Altering the Traditional Approach to Restorative Proctocolectomy After Subtotal Colectomy in Pediatric Patients

Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal J-Pouch-Anorectal Anastomosis in Children: Shifting to a Two Stage-Approach

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to medical therapy and those with familial adenomatous polyposis. Robotic IPAA is a safe and feasible option for the surgical treatment of UC in children. The feasibility of IPAA without ileostomy has been demonstrated in adult in the modified two-stage approach. Aim: The aim of the study was to examine feasibility, outcomes, and complications of robotic modified two-stage approach for RPC with IPAA in pediatric patients comparing it with robotic three-stage approach. Methods: All patients aged 4-18 years who underwent operative treatment for medically refractory UC were included. Demographic and clinical features, age at colectomy and at reconstructive surgery, intraoperative details and complications, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Thirteen patients were included in the study (6 males, 7 females). Ileostomy was fashioned in 8 patients at the time of RPC and IPAA (Group 1); in 5 patients the bowel continuity was reintegrated at the time of IPAA (Group 2). No intraoperative complications and no conversions were recorded. One patient of Group 1 had a postoperative pouch complication. The 5 patients who underwent a two-stage procedure did not show short-term complications. No statistical differences were found between the groups in short-term (P = .48) and long-term complications (P = .07). Conclusions: Modified two-stage IPAA is a safe and feasible option in pediatric patients with UC, and RALS offers advantages over other techniques for the precision of rectal dissection and ileo-anal anastomosis.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.

Interaction between the intestinal flora and the severity of diversion colitis after low anterior resection of rectal cancer

Background

Diversion colitis (DC) is nonspecific inflammation of the distal intestinal mucosa following disruption of colonic continuity with colonic dysfunction. The colonscopic score is a good tool for differentiating the severity of patients with DC. At present, no studies have analyzed the pathogenesis of DC from the perspective of the diversity and and differences of intestinal flora.

Methods

Retrospective study: Clinical information were collected from patients with low rectal cancer admitted to the Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, from April 2017 to April 2019. These patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) combined with terminal ileum enterostomy (dual-chamber). We used chi-square test to comparethe clinical baseline information, clinical symptoms, and colonscopic characteristics between different severity of DC. Propsective oberservational study: We recruited 40 patients with laparoscopic anterior low resection combined with terminal ileum enterostomy and they were further classified into mild group and severe group according to the scores of colonscopic examinations for DC. 16s-rDNA sequencing was carried out to analyze the diversity and and differences of intestinal flora in the intestinal lavage fluid of the two groups.

Results

In retrospective study, we found that age, BMI, history of diabetes, and symptoms associated with the stoma state were the independent risk factors that affect DC severity (P<0.05). Meanwhile, age, BMI, history of diabetes and colonscopic score were found to be independent risk factors affecting the severity of diarrhea after ileostomy closure surgery(P<0.05), which was consistent with our results of differentiating the severity of DC under endoscopy; In propsective oberservational study, 40 patients with low rectal cancer recruited by sample size calculation, 23 were in the mild group and 17 in the severe group. The results of 16s-rDNA sequencing showed that intestinal flora with high enrichment values primarily consisted of Bifidobacteriales and Prevotella in mild group, whereas that in the severe group consisted of Providencia and Dorea. The functional predictions on such two types of intestinal flora were mainly focused on lipid synthesis, glycan synthesis, metabolism, and amino acid metabolism pathways.

Conclusion

After ileostomy closure surgery, a series of severe clinical symptoms might appear in DC patients. There are significant differences in local and systemic inflammatory responses, composition of intestinal flora between DC patients with different colonscopic scores, which provide a basis for the clinical interventional treatment for DC in patients with permanent stoma.

Severity of complications following restorative proctocolectomy in children is related to staging not diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is performed using a variety of staged procedures for several diseases. Our aim was to assess whether the severity of complications, classified according to Clavien-Dindo, was related to the diagnosis or the procedure.

METHODS

A consecutive series of children receiving an ileoanal pouch was prospectively recorded. Complications were scored by two blinded observers. Major complications were Clavien-Dindo ≥3b. Procedures were classified as: colectomy, proctectomy and pouch or proctocolectomy and pouch. Diagnoses were classified as: ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis or other: idiopathic constipation, total colonic Hirschsprung's disease, juvenile polyposis, Crohn's colitis, fibrosing colonopathy or necrotising enterocolitis.

RESULTS

128 children underwent 191 procedures: 61 colectomies, 63 proctectomies and 67 proctocolectomies. 84 children had ulcerative colitis, 20 had FAP and 24 had other indications. Major complications were significantly more likely with proctocolectomy (16/67, 24%) than with either colectomy (4/61, 7%) or proctectomy (8/63, 13%), p = 0.01. There was no association between diagnosis and major complications: ulcerative colitis (18/133, 14%), FAP (5/20, 25%), other (5/38, 13%) p = 0.4. There was no increase in major complications following proctectomy if a major complication had occurred during prior colectomy. Overall, 15% of procedures experienced a major complication. 6/9 stoma related complications required operative intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of complications after RPC in children is related to use of a two stage rather than three stage sequence of surgery, not the underlying diagnosis.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does the timing of pouch creation in 2-stage operations for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis matter?

