Study of Thoracoscopic Repair of Diaphragmatic Eventration in Children: A Case Series

Laparoscopic approach in the management of diaphragmatic eventration in adults: gastrointestinal surgical perspective

The current literature is poor with studies handling the role of laparoscopy in managing diaphragmatic eventration (DE). Herein, we describe our experience regarding the role of laparoscopy in managing DE patients presenting mainly with gastrointestinal symptoms. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 patients who underwent laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication between January 2010 and December 2018. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life were assessed. Most DEs were left sided (95%). Laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication was possible in all patients, along with correcting all associated gastrointestinal and diaphragmatic problems. The former included gastric volvulus (60%), reflux esophagitis (25%), cholelithiasis (5%), and pyloric obstruction (5%), while the latter included diaphragmatic and hiatus hernia (10% and 15%, respectively).The average operative time was 142 min. All patients had a regular (reviewer #1) postoperative course except for one who developed hydro-pneumothorax. At a median follow-up of 48 months, midterm outcomes were satisfactory, with an improvement (reviewer #1) in gastrointestinal symptoms. Three patients (reviewer #1) developed radiological recurrence without significant clinical symptoms. Patient's quality of life, including all parameters, significantly improved after the laparoscopic procedure compared to the preoperative values. Laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for managing adult diaphragmatic eventration (reviewer #1).

Comparative Study of Thoracoscopic and Modified Small Incision Repair for Congenital Diaphragmatic Eventration in Children

Background: Thoracoscopic diaphragmatic plication has gained popularity in the treatment of congenital diaphragmatic eventration (CDE), but the therapeutic effect and prognosis have rarely been compared with nonendoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 77 children who had received treatment for CDE in our institution from September 2006 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the repair approach, the children were divided into a thoracoscopic plication group and a modified small incision plication group. The perioperative characteristics and follow-up details after diaphragm plication were compared between the two groups. Results: Among 77 children with CDE, 44 cases were in the thoracoscopic plication group and 33 cases were in the modified small incision plication group. All the cases of CDE were unilateral, with 13 cases on the left side and 64 cases on the right side. There were no differences in the preoperative characteristics between the two groups. The modified small incision plication group had a higher bleeding volume (P = .000) and a greater proportion of patients needing chest drainage (P = .000), whereas the differences in the total and postoperative hospital stays (P = .088, P = .247, respectively) did not significantly differ between the two groups. There were no differences in postoperative improvement in the location of the diaphragm between the two groups or between the right and left lesions (P = .438, P = .677, respectively). The total follow-up time was 2-11 years. No recurrence was reported during this period in either of the groups, but the incidence of postoperative thoracic deformities was higher in the modified small incision plication group (P = .013). Conclusions: Compared with the modified small incision plication, thoracoscopic plication has the advantages of smaller blood loss, a low percentage of intrathoracic drainage tube usage, and no occurrence of thoracic deformities.