1
|
Feng S, Roll GR, Rouhani FJ, Sanchez Fueyo A. The future of liver transplantation. Hepatology 2024; 80:674-697. [PMID: 38537154 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
Over the last 50 years, liver transplantation has evolved into a procedure routinely performed in many countries worldwide. Those able to access this therapy frequently experience a miraculous risk-benefit ratio, particularly if they face the imminently life-threatening disease. Over the decades, the success of liver transplantation, with dramatic improvements in early posttransplant survival, has aggressively driven demand. However, despite the emergence of living donors to augment deceased donors as a source of organs, supply has lagged far behind demand. As a result, rationing has been an unfortunate focus in recent decades. Recent shifts in the epidemiology of liver disease combined with transformative innovations in liver preservation suggest that the underlying premise of organ shortage may erode in the foreseeable future. The focus will sharpen on improving equitable access while mitigating constraints related to workforce training, infrastructure for organ recovery and rehabilitation, and their associated costs. Research efforts in liver preservation will undoubtedly blossom with the aim of optimizing both the timing and conditions of transplantation. Coupled with advances in genetic engineering, regenerative biology, and cellular therapies, the portfolio of innovation, both broad and deep, offers the promise that, in the future, liver transplantation will not only be broadly available to those in need but also represent a highly durable life-saving therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Feng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Garrett R Roll
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Foad J Rouhani
- Tissue Regeneration and Clonal Evolution Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College London, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alberto Sanchez Fueyo
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College London, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muaddi H, Gudmundsdottir H, Cleary S. Current Status of Laparoscopic Liver Resection. Adv Surg 2024; 58:311-327. [PMID: 39089784 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
The evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery, originating in the 1990s, has been marked by significant advancements and milestones, overcoming initial technical hurdles and gaining widespread acceptance within the surgical community as a precise and safe alternative to open procedures. Along this journey, numerous challenges emerged, leading to the accumulation of evidence and the development of guidelines aimed at assisting surgeons in determining the safety, suitability, and complexity of laparoscopic liver resection. This chapter provides a thorough examination of key aspects of laparoscopic liver resection, including difficulty scoring systems, criteria for patient selection, technical considerations, outcomes across different types of liver lesions, and the innovative solutions developed to address challenges, thus offering a comprehensive overview of laparoscopic liver resection, and highlighting its evolving significance in modern hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Muaddi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Sean Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang XK, Lu WF, Liu SY, Fu TW, Jin L, Du CF, Gao ZY, Wang KD, Dai MG, Zhong ZH, Ye TW, Xiao ZQ, Cheng J, Shen GL, Liu J, Liu JW, Huang DS, Liang L, Zhang CW. Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis to compare perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic or robotic complex hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1062-1071. [PMID: 38830783 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications are vital factors affecting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for complex hepatectomy. The present study aimed to compare perioperative complications between laparoscopic and robotic complex hepatectomy (LCH vs. RCH). METHODS Patients with solitary HCC after complex hepatectomy were collected from a multicenter database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was adopted to control confounding bias. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors. RESULTS 436 patients were included. After PSM, 43 patients were included in both the LCH and RCH groups. The results showed that compared to LCH, RCH had lower rates of blood loss and transfusion, and lower postoperative 30-day and major morbidity, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the RCH group (P = 0.026). Multivariable analysis showed RCH is an independent protective factor for reducing the 30-day morbidity, major morbidity and PHLF. CONCLUSION RCH has advantages over LCH in the minimally invasive treatment of complex HCC, as it can reduce the incidence of postoperative morbidity. Therefore, RCH should be considered for patients with HCC who require complex hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Kun Huang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wen-Feng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Si-Yu Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Interventional Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Jin
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhen-Yu Gao
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kai-Di Wang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mu-Gen Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhi-Han Zhong
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tai-Wei Ye
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zun-Qiang Xiao
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guo-Liang Shen
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Liang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Birgin E, Heibel M, Hetjens S, Rasbach E, Reissfelder C, Téoule P, Rahbari NN. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancies (ROC'N'ROLL): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 43:100972. [PMID: 39210947 PMCID: PMC11360176 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has been increasingly adopted for the treatment of liver malignancies despite lacking evidence from randomised trials. We aimed to determine the effect of RH compared to laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy for liver malignancies. Methods This single-blinded, randomised trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic centre (DRKS00027531). Patients with resectable liver malignancies were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to either RH or LH with stratification by type of malignancy and difficulty of resection. Patients were blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the mean quality of life within 90 days after surgery, measured with the role functioning scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included operating time, morbidity, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and resection margin status. Findings Between February 21, 2022, and Sep 18, 2023, 80 patients (RH: n = 41, LH: n = 39) were included and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Role functioning scores did not differ between RH and LH (mean [SD], 74.3 [23.3] versus 79.6 [22.3]; mean difference -5.3, 95% CI -15.6 to 5.1, p = 0.547). The comprehensive complication index was not significantly different between the study groups (8.9 [23.1] versus 15.5 [23.9], p = 0.137). There were no differences in other perioperative outcomes. Interpretation RH yielded similar outcomes in quality of life and can be considered a safe alternative to LH. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marie Heibel
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen ZH, Zhou Q, Chen ZB, Xie WX, Song ZM, Lin SR, Wang W, Shen SL, Kuang M. Comparisons of Percutaneous Ablation, Open or Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Concurrent Generalized Propensity Score Analysis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:1459-1472. [PMID: 39081686 PMCID: PMC11287372 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s477265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Liver resection and ablation remain the most common therapeutic options for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there is a lack of evidence to show which is the most suitable therapy. This study aimed to make concurrent multi-arm comparisons of the short-term and long-term outcomes of percutaneous ablation (PA), open (OLR) or laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for these patients. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective observational cohort study. A series of generalized propensity score methods for multiple treatment groups were performed to concurrently compare the clinical outcomes of these three treatment options to balance potential confounders. Regression standardization was used to account for hazard of all-cause mortality and recurrence of intergroup differences. Results Of the 1778 patients included, 1237, 307 and 234 underwent OLR, LLR and PA, respectively. After overlap weighting, which was the optimal adjustment strategy, patients in the minimally invasive group (LLR and PA groups) had few postoperative complications and short postoperative hospital stays (both P < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate were significantly higher in the LLR group when compared with the OLR and PA groups (RFS: 55.6% vs 48.0% vs 30.2%, P < 0.001; OS: 89.1% vs 79.7% vs 84.0%, P = 0.020). Multivariable Cox analysis and regression standardization showed that LLR was an independent factor for better RFS when compared with OLR and PA. In subgroup analysis, the long-term outcomes of patients with BCLC stage A HCC were consistent with the whole population. Conclusion In the observational study using various covariate adjustment analysis with excellent balance, LLR is not only minimally invasive, but also provides better RFS and equivalent OS for patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC when compared with OLR and PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Hang Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhou
- Department of Medical Statistics, Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ze-Bin Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Xuan Xie
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zi-Min Song
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shui-Rong Lin
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shun-Li Shen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peng Z, Zhu ZR, He CY, Huang H. A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38634257 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2334762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The indication of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for large HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched eligible articles about LLR versus OLR for large HCC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE and performed a meta-analysis. RESULTS Eight publications involving 1,338 patients were included. Among them, 495 underwent LLR and 843 underwent OLR. The operation time was longer in the LLR group (MD: 22.23, 95% CI: 4.14-40.33, p = 0.02). but the postoperative hospital stay time was significantly shorter (MD : -4.88, CI: -5.55 to -4.23, p < 0.00001), and the incidence of total postoperative complications and major complications were significantly fewer (OR: 0.49, 95% CI:0.37-0.66, p < 0.00001; OR: 0.54, 95% CI:0.36 - 0.82, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients in the laparoscopic group had no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, resection margin size, R0 resection rate, three-year overall survival (OS) and three-year disease-free survival (DFS). CONCLUSION LLR for large HCC is safe and feasible. This surgical strategy will not affect the long-term outcomes of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zha Peng
- Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Wuming Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Zhuang-Rong Zhu
- Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Wuming Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Cheng-Yi He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Wuming Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Hai Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Wuming Hospital, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim KS, Choi GS, Rhu J, Kim J. Comparison between laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2116-2123. [PMID: 38438678 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10732-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the outcomes of surgical treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have improved. However, despite the technical advancements in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), it is still not recommended as the standard treatment for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) because of the poor oncological outcomes. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of open liver resection (OLR) and LLR in patients with HCC with PVTT. METHODS A total of 86 patients with PVTT confirmed in the pathological report between January 2014 and December 2018, were enrolled. Short-term, postoperative, and long-term outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates, were evaluated. RESULTS No difference between the two groups, except for age, was detected. The median age in the laparoscopic group was significantly higher than that in the open group. Regarding the pathological features, the maximal tumor size was significantly larger in the OLR; other pathological factors did not differ. There was no significant difference between overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Vp3 PVTT (hazards ratio [HR] 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-18.5), Edmondson grade IV (HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-12.9, p = 0.003), and intrahepatic metastasis (HR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1-7.2, p < 0.001) remained the unique independent predictors of recurrence-free survival according to a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver resection for the management of HCC with PVTT provides the same short- and long-term results as those of the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyeong Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwin-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwin-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwin-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vitale A, Angelico R, Sensi B, Lai Q, Kauffmann E, Scalera I, Serenari M, Ginesini M, Romano P, Furlanetto A, D'Amico F. What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:966. [PMID: 38473327 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vitale
