Agreement Between Optoelectronic Volumetry and Circumferential Girth Measurements to Diagnose Lymphedema in Patients Submitted to Axillary Radical Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma

Association of clinical manifestations of secondary lymphedema and lymph node dissection sites in the lower extremities of patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that often requires life-long management. Predicting clinical manifestations and prognosis is crucial in clinical practice because the treatment of lymphedema should be individualized for best clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to explore the location and severity of lymphedema secondary to inguinal and/or iliac lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with melanoma who received LND at a single tertiary medical center between 1 January 2010 and 31 September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient who received inguinal LND only were designate as the inguinal group while those who received both ilioinguinal LND were included in the ilioinguinal group. Volumetric measurement was used to objectify the severity and location of lymphedema. Clinical data was acquired for 12-15 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 81 patients, 43 (53%) had developed lymphedema in the lower extremities at an average of 33 days after the surgery. Initially, patients manifested with medial thigh lymphedema in the inguinal group while patients were presented with whole leg lymphedema in the ilioinguinal group. Lower leg volume of the ilioinguinal group was significantly higher than the inguinal group. After more than 12 months of lymphedema treatment, upper leg volume was higher in the ilioinguinal group than the inguinal group (12.7% vs 5.4%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lymphedema developed in early post-op period. The ilioinguinal group presented with a larger volume of lymphedema in the distal area of the legs. Even after sufficient treatment, predominant lymphedema remained in the proximal leg for the ilioinguinal group. Patients with both inguinal and iliac LND were associated with more severe lymphedema. Based on the dissection sites, the clinical manifestations and prognosis of leg lymphedema can vary widely. Thus, clinicians should consider the dissection site when approaching melanoma patients with lymphedema.

Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the LLIS and ULL27 in Detecting Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer-related lymphedema occurs in up to 30% of women following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and less commonly following sentinel lymph node biopsy. To quantify disability in these patients, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have proven useful; however, given the overlap of symptoms between ALND and lymphedema, examination of their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting lymphedema in breast cancer patients undergoing ALND is needed.

METHODS

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLIS) and the Upper Limb Lymphedema 27 scale (ULL27) were administered to patients who had undergone ALND at least 2 years prior and either did or did not develop lymphedema. Survey responses and the degree of disability were compared to generate receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, and the sensitivity and specificity of PROMs to diagnose lymphedema were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both PROMs were highly accurate, sensitive, and specific for detecting lymphedema. The LLIS had an accuracy of 97%, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 84.8% at a cutoff of ≥ 5.88 overall percent impairment score (higher scores indicate worse disability). The ULL27 had an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 88.6%, and specificity of 90.9% at a cutoff of ≤ 83.3 global score (lower scores indicate worse disability).

CONCLUSIONS

The LLIS and the ULL27 appear to be highly specific for lymphedema and capable of differentiating it from symptoms resulting from ALND alone. Our findings suggest that use of these questionnaires with a threshold may be effective for diagnosing lymphedema, potentially reducing the need for frequent clinic visits and time-consuming measurements.