Laparoscopic Redo Pull-Through for Hirschsprung Disease Due to Innervation Disorders

The Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Transition Zone Anastomosis in Hirschsprung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is characterized by absent neuronal innervation of the distal colonic bowel wall and is surgically treated by removing the affected bowel segment via pull-through surgery (PT). Incomplete removal of the affected segment is called transition zone anastomosis (TZA). The current systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence and clinical impact of TZA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Sciences were searched (last search: October 2020), and studies describing histopathological examination for TZA in patients with HD were included. Data were synthesized into aggregated Event Rates (ER) of TZA using random-effects meta-analysis. The clinical impact was defined in terms of obstructive defecation problems, enterocolitis, soiling, incontinence, and the need for additional surgical procedures. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

KEY RESULTS

This systematic review included 34 studies, representing 2207 patients. After excluding series composed of only patients undergoing redo PT, the prevalence was 9% (ER = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.05-0.14, p < 0.001, I2 = 86%). TZA occurred more often after operation techniques other than Duhamel (X2 = 19.21, p = <0.001). Patients with TZA often had obstructive defecation problems (62%), enterocolitis (38%), soiling (28%), and fecal incontinence (24%) in follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 13 years. Patients with TZA more often had persistent obstructive symptoms (X2 = 7.26, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

TZA is associated with obstructive defecation problems and redo PT and is thus necessary to prevent.

Surgical approach and functional outcome of redo pull-through for postoperative complications in Hirschsprung's disease

AIM

To review our surgical experience and outcome of redo pull-through for various postoperative complications of Hirschsprung's disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on children who underwent redo pull-through from 2016 to 2019. Operative methods and functional outcomes were compared between those with anastomotic complications (stricture and fistula, n = 12) and patients without anastomotic complications (n = 24) such as residual aganglionosis/transition zone, twisted pull-through and tight soave cuff.

RESULT

36 Patients (29 male and 7 female) were included with median age 6 (0.1-54) months at primary and 36 (9-144) months at redo pull-through. A transanal rectal mucosectomy and partial internal anal sphincterectomy (TRM-PIAS) pull-through with laparoscopic (n = 10, 27.8%) or laparotomy (n = 26, 72.2%) assisted techniques were performed for all patients during redo procedure. Patients with anastomotic complications had lower incidence of successful laparoscopic pull-through (0%), higher postoperative complications (25%) after redo surgery, but similar functional outcomes compared to those without anastomotic complications (41.6% underwent laparoscopic surgery, 4.2% complications). Patients with partial colectomy had significantly less soiling (36.4%) and enterocolitis (0%) compared to those with subtotal/total colectomy (79.2% soiling and 58.3% enterocolitis).

CONCLUSION

TRM-PIAS with/without laparoscopic-assisted redo pull-through was effective in treating various complications after primary pull-through. The functional outcome is strongly associated with the length of residual colon after redo pull-though.

Reoperative techniques and management in Hirschsprung disease: a narrative review

The majority of children who undergo operative management for Hirschsprung disease have favorable results. A subset of patients, however, have long-term dysfunctional stooling, characterized by either frequent soiling or obstructive symptoms. The evaluation and management of a child with poor function after pull-through for Hirschsprung disease should be conducted by an experienced multidisciplinary team. A systematic workup is focused on detecting pathologic and anatomic causes of pull-through dysfunction. This includes an exam under anesthesia, pathologic confirmation including a repeat biopsy, and a contrast enema, with additional studies depending on the suspected etiology. Obstructive symptoms may be due to technique-specific types of mechanical obstruction, histopathologic obstruction, or dysmotility-each of which may benefit from reoperative surgery. The causes of soiling symptoms include loss of the dentate line and damage to the anal sphincter, which generally do not benefit from revision of the pull-through, and pseudo-incontinence, which may reveal underlying obstruction. A thorough understanding of the types of complications associated with various pull-through techniques aids in the evaluation of a child with postoperative dysfunction. Treatment is specifically tailored to the patient, guided by the etiology of the patient's symptoms, with options ranging from bowel management to redo pull-through procedure. This review details the workup and management of patients with complications after pull-through, with a focus on the perioperative management and technical considerations for those who require reoperation.