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AUO Policlinico I of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Scalera
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Romano
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Furlanetto
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco D'Amico
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Z, Ouyang J, Jia B, Zhou Y, Yang Y, Li X, Li Q, Zhou J. Laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for caudate lobe solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7068. [PMID: 38457235 PMCID: PMC10922025 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of the hepatic caudate lobe. METHODS Patients with hepatic caudate lobe HCC who underwent LLR or RFA at three hospitals in China between February 2015 and February 2021 were included. In total, 112 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 52 underwent RFA and 60 underwent LLR. The outcomes of the two groups were compared and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) method. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, HBV/HCV positivity, AFP positivity (>100 ng/mL), tumor position, Child-Pugh score, or preoperative liver function tests (ALT, AST, TBIL, ALB, and PT) (p > 0.05). Compared to the LLR group, the RFA group had a shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in overall postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). Despite the larger tumor size, the LLR group had better postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.00027) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0023) than the RFA group. After one-to-one PSM, 31 LLR patients and 31 RFA patients were selected for further analyses. The advantages of LLR over RFA were observed in terms of RFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.00029). CONCLUSION LLR should probably be recommended as the preferred method for solitary caudate lobe HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengzheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Jingzhong Ouyang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Binyang Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Yanzhao Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Research CenterTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Xiaoting Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People's HospitalPeople's Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Qingjun Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Jinxue Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xia F, Zhang Q, Ndhlovu E, Zheng J, Yuan M, Gao H, Xia G. Prognosis and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy for BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma with clinically significant portal hypertension: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:799-812. [PMID: 38062182 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10589-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The latest Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system suggests considering surgery in patients with resectable BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy for BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients with CSPH. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 647 HCC patients in BCLC stage 0/A who were treated at five centers between January 2010 and January 2019. Among these patients, 434 underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, and 213 underwent open hepatectomy. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the overall survival (OS) rate and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate between patients with and without CSPH before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for BCLC stage 0/A patients, and subgroup analyses were also conducted. RESULTS Among the 434 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, 186 had CSPH and 248 did not. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the OS and RFS rates were significantly worse in the CSPH group before and after PSM. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified CSPH as a prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS after laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, CSPH patients treated laparoscopically had a better short- and long-term prognosis than those treated with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS CSPH has a negative impact on the prognosis of BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients after laparoscopic hepatectomy. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is still recommended for treatment, but careful patient selection is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qiao Zhang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Elijah Ndhlovu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jun Zheng
- Department of Science and Education, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
| | - Minggang Yuan
- Department of Thyroid & Breast Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital of Edong Healthcare Group, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, Hubei, China
| | - Hengyi Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen Longhua District People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
| | - Guobing Xia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital of Edong Healthcare Group, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang J, Shi M, Ding W, Duan M, Dai Z, Chen Y. Effect of minimally invasive versus open surgery in hepatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2023; 20:4159-4165. [PMID: 37442783 PMCID: PMC10681463 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In a meta-analysis, we assessed the impact of different surgical approaches on the outcome of hepatectomy with hepatocellular carcinoma. Four databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science, have been critically reviewed through the full literature through June 2023. Eleven related trials were examined once they had met the trial's classification and exclusion criteria, as well as the assessment of the quality. A random effects approach was applied to analysis of operative organ infections, and a fixed-effect model was applied to determine the 95% CI and OR. Analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. Our findings indicated that patients undergoing minimally invasive liver cancer surgery had significantly lower risks of surgical organ infection (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.77; p = 0.009) and wound infection (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.28; p < 0.001) compared to those undergoing open surgery. There was no heterogeneity observed between the two groups (I2 = 0) in wound infection. Nevertheless, because of the limited number of randomised controlled trials in this meta-analysis, care should be taken and carefully considered in the treatment of these values. Further high-quality studies involving a large number of samples are needed to validate and reinforce the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junli Zhang
- Department of AnesthesiologyThe Sixth Medical Center of PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Meiping Shi
- Department of AnesthesiologyThe Sixth Medical Center of PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Wan Ding
- Department of AnesthesiologyThe Sixth Medical Center of PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Mingda Duan
- Department of AnesthesiologyHainan Branch of General Hospital of People's Liberation ArmySanyaChina
| | - Ziqing Dai
- Department of Medical RecordsThe Sixth Medical Center of PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of AnesthesiologyThe Sixth Medical Center of PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Angeli-Pahim I, Chambers A, Duarte S, Zarrinpar A. Current Trends in Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5378. [PMID: 38001637 PMCID: PMC10670586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgical management, including hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and ablation, offers the greatest potential for a curative approach. This review aims to discuss recent advancements in HCC surgery and identify unresolved issues in the field. Treatment selection relies on the BCLC staging system, with surgical therapies primarily recommended for early-stage disease. Recent studies have shown that patients previously considered unresectable, such as those with portal vein tumor thrombus and uncomplicated portal hypertension, may benefit from hepatic resection. Minimally invasive surgery and improved visualization techniques are also explored, alongside new techniques for optimizing future liver remnant, ex vivo resection, and advancements in hemorrhage control. Liver transplantation criteria, particularly the long-standing Milan criteria, are critically examined. Alternative criteria proposed and tested in specific regions are presented. In the context of organ shortage, bridging therapy plays a critical role in preventing tumor progression and maintaining patients eligible for transplantation. Lastly, we explore emerging ablation modalities, comparing them with the current standard, radiofrequency ablation. In conclusion, this comprehensive review provides insights into recent trends and future prospects in the surgical management of HCC, highlighting areas that require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; (I.A.-P.); (A.C.); (S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Berardi G, Ivanics T, Sapisochin G, Ratti F, Sposito C, Nebbia M, D’Souza DM, Pascual F, Tohme S, D’Amico F, Alessandris R, Panetta V, Simonelli I, Del Basso C, Russolillo N, Fiorentini G, Serenari M, Rotellar F, Zimitti G, Famularo S, Hoffman D, Onkendi E, Lopez Ben S, Caula C, Rompianesi G, Chopra A, Abu Hilal M, Torzilli G, Corvera C, Alseidi A, Helton S, Troisi RI, Simo K, Conrad C, Cescon M, Cleary S, Kwon CHD, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cillo U, Geller D, Cherqui D, Serrano PE, Ferrone C, Mazzaferro V, Aldrighetti L, Kingham PT. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1041-e1047. [PMID: 36994755 PMCID: PMC11218006 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare minimally invasive (MILR) and open liver resections (OLRs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). BACKGROUND Liver resections for HCC on MS are associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. No data on the minimally invasive approach in this setting exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicenter study involving 24 institutions was conducted. Propensity scores were calculated, and inverse probability weighting was used to weight comparisons. Short-term and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS A total of 996 patients were included: 580 in OLR and 416 in MILR. After weighing, groups were well matched. Blood loss was similar between groups (OLR 275.9±3.1 vs MILR 226±4.0, P =0.146). There were no significant differences in 90-day morbidity (38.9% vs 31.9% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.08) and mortality (2.4% vs 2.2% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.84). MILRs were associated with lower rates of major complications (9.3% vs 15.3%, P =0.015), posthepatectomy liver failure (0.6% vs 4.3%, P =0.008), and bile leaks (2.2% vs 6.4%, P =0.003); ascites was significantly lower at postoperative day 1 (2.7% vs 8.1%, P =0.002) and day 3 (3.1% vs 11.4%, P <0.001); hospital stay was significantly shorter (5.8±1.9 vs 7.5±1.7, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS MILR for HCC on MS is associated with equivalent perioperative and oncological outcomes to OLRs. Fewer major complications, posthepatectomy liver failures, ascites, and bile leaks can be obtained, with a shorter hospital stay. The combination of lower short-term severe morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes favor MILR for MS when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan and Department of Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation; Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Nebbia
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | - Valentina Panetta
- Laltrastatistica Consultancy and Training, Biostatistics Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Simonelli
