From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children

Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RP) compared with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have not been clearly established in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) children and require review. We searched in the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI database on 30 June 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in RevMan 5.4 based on studies comparing RP versus LP in children with UPJO and subgroup analysis in children < 2 years of age has been performed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the studies. We included one RCT, and eighteen cohort studies, a total involving 3370 children. Compared with LP, RP showed higher surgical success rates (OR 2.57, 95%CI (1.24, 5.32), P < 0.05), lower postoperative complication rates (OR 0.61, 95%CI (0.38, 0.99), P < 0.05), shorter hospital stay (MD - 1.04, 95% CI (- 1.6, - 0.47), P < 0.05) as well as operative time (MD - 22.11, 95%CI (- 35.91, - 8.31), P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected for intraoperative complication rates or conversion to open surgery rates. RP is an alternative to UPJO with higher success rates, and less postoperative complications. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of RP compared with LP for UPJO children is of low certainty. More quality evidence in the form of randomized controlled trials is needed to obtain more reliable analysis results.

The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for treating pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction through an extensive comparison of RALP, open pyeloplasty (OP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). We conducted a comprehensive search of the following databases: PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Web of Science database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and China Biology Medical Disc. Baseline data were compared, the sources of heterogeneity were assessed, and publication biases were detected. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023415667). 26 studies with 6074 cases performing pyeloplasty were included, and the overall data are comparable. Our analysis showed no significant difference in success rate and postoperative complications between RALP and OP, and RALP is associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS) (MD - 1.00 95%CI - 1.45 to - 0.55, p < 0.0001). In addition, compared to LP, RALP was associated with a shorter anastomosis time (MD - 18.35 95%CI - 29.88 to - 6.82, p = 0.002) and fewer postoperative analgesics (MD - 0.09 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.01, p = 0.03); however, RALP has a longer operative time (OT) (MD 52.39, 95% CI 39.75-65.03, p < 0.00001) and higher cost. The heterogeneity of OT may be influenced by factors, such as age and region, while the heterogeneity of LOS primarily stems from regional differences. No significant publication bias was detected. Our meta-analysis shows that RALP can be an alternative to OP and LP with a high success rate, minimal postoperative complications, and shorter LOS. In addition, RALP contributes to reduce anastomosis time and postoperative analgesic drugs. However, further well-designed, large-scale, randomized controlled trials with additional parameters are needed to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of heterogeneity.

A combined approach of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible endoscopy to treat concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction and calyceal stones in children: Technical considerations and review of the literature

The management of children with concomitant ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and calyceal stones remains challenging. The various treatment options available for pediatric nephrolithiasis may require multiple sessions, and the techniques by themselves are not designed for simultaneous correction of UPJ obstruction. Recently, success in combining robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and flexible endoscopy has been reported by multi-institutional studies to treat children with concomitant UPJ obstruction and renal stones. Given the paucity of technical details of this novel approach in the existing literature, we herein report our techniques to treat two girls aged 6 and 10 years who had concomitant UPJ obstruction and multiple stones in mid- and lower poles calyces. Three robotic ports were used without any assistant ports. A flexible endoscope, either a cystoscope or a single-use ureteroscope, was introduced via the undocked epigastric port to perform nephroscopy and stones removal after the renal pelvis was opened. The rest of the RALP was completed in the usual manner. Technical modifications were employed to facilitate the flexible endoscope to examine the entire calyceal system. Both patients underwent successful surgical procedures by the combined approach without any intra- or post-operative complications. Three and 14 stones were removed from each of the patients respectively. Postoperative investigations demonstrated successful correction of UPJ obstruction and complete stone clearance in both patients. A combined approach of RALP and flexible endoscopy is a safe and effective technique to treat concurrent UPJ obstruction and calyceal stones in children.

Long Term Outcome of 112 Pediatric Patients With Ureteroplevic Junction Obstruction Treated by Endourologic Retrograde Balloon Dilatation

