The Sexual Health of Women in Lebanon: Are There Differences by Sexual Orientation?

Sexual and gender minority health in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A scoping review

Background

Researchers in studies from multiple countries suggest that sexual and gender minority people experience high rates of violence, stigma, and discrimination, as well as mistrust of health care providers and systems. Despite growing evidence related to sexual and gender minority health in North America and Europe, we know little about the health of this population in the Middle East and North Africa.

Objectives

We aimed to comprehensively examine the literature related to the health of sexual and gender minority people in the Middle East and North Africa and to identify research gaps and priorities.

Design

We conducted a scoping review informed by the framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool.

Data sources

We searched the following databases: PubMed (using Medline All on the Ovid platform), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Embase (Ovid). The search strategy combined terms for the geographic region of interest (Middle East and North Africa) and the population of interest (sexual and gender minority). Each was operationalized using multiple search terms and, where available, controlled vocabulary terms.

Review Methods

Research articles were identified and assessed for inclusion using an explicit strategy. Relevant information was extracted and synthesized to present a descriptive summary of existing evidence.

Results

Research designs of the 98 articles we reviewed included quantitative (n = 73), qualitative (n = 20), and mixed methods (n = 5). Most studies were conducted in Lebanon (n = 33), Pakistan (n = 32), and Iran (n = 23) and focused mainly on gender minority individuals (n = 46) and men who have sex with men (n = 32). Five themes emerged from the review: sexual health (52; 53%); mental health (20; 20%); gender identity (17; 17%); violence and discrimination (7; 7%); and experiences with the healthcare system (2; 2%). Although researchers focused on multiple health outcomes in some studies, we included them under the theme most closely aligned with the main objective of the study.

Conclusion

Although our study is limited to few countries in the Middle East and North Africa region, we found that sexual and gender minority individuals face multiple adverse sexual and mental health outcomes and experience high rates of stigma, discrimination, and violence. More research is needed from countries outside of Lebanon, Pakistan, and Iran, including community-based participatory approaches and multi-level intervention development. Nurses and other healthcare providers in the region need training in providing inclusive care for this population.

Papanicolaou Test Rates Among Sexual Minority Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to compare differences in Papanicolaou (pap) test rates between sexual minority women (SMW) and heterosexual women. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception until June 2020 for articles reporting pap test rates among SMW. Studies were selected if they included pap test rates for SMW with a comparison rate for heterosexual women; studies were excluded if they did not report pap test rates. A quality assessment scale was used to assess study quality. A random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by implementation of the I² statistic, and L'Abbe plots were inspected visually to assess for homogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed by omitting each study sequentially and analyzing the overall impact of that study on the pooled results. Meta-regression was conducted to identify potential causes of heterogeneity among any statistically significant outcomes by an examination of the covariable of insurance coverage. Results: We identified 21 cross-sectional studies comprising 24,207 SMW and 546,259 heterosexual women that met inclusion criteria. Overall, studies were of a fair quality. When compared with heterosexual women, SMW received less frequent pap tests (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.71, 21 studies, 24,207 SMW, 546,259 heterosexual women). Compared with heterosexual women, lesbian women had routine pap tests less frequently (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.56, 17 studies, 9595 lesbian women and 516,760 heterosexual women). Meta-regression for insurance status did not alter these results. Conclusion: SMW, in general, and lesbian women, in particular, receive pap tests less frequently than heterosexual women. The reasons for this disparity should be investigated to better serve the needs of this population. PROSPERO Registration: CRD#42020191887.

Examining the Attitudes and Behaviors of Health-care Providers Toward LGBT Patients in Lebanon

The present cross-sectional descriptive study examined the attitudes and behaviors of health-care providers toward LGBT patients in Lebanon. Participants (N = 141) generally showed positive attitudes and behaviors toward LGBT patients. Mental health providers were significantly less likely to believe that homosexuality is a mental health disorder or that it is unnatural to identify with a gender identity other than one's biological sex when compared to non-mental health providers. Mental health providers were also more likely to be willing to address transgender people by their gender pronouns, and to believe that homosexuality is a natural variation on the sexual orientation spectrum when compared to non-mental health providers. Findings show favorable attitudes and behaviors of health-care providers toward LGBT individuals when compared to previous investigations in Lebanon. Implications on the educational, research, and policy levels are discussed.