Comparison of Laparoscopic Orchiopexy and Traditional Inguinal Incision Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended Testes in Cryptorchidism

Laparoscopic-Assisted Scrotal Approach for the Treatment of Inguinal Cryptorchidism with Patent Processus Vaginalis: Clinical Efficacy Analysis

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of two surgical approaches, laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision and conventional inguinal-scrotal incision, for treating cryptorchidism with unobliterated processus vaginalis. Methods: Clinical data from 60 pediatric patients with inguinal cryptorchidism who were admitted to our institution between January 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on the surgical technique used, the patients were split into two groups: the laparoscopic group (n = 30) underwent a laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision, whereas the conventional group (n = 30) underwent a conventional inguinal-scrotal incision for testicular descent and fixation. The length of the procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the typical hospital stay following the procedure were compared between the two groups. Also assessed was the frequency of postoperative complications including wound infection and hematoma development. Results: The laparoscopic group demonstrated a notably shortened average surgical duration compared with the traditional group, and this discrepancy held statistical significance (P = .017). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss, with a statistically significant distinction (P = .002), along with a decreased average length of hospital stay after surgery, also statistically significant (P = .009). Testicular retraction, atrophy, inguinal hernias, or hydrocele were not present in any group. Although the difference between the laparoscopic and open groups was not statistically significant (P > .05), the laparoscopic group saw a reduced frequency of scrotal hematoma. The frequency of wound infection was also decreased in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group, although there was no statistically significant difference (P > .05). Conclusion: The laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision approach for testicular descent and fixation offers precise localization of cryptorchidism, reduced surgical trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and results in smaller scars with minimal tissue damage. The procedure showcases enhanced overall clinical effectiveness, fewer postoperative complications, heightened safety, and superior cosmetic outcomes.

Advantages of single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes in children: a prospective comparison study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes in children.

METHODS

We prospectively studied patients with undescended testes between July 2021 and June 2022. In total, 223 patients were included in our study: 105 underwent single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy and 118 underwent conventional laparoscopic orchiopexy. During single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy, 3 ports were inserted within the umbilicus.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between the groups in terms of age and laterality. For unilateral undescended testes, the operating time was longer in the single site group than in the conventional group at the early stages (55.31 ± 12.04 min vs. 48.14 ± 14.39 min, P = 0.007), but it was similar to the conventional group at the later stages (48.82 ± 13.49 min vs. 48.14 ± 14.39 min, P = 0.78). Testicular ascent occurred in one patient from each group. There was no significant difference in the success rate between the single-site group and the conventional group (99.0% vs. 99.2%, P = 0.93). In the single-site group, no visible abdominal scarring was observed, while in the conventional group, there were two noticeable scars on the abdomen.

CONCLUSION

Single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy offers superior cosmetic results and comparable success rates compared to conventional laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes.

Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Orchiopexy With the Modified Prentiss Maneuver for Non-palpable Testis Near the Internal Ring

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic orchiopexy with the modified Prentiss maneuver (LOMPM) and laparoscopic trans-inguinal orchiopexy (LTIO) for the treatment of non-palpable testis (NPT) <1 cm from the internal ring.

METHODS

Children with unilateral NPT who underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy at our center between February 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical method, they were divided into LOMPM and LTIO groups. The operation time, postoperative pain degree, postoperative complications and follow-up results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were included in this study, including 41 cases in the LOMPM group and 57 cases in the LTIO group. All patients underwent successful surgery. The LOMPM group was superior to the LTIO group in terms of postoperative testicular position (lower scrotm: 90.2 vs. 71.9%, P = 0.026). There were no significant differences in operation time, postoperative pain score, and complications between the two groups. Preoperative testicular volume, postoperative testicular volume, and testicular growth rate in the LOMPM group were comparable to those in the LTIO group. There were no testicular atrophy, inguinal hernia and hydrocele in both groups after operation.

CONCLUSIONS

LOMPM was comparable in safety to LTIO, but LOMPM had a good post-operative testicular position, and was suitable for the treatment of NPT near the internal ring.

Open controversies on the treatment of undescended testis: An update

Cryptorchidism is a common congenital malformation in pediatric urology. Although there have been many studies on the etiology of the disease, it has not been fully clarified, and while its diagnostic and treatment models have gradually approached standardization and systematization, some controversies regarding treatment remain. Additionally, although ultrasound is a non-invasive examination without ionizing radiation, its role in the evaluation of cryptorchidism remains controversial. The main basis for treating cryptorchidism is orchidopexy, and the main view on treatment age is that treatment should be performed between 6 and 12 months after birth, but no more than 18 months after birth. The view on hormone therapy is still controversial because most scholars believe that early surgery is the key to treatment. There are many surgical treatment methods for cryptorchidism, including traditional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery, which provide satisfactory results. In conclusion, the treatment of undescended testis (UDT) had been largely standardized, apart from the treatment of high intra-abdominal testis (IAT), which remains a matter of debate.

Utility of Laparoscopic Approach of Orchiopexy for Palpable Cryptorchidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Traditional open orchiopexy is still a standard of treatment for palpable undescended testicles. Recently several authors reported successful results using a laparoscopic approach in the treatment of palpable cryptorchidism. The present systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the utility of laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable cryptorchidism. Methods: Scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were systematically searched for relevant articles using the following terms: (palpable cryptorchidism or palpable undescended testes) AND (laparoscopic orchiopexy or laparoscopic orchiopexy). The inclusion criteria were all children with unilateral or bilateral palpable undescended testes who underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy (LO) compared to children who underwent conventional open orchiopexy (CO). The main outcomes were the proportion of children requiring redo-orchiopexy and the incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were duration and the cost of surgery. Results: The final meta-analysis included five studies involving 705 children; LO, n = 369 (52.3%) and CO, n = 336 (47.7%). The majority of the included patients had unilateral palpable cryptorchidism. No significant differences were found in regard to average age at the time of surgery and follow-up periods between the investigated groups. No statistically significant differences were found in regard to redo-orchiopexy rates (RR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.03–1.88, p = 0.17), early complications (RR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.21–2.08, p = 0.48) and incidence of testicular atrophy (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.03–3.88, p = 0.40). No significant differences in the operative duration were observed among the groups. Laparoscopy was associated with higher costs in most of the studies. Conclusion: LO is safe and effective in children with palpable cryptorchidism. The rates of redo-orchiopexy as well as an incidence of early complications and testicular atrophy rates are comparable to CO.