Novel Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Technique for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia: Overlapping of Whole Posterior Wall with Newly Added Mesh and Pre-Existing Mesh by Closing Hernia Defect

Characteristics of pantaloon inguinal hernia and evaluation of added laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair to transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a retrospective observational study

Purpose

Pantaloon hernia (PH), defined as concurrent ipsilateral direct and indirect inguinal hernias, is known for its high postoperative recurrence rate. This study retrospectively investigated the characteristics of PHs and evaluated the safety and efficacy of incorporating laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) into transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty.

Methods

A total of 3,355 patients who underwent TAPP hernioplasty for groin hernias between October 2014 and December 2021 were analyzed. These patients were divided into 2 groups: PH (97 patients) and non-PH (3,258 patients). The PH group was further subdivided based on the surgical technique used: TAPP hernioplasty without IPTR (TAPP group, 39 patients) and TAPP hernioplasty with IPTR for defect closure (TAPP + IPTR group, 58 patients).

Results

The study included 93 male and 4 female patients with PH. Patients with PH were generally older and predominantly male compared to the non-PH group. The recurrence rate in the PH group was notably higher than in the non-PH group (2.1% [2 of 97] vs. 0.2% [6 of 3,258], respectively; P = 0.007). Among the PH group, reoperations were more frequent in the TAPP group compared to the TAPP + IPTR group (10.3% [4 of 39] vs. 0% [0 of 58], respectively; P = 0.048). The reasons for reoperation in the PH group included recurrences (2 patients), mesh bulge (1 patient), and chronic seroma (1 patient).

Conclusion

TAPP + IPTR hernioplasty is an acceptable approach in PH treatment, reducing reoperation.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Iliopubic Tract Repair Plus Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Treating Inguinal Hernia After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a risk factor for inguinal hernia (IH). Furthermore, in patients who have undergone RARP, the fibrotic scar tissue in the RARP area limits preperitoneal dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of performing laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) in addition to transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPPH) to treat IH after RARP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 80 patients with an IH after RARP were treated with TAPPH from January 2013 to October 2020 and were included in this retrospective study. Patients who underwent conventional TAPPH were categorized as the TAPPH group (25 patients with 29 hernias), whereas those who underwent TAPPH with IPTR were categorized as the TAPPH + IPTR group (55 patients with 63 hernias). The IPTR comprised suture fixation of the transversus abdominis aponeurotic arch to the iliopubic tract.

RESULTS

All patients had indirect IH. The incidence of intraoperative complications was significantly higher in the TAPPH group than in the TAPPH + IPTR group [13.8% (4/29) vs 0.0% (0/63), P = 0.011]. The average operative time was also significantly shorter in the TAPPH + IPTR group than in the TAPPH group ( P < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in the duration of hospitalization, recurrence rate, and pain severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of laparoscopic IPTR to TAPPH for treating IH after RARP is safe and is associated with a minimal risk of intraoperative complications and a short operative time.

Laparoscopic hydrocelectomy with transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty or iliopubic tract repair for treatment of encysted spermatic cord hydrocele

BACKGROUND

An encysted spermatic cord hydrocele (ESCH) causes an inguinal swelling resembling an inguinal hernia (IH). An ESCH should be considered as a differential diagnosis of IH. Although laparoscopic operations have been performed to treat ESCHs in pediatric patients, such operations have not been reported in adults. This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic hydrocelectomy for treatment of ESCHs in adults.

METHODS

The medical charts of 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal hydrocelectomy for ESCHs from January 2015 to December 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into those with and without an IH. Laparoscopic hydrocelectomy was performed, and the internal inguinal ring was closed with iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty depending on the presence of an IH. The patients' age, ESCH location, postoperative complications, recurrence, and operating time were examined.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 46.7 (20-77) years. All patients underwent laparoscopic hydrocelectomy without open conversion. ESCHs were more common on the right side (35/49, 71.4%) than on the left (14/49, 28.6%). The presenting symptom in all patients was inguinal swelling. The ESCH was located inside the inguinal canal in 47 patients and protruded to the abdominal cavity from the inguinal canal in 2 patients. After laparoscopic hydrocelectomy, 32 patients without an IH underwent IPTR and 17 patients with an IH underwent TAPP hernioplasty. The mean operating time was shorter in the IPTR than TAPP hernioplasty group. The postoperative complications and hospital stay were not different between the two groups. There were no recurrences in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic hydrocelectomy with IPTR or TAPP hernioplasty is safe and feasible for treatment of ESCHs in adults.