PURPOSE

To analyze the effectiveness, complications and long-term outcome of the patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) treated by endoscopic retrograde balloon dilatation (ERBD) in the largest series reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between years 2004 and 2018, 112 patients with primary unilateral UPJO were treated by ERBD. Endoscopic treatment consisted on a retrograde balloon dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), through cystoscopy and under fluoroscopic guidance, using high-pressure balloon catheters. In case of persistence in the balloon notch, a Cutting Balloon™ catheter was used. Double-J stent was placed after dilatation.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 13.1 ± 21.3 months, 92 cases being younger than 18 months. Mean operative time was 24.4 ± 10.3 min; hospital stay was 1 day in 82% of patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. UPJ was calibrated at time of stent removal with cystoscopy 39.1 ± 13.7 days after dilatation. ERBD was not possible in 11 cases. An additional procedure was needed in 24 cases: second ERBD (n = 11, seven during the stent withdrawal), a third dilatation (n = 3) due to persistent hydronephrosis, and percutaneous endopyelotomy (n = 3) or open pyeloplasty (n = 7) in cases of technical failure. Significant improvement in postoperative ultrasound measures were observed (p < 0.05, T-test). Long-term success rate was 76.8% after one dilatation, and 86.6% in those who required up to 2 dilatations. Mean follow-up was 66.7 ± 37.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ERBD is a feasible and safe option for the minimally invasive treatment of UPJ obstruction in infants. Long-term outcome is acceptable with a very low complication rate.

Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

BACKGROUND

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a commonly observed abnormality in pediatric urology. Minimally invasive approaches have gained popularity in recent years. Studies have demonstrated excellent results with both laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LAP) and robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP). Few studies have compared the experience of both procedures performed in a single institution. Our objective is to compare laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in the Puerto Rican pediatric population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using our clinic's database on patients with UPJO that were operated by the same surgeon (MPB) from 2008 to 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted of demographics, preoperative studies, perioperative data and complications of both procedures. This study was approved by our local IRB committee.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients that underwent pyeloplasty with at least 3 years of follow up were recorded for this study. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty were performed in 44 (51.1%) and 42 (48.8%) patients, respectively. Patient age ranged between 4 months and 17 years (LAP group - mean age of 6.19 years/RAP group - mean age of 7.07 years). Success rates was high in this series (LAP - 100% and RAP -95%). Using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann whitney sum test, significant differences between preoperative and postoperative hydronephrosis grading were observed in both LAP and RAP groups. However, no significant difference was seen regarding reduction of hydronephrosis grading when comparing both groups. No intraoperative complications were seen on either group.

CONCLUSION

Both LAP and RAP are safe and effective procedures that can properly manage UPJO. Our study shows that, under experienced hands, pure laparoscopic pyeloplasty achieves comparable results to robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Pediatric urologists should be comfortable offering either of these approaches as they demonstrate high success rates in our pediatric population. Selection of LAP vs. RAP approach depends on the Surgeon's preference or experience, and on institutional availability. Minimally invasive therapies will continue to gain popularity with future advances in laparoscopic and robotic technology.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty (RALP)

INTRODUCTION

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the English-language literature on surgical techniques and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction in children was performed without time filters using the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in July 2020 according to the PRISMA statement recommendations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 58 studies were selected for qualitative analysis, 46 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Nearly all studies included were observational and retrospective, either cohort or case-control. The quality of evidence was assessed using Modified Newcastle Ottawa Scoring, with the majority of studies scoring medium or high quality. The mean success rate was 95.4% (CI 91.0-99.3%), over a wide age range. There was a noticeable heterogeneity in reported follow up length and definitions of success rate. The majority of studies reported length of stay of ~1 day. The mean overall complication rate was 12%. For studies that reported complication rate by grade, the mean low Clavien grade (grade 2 or less) complication rate was 9.3% and the mean high Clavien grade (grade 3 or more) complication rate was 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assisted surgery is technically feasible and has been shown to achieve very favorable outcomes for pyeloplasty in children. The evidence however is mostly retrospective and from single sites, which introduces potential biases. Further research is needed to further elucidate RALP benefits compared to the open and laparoscopic approach. As a RCT may not be practical in this space, perhaps a prospective multi-institutional design with a uniform reporting system of pediatric RALP is the next step to define its benefits and limits.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants

OBJECTIVE

While there are several reports confirming the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children there have been none comparing LP and RALP specifically in infants. In this meta-analysis, we have compared the outcomes of LP and RALP in infants.

