A Systematic Review Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

Development and validation of a realistic type III esophageal atresia simulator for the training of pediatric surgeons

BACKGROUND

The technical complexity and limited casuistry of neonatal surgical pathology limit the possibilities of developing the necessary technical competencies by specialists in training. Esophageal atresia constitutes the paradigm of this problem. The use of synthetic 3D models for training is a promising line of research, although the literature is limited.

METHODS

We conceptualized, designed, and produced an anatomically realistic model for the open correction of type III oesophageal atresia. We validated it with two groups of participants (experts and non-experts) through face, construct, and content-validity questionnaires.

RESULTS

The model was validated by nine experts and nine non-experts. The mean procedure time for the experts and non-experts groups was 34.0 and 38.4 min, respectively. Two non-experts did not complete the procedure at the designed time (45 min). Regarding the face validity questionnaire, the mean rating of the model was 3.2 out of 4. Regarding the construct validity, we found statistically significant differences between groups for the equidistance between sutures, 100% correct in the expert group vs. 42.9% correct in the non-expert group (p = 0.02), and for the item "Confirms that tracheoesophageal fistula closure is watertight before continuing the procedure", correctly assessed by 66.7% of the experts vs. by 11.1% of non-experts (p = 0.05). Concerning content validity, the mean score was 3.3 out of 4 for the experts and 3.4 out of 4 for the non-experts.

CONCLUSIONS

The present model is a cost-effective, simple-to-produce, and validated option for training open correction of type III esophageal atresia. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and blinded validators are needed before drawing definitive conclusions.

Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review

Worldwide, 150 children are born each day with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a diaphragmatic defect with concomitant abnormal lung development. Patients with CDH with large defects are particularly challenging to treat, have the highest mortality, and are at significant risk of long-term complications. Advances in prenatal and neonatal treatments have improved survival in high-risk patients with CDH, but surgical treatment of large defects lacks standardization. Open repair by an abdominal approach has long been considered the traditional procedure, but the type of defect repair (patch or muscle flap) and patch material (non-absorbable, synthetic or absorbable, biological) remain subjects of debate. Increased experience and improved techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have expanded selection criteria for thoracoscopic defect repair in cardiopulmonary stable patients with small defects. However, the application of MIS to repair large defects remains controversial due to increased recurrence rates and unknown long-term effects of perioperative hypercapnia and acidosis resulting from capnothorax and reduced ventilation. Current recommendations on the surgical management rely on cohort studies of varying patient numbers and data on the long-term outcomes are sparse. Here, we discuss surgical approaches for diaphragmatic defect repair highlighting advancements, and knowledge gaps in surgical techniques (open surgery and MIS), patch materials and muscle flaps for large defects, as well as procedural adjuncts and management of CDH variants.

Surgical approaches to congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Surgical repair of the diaphragm is essential for survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). There are many considerations surrounding the operation - why the operation matters, optimal timing of repair and its relation to extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use, minimally invasive versus open approaches, and strategies for reconstruction. Surgery is both affected by, and affects, the physiology of these infants and is an important factor in determining long-term outcomes. Here we discuss the evidence and provide insight surrounding this complex decision making, technical pearls, and outcomes in repair of CDH.

Comprehensive meta-analysis of surgical procedure for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: thoracoscopic versus open repair

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown a higher recurrence rate and longer operative times for thoracoscopic repair (TR) of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) compared to open repair (OR). An updated meta-analysis was conducted to re-evaluate the surgical outcomes of TR.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search comparing TR and OR in neonates was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement (PROSPERO: CRD42020166588).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were selected for quantitative analysis, including a total of 709 patients (TR: 308 cases, OR: 401 cases). The recurrence rate was higher [Odds ratio: 4.03, 95% CI (2.21, 7.36), p < 0.001] and operative times (minutes) were longer [Mean Difference (MD): 43.96, 95% CI (24.70, 63.22), p < 0.001] for TR compared to OR. A significant reduction in the occurrence of postoperative bowel obstruction was observed in TR (5.0%) compared to OR (14.8%) [Odds ratio: 0.42, 95% CI (0.20, 0.89), p = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

TR remains associated with higher recurrence rates and longer operative times. However, the reduced risk of postoperative bowel obstruction suggests potential long-term benefits. This study emphasizes the importance of meticulous patient selection for TR to mitigate detrimental effects on patients with severe disease.

Exploring new perspectives on congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A comprehensive review

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) represents a developmental anomaly that profoundly impacts the embryonic development of both the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Understanding the influences of developmental defects, their origins, and clinical consequences is of paramount importance for further research and the advancement of therapeutic strategies for this condition. In recent years, groundbreaking studies in the fields of metabolomics and genomics have significantly expanded our knowledge regarding the pathogenic mechanisms of CDH. These investigations introduce novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues. CDH implies a scarcity of available information within this domain. Consequently, a comprehensive literature review has been undertaken to synthesize existing data, providing invaluable insights into this rare disease. Improved comprehension of the molecular underpinnings of CDH has the potential to refine diagnostic precision and therapeutic interventions, thus potentially enhancing clinical outcomes for CDH patients. The identification of potential biomarkers assumes paramount significance for early disease detection and risk assessment in CDH, facilitating prompt recognition and the implementation of appropriate interventions. The process of translating research findings into clinical practice is significantly facilitated by an exhaustive literature review. It serves as a pivotal step, enabling the integration of novel, more effective diagnostic and therapeutic modalities into the management of CDH patients.

Use of Barbed Sutures for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair can be challenging, particularly when a larger defect is present. Barbed sutures prevent the suture from slipping back after approximation of the tissues. Although introduced almost 2 decades ago, barbed sutures have not been widely used for CDH repair. We report our initial experience and pitfalls.

METHODS

All patients presenting with CDH from 2021 onward underwent repair using barbed sutures. Demographics, operative parameters, complications, and outcomes were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients underwent CDH repair during the study interval (median age 6 days, range 3 days to 5.75 years). Median operative time was 89 min (range 46 to 288 min). Five thoracoscopic and eight open procedures were performed. Severe pulmonary hypertension and ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were considered contraindications for thoracoscopic repair. The included patients were compared to a historic controlled group performed without barbed sutures. The barbed suture facilitated easy and quick closure of the defects in most cases and obviated the need for knot tying. One patient in the thoracoscopic group had a patch placed due to high tension after the barbed sutures tore the diaphragm. At a median follow-up time of 15 months (range 2 to 34 months), one patient had died, and one patient with complete diaphragmatic agenesis was home-ventilated. There were no recurrences. Median operative time trended lower (89 min) than in the historic control group repaired without barbed sutures (119 min, p < 0.06) after eliminating outliers with large, complex patch repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Barbed sutures simplify congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair regardless of whether a minimal-invasive or open approach is performed. Patch repair is not a contraindication for using barbed sutures. The resulting potential time savings make them particularly useful in patients with cardiac or other severe co-morbidities in which shorter operative times are essential. In cases with high tension, though, the barbs may tear through and produce a "saw" effect on the tissue with subsequent damage.