- Laltrastatistica Consultancy and Training, Biostatistics Department, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Guido Fiorentini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Hepato-biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Sant’Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Zimitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Simone Famularo
- Department of General Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Edwin Onkendi
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA
| | - Santiago Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta de Girona, Spain
| | - Celia Caula
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta de Girona, Spain
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università Federico Secondo, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of General Surgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlos Corvera
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Scott Helton
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, USA
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università Federico Secondo, Naples, Italy
| | - Kerri Simo
- Department of Surgery, Promedica Toledo Ohio, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepato-biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Sant’Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Sean Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | | | - Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan and Department of Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation; Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter T. Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mithany RH, Gerges F, Shahid MH, Abdallah S, Manasseh M, Abdelmaseeh M, Abdalla M, Elmahi E. Operative and Hepatic Function Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e47274. [PMID: 37859673 PMCID: PMC10584273 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is a pivotal treatment for various liver diseases, and the choice between laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) methods is debatable. This study aims to compare their respective complications and hepatic outcomes comprehensively, providing critical insights to guide clinical decisions and optimize patient results. We conducted a comprehensive review across PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Library until September 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) liver resections were included. Data screening, extraction, and quality assessments utilized the Risk of Bias (ROB-2). We conducted our analysis using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software, and the data were presented as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our comprehensive research yielded 3,192 relevant records, and 9 RCTs were finally included. LR exhibited reduced operative bleeding (MD = -82.87 ml, 95% CI: -132.45 to -33.30, P=0.001) and shorter hospital stays (MD = -2.32 days, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.98, P=0.0007). The risk of complications was significantly lower in the LR group (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.76, P<0.0001), especially in Clavian-Dindo classification degree 1 and 2 complications (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, P=0.005). LR patients also had lower postoperative AST levels at one day (MD = -123.16 U/L, 95% CI: -206.08 to -40.24, P=0.004) and three days (MD = -35.95 U/L, 95% CI: -65.83 to -6.06, P=0.02). These findings underscore LR's superiority, emphasizing its potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes, reduce complications, and improve recovery in liver resection procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reda H Mithany
- Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | - Farid Gerges
- General and Emergency Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | | | | | - Mina Manasseh
- General Surgery, Torbay and South Devon National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR
| | - Mark Abdelmaseeh
- General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, EGY
| | - Mazin Abdalla
- General Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kingston, GBR
| | - Eiad Elmahi
- General Surgery, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ghotbi J, Aghayan D, Fretland Å, Edwin B, Syn NL, Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Lim C, Scatton O, Long TCD, Herman P, Coelho FF, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Prieto M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Levi Sandri GB, Pascual F, Cherqui D, Liang X, Mazzotta A, Wakabayashi G, Giglio M, Troisi RI, Han HS, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Chen KH, Liu R, Soubrane O, Fuks D, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Goh BKP. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic major liver resections for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score and coarsened exact-matched controlled study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1209-1216. [PMID: 36774216 PMCID: PMC10809954 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimal invasive liver resections are a safe alternative to open surgery. Different scoring systems considering different risks factors have been developed to predict the risks associated with these procedures, especially challenging major liver resections (MLR). However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) on the difficulty of minimally invasive MLRs remains poorly investigated. METHODS Patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic MLRs for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) performed across 57 centers between January 2005 to December 2021 were included in this analysis. Patients who did or did not receive NAT were matched based on 1:1 coarsened exact and 1:2 propensity-score matching. Pre- and post-matching comparisons were performed. RESULTS In total, the data of 5189 patients were reviewed. Of these, 1411 procedures were performed for CRLM, and 1061 cases met the inclusion criteria. After excluding 27 cases with missing data on NAT, 1034 patients (NAT: n = 641; non-NAT: n = 393) were included. Before matching, baseline characteristics were vastly different. Before matching, the morbidity rate was significantly higher in the NAT-group (33.2% vs. 27.2%, p-value = 0.043). No significant differences were seen in perioperative outcomes after the coarsened exact matching. After the propensity-score matching, statistically significant higher blood loss (mean, 300 (SD 128-596) vs. 250 (SD 100-400) ml, p-value = 0.047) but shorter hospital stay (mean, 6 [4-8] vs. 6 [5-9] days, p-value = 0.043) were found in the NAT-group. CONCLUSION The current study demonstrated that NAT had minimal impact on the difficulty and outcomes of minimally-invasive MLR for CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Ghotbi
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Davit Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Åsmund Fretland
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung-Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center - IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Mariano Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom and Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schneider C, Bogatu D, Leahy J, Zen Y, Ross P, Sarker D, Suddle A, Agarwal K, Srinivasan P, Prachalias AA, Heaton N, Menon K. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic minor hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the UK. Surg Oncol 2023; 49:101965. [PMID: 37348195 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Minor hepatectomy, which is increasingly carried out laparoscopically (LLR), is a cornerstone of curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The majority of relevant publications however originate from regions with endemic viral hepatitis. Although the incidence of HCC in the UK is increasing, little is known about outcomes following LLR. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing minor (involving ≤2 segments) LLR or open resection (OLR) at our institute between 2014 and 2021 were compared. Selection from a plethora of factors potentially impacting on overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was optimised with Lasso regression. To enable analysis of patients having repeat resection, multivariate frailty modelling was utilised to calculate hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS The analysis of 111 liver resections included 55 LLR and 56 OLR. LLR was associated with a shorter hospital stay (5 ± 2 vs. 7 ± 2 days; p < 0.001) and a lower comprehensive complication index (4.43 vs. 9.96; p = 0.006). Mean OS (52.3 ± 2.3 vs. 49.9 ± 3.0 months) and DFS (33.9 ± 3.4 vs. 36.5 ± 3.6 months; p = 0.59) were comparable between LLR and OLR, respectively (median not reached). Presence of mixed cholangiocarcinoma/HCC, satellite lesions and AFP level predicted OS and DFS. In addition tumour size was predictive of DFS. CONCLUSIONS In the studied population minor LLR was associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer complications while offering non-inferior long-term outcomes. A number of predictors for disease free survival have been elucidated that may aid in identifying patients with a high risk of disease recurrence and need for further treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schneider
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Bogatu
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Leahy
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Y Zen
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Ross
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - D Sarker
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - A Suddle
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Srinivasan
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - A A Prachalias
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - N Heaton
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Menon
- Department of Hepatopancreatico-biliary Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xiang ZQ, Zhu FF, Zhao SQ, Li HJ, Long ZT, Wang Q, Dai XM, Zhu Z. Laparoscopic versus open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched cohort studies. Int J Surg 2023; 109:963-971. [PMID: 36999779 PMCID: PMC10389376 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effectiveness of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) versus open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is unclear. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes of LRH and ORH in patients with RHCC with a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords until 30 September 2022. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI was used for the analysis of continuous variables; odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used for binary variables; and hazard ratio with 95% CI was used for survival analysis. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies with 818 patients were included; 409 patients (50%) were treated with LRH and 409 (50%) with ORH. In most surgical outcomes, LRH was superior to ORH: less estimated blood loss, shorter operation time, lower major complication rate, and shorter length of hospital stay (MD=-225.9, 95% CI=[-360.8 to -91.06], P =0.001; MD=66.2, 95% CI=[5.28-127.1], P =0.03; OR=0.18, 95% CI=[0.05-0.57], P =0.004; MD=-6.22, 95% CI=[-9.78 to -2.67], P =0.0006). There were no significant differences in the remaining surgical outcomes: blood transfusion rate and overall complication rate. In oncological outcomes, LRH and ORH were not significantly different in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS For patients with RHCC, most surgical outcomes with LRH were superior to those of ORH, but oncological outcomes with the two operations were similar. LRH may be a preferable option for the treatment of RHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Si-Qi Zhao
- Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhu Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Department of Education and Training, The First Affiliated Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score study. Surg Today 2023; 53:322-331. [PMID: 35986784 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02576-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, especially for tumors larger than 5 cm. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection (OLR) for large HCC. METHODS Patients with large HCC after curative hepatectomy were enrolled. To compare the short-term outcomes, propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effect of confounding factors, respectively. Subsequently, Cox-regression analyses were conducted to identify the independent risk factors associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) and poor overall survival (OS). RESULT There were 265 patients enrolled in the final analysis: 146 who underwent OLR and 119 who underwent LLR. There was no significant difference between the OLR and LLR groups according to PSM and IPTW analysis (all P > 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that LLR was not independently associated with poorer OS (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80-1.67, P = 0.448) or RFS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.88-1.70, P = 0.238). CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in perioperative complications or long-term prognosis between LLR and OLR for large HCC, which provides evidence for standard laparoscopic surgical practice with adequate surgeon experience and careful patient selection.