METHODS

Pubmed (Medline), Publon, Index Medicus and Embase were searched using the search terms: pyeloplasty (laparoscopic OR robot-assisted) AND (infant), to identify all papers pertaining to LP and RALP. Systematic review was performed to identify information regarding number of patients/renal units, age, body weight, operating time, hospital stay, success and complications. Meta-analysis of heterogeneity was reported with I2statistics. Once heterogeneity was found low, the pooled outcomes were compared with student's t test and Fishers exact test, wherever appropriate.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 267 articles, 18 articles were included (10 articles on LP, 7 on RALP, 1 reporting both), comprising 323 renal units for LP and 173 renal units for RALP. With low heterogeneity (I2: 0%) both groups were considered to have been conducted under similar conditions for fixed effect model. There was no significant difference between the success rates of LP or RALP (97.5% vs 94.8%; p = 0.21). The mean age at operation was significantly lower for LP (5.6 ± 1.8 months) than RALP (7.2 ± 1.2 months, P = 0.0001). The duration of surgery was 137 ± 45 min for LP while significantly higher at 179 ± 49 min for RALP (p = 0.0001). The mean (s.d) time to discharge was 2.0 (1.9) days for LP while 1.3 (0.4) days for RALP. The overall complication rate was significantly higher (summary table) for RALP than LP (p = 0.03), mainly due to more port-site hernias in RALP.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we found that the success of LP and RALP in infants was similar. RALP in infants had longer duration of surgery, similar hospital stay and higher Clavien-3 complications than LP. While several studies have reported favorable outcomes for RALP over LP in children, this was not the case in infants. The smaller workspace, in an infant, can significantly limit the mobility of robotic instruments and increase the chance of port-site conflicts or trocar collisions. The use of larger robotic ports and instruments in the small space of infant abdomen might have been responsible for higher complications in RALP, including significantly larger number of port-site hernias. This meta-analysis represents the early experience of most RALP in infants, and it is possible that with experience RALP outcomes in infants also will catch up with LP. Miniaturization of robotic instruments might render RALP the future standard of care for pyeloplasty in infants.

Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less

Objective: To investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive approach to infants with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction by comparing the two surgical modalities of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive infants aged ≤12 months who underwent either LP or RALP in a single institution over the period of 2008-Jul 2020. We included primary pyeloplasty cases that were performed by or under the supervision of the same surgeon. Results: Forty-six infants (LP = 22; RALP = 24) were included with medians of age and body weight at 6 months (2-12months) and 8.0 kg (5.4-10 kg), respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in the patients' demographics and pre-operative characteristics. All infants underwent LP or RALP successfully without conversion to open surgery. None had intraoperative complications. Operative time (OT) was 242 min (SD = 59) in LP, compared with 225 min (SD = 39) of RALP (p = 0.25). Linear regression analysis showed a significant trend of decrease in OT with increasing case experience of RALP(p = 0.005). No difference was noted in the post-operative analgesic requirement. RALP was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay than LP (3 vs. 3.8 days; p = 0.009). 4/22(18%) LP and 3/24(13%) RALP developed post-operative complications (p = 0.59), mostly minor and stent-related. The success rates were 20/22 (91%) in LP and 23/24 (96%) in RALP (p = 0.49). Conclusions: Pyeloplasty by minimally invasive approach is safe and effective in the infant population. RALP may have superiority over LP in infants with its faster recovery and a more manageable learning curve to acquire the skills.

[Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery]

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is characterized by decreased flow of urine down the ureter and increased fluid pressure inside the kidney. Open pyeloplasty had been regarded as the standard management of UPJO for a long time. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty reports high success rates, for both retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, which are comparable to those of open pyeloplasty. However, open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty have yielded disappointing failure rates of 2.5%-10%. The main causes for recurrent UPJO are severe peripelvic and periureteric fibrosis due to urinary extravasation, ureteral ischemia, and inadequate hemostasis. In addition, failing to diagnose lower pole crossing vessels before or during the primary procedure is also responsible for recurrent UPJO. In addition, poor preoperative split renal function, hydronephrosis, presence of renal stones, patient age, diabetes, prior endopyelotomy history, and retrograde pyelography history were considered as predictors of pyeloplasty failure. The failure is usually defined by persistent pain, persistent radiographic obstruction (infection or stones), continued decline in split renal function, or a combination of the above. And the failure of pye-loplasty often occurs in the first 2 years after the surgery. The available options for managing recurrent UPJO with a salvageable renal unit include endopyelotomy, re-do pyeloplasty, stent implantation, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureterocalicostomy, and nephrectomy. Re-do pyeloplasty has such merits as high successful rates and rare complications, compared with endopyelotomy or ureterocalicostomy. And some investigators think that re-do pyeloplasty should be regarded as the gold standard for secondary therapy if feasible. Open pyeloplasty can enlarge the operating field, facilitate the exposure of the ureteropelvic junction, reduce the difficulty of operation, and thus reduce the occurrence of complications. There are no significant differences among the success rates of re-do pyeloplasty under open approach, traditional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy, according to previous reports. However, traditional laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty give advantages of cosmetology, small trauma, less postoperative pain, speedy recovery and shorter hospitalization, fewer complications and lower recurrent rates. If the primary pyeloplasty is an open operation in retroperitoneal approach, the traditional laparoscopic and robotic operation with retroperitoneal approach should be considered for secondary repair. The cause of recurrent UPJO should be evaluated before surgery and identified intraoperatively to minimize the possibility of recurrence.

