Effects of the Three-Dimensional Vision System on Surgical Performance, Muscular Fatigue, and Pain During Urologic Laparoscopic Tasks: Results of Objective Assessments and a Mini Questionnaire Survey

Ergonomics of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

There has been a significant expansion in endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery (EES) that has been used to address a wide range of intracranial and sinonasal pathologies. Although there exists a large amount of literature on approaches and patient outcomes, there is a paucity of data describing ergonomics in this field. Our goal was to evaluate and summarize the literature on ergonomics in EES.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed all published, peer-reviewed, English language literature in the PubMed and Web of Science databases as screened by multiple reviewers describing ergonomics as related to EES.

RESULTS

A total of 50 articles were found that described significant conclusions and descriptions on ergonomics in EES. We found and summarized the different technical aspects of ergonomics as pertaining to EES and provided evidence-based suggestions on operating room and surgeon setup.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several improvements in EES ergonomics that can decrease fatigue, improve efficiency, and overall surgeon well-being.

Comparative Study of the Influence of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Urological Laparoscopy on Surgeons' Surgical Performance and Ergonomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision systems with traditional two-dimensional systems in laparoscopic urological surgery, analyzing the benefits, limitations, and impact of introducing this medical technology with regard to surgical performance and the surgeon's ergonomics. Methods: A systematic review with a structured bibliographic search was conducted in the electronic libraries (PubMed and EMBASE) until August 2019 and with no language restrictions. Studies on 3D visualization technology in laparoscopic urologic surgery, randomized controlled trials, and observational comparative studies were included. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 25 articles were obtained, of which 4 were clinical studies with patients, 2 studies were carried out in experimental animal models, and the remaining 19 were conducted in simulated environments. Regarding the European training program in basic laparoscopic urological skills, the results showed no significant differences in execution time using either imaging system. Three-dimensional vision led to a significant reduction in surgery time in pyeloplasty and radical nephrectomy. In addition, there was a reported decrease in blood loss in adrenalectomy, nephron-sparing nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, simple nephrectomy, and pyeloplasty using 3D vision. Regarding ergonomics, the studies generally described no differences in side effects (headache, nausea, eye strain) when comparing the two types of visualization systems. Surgeons reported reduced workloads and stress with 3D vision than with traditional laparoscopy. Conclusions: Three-dimensional laparoscopic systems essentially advance surgical performance in less-experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Three-dimensional laparoscopy leads to improvements in surgery time, which is important for specific surgical procedures involving intracorporeal ligatures and sutures. The results achieved on the surgeons' ergonomics showed better depth perception and decreased stress and workloads during 3D vision with no differences in potential side effects.