Collapse
|
19
|
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:700-708. [PMID: 36842897 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) versus open hepatectomy (OH) on the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) through a meta-analysis of studies using propensity score-matched cohorts. METHODS The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until August 31, 2022. Meta-analysis of surgical (major morbidity, the length of hospital stay, 90-day postoperative mortality), oncological (R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate) and survival outcomes (1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival) was performed using a random effects model. Data were summarized as relative risks (RR), mean difference (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Six case-matched studies with 1054 patients were included (LH 518; OH 536). Major morbidity was significantly lower (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88, P = 0.01) and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (MD = -2.44, 95% CI = -4.19 to -0.69, P = 0.006) in the LH group than in the OH group, but there was no significant difference in 90-day postoperative mortality between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival between the LH and OH groups. CONCLUSIONS LH has better surgical outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes and survival outcomes than does OH on ICC. Therefore, laparoscopy is at least not inferior to open surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
20
|
Guan P, Luo H, Guo J, Zhang Y, Jia F. Intraoperative laparoscopic liver surface registration with preoperative CT using mixing features and overlapping region masks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2023:10.1007/s11548-023-02846-w. [PMID: 36787037 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-023-02846-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic liver resection is a minimal invasive surgery. Augmented reality can map preoperative anatomy information extracted from computed tomography to the intraoperative liver surface reconstructed from stereo 3D laparoscopy. However, liver surface registration is particularly challenging as the intraoperative surface is only partially visible and suffers from large liver deformations due to pneumoperitoneum. This study proposes a deep learning-based robust point cloud registration network. METHODS This study proposed a low overlap liver surface registration algorithm combining local mixed features and global features of point clouds. A learned overlap mask is used to filter the non-overlapping region of the point cloud, and a network is used to predict the overlapping region threshold to regulate the training process. RESULTS We validated the algorithm on the DePoLL (the Deformable Porcine Laparoscopic Liver) dataset. Compared with the baseline method and other state-of-the-art registration methods, our method achieves minimum target registration error (TRE) of 19.9 ± 2.7 mm. CONCLUSION The proposed point cloud registration method uses the learned overlapping mask to filter the non-overlapping areas in the point cloud, then the extracted overlapping area point cloud is registered according to the mixed features and global features, and this method is robust and efficient in low-overlap liver surface registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peidong Guan
- Research Center for Medical AI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.,Shenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy and Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Huoling Luo
- Research Center for Medical AI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jianxi Guo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yanfang Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
| | - Fucang Jia
- Research Center for Medical AI, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China. .,Shenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy and Sciences, Shenzhen, China. .,Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tanaka S, Kubo S, Ishizawa T. Positioning of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Laparoscopic to Robot-Assisted Liver Resection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020488. [PMID: 36672437 PMCID: PMC9856586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is widely accepted in the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through international consensus conferences and the development of difficulty classifications. LLR has been reported to result in earlier postoperative recovery and fewer postoperative complications than open liver resection (OLR) for HCC. However, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis, obesity, the elderly, HCC recurrence (repeat liver resection), and major resection must be considered for LLR for HCC. Some systematic reviews, meta-analysis studies, and large cohort studies indicated that LLR is technically feasible for selected patients with HCC with these factors that led to less intraoperative blood loss, fewer transfusions and postoperative complication incidences, and shorter hospital stays than OLR. Furthermore, some reported LLR prevents postoperative loss of independence. No difference was reported in long-term outcomes among patients with HCC who underwent LLR and OLR; however, some recent reports indicated better long-term outcomes with LLR. In recent years, robot-assisted liver resection (RALR) has gradually become popular, and its short- and long-term results for HCC are not different from those of LLR. Additionally, RALR is expected to become the mainstay of minimally invasive surgery in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogo Tanaka
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-6-6645-3841; Fax: +81-6-6646-6057
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhu P, Liao W, Zhang WG, Chen L, Shu C, Zhang ZW, Huang ZY, Chen YF, Lau WY, Zhang BX, Chen XP. A Prospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching to Compare Long-term Survival Outcomes After Robotic-assisted, Laparoscopic, or Open Liver Resection for Patients With BCLC Stage 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e103-e111. [PMID: 35081573 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RALR), laparoscopic (LLR), or open liver resection (OLR) in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Following the Balliol IDEAL classification, long-term oncological outcomes can be used to evaluate the value of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of HCC, and to assess whether they should become a standard practice. METHODS Data from prospective cohorts of patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC who underwent curative liver resection using OLR, LLR, or RALR at Tongji Hospital were reviewed. The short-term and long-term oncological outcomes of these 3 different surgical approaches after adequate follow-up were compared using propensity score matching to reduce selection bias. RESULTS Of 369 patients included in this study (71, RALR; 141, LLR; and 157, OLR), 56 patients in each of the 3 groups were chosen for further comparison, after propensity score matching. In the minimally invasive group (RALR+LLR), both the operative time and duration of Pringle's maneuver were significantly longer than those in the OLR group; however, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. There were no significant differences in the other intraoperative parameters and the incidence of postoperative complications among the 3 groups. HCC recurrence in the minimally invasive group when compared with the OLR group was characterized by a significantly higher proportion of single lesion or early-stage HCC. However, there were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival (63.8%, 54.4%, and 50.6%) or overall survival rates (80.8%, 78.6%, and 75.7%, respectively) among the 3 groups. Clinically significant portal hypertension was the only risk factor that negatively affected the 5-year disease-free survival rate. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that clinically significant portal hypertension, serum alpha-fetoprotein level (≥400 ng/mL), and Edmondson-Steiner grading (III+IV) were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival. CONCLUSION Both robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomies were safe and effective for patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC when compared with open hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Wei Liao
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Wan-Guang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Lin Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Chang Shu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Zhi-Yong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Yi-Fa Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
- Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Terriotories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bi-Xiang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
- Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Terriotories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ghotbi J, Sahakyan M, Søreide K, Fretland ÅA, Røsok B, Tholfsen T, Waage A, Edwin B, Labori KJ, Yaqub S, Kleive D. Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Contemporary Practice, Evidence, and Knowledge Gaps. Oncol Ther 2022; 10:301-315. [PMID: 35829933 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy has gained popularity throughout the last decade. For laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, some high-level evidence exists, but with conflicting results. There are currently no published randomized controlled trials comparing robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Comparative long-term data for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is lacking to date. Based on the existing evidence, current observed benefits of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy over open pancreatoduodenectomy seem scarce, but retrospective data indicate the safety of these procedures in selected patients. As familiarity with the robotic platform increases, studies have shown an expansion in indications, also including patients with vascular involvement and even indicating favorable results in patients with obesity and high-risk morphometric features. Several ongoing randomized controlled trials aim to investigate potential differences in short- and long-term outcomes between minimally invasive and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Their results are much awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Ghotbi
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mushegh Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Tholfsen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Waage
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cisneros-Garza L, González-Huezo M, Moctezuma-Velázquez C, Ladrón de Guevara-Cetina L, Vilatobá M, García-Juárez I, Alvarado-Reyes R, Álvarez-Treviño G, Allende-Pérez S, Bornstein-Quevedo L, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Carrillo-Martínez M, Castillo-Barradas M, Cerda-Reyes E, Félix-Leyva J, Gabutti-Thomas J, Guerrero-Ixtlahuac J, Higuera-de la Tijera F, Huitzil-Melendez D, Kimura-Hayama E, López-Hernández P, Malé-Velázquez R, Méndez-Sánchez N, Morales-Ruiz M, Ruíz-García E, Sánchez-Ávila J, Torrecillas-Torres L. The second Mexican consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Part II: Treatment. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 87:362-379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
26
|
Yeh CY, Chang WK, Wu HL, Chau GY, Tai YH, Chang KY. Associations of Multimodal Analgesia With Postoperative Pain Trajectories and Morphine Consumption After Hepatic Cancer Surgery. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:777369. [PMID: 35155466 PMCID: PMC8831718 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.777369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the influential factors of postoperative pain trajectories and morphine consumption after hepatic cancer surgery with a particular interest in multimodal analgesia. Methods Patients receiving hepatic cancer surgery at a tertiary medical center were enrolled between 2011 and 2016. Postoperative pain scores and potentially influential factors like patient characteristics and the analgesic used were collected. Latent curve analysis was conducted to investigate predictors of postoperative pain trajectories and a linear regression model was used to explore factors associated with postoperative morphine consumption. Results 450 patients were collected, the daily pain scores during the first postoperative week ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 on average. Male and higher body weight were associated with more morphine consumption (both P < 0.001) but reduced morphine demand was noted in the elderly (P < 0.001) and standing acetaminophen users (P = 0.003). Longer anesthesia time was associated with higher baseline pain levels (P < 0.001). In contrast, male gender (P < 0.001) and standing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use (P = 0.012) were associated with faster pain resolution over time. Conclusions Multimodal analgesia with standing acetaminophen and NSAIDs had benefits of opioid-sparing and faster pain resolution, respectively, to patients receiving hepatic cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Yi Yeh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Kuei Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ling Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Gar-Yang Chau
