel and 2 required resection of the involved reconstruction. One patient died intraoperatively from cardiac arrest. Only 1 patient required a subsequent procedure to regain lost function.

CONCLUSION

Internal herniation caused by small or large bowel passing through a defect between the mesentery and abdominal wall or twisting around a channel occurred in 1% of 257 reconstructions performed over 11 years. This complication can arise many years after abdominal reconstruction, resulting in bowel resection and possibly takedown of the reconstruction. When anatomically possible and technically feasible, the surgeon should close any potential spaces created during the initial abdominal reconstruction.

Single institution review of Mini-ACE® low-profile appendicostomy button for antegrade continence enema administration

PURPOSE

Malone antegrade continence enemas (MACE) provide a conduit in which the patient can achieve improved continence, be clean of stool, and gain independence in maintaining bowel function. The Mini-ACE® is a low-profile balloon button that is used to facilitate the administration of antegrade enemas. We sought to describe our practice and short-term outcomes.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective review of the Mini-ACE® appendicostomy button from April 2019 to March 2021, with follow-up concluding in October 2021. Patient demographics, colorectal diagnoses, and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients underwent Mini-ACE® placement; 22 (51%) were male. The average age at Mini-ACE® insertion was 9.2 years (range 3-20 years). The most common diagnoses were functional constipation in 19 (44%), anorectal malformation in 15 (35%), and Hirschsprung disease in 3 (7%), spinal differences 3 (7%). There were no intra-operative complications, but 5 (12%) required prolapse resection. The median length of stay was two days (IQR 1, 4). Patients achieved self-catheterization at 4.5 [3,7] months from MACE creation, with 38 children (88%) reporting excellent success in remaining clean of stool.

CONCLUSION

The Mini-ACE® appears to be a safe and low-profile option for antegrade continence enema access. Further research is needed directly comparing complications and patient satisfaction rates between different MACE devices and overall quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Antegrade continence enema stoppers: a pilot study on patient preferences

BACKGROUND

Severe constipation can have a major impact on a child's quality of life and that of their families. Forming an antegrade continence enema (ACE) can be a transformational intervention to manage severe symptoms. However, operations can also have unpredictable negative consequences such as stomal stenosis or leaks from the ACE site.

AIM

To investigate whether the choice of an ACE stopper can increase patient satisfaction and compliance.

METHODS

A service evaluation with a standardised questionnaire was completed to assess quality of life and explore factors that have an impact on the preference for which ACE stopper was used.

RESULTS

In total, 17 patients completed the evaluation of all three ACE stopper devices. At least 75% of the children improved their stooling pattern with an overall satisfaction rate of 8.5 out of 10. More patients preferred a flexible stopper but no one device was strongly preferred over the others.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that an ACE has a positive impact on quality of life. With regards to the choice of ACE stopper, results show that different stoppers suit different individuals, highlighting that there is a place for a choice. This is useful information for healthcare providers who wish to improve compliance and reduce the risk of complications in this patient group.

Reducing Constipation-Related Admissions: The Effectiveness of Antegrade Continence Enema Procedures in Children

INTRODUCTION

Constipation in pediatrics remains a common problem. Antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedures have been shown to decrease the distress of daily therapy. Patients are able to administer more aggressive washouts in the outpatient setting. Therefore, we hypothesize that patients following an ACE procedure would have reduced admissions for constipation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an ACE procedure at a large children's hospital from 2015 to 2018 were included. Demographics, diagnosis, procedure, and preoperative/postoperative hospital admissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in the study. Over half were diagnosed with idiopathic constipation. Majority of patients underwent an appendicostomy (88%, n = 42). Preoperatively, 26 patients were admitted for a combined total of 63 times for constipation. Postoperatively, 4 patients were admitted for a total of 5 visits (P = .021). Twenty-eight patients required a nonscheduled appendicostomy tube replacement.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates ACE procedures can improve constipation-related symptoms in children and are associated with decrease hospital admissions.

In-hospital resource utilization, outcome analysis and radiation exposure in children undergoing appendicostomy vs cecostomy tube placement

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Continence enemas for the purpose of bowel management may be delivered via trans-anal retrograde irrigations, and via antegrade conduits including surgical appendicostomy or placement of cecostomy tube (CT). An appreciation of the relative advantages and disadvantages of each antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedure allows clinicians, parents and children to make an informed decision regarding which procedure is most appropriate in individual cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in in-hospital resource utilization, surgical outcomes and radiation exposure between children undergoing appendicostomy creation and CT placement at our institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of children undergoing these procedures at our institution over a 10-year period. All patients 0-18 years of age undergoing either procedure for any indication were included. Data on demographics, length of stay (LOS), radiation exposure events (REE), and surgical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen (63 appendicostomy/52 CT) patients were included. Those undergoing CT placement had significantly increased post-procedural LOS, catheter exchanges and REE compared to those undergoing appendicostomy (see Table). Reported rates of bowel control were similar between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in rates of surgical complications, although each group had unique, procedure-specific complications.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In our study, appendicostomy holds a clear advantage over CT in terms of post-procedural LOS, as well as REE. In general, children with CTs require more planned and unplanned device maintenance procedures than those with appendicostomy. These findings aside, the rates of success for bowel control between the two groups are similar, and the incidence of complications does not differ significantly between the two groups. CT remains a safe and effective conduit for delivery of ACEs, and is a particularly good option in patients whose appendix has been lost or used for another conduit. However, patients wishing to avoid repeated procedures and radiation exposure may find the option of appendicostomy more attractive.

Optimization of Pediatric Bowel Management Using an Antegrade Enema Troubleshooting Algorithm

BACKGROUND

A successful flush is the ability to flush through the appendicostomy or cecostomy channel, empty the flush through the colon, and achieve fecal cleanliness. We evaluated our experience with patients who were having flush difficulties based on a designed algorithm.

METHODS

Eight patients with flush difficulties were initially evaluated. Based on the need for additional surgery versus changes in bowel management therapy (BMT), we developed an algorithm to guide future management. The algorithm divided flush issues into before, during, and after flushing. Children aged <20 y who presented with flush issues from September 2018 to August 2019 were evaluated to determine our algorithm's efficacy. Specific outcomes analyzed included changes in BMT versus need for additional surgery.

RESULTS

After algorithm creation, 29 patients were evaluated for flush issues. The median age was 8.4 y (interquartile range: 6, 14); 66% (n = 19) were men. Underlying diagnoses included anorectal malformations (n = 17), functional constipation (n = 7), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 2), spina bifida (n = 2), and prune belly (n = 1). A total of 35 flush issues/complaints were noted: 29% before the flush, 9% during the flush, and 63% after the flush. Eighty percent of issues before the flush required surgical intervention, wherease 92% of issues during or after the flush were managed with changes in BMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Most flush issues respond to changes in BMT. This algorithm can help delineate which types of flush issues would benefit from surgical intervention and what problems might be present if patients are not responding to changes in their flush regimen.