INTRODUCTION

Children with fulminant ulcerative colitis(UC) traditionally undergo 2-stage operations: restorative-proctocolectomy(RP/IPAA) and ileostomy followed by ostomy closure. In the biologic era, surgeons have modified their strategy: initial subtotal-colectomy/diversion, followed by RP/IPAA without diversion. Yet, evidence on efficacy and functional outcomes with the "modified 2-stage" approach is limited in children. We sought to compare the timing of pouch creation in 2-stage operations to determine outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of children with UC undergoing either a traditional 2-stage RP/IPAA or modified 2-stage RP/IPAA between 2010 and 2019. Complications (leak, stricture, wound-infection) were recorded at 90-days and 1 year from 2nd operation.

RESULTS

N = 57 (Traditional n = 40, Modified n = 17). Median time to surgery from consultation was shorter in the modified-group (7 vs.25 days, p = 0.01). Preoperatively, the modified-group had lower albumin(p = 0.01), higher CRP(p = 0.01), and more frequently took biologics within 90-daysp=0.001). After re-establishing intestinal continuity, stricture requiring dilation was higher in the traditional-group (59% vs.18%, p = 0.008). No difference in pouch leak (p = 0.38), bowel obstruction(p = 0.35), loperamide dose(p = 0.21), or incontinence(p = 0.38) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Delaying pouch creation to the second operation without a protective ileostomy as a modified 2-stage is safe in a sicker and more acute pediatric population.

Analysis of a Modified Two-Stage Approach to Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Without Fecal Diversion in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Fecal diversion after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) remains controversial. We hypothesize that a modified two-stage IPAA omitting diverting ileostomy (DI) after IPAA, found to be safe in adults, would produce similar results in children.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-institution study of children (≤18 years) undergoing staged total proctocolectomy with IPAA from 2014 to 2020. Traditional two-stage and three-stage approaches including DI after IPAA were compared to two-stage approach without DI.

RESULTS

32 patients were included; of these, 7 (22%), 14 (44%), and 11 (34%) patients underwent traditional two-stage, modified two-stage, or three-stage IPAA, respectively. Following IPAA, modified two-stage patients had shorter operative time, decreased opioid utilization, quicker return to regular diet, and shorter stoma duration. After IPAA, there was similar postoperative length of stay, complication rates, readmissions, visits to the emergency department, or unplanned return to the operating room (OR) within 30 days. Anastomotic leak occurred in 2 patients; both were managed nonoperatively without evidence of pouch dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Modified two-stage IPAA with omission of DI after the IPAA stage is safe to perform in pediatric UC patients. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to identify risk factors associated with operative complications.

Modified two-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research

PURPOSE

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is performed for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). This operation is performed in 2 or 3 stages and involves forming a diverting loop ileostomy thought to protect patients from complications related to anastomotic leak. However, some advocate for a modified 2-stage approach, consisting of subtotal colectomy followed by completion proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative complication rates between modified 2-stage and traditional RPC with ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

METHODS

Records were sourced from PubMed/Embase databases. Studies comparing postoperative complications following RPC for ulcerative colitis (UC) were selected according to PRISMA guidelines comparing modified 2-stage (exposure), classic 2-stage, and 3-stage approaches (comparators). The primary outcome measure was safety as measured by postoperative complication rates. We employed random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included ten observational studies including 1727 patients (38% modified 2-stage). Among pediatric patients, modified 2-stage approaches had higher rates of anastomotic leak than 3-stage approaches (p = 0.03). Among adult cohorts with lower preoperative biologic use rates, modified 2-stage approaches had lower leak rates than classic 2-stage approaches (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified 2-stage approach may be safe for adult patients who otherwise require a 3-stage approach while reducing costs and length of stay. Pediatric patients may benefit from lower leak rates when receiving 3-stage compared with modified 2-stage approaches, especially when on biologics. The modified 2-stage approach may be safer than the classic 2-stage approach for adult patients with lower biologic exposure.

The effect of diversion on readmission following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in children

BACKGROUND

Readmission rates as high as 20% have been reported after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in children, with obstruction and dehydration as the most commonly listed reasons. We hypothesized that a diverting ileostomy contributes to unplanned readmission after IPAA creation.

METHODS

Children (age <18) who underwent IPAA creation from January 2007 to August 2018 at two affiliated institutions were reviewed. Patient demographics, operative details, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were abstracted. Unplanned readmission within 30 days and details on patient readmission were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (57% female) with a median age of 15 years (range: 18 months-17 years) underwent IPAA. Indications for IPAA included ulcerative colitis (n = 63; 68%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 24; 26%), indeterminate colitis (n = 5; 5%), and total colonic Hirschsprung's (n = 1; 1%). Sixty-one (66%) patients were diverted at the time of IPAA creation. Fourteen patients (15%) were readmitted, and reasons for readmission included bowel obstruction (n = 9; 64%), dehydration (n = 2; 14%), anastomotic leak (n = 2; 14%), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (n = 1; 6%). Patients with a diverting ileostomy at the time of IPAA were more often readmittted than patients who were not diverted (21% vs 3%, p = 0.03). Further, 10 (71%) of the readmitted patients had complications attributable to their ileostomy. In patients readmitted for obstructive symptoms, six (67%) required red rubber catheter insertion for resolution, two (22%) patients required reoperation for obstructions at the level of the stoma, and one (11%) resolved with bowel rest alone.

CONCLUSION

Readmission following IPAA creation in children is often secondary to preventable issues related to diverting ileostomy. Surgeons should carefully consider the necessity of diversion. When it is necessary, particular attention to fascial aperture size and post-discharge initiatives to reduce dehydration may reduce readmission rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.