Adding Laparoscopic Iliopubic Tract Repair to Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Treatment of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Totally Extraperitoneal Hernioplasty

Background: In patients with recurrent inguinal hernia (IH) after totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty, re-TEP hernioplasty is difficult because of fibrotic adhesions. Re-laparoscopic hernioplasty is possible by changing the approach from extraperitoneal to transabdominal. If iliopubic tract repair (IPTR), mainly used in the past for the open approach, is added as a laparoscopic procedure, re-laparoscopic hernioplasty is possible when treating recurrent IH. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of alternate transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty supplemented by IPTR for treating recurrent IH after TEP hernioplasty. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 2600 patients with IHs who underwent TAPP hernioplasty from January 2015 to December 2020. Among patients with recurrent IH, those who underwent primary TEP were included in the study. For reoperation, TAPP hernioplasty was performed and IPTR was added. IPTR was performed by suture closure of the internal inguinal ring by the iliopubic tract and medial aponeurotic arch of the transversus abdominis muscle. Results: Of the 35 patients (33 males and 2 females) with recurrent IH after primary TEP hernioplasty, 51% (18/35) of patients had recurrence within 2 years of the first operation. There were 28 recurrent IHs of the same type as the original, and 7 cases of a different type. The mean TAPP operation time was 41 minutes. Chronic inguinodynia and re-recurrence was not observed. One patient had inferior epigastric vessel injury, which was successfully repaired. Conclusion: Adding laparoscopic IPTR to TAPP hernioplasty is safe feasible treatment for recurrent IH after TEP hernioplasty.

Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty and laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair for Nyhus type II hernia in women

BACKGROUND

Indirect inguinal hernia with a dilated internal ring but an intact posterior inguinal wall is classified as Nyhus type II. Females have a higher incidence of indirect hernia than direct hernia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) compared with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty in treating women with Nyhus type II hernia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 318 women aged ≥ 20 years who were treated for Nyhus type II hernia from January 2013 to December 2018. The patients were categorized into two groups in accordance with the operative technique: the TAPP group (33 patients) and the IPTR group (285 patients). In the IPTR group, intraabdominal suturing of the iliopubic tract and transversalis fascia arch was performed without mesh implantation.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was shorter in the IPTR group (17.2 ± 3.9 min) than the TAPP group (20.5 ± 8.1 min, p = 0.028). The postoperative complication rate was higher in the TAPP group than the IPTR group [6.1% (2/33) vs. 0.4% (1/285), respectively; p = 0.001]. Inguinodynia occurred in one patient in the TAPP group and no patients in the IPTR group. The hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. The numeral rating scale pain scores at 1 day and 1 week postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two groups. There was no recurrence in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic IPTR was safe and feasible for treating Nyhus type II hernia in women.

Pitfalls of laparoscopic Re-TAPP in recurrent inguinal hernia repair-a plea for extended preoperative diagnostic

According to international guidelines, recurrent inguinal hernia should be treated by a surgical approach opposing of the primary strategy (anterior–posterior or posterior–anterior). However, recent evidence demonstrates feasibility and safety of re-laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after primary laparoscopy. For such a strategy, correct identification of anatomical structures is challenging, but absolutely crucial for a satisfactory postoperative result. This case of an unrecognized sliding hernia of the sigmoid colon during re-laparoscopy highlights that a precise physical examination as well as an extended preoperative radiological workup (ultrasound, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis) should be considered prior to re-laparoscopy of recurrent inguinal hernia.