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Hsuan Tai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Yi Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Kuang-Yi Chang
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ortiz Galindo SA, Haber PK, Benzing C, Krenzien F, Riddermann A, Frisch O, Schöning W, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Feldbrügge L. Safety of intermittent Pringle maneuver during minimally invasive liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with and without cirrhosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:235-244. [PMID: 34787706 PMCID: PMC8847278 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02361-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of minimally invasive intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) on postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the safety of IPM in patients with HCC who underwent minimally invasive liver resection during five years at our center. Factors influencing the use of IPM were examined in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Cases with use of IPM (IPM) and those without use of IPM (no IPM) were then compared regarding intraoperative and postoperative outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM) for surgical difficulty. Results One hundred fifty-one patients underwent liver resection for HCC at our center and met inclusion criteria. Of these, 73 patients (48%) received IPM with a median duration of 18 min (5–78). One hundred patients (66%) had confirmed liver cirrhosis. In multivariate analysis, patients with large tumors (≥ 3 cm) and difficult tumor locations (segments VII or VIII) were more likely to undergo IPM (OR 1.176, p = 0.043, and OR 3.243, p = 0.001, respectively). After PSM, there were no differences in intraoperative blood transfusion or postoperative complication rates between the IPM and no IPM groups. Neither did we observe any differences in the subgroup analysis for cirrhotic patients. Postoperative serum liver function tests were not affected by the use of IPM. Conclusions Based on our findings, we conclude that the use of IPM in minimally invasive liver resection is safe and feasible for patients with HCC, including those with compensated liver cirrhosis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02361-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago A Ortiz Galindo
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp K Haber
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Riddermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Frisch
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kabir T, Tan ZZ, Syn NL, Wu E, Lin JD, Zhao JJ, Tan AYH, Hui Y, Kam JH, Goh BKP. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 109:21-29. [PMID: 34757385 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The exact role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis (LC) is not well defined. In this meta-analysis, both long- and short-term outcomes following LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) were analysed. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies reporting outcomes of LLR versus OLR of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). This was analysed using one-stage (individual participant data meta-analysis) and two-stage (aggregate data meta-analysis) approaches. Secondary outcomes were operation duration, blood loss, blood transfusion, Pringle manoeuvre utilization, overall and major complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 90-day mortality and R0 resection rates. RESULTS Eleven studies comprising 1618 patients (690 LLR versus 928 OLR) were included for analysis. In the one-stage meta-analysis, an approximately 18.7 per cent lower hazard rate (HR) of death in the LLR group (random effects: HR 0.81, 95 per cent confidence interval [C.I.] 0.68 to 0.96; P = 0.018) was observed. Two-stage meta-analysis resulted in a pooled HR of 0.84 (95 per cent C.I. 0.74 to 0.96; P = 0.01) in the overall LLR cohort. This indicated a 16-26 per cent reduction in the HR of death for patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LLR. For secondary outcomes, LLR was associated with less blood loss (mean difference [MD] -99 ml, 95 per cent C.I. -182 to -16 ml), reduced overall complications (odds ratio 0.49, 95 per cent C.I. 0.37 to 0.66) and major complications (odds ratio 0.45, 95 per cent C.I. 0.26 to 0.79), and shorter LOHS (MD -3.22 days, 95 per cent C.I. -4.38 to -2.06 days). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis is associated with improved survival and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Zoe Z Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Eric Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | | | | | - Alvin Y H Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yong Hui
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Juinn H Kam
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of a high-volume North American center. Surgery 2021; 171:982-991. [PMID: 34742570 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resections for malignancy are increasing worldwide, and yet data from North America are lacking. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS Patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively studied. A propensity score matching was performed using patient demographics, laboratory parameters, etiology of liver disease, liver function, and tumor characteristics. Primary outcomes included overall survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier and competing risk cumulative incidence were used for survival analyses. Multivariable Cox regression and Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression were performed to determine hazard for death and recurrence, respectively. RESULTS Three hundred and ninety-one patients were identified (laparoscopic liver resection: 110; open liver resection: 281). After propensity score matching, 149 patients remained (laparoscopic liver resection: 57; open liver resection: 92). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to extent of hepatectomy performed and tumor characteristics. The laparoscopic liver resection group experienced a lower proportion of ≥Clavien-Dindo grade III complications (14% vs 29%; P = .01). In the matched cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rate in the laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection group was 90.9%, 79.3%, 70.5% vs 91.3%, 88.5%, 83.1% (P = .26), and the cumulative incidence of recurrence 31.1%, 59.7%, 62.9% vs 18.9%, 40.6%, 49.2% (P = .06), respectively. CONCLUSION This study represents the largest single institutional study from North America comparing long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection as a treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination of reduced short-term complications and equivalent long-term oncologic outcomes favor the laparoscopic approach when feasible.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lam S, Cheng KC. Long-term survival outcome of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1110-1121. [PMID: 34754381 PMCID: PMC8554717 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i10.1110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Long-term survival is the most important outcome measurement of a curative oncological treatment. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the long-term disease-free and overall survival of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is shown to be non-inferior to the current standard of open liver resection (OLR). Some studies have reported a superior long-term oncological outcome in LLR when compared to OLR. It has been argued that improvement of visualization and instrumentation and reduced operative blood loss and perioperative blood transfusion may contribute to reduced risk of postoperative tumor recurrence. On the other hand, since most of the comparative studies of the oncological outcomes of LLR and OLR for HCC are non-randomized, it remained inconclusive as to whether LLR confers additional survival benefit compared to OLR. Despite the paucity of level 1 evidence, the practice of LLR for HCC has gained wide-spread acceptance due to the reproducible improvements in the perioperative outcomes and non-inferior oncological outcomes demonstrated by large-scaled, matched comparative studies. Meta-analyses of the outcomes of these studies by multiple systematic reviews have also returned noncontradictory conclusions. On the basis of a theoretical advantage of LLR over OLR in preventing tumor recurrence, the current review aims to dissect from the current meta-analyses and comparative studies any evidence of such superiority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi Lam
- Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| | - Kai-Chi Cheng
- Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P, Fan C, Müller PC, Golriz M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A, Nickel F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1467-1481. [PMID: 33820689 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been based on non-randomized studies and reviews of these. Aim of this study was to evaluate if the randomized evidence comparing LLR to open liver resection (OLR) supports these findings. METHODS A prospectively registered (reviewregistry866) systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines comparing LLR to OLR for benign and malignant diseases was performed via Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL up to 31.12.2020. The main outcome was postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0, certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS The search yielded 2080 results. 13 RCTs assessing mostly minor liver resections with 1457 patients were included. There were reduced odds of experiencing any complication (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0·42 [0·30, 0·58]) and severe complications (OR[CI]: 0·51 [0·31, 0·84]) for patients undergoing LLR. LOS was shorter (Mean difference (MD) [CI]: -2·90 [-3·88, -1·92] days), blood loss was lower (MD: [CI]: -115·41 [-146·08, -84·75] ml), and functional recovery was better for LLR. All other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS LLR shows significant postoperative benefits. RCTs assessing long-term outcomes and major resections are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Study Center of the German Surgical Society, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Minimally Invasive versus Open Liver Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194800. [PMID: 34638285 PMCID: PMC8507639 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is increasingly used as a surgical treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is no large scale data to compare the effectiveness of MILR in comparison to open liver resection (OLR). We identified patients with stage I or II HCC from the National Cancer Database using propensity score matching techniques. Overall, 1931 (66%) and 995 (34%) patients underwent OLR or MILR between 2010 and 2015. After propensity matching, 5-year OS was similar in the MILR and OLR group (51.7% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.766). MILR was associated with lower 90-day mortality (5% vs. 7%, p = 0.041) and shorter length of stay (4 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.001), but higher rates of positive margins (6% vs. 4%, p = 0.001). An operation at an academic institution was identified as an independent preventive factor for a positive resection margin (OR 0.64: 95% CI 0.43-0.97) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.91). MILR for HCC is associated with similar overall survival to OLR, with the benefit of improved short term postoperative outcomes. The increased rate of positive margins after MILR requires further investigation, as do the differences in perioperative outcomes between academic and nonacademic institutions.