Laparoscopic vs. Transabdominal Treatment for Overflow Fecal Incontinence Due to Residual Aganglionosis or Transition Zone Pathology in Hirschsprung's Disease Reoperation

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the details of laparoscopic-assisted reoperative surgery for Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) with overflow fecal incontinence, and to retrospectively compare laparoscopic-assisted surgery with transabdominal pull-through surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with HSCR with overflow fecal incontinence after the initial surgery in our center between January 2002 and December 2018. Pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative data were recorded for statistical analysis. Results: Thirty patients with overflow fecal incontinence after initial megacolon surgery [17 who underwent transanal pull-through (TA-PT) and 13 who underwent laparoscopic-assisted pull-through (LA-PT)] required a secondary surgery [reoperation with LA-PT (LAR-PT) (n = 16) or reoperation with transabdominal pull-through (TR-PT) (n = 14)]. Indications for reoperation were residual aganglionosis (RA) (7/30, 23.3%) or transition zone pathology (TZP) (23/17, 76.7%). Blood loss was significantly decreased in the LAR-PT group (75 ± 29.2 ml) compared to the TR-PT group (190 ± 51.4 ml) (P = 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LAR-PT group (10 ± 1.5 days) than that in the TR-PT group (13 ± 2.4 days). No significant differences were found between two groups in surgical methods, defecation function score, or post-operative complications except for wound infection (LAR-PT vs. TR-PT 0 vs. 28.6%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: It is necessary to make a comprehensive analysis of the causes of fecal incontinence after HSCR surgery and make an accurate judgment using appropriate methods. If a reoperation was inevitable for patients with overflow fecal incontinence due to RA or TZP, a comprehensive evaluation prior to the operation is required to maximize the benefit from reoperation. Although laparoscopic reoperation with heart-shaped anastomosis was safe and feasible for patients with failed initial Soave technique, unnecessary reoperation should be avoided as much as possible.

Minimally Invasive Redo Pull-Throughs in Hirschsprung Disease

Introduction: To reoperate a patient with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) can be technically demanding and most surgeons would resort to conventional laparotomy. This article describes a series of patients with postoperative obstructive symptoms who underwent minimally invasive redo pull-throughs (MIRPT) (either laparoscopic or robotic) to assess the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in complicated HSCR patients. Patients and Methods: All consecutive HSCR patients with postoperative obstructive symptoms, who underwent MIRPT with fast track concepts of care between January 2012 and January 2020, have been included. Data regarding indications, surgical details, complications, and outcome have been compared to those of a series of patients who underwent conventional laparotomic redo. Results: Sixteen patients were included. Male to female ratio was 4.3:1. Median age at surgery was 78 months. Eleven patients underwent laparoscopic redo and 5 underwent robotic redo. Median length of follow-up was 49 months. Reasons for redoing were transition zone pull-through, residual aganglionosis, anastomotic retraction or leak, rectal diverticulum, and refractory anastomotic stricture. No major intraoperative complication occurred. No conversion to laparotomy was required. One patient experienced cuff stricture requiring laparoscopic release. Two patients reported bouts of enterocolitis postoperatively. Compared to classic laparotomic redo pull-throughs (49 patients with complete data), overall complications were significantly less frequent, accounting for 1 and 21 events, respectively (6% versus 43%) (P = .0067). Continence after a median of 21 months postoperatively scored excellent to good in 9 out of 12 patients, who were assessed on this regard (75%), without statistically significant differences. Conclusions: MIRPT proved to be effective and safe in HSCR patients complaining postoperative obstructive symptoms. Robotic surgery could play a crucial. Our study confirms that complicated HSCR cases can be safely managed by means of MIS, applying concepts of fast track care to serve the best for our patients.

Postoperative Pullthrough Obstruction in Hirschsprung Disease: Etiologies and Diagnosis

Some patients continue to have obstructive symptoms and/or incontinence after pullthrough surgery for Hirschsprung disease. Incontinence can be due to injury to the anal sphincter and/or dentate line, abnormal colonic motility (nonretentive), or a chronic large stool burden (retentive). A diagnostic algorithm based on clinical and pathological evaluations can be applied to distinguish potential etiologies for obstructive symptoms, which segregate into anatomic (mechanical or histopathological) or physiologic subgroups. Valuable clinical information may be obtained by anorectal examination under anesthesia, radiographic studies, and anorectal or colonic manometry. In addition, histopathological review of a patient's original resection specimen(s) as well as postoperative biopsies of the neorectum usually are an important component of the diagnostic workup. Goals for the surgical pathologist are to exclude incomplete resection of the aganglionic segment or transition zone and to identify other neuromuscular pathology that might explain the patient's dysmotility. Diagnoses established from a combination of clinical and pathological data dramatically alter management strategies. In rare instances, reoperative pullthrough surgery is required, in which case the pathologist must be aware of histopathological features specific to redo pullthrough resection specimens.