Roboterassistierte (RA-)Kinderchirurgie: Nierenbeckenplastiken mit dem Da-Vinci-Roboter

Hintergrund

Im Ausland stellt die roboterassistierte (RA-)Chirurgie und hier besonders die RA-Urologie in der Kinderchirurgie bereits eine wichtige Alternative zu konventionellen Eingriffen (offen, laparoskopisch, laparoskopisch-assistiert) dar. Für Deutschland wurden dazu erst wenige Untersuchungen publiziert.

Ziel der Arbeit (Fragestellung)

Im Sinne einer vergleichenden Serie sollten die ersten Fälle von RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken der Kinderchirurgie der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen im Vergleich zu konventionell laparoskopisch-assistierten (LAA) vor dem Hintergrund der internationalen Literatur evaluiert werden.

Material und Methoden

Es werden retrospektiv die ersten 13 RA und 14, unter Berücksichtigung des Patientenalters ausgewählte, konventionell LAA Anderson-Hynes-Plastiken hinsichtlich Operationsdauer, Krankenhausverweildauer, Alter der Patienten, Komplikationen und Rezidiven untersucht. Laparoskopisch-assistierte Operationen werden laparoskopisch durchgeführt, lediglich die Anlage der Anastomose erfolgt über einen kleinen Flankenschnitt extrakorporal. Roboterassistierte Eingriffe verlaufen gänzlich laparoskopisch.

Ergebnisse

Für die Operationsdauer ergab sich kein signifikanter Unterschied (111,54 min vs. 117,64 min). Die Liegezeit fiel für RA-Eingriffe signifikant kürzer aus (5,85 Tage vs. 10,0 Tage). Die Altersverteilung ergab für die RA-Kohorte ein Mittel von 52,23 Monaten und für die LAA 30,29 Monate. Die Komplikationsrate betrug 15,38 % (Harntransportstörung, paralytischer Ileus und Dislokation des PDK sowie Omentumprolaps), die Rezidivrate 7,69 % für die RA Eingriffe. Für die LAA operierten Patienten und Patientinnen lagen die Werte bei 7,14 % (Dislokation der Doppel-J-Schiene nach kranial) und 14,28 %.

Diskussion

Die ersten RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken unserer Klinik wiesen im internationalen Vergleich ähnliche Werte für Operationsdauer, Komplikations- sowie Rezidivrate auf. Es zeigten sich ein ähnliches Outcome für beide Operationsverfahren und keine signifikante Zeitersparnis durch Verwendung des OP-Roboters. Im Gegensatz dazu fiel die Krankenhausverweildauer nach RA-Eingriffen signifikant kürzer aus als nach LAA-Operationen. In der internationalen Literatur finden sich jedoch auch insgesamt kürzere Liegezeiten. Insgesamt stellen RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken eine wertvolle Alterative zu LAA-Verfahren dar.

The outcomes of mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children - brazilian experience

Objetive

Pelvicureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction is the main cause of hydronephrosis in childhood. Open pyeloplasty has been the gold standard treatment of this condition with success rate above 90%. The role of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in children is less well defined and has slowly emerged as an alternative procedure. We report outcomes of our initial experience with LP in 38 children from 2 months of age.

Materials and Methods

From June 2015 to December 2017 38 children aged 2-60 months (mean age 1.7 years) underwent LP for correction of PUJ obstruction. The mean pre operative anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis (APD) was 43,5mm and all patients had hydronephrosis (APD 21.4-76 mm) and obstructed curve on diuretic renogram. Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was the performed technique. Results are reported.

Results

Mean operative time was 107 minutes (70-180) with no conversion to open procedure. Pain control was needed mainly in the first 12hs. Mean hospitalization was 2 days (1-5). There were complications in 5 children not affecting the final outcome. Two patients had a re-obstruction requiring a second procedure with good result. The mean follow up was 18 months (13-36). The mean reduction on the postoperative APD was 41% - p<0,001 (end APD 5 to 41mm). Overall success rate was 94,7%. All children had good cosmetic results.

Conclusions

This is a small series limited by short follow up, however its data suggest that LP has good functional and cosmetic results, not compromising the success of the open procedure, regardless patient age.

Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery has been increasingly used in fashioning various surgical anastomoses. Our aim was to collect and analyze outcomes related to anastomoses performed using a robotic approach and compare them with those done using laparoscopic or open approaches through meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for articles comparing robotic with laparoscopic and/or open operations (colectomy, low anterior resection, gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), pancreaticoduodenectomy, radical cystectomy, pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy, renal transplant) published up to June 2019 searching Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies containing information about outcomes related to hand-sewn anastomoses were included for meta-analysis. Studies with stapled anastomoses or without relevant information about the anastomotic technique were excluded. We also excluded studies in which the anastomoses were performed extracorporeally in laparoscopic or robotic operations.

RESULTS

We included 83 studies referring to the aforementioned operations (4 randomized controlled and 79 non-randomized, 10 prospective and 69 retrospective) apart from colectomy and low anterior resection. Anastomoses done using robotic instruments provided similar results to those done using laparoscopic or open approach in regards to anastomotic leak or stricture. However, there were lower rates of stenosis in robotic than in laparoscopic RYGB (p=0.01) and in robotic than in open radical prostatectomy (p<0.00001). Moreover, all anastomoses needed more time to be performed using the robotic rather than the open approach in renal transplant (p≤0.001).

CONCLUSION

Robotic anastomoses provide equal outcomes with laparoscopic and open ones in most operations, with a few notable exceptions.

Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results

BACKGROUND

Although both laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) have reported excellent clinical outcomes, no evidence is currently available about the best surgical approach for surgical treatment of children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LP and RALP in children with UPJO.

STUDY DESIGN

The medical records of all patients with UPJO, who underwent LP or RALP in three pediatric urology units over a 2-year period, were retrospectively reviewed. The authors excluded open pyeloplasty and cases with complex anatomy such as horseshoe kidney. A dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in all cases.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (39 boys and 28 girls) with a median age of 4 years (range 8 months-14 years) were included. Thirty-seven patients (55.2%) underwent RALP, and 30 patients (44.8%) underwent LP. Three patients of RALP group presented a recurrent UPJO. No significant difference was found in the median total operative time between RALP (133 min) and LP (139 min) (P = 0.33). The median anastomotic time was significantly shorter in RALP (79 min) compared with LP (105.5 min) (P = 0.001). Overall surgical success rate was 96.7% for LP and 100% for RALP (P = 0.78). As for postoperative complications, the authors recorded re-stenosis of UPJO in one LP patient (3.3%), who underwent redo-RALP.

DISCUSSION

According to the authors experience, robotic surgery should be indicated in patients older than 18-24 months with a body weight > 10-15 Kgs. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty requires advanced laparoscopic skills related to intracorporeal suturing. However, the learning curve of suturing in robotics is much shorter compared with laparoscopy. In fact, during LP, the authors have to place 2-3 transabdominal stay sutures to stabilize the uretero-pelvic junction, before performing the anastomosis. Conversely, the authors never needed to place stay sutures in RALP.

CONCLUSIONS

The study experience suggested that RALP and LP give excellent results in children with UPJO. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be considered more minimally invasive than RALP because 3-mm trocars are adopted instead of 8-mm robotic ports. However, LP is technically challenging and has a bad ergonomics for the surgeon. Conversely, RALP is technically easier compared with LP, especially in redo procedures, with an excellent ergonomics. The main disadvantages of RALP remain high costs and size of robotic instruments. The choice to perform LP or RALP should be tailored to the individual case, considering patient's age and surgeon's experience.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Owing to the improved vision and instrument manipulation in robot-assisted procedures, we sought to evaluate the comparative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in a paediatric patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO).

Methods

We conducted a systemic literature search of online sources, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and respective bibliographic reference lists. Success rate, operative time, hospital length of stay, postoperative complication rate and re-intervention rate were our primary outcomes. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effects models.

Results

We identified 14 observational studies reporting a total of 2254 paediatric patients with PUJO, who underwent LP (n = 1021) or RALP (n = 1233). Our analysis demonstrated that RALP was associated with a significantly higher success rate [odds ratio (OR) 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-5.83, p = 0.03] and shorter length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) -1.49; 95% CI -2.22 to -077; p < 0.0001] compared with LP. Moreover, nonsignificant reductions in postoperative complications (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.36-1.02; p = 0.06) and re-intervention (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.15-1.21; p = 0.11) were found in favour of RALP. There was no difference in procedure time between the two approaches (MD -0.15; 95% CI -30.22 to 29.93, p = 0.99).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated that RALP is safe and may have higher success rate compared with the more traditional laparoscopic approach in a paediatric population. Moreover, it may be associated with lower postoperative complications and re-intervention rates. Evidence from randomized trials is required.