Collapse
|
33
|
Brustia R, Laurent A, Goumard C, Langella S, Cherqui D, Kawai T, Soubrane O, Cauchy F, Farges O, Menahem B, Hobeika C, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Okumura S, Hofmeyr S, Ferrero A, Pruvot FR, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, Vibert E, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching. Surgery 2021; 171:1290-1302. [PMID: 34535270 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence. METHODS Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described. RESULTS During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSION The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. https://twitter.com/raffaele.brustia
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Takayuki Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Francois Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Benjamin Menahem
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Shinya Okumura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Stefan Hofmeyr
- Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - François-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Univ Lille, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care), Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France and Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rocca A, Scacchi A, Cappuccio M, Avella P, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Costa G, Polistena A, Codacci-Pisanelli M, Amato B, Carbone F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases resection: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2330. [PMID: 34498805 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has never been investigated in large series. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane libraries. RESULTS We selected nine studies between 2008 and 2021. Two hundred sixty-two patients were included. One hundred thirty-one patients underwent simultaneous resections. The mean blood loss was 309.4 ml (range, 200-450 ml), the mean operative time was 250.5 min (range, 198.5-449.0 min). The mean length of hospital stay was 7.98 days (range, 4.5 to 12 days). The overall postoperative mortality was 0.4%. The overall morbidity rate was 37.0%, Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were 8.4%. The mean 3-year overall survival was 55.25% (range, 44.4-66.1%), the mean 3-year disease free survival was 37% (range, 33.3-41.9%) CONCLUSION: We can conclude that robotic-assisted surgery might be considered as a technical upgrade option for minimally invasive approach to CRCLM resections even for simultaneous operations and challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Carbone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università di Napoli - "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schneider C, Allam M, Stoyanov D, Hawkes DJ, Gurusamy K, Davidson BR. Performance of image guided navigation in laparoscopic liver surgery - A systematic review. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101637. [PMID: 34358880 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to open surgery, minimally invasive liver resection has improved short term outcomes. It is however technically more challenging. Navigated image guidance systems (IGS) are being developed to overcome these challenges. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of their current capabilities and limitations. METHODS Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched using free text terms and corresponding controlled vocabulary. Titles and abstracts of retrieved articles were screened for inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the retrieved data it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis. Therefore results are presented in tabulated and narrative format. RESULTS Out of 2015 articles, 17 pre-clinical and 33 clinical papers met inclusion criteria. Data from 24 articles that reported on accuracy indicates that in recent years navigation accuracy has been in the range of 8-15 mm. Due to discrepancies in evaluation methods it is difficult to compare accuracy metrics between different systems. Surgeon feedback suggests that current state of the art IGS may be useful as a supplementary navigation tool, especially in small liver lesions that are difficult to locate. They are however not able to reliably localise all relevant anatomical structures. Only one article investigated IGS impact on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Further improvements in navigation accuracy are needed to enable reliable visualisation of tumour margins with the precision required for oncological resections. To enhance comparability between different IGS it is crucial to find a consensus on the assessment of navigation accuracy as a minimum reporting standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schneider
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK.
| | - M Allam
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK; General surgery Department, Tanta University, Egypt
| | - D Stoyanov
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK
| | - D J Hawkes
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK; Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
| | - K Gurusamy
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK
| | - B R Davidson
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Glantzounis GK, Karampa A, Peristeri DV, Pappas-Gogos G, Tepelenis K, Tzimas P, Cyrochristos DJ. Recent advances in the surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:453-465. [PMID: 34276183 PMCID: PMC8276352 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, despite effective antiviral treatment for hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus infection and the application of preventive measures such as vaccination at birth against HBV infection. This is mainly due to the increase in metabolic syndrome and its hepatic components, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis. Liver resection and transplantation are the main treatment options, offering long-term survival and potential cure. In this review, the recent advances in the surgical management of HCC are presented. More specifically, the role of liver resection in the intermediate and advanced stages, according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, is analyzed. In addition, the roles of minimally invasive surgery and of living-related liver transplantation in the management of patients with HCC are discussed. Finally, recent data on the role of molecular markers in the early diagnosis and recurrence of HCC are presented. The management of HCC is complex, as there are several options for each stage of the disease. In order for, each patient to get the maximum benefit, an individualized approach is suggested, in specialized liver units, where cases are discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios K. Glantzounis
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| | - Anastasia Karampa
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| | - Dimitra V. Peristeri
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| | - George Pappas-Gogos
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| | - Kostas Tepelenis
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| | - Petros Tzimas
- Department of Anesthesiology (Petros Tzimas), University Hospital of Ioannina and School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery (Georgios K. Glantzounis, Anastasia Karampa, Dimitra V. Peristeri, George Pappas-Gogos, Kostas Tepelenis, Dimitrios J. Cyrochristos)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pan Y, Xia S, Cai J, Chen K, Cai X. Efficacy of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy versus Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis of Case-Matched Studies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652272. [PMID: 34026628 PMCID: PMC8139628 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis remains controversial and needs to be further assessed. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LH with those of open hepatectomy (OH) for HCC with cirrhosis. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing LH and OH until Mar 2021. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for continuous, dichotomous, and long-term variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to different resection types: major resection and minor resection. The meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0. Results A total of 16 case-matched studies (784 patients in the LH group and 1,191 patients in the OH group.) were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of primary outcomes, LH was associated with decreased overall complication rate (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.71; P <0.01), major complication rate (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82; P < 0.01), postoperative mortality (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.66; P <0.01), 1-y overall survival (OS) rate (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.73; P <0.01), 2-y OS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.83; P < 0.01), and 5-y OS (0.67; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85; P < 0.01). With respect to secondary outcomes, blood loss (WMD −69.16; 95% CI −101.72 to −36.61; P < 0.01), length of hospitalization (LOH) (WMD −2.65; 95% CI −3.41 to −1.89; P < 0.01), minor complication rate (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94; P = 0.02), postoperative liver failure (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.95; P = 0.03), and postoperative ascites (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.72; P < 0.01) was lower in LH than in OH. No significant differences in operation time (P = 0.07), transfusion rate (P = 0.05), 1-, 2-, and 5-year DFS rate (1-year, P = 0.08; 2-year, P = 0.08; 5-year, P = 0.23) were noted between LH and OH. Subgroup analysis based on minor resection revealed that LH had similar favored outcomes in comparison with those in the overall pooled analysis. However, LH had a longer operation time than OH in the setting of major resection (P < 0.01). Conclusion LH is technically feasible and safe for selected HCC patients with cirrhosis. LH can achieve favored short-term and long-term oncological outcomes in minor liver resection. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) seems to offer some advantages over the open approach; however concerns about surgical and oncological safety remain. More evidence on LMH is warranted before expanding its indication to patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Pan
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.,Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shunjie Xia
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.,Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiaqin Cai
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.,Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.,Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Technique Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wen N, Liu F, Zhang H, Lu J, Li B, Cheng N. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma presents less respiratory complications compared with open procedure: A propensity score analysis in the elderly. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:2675-2681. [PMID: 34059378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection is still the most efficacious treatment to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), among which laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have controversial effects against conventional open procedure (OLR). With a predictable aging tendency of population worldwide, conventional surgical procedures need to be modified to better accommodate elderly patients. Here, we designed a retrospective study based on propensity score analysis, aiming to compare the efficacy of OLR and LLR in patients over 65 years. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with an age over 65 who underwent liver resection between January 2015 and September 2018. Patients were divided into the LLR group and OLR group. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS Among 240 enrolled patients, 142 were matched with comparable baseline (71 each group). In the matched cohort, LLR group presented with shorter postoperative hospital stay (median 7 vs 6 days, p = 0.003) and fewer respiratory complications (19.7% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.049), especially pleural effusion (15.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.020). Meanwhile, LLR had comparable overall hospital cost (6142 vs. 6243 USD, p = 0.977) compared with OLR. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that laparoscopic liver resection for HCC in the older age groups is associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay and comparable hospital cost compared with open procedure, which could be attributable to less respiratory complications. We recommend that laparoscopy be taken as a priority option for elderly patients with resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningyuan Wen
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| | - Haili Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| | - Jiong Lu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China.
