Laparoscopic Extravesical Reimplantation in Children with Primary Obstructive Megaureter

Advancements in Surgical Management of Megaureters

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and describe the recent evolution of surgery for the various types of pediatric megaureter.

RECENT FINDINGS

Megaureter management first relies on determining the underlying cause, whether by obstruction, reflux, or a combination, and then setting appropriate surgical indications because many cases do not require surgery as shown by observation studies. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been on the rise as a major treatment option for obstructive megaureter, while refluxing megaureters can also be treated by laparoscopic and robotic techniques, whether extravesically or transvesicoscopically. During ureteral reimplantation, tapering is sometimes necessary to address the enlarged ureter, but there are also considerations for not tapering or for tapering alternatives. Endoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries for megaureter have been the predominant focus of recent megaureter literature. These techniques still need collaborative prospective studies to better define which surgeries are best for patients needing megaureter interventions.

High-pressure balloon dilatation of primary obstructive megaureter in children: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and complication rates of endoscopic high-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) in treating primary obstructive megaureter (POM) in children based on current literature. Specifically, we wanted to clarify the evidence on the use of HPBD in children under one year of age.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed via several databases. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. The primary outcomes studied in this systematic review were the effectiveness of HBPD in relieving obstruction and reducing hydroureteronephrosis in children. The secondary outcome was to study the complication rate of endoscopic high-pressure balloon dilatation. Studies that reported one or both of these outcomes (n = 13) were considered eligible for inclusion in this review.

RESULTS

HPBD significantly decreased both ureteral diameter (15.8 mm [range 2-30] to 8.0 mm [0-30], p = 0.00009) and anteroposterior diameter of renal pelvis (16.7 mm [0-46] to 9.7 mm [0-36], p = 0.00107). The success rate was 71% after one HPBD and 79% after two HPBD. The median follow-up time was 3.6 years (interquartile range 2.2-6.4 years). A complication rate of 33% was observed, but no Clavien-Dindo grade IV-V complications were reported. Postoperative infections and VUR were detected in 12% and 7.8% of cases, respectively. For children under one year of age, outcomes of HPBD seem to be similar to those in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that HPBD appears to be safe and can be used as the first-line treatment for symptomatic POM. Further comparative studies are needed addressing the effect of treatment in infants, and also long-term outcomes of the treatment. Due to the nature of POM, identifying those patients who will benefit from HPBD remains challenging.

Application of Indocyanine Green in Combination with Da Vinci Xi Robot in Surgeries on the Upper Urinary Tract: A Case Series Study

BACKGROUND

To explore the application value of intraoperative imaging by indocyanine green (ICG) injection through the collection system of the urinary tract for Da Vinci Xi robot navigation in complex surgeries on the upper urinary tract.

METHODS

Data of 14 patients who underwent complex surgeries of the upper urinary tract post-ICG injection through the collection system of the urinary tract in combination with Da Vinci Xi robot navigation in the Tianjin First Central Hospital between December 2019 and October 2021 were analyzed in this retrospective study. The operation duration, estimated blood loss, and exposure time of ureteral stricture to ICG were evaluated. The renal functions and tumor relapse were evaluated after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the fourteen patients, three had distal ureteral stricture, five had ureteropelvic junction obstruction, four presented duplicate kidney and ureter, one had a giant ureter, and one presented an ipsilateral native ureteral tumor after renal transplantation. The surgeries in all patients were successful, with no conversion to open surgery. In addition, no injury to the surrounding organs, anastomotic stenosis or leakage, or ICG injection-related side effects were detected. Imaging at 3 months post-operatively revealed improved renal functions compared to those before the operation. No tumor recurrence or metastasis was observed in patient 14.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence imaging compensating for the inadequacy of tactile feedback in the surgical operating system has advantages in identifying the ureter, determining the site of ureteral stricture, and protecting the blood flow for the ureter.

Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Obstructive Megaureter in Pediatric Patients: Is It Time for Robot-Assisted Approach?

Objective: To compare open and robotic approach for treatment of Primary Obstructive Megaureter (POM) in a series of pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Medical records of all patients who had undergone ureteral reimplantation for POM at our institution, between January 2016 and December 2019, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Open (Group B) and robotic (Group A) approach were compared. Success was defined as reduction of anteroposterior diameter of pelvis and ureter on postoperative ultrasound scan. Surgical complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Esthetic results were compared through the Vancouver Scar Scale. Results: Out of 23 patients, 11 belonged to Group A (5M and 6F) and 12 to Group B (9M and 3F). Median age at diagnosis was 38 months in Group A and 46 months in Group B (P = .69). Operative times were comparable (150' Group A and 140' Group B; P = .35), but the hospital stay was significantly shorter in the robotic group (P < .01). Success rate was comparable: 90.9% in Group A and 91.7% in Group B, respectively (P = .95). Incidence of early complications was 9.1% in Group A (grade IIIB) and 8.3% in Group B (grade II) (P = .95). Esthetic evaluation obtained a median score of 1 in Group A and 3 in Group B (P < .01). Conclusions: Our preliminary experience shows that robotic reimplantation can be a safe option in the treatment of POM in pediatric patients with clinical outcomes comparable to the open technique.