Edema Fluid Can Be Successfully Evacuated from the Lymphedematous Limbs by Implantation of Silicone Tubings Bypassing the Site of Flow Obstruction Long-Term Observations

Biomaterials in the clinical treatment of lymphedema-a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by impaired lymphatic fluid drainage, resulting in progressive edema. The current mainstay of lymphedema therapy consists of conservative therapy and surgical therapy. In this systematic review, we investigated the novel role of biomaterials in clinical lymphedema therapy and assessed their objective outcomes and the complication rate associated with their use.

METHODS

Studies were identified through systematic review using the Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE databases. Only original articles reporting the use of biomaterials for clinical lymphedema therapy were included. The primary outcome measure was the objective reduction in limb volume after biomaterial use. The secondary outcome measure was the assessment of biomaterial safety.

RESULTS

A total of 354 articles were identified in the first search, of which 10 met our inclusion criteria. These articles described the use of two biomaterials, nanofibrillar collagen scaffolds (NCSs) and silicone tubes (STs), for the treatment of lymphedema. NCS implantation showed an average excess limb volume reduction of 1% to 10.7% and clear evidence of lymphangiogenesis on imaging. No complications were 7documented after NCS implantation. ST implantation showed an average limb volume reduction of 700 to 887 mL and limb circumference reduction of 3.1 to 8 cm in patients with advanced stage lymphedema. Of 177 patients treated with ST implantation, only 11 (6.2%) developed local inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both NCS and ST implantation showed promising limb volume reduction; however, with the scarce literature available, additional research is needed to determine their effectiveness. Both demonstrated good safety profiles, with no complications after NCS implantation and a complication rate equivalent to other similar implants for ST implantation.

Experimental Study of the Prevention and Treatment of Lymphoedema in a Rat Hindlimb Model by Applying Cardioperitoneal Catheters and Lacrimal Intubation Tubes in the Inguinoperitoneal Region

OBJECTIVE

Secondary lymphoedema (LE) is a chronic condition with limited surgical treatment options for restoring extremity form and function. This study aimed to establish a reproducible model of secondary LE and evaluate the preventive and corrective effects of fenestrated catheters (FC) and capillary tubes (CT).

METHODS

Thirty-five rats underwent left hindlimb inguinal and popliteal lymph node dissection, followed by radiotherapy after two weeks. The right hindlimb served as the control. The rats were divided into five groups: sham, two preventive (Group 2 - EFC, Group 3 - ECT), and two corrective (Group 4 - LFC, Group 5 - LCT). Measurements of ankle circumference (AC) and paw thickness (PT) were taken weekly, and imaging modalities were performed. After a 16 week follow up, rats were euthanised for histological examination.

RESULTS

Data include paw thickness (PT) and ankle circumference (AC) ratios for hindlimbs. In the sham group, AC ratio was 1.08 (p = .002) and PT ratio was 1.11 (p = .020), confirming successful lymphoedema model establishment. Early catheter and tube placement in Groups 2 and 3 prevented AC and PT increase until the 16th week. Group 2: the AC ratio was 0.98 (p = .93), and the PT ratio was 0.98 (p = .61). Group 3: the AC ratio was 0.98 (p = .94) and the PT ratio was 0.99 (p = .11). From the 10th to the 16th week, Groups 4 and 5 exhibited reduced measurements after insertion of catheters and tubes. Computed tomography imaging as an objective examination supported the results obtained from the measurements. The histological findings confirmed the benefits of both FC and CT.

CONCLUSION

The insights gained from the present study provide a basis for further exploration and refinement of drainage system designs, ultimately leading to improved treatment approaches for individuals suffering from lymphoedema in the future.

Lymphatic channel sheet of polydimethylsiloxane for preventing secondary lymphedema in the rat upper limb model

Secondary lymphedema is a severe complication of cancer treatment, but there is no effective curative method yet. Lymph node dissection and radiation therapy for cancer treatment may lead to secondary lymphedema, which is a chronic disease induced by malfunction of lymphatic flow. The lymphatic channel sheet (LCS) is an artificial micro-fluidic structure that was fabricated with polydimethylsiloxane to maintain lymphatic flow and induce lymphangiogenesis. The structure has two-dimensional multichannels that increase the probability of lymphangiogenesis and allow for relatively easy application. We verified the efficacy of the lymphatic channel sheet through macroscopic and microscopic observation in small animal models, which underwent brachial lymph node dissection and irradiation. The lymphatic channel sheet enabled the successful transport of lymphatic fluid from the distal to the proximal area in place of the removed brachial lymph nodes. It prevented swelling and abnormal lymphatic drainage during the follow-up period. Lymphangiogenesis was also identified inside the channel by histological analysis after 8 weeks. According to these experimental results, we attest to the roles of the lymphatic channel sheet as a lymphatic pathway and scaffold in the rat upper limb model of secondary lymphedema. The lymphatic channel sheet maintained lymphatic flow after lymph node dissection and irradiation in an environment where lymph flow is cut off. It also relieved symptoms of secondary lymphedema by providing a lymph-friendly space and inducing lymphangiogenesis.