| | - Nansheng Cheng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shen ZF, Liang X. Current status of radical laparoscopy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with portal hypertension. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:2419-2432. [PMID: 33889608 PMCID: PMC8040172 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i11.2419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The laparoscopic technique is clinically effective in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal hypertension (PHT). However, existing studies lack systematic arrangement and induction. Here, we review the latest research advancement in laparoscopic technique for treatment of HCC with PHT, based on published literature and our single-institution experience. Our single-center experience reveals no statistical difference in both short- and long-term prognosis of HCC patients after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), regardless of whether they suffer from PHT, which is consistent with previous studies on the use of LLR for HCC with PHT. Retrieval outcomes indicate existence of short- and long-term prognostic superiority, following laparoscopic treatment, relative to non-laparoscopic treatment. Besides that, LLR offers long-term prognostic advantage compared to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. In addition, we review the previous literature and propose corresponding perspectives on the therapy of hypersplenism, the utilization of Pringle maneuver, and the adoption of anatomical hepatectomy during radical laparoscopic treatment. HCC with PHT is not the "forbidden zone" of radical laparoscopic treatment. However, patients’ preoperative liver function should be adequately estimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Feng Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chiow AKH, Rho SY, Wee IJY, Lee LS, Choi GH. Robotic ICG guided anatomical liver resection in a multi-centre cohort: an evolution from "positive staining" into "negative staining" method. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:475-482. [PMID: 32863114 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic major anatomical liver resection is challenging. The robotic liver resection (RLR) approach, with Firefly indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, was proposed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy. The aim of this multi-centre international study was to evaluate the use of Firefly ICG imaging in anatomical RLR. METHODS A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing RLR anatomical resection with intra-operative ICG administration from January 2015 to July 2018 were enrolled. Patients who underwent simultaneous or en-bloc resections of other organs were excluded. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were recruited of which 32 patients were healthy donors, 17 with malignancy and 3 for benign conditions. 12 patients had cirrhosis. 28 patients underwent a right hepatectomy (53.8%) with left hepatectomy performed with 18 patients. 40 patients underwent negative staining and 12 patients via direct portal vein injection for positive staining. ICG demarcation line was visualized in 43 patients and was clearer than the ischaemic demarcation line in 29 patients. All resections for malignancy had clear margins. There were no 30-day/inpatient mortalities. CONCLUSION Robotic ICG guided hepatectomy technique for anatomical liver resection is safe, feasible and has the benefit for improved visualization in healthy donors and cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Seoung Yoon Rho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ian J Y Wee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lip Seng Lee
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM, Dagenborg VJ, Røsok BI, Fagerland MW, Waaler Bjørnelv GM, Kristiansen R, Flatmark K, Fretland ÅA, Edwin B. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases : A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:175-182. [PMID: 33197213 DOI: 10.7326/m20-4011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the recent worldwide dissemination of laparoscopic liver surgery, no high-level evidence supports the oncologic safety of this approach. OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open liver resection in patients with colorectal metastases. DESIGN A single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial (OSLO-COMET [Oslo Randomized Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases Trial]). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01516710). SETTING Oslo University Hospital, the only provider of liver surgery for the 3 million inhabitants of southeastern Norway. PARTICIPANTS Patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases were randomly assigned to have open or laparoscopic liver resection. INTERVENTION From February 2012 to January 2016, a total of 280 patients were included in the trial (laparoscopic surgery: n = 133; open surgery: n = 147). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity within 30 days. Five-year rates of overall and recurrence-free survival were predefined secondary end points. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 70 months, rates of 5-year overall survival were 54% in the laparoscopic group and 55% in the open group (between-group difference, 0.5 percentage point [95% CI, -11.3 to 12.3 percentage points]; hazard ratio, 0.93 [CI, 0.67 to 1.30]; P = 0.67). Rates of 5-year recurrence-free survival were 30% in the laparoscopic group and 36% in the open group (between-group difference, 6.0 percentage points [CI, -6.7 to 18.7 percentage points]; hazard ratio, 1.09 [CI, 0.80 to 1.49]; P = 0.57). LIMITATION The trial was not powered to detect differences in secondary end points and was not designed to address a noninferiority hypothesis for survival outcomes. CONCLUSION In this randomized trial of laparoscopic and open liver surgery, no difference in survival outcomes was found between the treatment groups. However, differences in 5-year overall survival up to about 10 percentage points in either direction cannot be excluded. This trial should be followed by pragmatic multicenter trials and international registries. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre at Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine at University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia (D.L.A.)
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Centre at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia, and I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (A.M.K.)
| | - Vegar Johansen Dagenborg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine at University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (V.J.D., K.F.)
| | - Bård I Røsok
- Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway (B.I.R.)
| | - Morten Wang Fagerland
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (M.W.F.)
| | | | - Ronny Kristiansen
- The Intervention Centre at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (R.K., Å.A.F.)
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine at University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (V.J.D., K.F.)
| | | | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre at Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine at University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (B.E.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Introduction Globally, the incidence, as well as mortality, related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is on the rise, owing to relatively few curative options. Underlying cirrhosis is the most common etiology leading to HCC, but risk factors of cirrhosis show great regional variability. Over the years, there has been a steady development in the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of HCC, including the availability of a wide range of systemic chemotherapeutic agents. We aim to review the recent advancements in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for HCC. Methodology The literature search was done using databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct, and the latest relevant articles were reviewed. Findings Screening of HCC is a pivotal step in the early diagnosis of the disease. Current guidelines recommend using ultrasound and alfa fetoprotein but various new biomarkers are under active research that might aid in diagnosing very small tumors, not picked up by the current screening methods. Treatment options are decided based upon the overall performance of the patient and the extent of the disease, as per the Barcelona classification. There are very few options that offer a cure for the disease, ranging from liver resection and transplantation to tumor ablation. Downstaging has proven to have a significant role in the course of the disease. An attempt to control the disease can be made via radiological interventions, such as transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, or radiation therapy. For advanced disease, sorafenib used to be the only option until a couple of years ago. Recently, many other systemic agents have received approval as first-line and second-line therapies for HCC. Genomics is an area of active clinical research as understanding the mutations and genomics involved in the evolution of HCC might lead to a breakthrough therapy. How to cite this article Raees A, Kamran M, Özkan H, et al. Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):32–40.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimun Raees
- The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Hasan Özkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Wasim Jafri
- The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Coletta D, De Padua C, Parrino C, De Peppo V, Oddi A, Frigieri C, Grazi GL. Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:1054-1065. [PMID: 32707003 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is a choice of treatment for liver diseases; it can decrease postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay (LOS). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension may benefit from minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) instead of open liver resections (OLRs). Whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional ones is still a matter of debate. We thus aimed to gather the available literature on this specific topic to achieve greater clarity. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Sciences databases were assessed for studies comparing OLRs versus MILRs for HCC in cirrhotic patients up to February 2020. Data from our surgical experience from June 2010 to February 2020 were also included. Demographic characteristics, liver function, the presence of portal hypertension, tumor number, and tumor size and location were assessed; operative time, need for Pringle maneuver, estimated blood loss (EBL), major or minor hepatectomy performance, and conversion rate were evaluated for operative findings. Postoperative outcomes and liver-related complications, surgical site infection (SSI) rate, blood transfusion (BT) rate, need for reintervention, LOS, in-hospital or 30-day mortality, and radicality of resection were also considered. Meta-analysis was performed employing Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: One thousand three hundred twenty-one patients from 13 studies and our own series were considered in the meta-analysis. At preoperative settings, the OLR and MILR groups differed significantly only by tumor size (4.4 versus 3.0, P = .006). Laparoscopic procedures resulted significantly faster (120.32-330 minutes versus 146.8-342.75 minutes, P = .002) and with lower EBL than open ones (88-483 mL versus 200-580 mL, P < .00001), thus requiring less BTs (7.9% versus 13.2%, P = .02). In terms of overall morbidity, minimally invasive surgeries resulted significantly favorable (19.32% versus 38.04%, P < .00001), as well as for ascites (2.7% versus 12.9% P < .00001), postoperative liver failure (7.51% versus 13.61% P = .009), and SSI (1.8% versus 5.42%, P = .002). Accordingly, patients who had undergone MILRs had significantly shorter postoperative hospitalization than patients who underwent conventional open surgery (2.4-36 days versus 4.2-19 days P < .00001). Both groups did not differ in terms of mortality rate and radicality of resection (OLR 93.8% versus 96.1% laparoscopic liver resection, P = .12). Conclusions: Based on the available evidence in the literature, laparoscopic resections rather than open liver ones for HCC surgery in cirrhotic patients seem to reduce postoperative overall morbidity, liver-specific complications, and LOS. The lack of randomized studies on this topic precludes the possibility of achieving defining statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Coletta
