Side of cancer does not influence limb volumes in women prior to breast cancer surgery

Preoperative inter-arm differences and normative-based thresholds for lymphedema in Chinese breast cancer patients: Insights from a large cohort study

Objective

Early detection and diagnosis of lymphedema are crucial for effective treatment and prevention of its progression. Normative-based diagnostic thresholds can enhance diagnostic accuracy in the absence of preoperative measurements. This study aimed to investigate preoperative inter-arm differences and the associated factors, as well as to determine normative-based thresholds for lymphedema in Chinese breast cancer patients.

Methods

This study utilized baseline data from a large cohort of Chinese breast cancer patients. Bilateral arm circumferences were measured at the wrist and at 10 cm intervals proximally up to 40 cm. Arm volumes were calculated using the truncated cone formula. Paired t test, repeated measures analysis of variance, and regression analysis were performed.

Results

A total of 1707 breast cancer patients were included. Paired t tests showed that the dominant arm circumferences and volumes were significantly larger than those of the nondominant arm (P < 0.001). Regression analysis and repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that hand dominance was the influencing factor of inter-arm differences (P < 0.05). Normative-based thresholds determined by two standard deviations above the mean inter-arm volume ratio were 1.057 for the dominant arm and 1.079 for the nondominant arm.

Conclusions

The absolute and relative normative-based thresholds for Chinese breast cancer patients differed slightly from the commonly used diagnostic criteria and those reported in Western populations and among Chinese healthy women. The normal variability and asymmetry associated with arm dominance underscore the importance of preoperative baseline assessments. Implementing normative-based diagnostic thresholds can facilitate more accurate lymphedema diagnosis when preoperative measurements are unavailable.

Trial registration

Registration No. ChiCTR2200057083.

Perioperative variations in indices derived from noninvasive assessments to detect postmastectomy lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the variations in indices derived from noninvasive assessments for the early detection of postmastectomy lymphedema (LE) from 1 month preoperatively until 2 years postoperatively.

METHODS

In total, 120 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer in our institution were prospectively followed up with a questionnaire for arm swelling as well as with tape measurements, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and skin and subcutaneous tissue ultrasound at 1 month before and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients completed the study. Among 93 patients who did not present with LE, 9% complained of arm swelling even before surgery, and the incidence peaked at 17% at 6 months after surgery. There were no differences in the circumferences of the upper arm, forearm, and hand between sides throughout the study period. However, the postoperative circumference values of the upper arm only on the operation side were slightly increased compared with the preoperative values. The mean excess fluid in the arm on the operation side compared with the contralateral side, as assessed by BIA, was nearly zero throughout the study period. There were no differences in subcutaneous echogenicity or skin and subcutaneous thicknesses between the sides throughout the study period. However, time-dependent increases in subcutaneous thicknesses were noticed on both sides. Four patients (4.1%) developed LE. In three of these patients, abnormality in the BIA was recorded 6 to 12 months before presentation. Immediately after presentation, the common findings included BIA abnormality and increased subcutaneous echogenicity and skin thickness in the medial forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a complaint of arm swelling was not sensitive enough for detection of the early onset of LE because a certain number of patients constantly complained of this symptom. Measurements of circumference might help in the diagnosis of LE onset, but this method is not specific enough because these measurements are also affected by various factors. However, BIA and skin and subcutaneous ultrasound were identified as potential tools for the early detection of LE.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and treatment

SUMMARY 

Lymphedema is one of the late effects of breast cancer treatment that affects many breast cancer survivors. Despite an increased focus on morbidity among this survivor population, our understanding of risk reduction, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema remain poorly understood. This article provides an overview of the current state of the research (2009–2014) on breast cancer-related lymphedema and offers future directions for research. A greater emphasis must be placed on reducing the impact of lymphedema to improve the quality of life for breast cancer survivors.