1
|
de Moura DTH, Dantas ACB, Ribeiro IB, McCarty TR, Takeda FR, Santo MA, Nahas SC, de Moura EGH. Status of bariatric endoscopy–what does the surgeon need to know? A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:185-199. [PMID: 35317547 PMCID: PMC8908340 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a chronic and multifactorial disease with a variety of potential treatment options available. Currently, there are several multidisciplinary therapeutic options for its management, including conservative, endoscopic, and surgical treatment.
AIM To clarify indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of bariatric endoscopy.
METHODS Narrative review of current literature based on electronic databases including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and SciELO.
RESULTS Bariatric endoscopy is in constant development and comprises primary and revisional treatment options as well as management of surgical complications. Various devices act upon different mechanisms of action, which may be individualized to each patient. Despite favorable results for the endoscopic treatment of obesity, prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up are required to fully validate primary and revisional endoscopic therapies. Regarding the management of bariatric surgery complications, endoscopic therapy may be considered the procedure of choice in a variety of situations. Still, as there is no standardized algorithm, local experience should be considered in decision-making.
CONCLUSION The treatment of patients with obesity is complex, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential. Bariatric endoscopy has shown impressive results both in the treatment of obesity and its surgical complications, and therefore, must be part of the armamentarium in the fight against this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Anna Carolina Batista Dantas
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Unidade de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica, Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo e Coloproctologia, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 021115, United States
| | - Flávio Roberto Takeda
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Unidade de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica, Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo e Coloproctologia, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Marco Aurelio Santo
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Unidade de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica, Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo e Coloproctologia, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Sergio Carlos Nahas
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Unidade de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica, Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo e Coloproctologia, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manos T, Nedelcu M, Nedelcu A, Gagner M, Weiss AK, Bastid C, Carandina S, Noel P. Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4861-4867. [PMID: 34455540 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation. METHODS All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak. RESULTS A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Manos
- ELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France
| | - Marius Nedelcu
- ELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France. .,ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Place du 4 Septembre, 83100, Toulon, France.
| | - Anamaria Nedelcu
- ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Place du 4 Septembre, 83100, Toulon, France
| | | | - Abdul Kader Weiss
- Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Christophe Bastid
- ELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France
| | - Sergio Carandina
- ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Place du 4 Septembre, 83100, Toulon, France
| | - Patrick Noel
- ELSAN, Clinique Bouchard, 77 Rue de Dr. Escat, 13006, Marseille, France.,Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.,Mediclinic Airport Road, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|