Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Bleeding and Leakage Rates in Four Staple-Line Reinforcement Methods: A Prospective Observational Study

How Does Oversewing/Suturing (OS/S) Compare to Other Staple Line Reinforcement Methods? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Various staple line reinforcement (SLR) techniques in sleeve gastrectomy, including oversewing/suturing (OS/S), gluing, and buttressing, have emerged to mitigate postoperative complications such as bleeding and leaks. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated OS/S as an efficacious strategy for preventing postoperative complications, encompassing leaks, bleeding, and reoperations. Given that OS/S is the sole SLR technique not incurring additional costs during surgery, our study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes associated with OS/S versus alternative SLR methods. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed the literature and conducted fifteen pairwise meta-analyses of comparative studies, each evaluating an outcome between OS/S and another SLR technique. Thirteen of these analyses showed no statistically significant differences, whereas two revealed notable distinctions.

Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer Vision Model for Sleeve Gastrectomy: Experience in One Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common metabolic and bariatric procedure performed. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for automated real-time data structuring and annotations of surgical videos has immense potential of clinical applications. This study presents initial real-world implementation of AI-based computer vision model in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and external validation of accuracy of safety milestone annotations.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of 49 consecutive SG videos was captured and analyzed by the AI platform (December 2020-August 2023). A bariatric surgeon viewed all videos and assessed safety milestones adherence, compared to the AI annotations. Patients' data were retrieved from the bariatric unit registry.

RESULTS

SG total duration was 47.5 min (interquartile range 36-64). Main steps included preparation (12.2%), dissection of the greater curvature (30.8%), gastric transection (28.5%), specimen extraction (7.2%), and final inspection (14.4%). Out of body time comprised 6.9% of the total video. Safety milestones components and AI-surgeon agreements included the following: bougie insertion (100%), distance from pylorus ≥ 2 cm (100%), parallel to lesser curvature (98%), fundus mobilization (100%), and distance from esophagus ≥ 1 cm (true-100%, false-13.6%; kappa coefficient 0.2, p = 0.006). Intraoperative complications included notable hemorrhage (n = 4) and parenchymal injury (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The AI model provides a fully automated SG video analysis. Outcomes suggest its accuracy in four of five safety milestone annotations. This data is valuable, as it reflects objective performance measures which can help us improve the surgical quality and efficiency of SG. Larger cohorts will enable SG standardization and clinical correlations with outcomes, aiming to improve patients' safety.

Single-Center Experience of 500 Cases of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Surgical Techniques and Perioperative Management Strategies

Introduction: Reported results and techniques of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are variable. Our objective was to assess results of weight loss, complications, and reflux in a large consecutive series of LSG, describing technical detail which contributed to outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 500 consecutive patients undergoing LSG. Patient demographics, weight loss, complications, and functional outcomes were analyzed and operative technique described. Results: Five hundred patients underwent LSG over 3 years (2 revisional). Mean (range) preoperative body mass index was 40 kg/m2 (32-75 kg/m2). Mean follow-up and length of hospital stay were 12 months (1-36) and 7.2 days (5-12), respectively. All-cause 30-day readmission rate was 0.3%. Mean excess weight loss was 22.3% (1 month), 42.2% (3 month), 57.2% (6 month), and 73.1% (1 year). There was no mortality and intraoperative complications occurred in our 500 cases. Early surgical complications in 2 (0.2%) patients (postoperative bleeds). Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms decreased about 10%. Conclusion: With attention to detail, LSG can lead to good excess weight loss with minimal complications. Tenants to success include repair of hiatal laxity, generous width at angula incisura, and complete resection of posterior fundus.

Seamguard Buttressing of the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Appears to Decrease the Incidence of Postoperative Bleeding, Leaks, and Reoperations. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Non-Randomized Comparative Studies

Leaks and bleeding are major acute postoperative complications following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Various staple line reinforcement (SLR) methods have been invented such as oversewing/suturing (OS/S), omentopexy/gastropexy (OP/GP), gluing, and buttressing. However, many surgeons do not use any type of reinforcement. On the other hand, surgeons who use a reinforcement method are often confused of what kind of reinforcement they should use. No robust and high-quality data supports the use of one reinforcement over the other or even supports the use of reinforcement over no-reinforcement. Therefore, SLR is a controversial topic that is worth our focus. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of LSG with versus without Seamguard buttressing of the staple line during LSG.