Revisional Procedures for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy and Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy

Robotic stapled cardioplasty, an alternative before esophagectomy

Robotic stapled cardioplasty offers a novel, minimally invasive alternative for treating end-stage achalasia, a rare esophageal motor disorder. Achalasia is characterized by the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax and reduced peristalsis, with about 5% of patients progressing to a stage where esophagectomy is often the only treatment option. This study introduces robotic stapled cardioplasty as a less aggressive, organ-preserving approach. Using a robotic platform, the procedure improves visibility, precision, and careful dissection, making it especially useful in complex revision cases. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of robotic stapled cardioplasty for end-stage achalasia. It appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy and may also serve as a rescue procedure for patients who have exhausted other treatment options before considering organ resection.

Robotic versus laparoscopic heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia has evolved over the years, with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and partial fundoplication becoming widely used worldwide. More recently, an increased interest in the robotic Heller myotomy (RHM) has arisen.

PURPOSE

Compare short-term and functional outcomes of RHM vs. LHM.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried. Primary outcome was esophageal perforation (EP). Risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were effect size and relative inference measures. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644.

RESULTS

Fourteen observational studies (12962 patients) were included. Of those, 2503 (19.3%) underwent RHM. The patient age ranged from 34 to 66 years and 51.7% were males. EP occurred in 259 patients (1.99%). The cumulative incidence of EP was 1.67% for RHM and 2.07% for LHM. Compared to LHM, RHM was associated with a reduced risk of EP (RR: 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.59). No differences were found in term of dysphagia requiring reoperation or additional endoscopic procedures (RR: 0.47; 95% CI 0.20-1.09) and postoperative Eckardt score (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI -0.94, 0.11). Blood loss, conversion to open, operative time, and hospital length of stay were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

RHM may be associated with a reduced risk of EP compared to LHM. However, because of selection bias, diverse surgeon expertise, variations in surgical technique, and prior endoscopic procedures these findings should not be viewed as conclusive while the superiority of one approach over the other remains to be established.

A case report of end-stage achalasia: Conservative option as the new surgical standard

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

End-stage achalasia is a rare disease, consisting of a functional impairment of the esophagus which becomes dilated with a sigmoid shape. While esophagectomy was considered for a long time as the principal surgical procedure in end-stage achalasia, recent literature results demonstrate that laparoscopic Heller Dor (LHD) could be an advocated alternative with acceptable functional results.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of an eighty-three-year-old male, an elderly patient, who had been complaining for one year of dysphagia and general status loss. Endoscopy, manometry then a barium X-ray confirmed end-stage achalasia. The patient had LHD with an improvement of symptomatology post-operatively.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Achalasia is a rare disease affecting oesophagal motility. The diagnosis is suggested clinically and confirmed by a wide range of tests notably esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium swallow and manometry. The diagnosis of achalasia is classically made by demonstrating impaired relaxation of the lower oesophagal sphincter and absent peristalsis in the oesophagal manometry. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is made mainly to eliminate the diagnosis of oesophagal cancer. Barium swallow, however, is done to appreciate the impact of achalasia on the rest of the esophagus.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlights the satisfying results after an LHD which is an alternative to esophagectomy especially in elderlies with high risk.

Do preoperative endoscopic interventions predict symptom recurrence or reintervention after peroral endoscopic myotomy?

BACKGROUND

Studies assessing outcomes of patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after botulinum injection or dilation have had various results with respect to failure, although this has not been differentiated between lack of clinical response and recurrence. We hypothesize that patients with previous endoscopic intervention(s) are more likely to recur than treatment-naïve patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent POEM for achalasia at a single tertiary care center between 2011 and 2022. Patients were excluded if they had previous myotomy (POEM or Heller). The remaining patients were stratified into treatment-naïve patients (TN), those with previous botulinum injection (BTX), those with previous dilatation (BD), and those with both previous endoscopic interventions (BOTH). Primary outcome was recurrence indicated by clinical symptoms or need for repeat endoscopic intervention or surgery after originally having clinical resolution (Eckardt ≤ 3). Multivariate logistic regression using preoperative and intraoperative factors was completed to assess odds of recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included in the analysis, 90 TN, 34 BD, 28 BTX, and 12 BOTH. There were no other significant differences in demographics or in preoperative Eckardt score (p = 0.53). There was no difference in the proportion of patients that had postoperative manometry (p = 0.74), symptom recurrence (p = 0.59), surgical intervention (p = 0.16). BTX (14.3%) and BOTH (16.7%) patients had a higher rate of repeat endoscopic intervention than BD and TN patients (5.9% and 1.1%). In the logistic regression analysis, there was no association among the BTX, BD, or BOTH groups compared to the TN group. No odds ratios achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no increased likelihood of recurrence with botulinum injection or dilatation prior to POEM, implying that they are similarly good candidates compared to treatment-naïve patients.

Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for pediatric achalasia: Institutional experience and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of achalasia by both laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches has been recognized as the definitive management in children. Despite reported low volumes in many centers, there has been an increasing worldwide experience with endoscopic approaches to pediatric achalasia. The aim of this study is to report our institutional experience with per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as first-line or revisional therapy for achalasia.

METHODS

An IRB approved retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative procedures for achalasia, specifically with the POEM technique, from July 2015 to September 2021. Data including demographics, intra-operative details, pre and post operative Eckardt scores, complications, outcomes, and follow-up were obtained.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 43 children underwent 46 operations for achalasia including POEM and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Operations included 37 POEMS (33 primary POEMS; 3 POEMS after failed LHM; and 1 POEM after failed POEM). Additionally, 9 LHM operations including, 4 primary LHM; 3 attempted POEMS converted to LHM; 1 attempted POEM after failed LHM converted to redo LHM; and 1 LHM after failed POEM. In the POEM group (n = 37), based on the high resolution esophageal manometry findings Chicago Classification types at diagnosis were as follows: 9 patients were type I (24.3%); 25 patients were type II (67.6%); 2 patients were type III (5.9%) and 1 patient was unknown type (2.7%). Sixteen children (43.2%) had prior endoscopic treatment of achalasia prior to POEM [Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation (PBD), and/or Botox injection (BTI)],), while prior operative intervention occurred in 4 patients (10.8%), 3 LHM and 1 POEM. Age at operation was 2-18 years (mean ± SD age: 11.6 ± 4.5 years). Weight at operation 11.8-100.7 kg (mean ± SD kg; 39 ± 19.9 kg). Range of baseline Eckardt score was 4-10 (mean ± SD: 6.73 ± 1.5). Operative time was 64-359 min (mean ± SD minutes: 138.1 ± 62.2 min). Intraoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (43.2%) but did not require reoperation during index admission including: 4 mucosotomy (11.8%); 9 pneumothoraces (24.3%); 2 pneumomediastinum (5.4%); 10 pneumoperitoneum (27%); 0 sub-mucosal tunnel bleeding (0%); 0 open conversion/death (0%). Post operative complications included: 5 recurrent dysphagia (13.5%); 0 esophageal leak (0%); 3 GERD (8.1%); 1 failed POEM (2.7%). Median length of stay was 2 days (mean ± SD days: 2.4 ± 0.9 day). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 74 months (median 15 months), mean follow-up 22.6 months ± 20 months. Post POEM Eckardt score was 0.6 ± 0.9. Five patients required a single PBD post POEM (13.5%) and 1 patient required a repeat myotomy (LHM) after POEM (2.7%) for a 16.2% reintervention rate. Subsequent normalization of Eckardt scores (≤ 3) and symptomatic relief was achieved in all patients (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

POEM as first-line therapy for pediatric achalasia, or as a secondary procedure after failed prior myotomy or POEM, in our experience is safe and effective. We have shown equivalent results to our own prior experience with LHM. Long-term follow-up will be performed to monitor for recurrent symptoms, adequate physical growth, and general development.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia

PURPOSE

Symptom recurrence after initial surgical management of esophageal achalasia occurs in 10-25% of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of revisional therapy after failed Heller myotomy (HM).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed searching for patients with recurrent symptoms after primary surgical therapy for achalasia. Patients with previously failed HM were considered for the final analysis. The Foregut questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess severity of symptoms. Objective investigations routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Redo treatments consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic HM, hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, or stapled cardioplasty. A yearly clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled in all patients.

RESULTS

Over a 20-year period, 26 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR 19.5) underwent revisional therapy after failed HM for achalasia at a tertiary-care university hospital. The median time after index procedure was 10 years (IQR 21). Revisional therapy consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (n=13), laparoscopic HM and fundoplication (n=10), esophagectomy (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty and fundoplication (n=1). Nine (34.6%) of these patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. There was no mortality, and the overall complication rate was 7.7%. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-149), a significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, respiratory symptoms, and median Eckardt score (p<0.05) was noted.

CONCLUSION

In specialized and multidisciplinary centers, revisional therapy for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective.

