“Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymph Node Sampling” First Approach for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma as an Oncological Practice

Survival in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node dissection: A retrospective study in Vietnamese population

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a high recurrence rate and poor outcome. Lymph node (LN) metastasis, especially para-aortic LN (PALN), is an important prognostic factor. PALN assessment through sampling with frozen-section analysis is a validated method. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of PALN on overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, lymphadenectomy with PALN sampling, as well as to identify other prognostic factors for survival.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 89 PDAC patients undergoing radical resection with PALN sampling. The patients were classified into PALN(+) (n = 11) and PALN(-) (n = 78). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-year and 3-year OS and Kaplan-Meier model were used.

Results

OS after 1-year for PALN(+) and PALN(-) was 18.2 and 56.4%, after 3-year was 15.4% and 0%, respectively. Tumor differentiation, LN metastasis (LN(-), LN(+) PALN(-), LN(+) PALN(+)) were significant prognostic factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses for 1-year OS, and neural invasion (PN) was the solely significant factor for 3-year OS (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier estimate showed that OS of PALN(+) and PN (+) was significantly lower than the negative group, respectively (p < 0.05). No statistical difference in OS was seen between LN(-) and LN(+) PALN(-); and between LN(+) PALN(-) and PALN(+) (p = 0.107). Patients with PN (-) PALN(+) had similar OS compared to PN (+) PALN(-) (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

PDAC had a poor outcome despite treatment with radical resection. Further follow-up should be conducted to determine the role of surgery in PALN(+)and PN invasion.

Laparoscopic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy: Initial single center experience

Backgrounds/Aims

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the gold standard for the treatment of periampullary tumors. Many specialized centers have adopted the totally laparoscopic or hybrid laparoscopic PD (LPD). However, this procedure has not yet been standardized and serious debate is taking place towards its safety and feasibility. Herein, we report our recent experience whit hybrid-LPD.

Methods

During 2019 in our department 56 PD were performed and 21 (37.5%) underwent hybrid-LPD. We have retrospectively reviewed the short-term outcomes of these patients.

Results

Main indication was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (71,4%). The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were respectively 425 min (range, 226 to 576) and 317 ml (range 60 to 800 ml). Conversion to an open procedure was required in 4 patients (19%): 2 with suspected vein involvement, 1 for mesenteric panniculitis and 1 for biliary injury. The post-operative complication rate was 42.8% (9/21). Regarding post-operative pancreatic fistula, three patients (14.2%) had grade B and 1 grade C (4.7%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 9-23) and 90- days mortality was 4.7%. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 17.7 (range 12 to 26). The rate of margins R0 was 80%; R1 ＞0<1 mm was 10.5% and R1 0 mm was 9.5%.

Conclusions

Hydrid-LPD is safe and feasible. Careful patient selection and increasing experience can reduce the risk of post-operative complications.

Para-aortic lymph node metastasis detected intraoperatively by systematic frozen section examination in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: is resection improving the prognosis?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the controversial benefit of a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with PALN metastasis intraoperatively detected by systematic frozen section examination in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

PALN intraoperative examination by frozen section was systematically performed from January 2006 to February 2018 prior to performing PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Until June 2012, PALN + patients still underwent PD (PALN+/PD group) in the framework of a prospective study. Since July 2012, PALN+ was considered as contraindicating the planned PD (PALN+/No-PD group). Post-operative morbidity and survival were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 32 PALN + patients intraoperatively detected, the first 13 underwent a PD, while the last 19 did not undergo resection. Seven patients (54%) among 13 PALN+/PD patients developed a post-operative complication against 3 (16%) among 19 PALN+/No-PD patients (p = 0.049). The median length of stay was 5 days longer for PALN+/PD patients (p = 0.001). The median survival did not differ between PALN+/No-PD and PALN+/PD groups (respectively 13.4 months (95%CI:7.6-19.3) and 11.5 months (95%CI:5.9-17.1), p = 0.471). No patient was alive 4 years after surgery in both the PALN+/No-PD or PALN+/PD groups.

CONCLUSION

In case of PALN detected intraoperatively in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, PD does not improve survival compared to current palliative treatment.

Prognostic Impact of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) with paraaortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of PALNM in resected EHCC.

METHODS

The present retrospective study included 410 patients, including 16 patients with PALNM, who underwent surgical resection of EHCC between September 2002 and December 2018. These were compared to 9 patients in whom EHCC was not resected due to PALNM. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were investigated to identify the prognostic factors in resected EHCC.

RESULTS

The overall survival in the resected patients with PALNM was significantly better than that in unresected patients (median survival time [MST] 33.7 vs. 16.7 months, p=0.009) and was not significantly worse than that of patients with regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) (MST 33.7 vs 36.0 months, p=0.278). The multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, male sex, tumor location (perihilar), residual tumor status, histological grade, microscopic venous invasion, and regional LNM as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in survival between the resected patients with PALNM and patients with regional LNM, and PALNM was not a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Surgical resection may be considered an acceptable approach for EHCC with PALNM in selected patients.