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina De Padua
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Parrino
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio De Peppo
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Oddi
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Frigieri
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:725-735. [PMID: 32607841 PMCID: PMC7471173 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive techniques have increasingly found their way into liver surgery in recent years. A multitude of mostly retrospective analyses suggests several advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery. Due to the speed and variety of simultaneous technical and strategic developments, it is difficult to maintain an overview of the current status and perspectives in laparoscopic liver surgery. Purpose This review highlights up-to-date aspects in laparoscopic liver surgery. We discuss established indications with regard to their development over time as well as continuing limitations of applied techniques. We give an assessment based on the current literature and according to our own center experiences, not least with regard to a highly topical cost discussion. Conclusions While in the beginning mainly benign tumors were laparoscopically operated on, liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma are now among the most frequent indications. Technical limitations remain and should be evaluated with the overall aim not to endanger quality standards in open surgery. Financial aspects cannot be neglected with the necessity of cost-covering reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Segmentectomy for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 29:513-519. [PMID: 31568257 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the advancement of endoscopic technology, laparoscopic liver resection has become the standard procedure for left lateral segmentectomy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open left lateral segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >5 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 66 patients underwent left lateral segmentectomy for HCC (>5 cm) during the period spanning between 2013 and 2015. To overcome selection bias, 1:3 match using propensity score-matched analysis was performed between laparoscopic and open liver resection. RESULTS Relatively smaller tumor size (6.0 vs. 7.0 cm; P=0.030) and more frequent incidence of complete tumor capsule (93.3% vs. 58.8%; P=0.013) were observed in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group before matching. Although the longer operation time (195 vs. 150 min; P=0.022) was consumed in the laparoscopic procedure after matching, the laparoscopic group had shorter postoperative hospital stay (6 vs. 7 d; P=0.002) and less blood loss volume (50 vs. 100 mL; P=0.022). The Pringle maneuver for hepatic inflow occlusion was more likely to be applied in patients who underwent open surgery. The incidence of postoperative complication seemed to be lower in the laparoscopic group (6.7%) compared with that in the open group (11.8%) before matching. On the basis of propensity score-matched analysis, the complication rates were comparable between the 2 groups (7.1% vs. 6.7%, P=0.953). No difference in the 1-year and 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates was found between the laparoscopic and open groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic left lateral segmentectomy for large HCC patients showed better perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncologic outcomes as the open procedure, providing evidence for considering as a standard laparoscopic practice through careful selection.
Collapse
|
46
|
Haber PK, Wabitsch S, Kästner A, Andreou A, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M. Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:1354-1359. [PMID: 32503376 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite recent advances in the field of laparoscopic liver surgery, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) as an entity has been nearly exempted from the new approaches because of proposed technical difficulties in achieving lymphadenectomy (LAD) and beneficial oncologic outcomes. Materials and Methods: Clinical courses of all consecutive patients (n = 159) undergoing liver resection for iCC at the Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin between January 2015 and October 2019 were studied. Ultimately, after applying selection criteria 27 laparoscopic liver resections were compared with 31 open liver resections. Results: Preoperative patient characteristics were similar with regard to general health and tumor characteristics. However, patients in the laparoscopic group tended to have more advanced liver fibrosis. When LAD was performed laparoscopically, a median of eight lymph nodes were resected, complying with current AJCC treatment guidelines. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection showed lower overall morbidity contributing at least in part to a markedly decreased hospital stay. Conclusions: Herein, we report on one of the largest series of laparoscopically resected iCC, with a high proportion of major resections. Our data show laparoscopic resection to achieve noninferior outcomes to open resection despite impaired preoperative liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Konstantin Haber
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Wabitsch
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anika Kästner
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Andreou
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin School of Integrative Oncology (BSIO), Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Single versus multiple port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective comparative study. Int J Surg 2020; 77:15-21. [PMID: 32179178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single port laparoscopic hepatectomy has been applied in some surgeries. We aimed to describe our experience with single port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (SPLS) and to compare the safety and feasibility of this technique with those of conventional multi-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (MPLS) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS A total of 72 consecutive patients who underwent SPLS (n = 33) and MPLS (n = 39) for HCC were enrolled. The peri-operative parameters of safety and feasibility, as well as the short-term oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS The length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in the SPLS group than in the MPLS group (4.12 vs. 4.59 days, P = 0.043). No significant difference between the two groups was found in the operation time (104.58 vs. 95.69 min in the SPLS group and MPLS group respectively, P = 0.353) or the amount of blood loss (62.73 vs. 68.46 ml, P = 0.595). The 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 77.9% in the SPLS group and 70.7% in the MPLS group (P = 0.82). Subgroup analysis showed that for patients without cirrhosis, the LOS was shorter in the SPLS group than in the MPLS group (P = 0.033), while for patients with cirrhosis, the LOS was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.201), although it was shorter in the SPLS group. CONCLUSIONS SPLS was a feasible and safe surgical approach for the treatment of HCC on left lateral section.
Collapse
|
48
|
Clinical outcome of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32:239-245. [PMID: 31567715 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Open surgery remains the major approach to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, and laparoscopy-assisted liver resection has been recommended as a superior treatment. However, the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for cirrhotic patients is under debate. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for eligible literature updated on November 2018. After rigorous review of quality, the data were extracted from eligible trials. All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence interval using RevMan software. Sensitivity analyses and heterogeneity were quantitatively evaluated. RESULTS Fourteen trials met the inclusion criteria. According to the pooled result of surgery duration, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay [STD mean difference (SMD) = -0.61, 95% confidence interval -0.89 to -0.32; P < 0.0001], lower intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.56, 95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.12; P = 0.01), fewer complications (odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.52; P < 0.00001) and lower transfusion rate (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.93; P = 0.02). Nevertheless, there was no remarkable difference in operative time (SMD = 0.17, 95% confidence interval -0.25 to -0.59; P = 0.42) between the two groups. The pooled analysis of overall survival showed that laparoscopic surgery did not achieve benefit compared with open surgery (P = 0.02). Moreover, the pooled results of three subgroups indicated that laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly better disease-free survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The current analysis indicates that laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma improved intraoperative and disease-free survival, with similar overall survival compared to the open procedure. Laparoscopic surgery may serve as a safe and feasible alternative for selected hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
|
49
|
Jia LH, Ma XM, Yan QL, Wu XS, Chen Y, Ye QH, Wang ZJ, Qiu MM, Zhu JH. Autologous Blood Transfusion and Pringle Maneuver in Laparoscopic Segmental Hepatectomy for Benign Hepatic Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:1571-1576. [PMID: 31682205 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effect of autologous blood transfusion (ABT) and Pringle maneuver (PM) on postoperative early liver function and short-term postoperative results following laparoscopic liver resection in patients with benign hepatic neoplasms. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data for 125 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic segmental hepatectomy from January 2015 to May 2018 (68 in the ABT group versus 57 in the PM group). We compared patients' characteristics and intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes between the groups. Results: The 2 groups were well matched regarding patients' clinical characteristics, types of liver resection, operative time, and histopathological findings (P > .05). Median blood loss was significantly lower in the PM group versus the ABT group (200 mL versus 750 mL, respectively; P < .01), and overall complication rates were similar (n = 12 [17%] versus n = 9 [16%], respectively; P > .05). The ABT group had significantly lower mean levels of total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, and alanine aminotransferase on postoperative days 1 and 3 (P < .05). The ABT group had a shorter hospital stay compared with the PM group (5.8 days versus 7.7 days, respectively; P < .05) and lower hospitalization costs (55,400 ± 15,400 versus 667,000 ± 21,600 CN dollars, respectively; P < .05). Conclusions: Compared with Pringle's maneuver, laparoscopic hepatectomy with ABT promoted early recovery of liver function and reduced hospitalization costs in select patients with benign hepatic neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Hua Jia
- Department of General Surgery, Jinhua Hospital of TCM, Jinhua, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Ma
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Liang Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Jinhua People's Hospital, Jinhua, China
| | - Xiang-Song Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qing-Huang Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Jiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Man-Man Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Hui Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wilson GC, Geller DA. Evolving Surgical Options for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2019; 28:645-661. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2019.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|