Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Mass in Patients on Dialysis or with Renal Transplant in Place Compared to Normal Controls

Impact of pre- and peri-operative risk factors on length of stay and hospital readmission following minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy

Objective

We conducted an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy cases reported with the goal to identify pre- and peri-operative variables associated with length of stay (LOS) greater than 3 days and readmission within 30 days.

Methods

Records from 2008 to 2018 for "laparoscopy, surgical; partial nephrectomy" for prolonged LOS and readmission cohorts were compiled. Univariate analysis with Chi-square, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (ORs), p-values, and 95% confidence intervals assessed statistical associations.

Results

Totally, 20 306 records for LOS greater than 3 days and 15 854 for readmission within 30 days were available. Univariate and multivariable analysis exhibited similar results. For LOS greater than 3 days, undergoing non-elective surgery (OR=5.247), transfusion of greater than four units within 72 h prior to surgery (OR=5.072), pre-operative renal failure or dialysis (OR=2.941), and poor pre-operative functional status (OR=2.540) exhibited the strongest statistically significant associations. For hospital readmission within 30 days, loss in body weight greater than 10% in 6 months prior to surgery (OR=2.227) and bleeding disorders (OR=2.081) exhibited strongest statistically significant associations.

Conclusion

Multiple pre- and peri-operative risk factors are independently associated with prolonged LOS and hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Recognizing the risks factors that can potentially be improved prior to minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy is crucial to informing patient selection, optimization strategies, and patient education.

How to manage renal masses in kidney transplant recipients? A collaborative review by the EAU-YAU kidney transplantation and renal cancer working groups

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a four-times higher risk of renal malignancies compared to general population. As these patients frequently harbor bilateral or multifocal tumors, the management of renal masses is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the current management of the native kidney masses in KT patients.

ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE

We performed a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed database. A number of 34 studies were included in the present review.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

In frail patients with renal masses below 3 cm, active surveillance is a feasible alternative. Nephron-sparing surgery is not justified for masses in the native kidney. Radical nephrectomy is the standard treatment for post-transplant renal tumors of the native kidneys in KT recipients, with laparoscopic techniques leading to significantly less perioperative complication rates as compared to the open approach. Concurrent bilateral native nephrectomy at the time of transplantation can be considered in patients with renal mass and polycystic kidney disease, especially if no residual urinary output is present. Patients with localized disease and successful radical nephrectomy do not require immunosuppression adjustment. In metastatic cases, mTOR agents can ensure efficient antitumoral response, while maintaining proper immunosuppression in order to protect the graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant renal cancer of the native kidneys is a frequent occurrence. Radical nephrectomy is most frequently performed for localized renal masses. A standardized and widely-approved screening strategy for malignancies of native renal units is yet to be implemented.