The Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Reduction of Intussusception in Infants and Children: An Updated Institutional Experience

Case Report: An unusual case of wide ileoileal intussusception associated with intestinal volvulus in a 8-months-old infant

Introduction

Midgut volvulus and intussusception are prevalent paediatric abdominal emergencies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a connection between intestinal volvulus and a massive intussusception.

Case report

An 8-month-old male infant was brought to the emergency room with a history of abdominal pain and vomiting for <24 h. On physical examination, the child appeared restless and was found to have a circumferential hard mass of approximately 4 cm in diameter in the epigastric region. Upon admission, laboratory results showed a C-reactive protein level of 0.4 mg/dl, LDH level of 351 U/L, mild leukocytosis with a white blood cell count of 12 × 103 /µl, and 67% neutrophils. A physical exam was significant for abdominal distention, hyperresonance in percussion, and a palpable, painful epigastric mass. The findings of the operation included a dilated and ischemic intestinal loop, approximately 25 cm from the ileocecal valve, twisted upon itself for three turns. After de-rotation, an extensive occluding ileo-ileal invagination with an ischemic intestinal loop was identified, and a length of approximately 55-60 cm of the distal ileum, including the ischemic segment, was resected.

Discussion

This is the first reported case of a connection between intestinal volvulus and a massive intussusception. Currently, only two reported cases describe the connection between volvulus and intussusception, which are insufficient to establish a direct link between the two clinical conditions.

Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Pediatric Intussusception: Analysis Using a National Inpatient Database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric intussusception has recently become more common as an alternative to open surgery. However, the differences in outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare short-term surgical outcomes and recurrence rates between patients treated with laparoscopic and open surgery for pediatric intussusception.

METHODS

Patients aged <18 years who underwent laparoscopic (n = 192) and open (n = 416) surgery for intussusception between April 2016 and March 2021 were retrospectively identified using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Propensity-score overlap weighting analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The outcomes included in-hospital morbidity, reoperation, readmission for intussusception, bowel resection, the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum, duration of anesthesia, postoperative length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic surgery group was older, heavier, and had fewer congenital malformations and emergency admissions than the open surgery group did. Overlap weighting analyses showed no significant differences in in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.88 [0.35-2.23]), reoperation (1.88 [0.24-14.9]), readmission for intussusception within 30 days (0.80 [0.12-5.30]) and 1 year (0.90 [0.28-2.93]), bowel resection (0.69 [0.46-1.02]), the diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum (0.97 [0.50-1.90]), duration of anesthesia (difference, 11 [-1-24] minutes), postoperative length of stay (difference, -1.9 [-4.2-0.4] days), or total hospitalization costs (difference, 612 [ -746-1970] US dollars) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationwide cohort, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between laparoscopic and open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment option for pediatric intussusception.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic versus Open Reduction of Intussusception in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic reduction (LR) and open reduction (OR) of intussusception in infants and children. Literature searches were conducted to identify studies having compared LR and OR for children with intussusception failed to enema reduction. Parameters such as operative time, time to oral intake, length of hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, and recurrence were pooled and compared by meta-analysis. Among the 502 pediatric participants included in the 11 studies, 275 had received LR and 227 received OR. There were shorter length of hospital stays and time to oral intake with the LR approach compared with OR. However, no significant difference was found between LR and OR in the secondary outcome, such as the overall postoperative complications and recurrence. LR is a feasible, safe, and effective surgical procedure alternative to OR for pediatric intussusception. Compared with OR, LR has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and faster time to oral intake. Besides, the overall postoperative complications may be slightly lower in LR. We conclude that LR should be considered an acceptable option for children.

Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

 Despite its wide acceptance, the superiority of laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery has remained controversial. There is still a call for well-founded evidence. We reviewed the literature on studies published in the last three decades and dealing with advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy compared to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open abdominal procedures in children were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Reports on upper and lower gastrointestinal as hepatobiliary surgery and on surgery of pancreas and spleen were included. Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery were analyzed for different types of procedures. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

 A total of 239 studies dealing with 19 types of procedures and outcomes in 929,157 patients were analyzed. We identified 26 randomized controlled trials (10.8%) and 213 comparative studies (89.2%). The most frequently reported advantage of laparoscopy was shorter hospital stay in 60.4% of studies. Longer operative time was the most frequently reported disadvantage of laparoscopy in 52.7% of studies. Clavien-Dindo grade I to III complications (mild-moderate) were less frequently identified in laparoscopic compared to open procedures (80.3% of studies). Grade-IV complications (severe) were less frequently reported after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis and more frequently after laparoscopic Kasai's portoenterostomy. We identified a decreased frequency of reporting on advantages after laparoscopy and increased reporting on disadvantages for all surgery types over the decades.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic compared with open pediatric surgery seems to be beneficial in most types of procedures. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. However, the number of reports on disadvantages increased during the past decades.

Laparoscopic versus open reduction of idiopathic intussusception in children: an updated institutional experience

Background

In the reduction of intussusception, due to the lack of randomized, controlled, and prospective clinical trials to confirm the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over open surgery, more evidence was needed. This study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopy and open reduction of idiopathic intussusception in children as well as to illustrate some skills for the reduction of intussusception laparoscopically.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to evaluate outcomes for patients with idiopathic intussusception who were treated laparoscopically (LAP group) from January 2015 to December 2019 and to compare the outcomes with laparotomy (OPEN group) during the same period.

Results

During the period studied, there were 162 patients treated surgically for intussusception: 62 LAP and 100 OPEN. No statistical differences were found in demographic data, clinical symptoms and signs, duration of symptoms, location and types of intussusception between the two groups. Conversion to open procedure was required for 11 patients in the LAP group. The operation time and time to oral intake were shorter in the LAP group while the difference was not significant. If the 11 conversion cases were excluded, the operation time and time to oral intake were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) in the LAP group. The length of stay was significantly shorter in the LAP group (P < 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates between the two groups were comparable (P = 1.0).

Conclusion

Laparoscopy was safe and effective in the treatment of pediatric idiopathic intussusceptions. Pediatric surgeons with sophisticated minimally invasive skills should choose laparoscopy as the first choice in the treatment of idiopathic intussusceptions.

[Postoperative intussusception in children]

The authors present diagnosis and treatment of two children with postoperative intussusception. A 6-month baby with retroperitoneal teratoma developed clinical signs of intestinal obstruction in 2 days after surgery. The child underwent redo laparotomy, and ileocecal intussusception was found. In the second case, a 6-month baby with choledochal cyst underwent laparotomy, cyst excision and Roux-en-Y-hepaticojejunostomy. Six days later, clinical deterioration with signs of bowel obstruction appeared. Redo laparotomy was performed for early adhesive ileus, and ileoileal intussusception was observed. In both cases, postoperative intussusception was diagnosed during relaparatomy that confirms the complexity of diagnosis.

Peter SD, Beres AL, Hu YY, Renaud EJ, Ricca R, Slidell MB, Taylor A, Smith CA, Miniati D, Sola JE, Valusek P, Berman L, Raval MV, Gosain A, Dellinger MB, Sømme S, Downard CD, McAteer JP, Kawaguchi A. Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to develop recommendations for the management of ileocolic intussusception in children.

METHODS

The ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were queried for literature from January 1988 through December 2018. Search terms were designed to address the following topics in intussusception: prophylactic antibiotic use, repeated enema reductions, outpatient management, and use of minimally invasive techniques for children with intussusception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 83 articles were analyzed and included for review. Prophylactic antibiotic use does not decrease complications after radiologic reduction. Repeated enema reductions may be attempted when clinically appropriate. Patients can be safely observed in the emergency department following enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception, avoiding hospital admission. Laparoscopic reduction is often successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding intussusception in hemodynamically stable children without critical illness, pre-reduction antibiotics are unnecessary, non-operative outpatient management should be maximized, and minimally invasive techniques may be used to avoid laparotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-5 (mainly level 3-4) TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic Review of level 1-4 studies.