Myotomy in sigmoid megaesophagus: is it applicable? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia may evolve to sigmoid megaesophagus in 10-15% of patients and is usually treated with esophagectomy, which has high morbi-mortality. Many surgeons debate the applicability of the Heller myotomy for treating sigmoid megaesophagus. This study intents to analyze the effectiveness of myotomy for treating patients with sigmoid megaesophagus.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs and Embase alongside manual search of references. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials, cohort, case-series; patients with sigmoid megaesophagus and esophageal diameter ≥ 6 cm; and patients undergoing primary myotomy. The exclusion criteria were reviews, case reports, cross-sectional studies, editorials, letters, congress abstracts, full-text unavailability; previous surgical treatment for achalasia; and pediatric or animal model studies. No restrictions on language and date of publication, and no filters were applied. Subgroups analyses were performed to assess the laparoscopic myotomy perioperative outcomes. Besides, subgroup analyses were performed to assess the long-term outcomes of the studies with a follow-up time > 24 months. To verify heterogeneity, the I2 test was used. The random effects were applied, and the fixed model was evaluated as sensitivity analysis. To assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence, the tools ROBINS-I and GRADE were used, respectively. Registration number: CRD42020199667.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were selected, encompassing 350 patients. The mean age ranged from 36 to 61 years old, and the mean follow-up ranged from 16 to 109 months. Complications rate was 0.08 (CI: 0.040-0.153; P = 0.01). Need for retreatment rate was 0.128 (CI: 0.031-0.409; P = 0.01). The probability of good or excellent outcomes after myotomy was 0.762 (CI: 0.703-0.812; P < 0.01). Postoperative mortality rate was 0.008 (CI: 0.004-0.015; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Surgical myotomy is an option for avoiding esophagectomy in achalasia, with a low morbi-mortality rate and good results. It is effective for most patients and only a minority will demand retreatment.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Heller myotomy (HM) is considered the standard surgical treatment for patients with achalasia. However, approximately 10% to 20% of patients with achalasia have persistent or recurrent symptoms after HM that require further therapy. Several studies have reported the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 31, 2020. Studies evaluating the outcomes of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were the pooled rates of clinical success (defined as post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3), mean change in Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and incidence of postoperative GERD.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies involving 272 patients with achalasia were recruited in this review. POEM was successfully performed in 270 (99.3%) patients after previous HM. Clinical success was achieved in 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.1%-96.8%) of patients. Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and IRP were significantly lowered by 5.14 (95% CI, 4.19-6.09), 12.01 mm Hg (95% CI, 6.74-17.27), and 10.02 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.95-15.09), respectively. The pooled rates of postoperative symptomatic reflux, esophagitis, and abnormal pH monitoring were 36.9% (95% CI, 20.7%-53.1%), 33.0% (95% CI, 9.6%-56.4%), and 47.8% (95% CI, 33.4%-62.2%), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was detected across all outcome measurements. Most of the AEs were self-limiting or managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is a safe and effective treatment for patients with achalasia with previous HM. Further data from prospective, controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Discordance between high-resolution manometry, esophagoscopy and contrast esophagogram in determining landmarks for per-oral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: a word of caution

BACKGROUND

Myotomy length for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is standardized for type I and II achalasia. However, for type III achalasia, jackhammer esophagus, diffuse esophageal spasms and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, there is no standard. Determining myotomy length based on the high-pressure zone found during high-resolution manometry (HRM) and spastic length found during esophagography may be used to determine adequate myotomy length without excess muscle destruction.

METHODS

The records of patients who have undergone POEM procedures at our institution had the following data gleaned: age, sex, esophageal spastic diagnosis, length of high-pressure zone and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) position by HRM, length of spastic esophagus by esophagography, position of the z-line by esophagoscopy and length of myotomy performed. Outcomes were assessed based on patient symptomatic improvement and need for re-intervention.

RESULTS

71 patients were evaluated for POEM, with 67 completing POEM. There was an average difference in LES position by HRM and z-line position by esophagoscopy of 3.9 ± 3.0 cm. There was an average difference in high-pressure zone by HRM and spastic length by esophagography of 4.9 ± 3.2 cm. Overall, with a median of 20 months follow-up, 74% achieved long-term symptomatic improvement, with 17 patients requiring re-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Discordance among HRM, esophagography and esophagoscopy can be significant. Caution should be employed with using these methods to determine myotomy length in POEM.

Achalasia: what to do in the face of failures of Heller myotomy

Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, and while there are several treatment options, there is no consensus regarding them. When therapeutic intervention for achalasia fails, a careful evaluation of the cause of the persistent or recurrent symptoms using upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and contrast radiologic studies is required to understand the cause of therapy failure and guide plans for subsequent treatment. Options for reintervention are the same as for primary intervention and include pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, or redo esophageal myotomy. When reintervention fails or if the esophagus is not amenable to intervention and the disease is considered end-stage, esophagectomy is the last option to manage recurrent achalasia.