1
|
Shi H, Lv Z, Xu W, Liu J, Sheng Q, Ren X, Chen Z. Laparoscopic-assisted sclerotherapy in pediatric retroperitoneal lymphatic malformations. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1418616. [PMID: 39040666 PMCID: PMC11260707 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1418616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Retroperitoneal lymphatic malformations (LMs) are rare. Currently, the treatment of retroperitoneal LMs remains challenging. This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted sclerotherapy for retroperitoneal LMs in pediatric patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with laparoscopic-assisted sclerotherapy for retroperitoneal LMs in a single tertiary medical center between July 2020 and February 2023. Doxycycline was prepared into a solution with a concentration of 10 mg/ml for use in sclerotherapy. Demographic data, clinical features, details of management, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results A total of six patients, comprising three males and three females, were identified. The LMs were categorized into four macrocystic and two mixed-cystic types. The mean age and weight were 52.2 months (range, 11-108 months) and 20 kg (range, 12.5-27.5 kg), respectively. Three patients presented with abdominal pain or distension, while the other three patients were asymptomatic. All six patients underwent a total of eight sclerotherapy sessions. Two patients experienced intra-cystic hemorrhage and required a second sclerotherapy session. Only one patient presented with vomiting after sclerotherapy, which resolved spontaneously. Five patients met the complete response criteria, and one patient met the effective criteria. The mean reduction in lesion size was 92.3% (range, 69.9%-99.6%). No further complications or recurrence were recorded during follow-up. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted sclerotherapy is a safe and effective approach for treating retroperitoneal LMs. This technique is applicable for both macrocystic and mixed-cystic retroperitoneal LMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Shi
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhibao Lv
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weijue Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiangbin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingfeng Sheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Ren
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhou Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pieper CC. Back to the Future II-A Comprehensive Update on the Rapidly Evolving Field of Lymphatic Imaging and Interventions. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:610-640. [PMID: 37058335 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Lymphatic imaging and interventional therapies of disorders affecting the lymphatic vascular system have evolved rapidly in recent years. Although x-ray lymphangiography had been all but replaced by the advent of cross-sectional imaging and the scientific focus shifted to lymph node imaging (eg, for detection of metastatic disease), interest in lymph vessel imaging was rekindled by the introduction of lymphatic interventional treatments in the late 1990s. Although x-ray lymphangiography is still the mainstay imaging technique to guide interventional procedures, several other, often less invasive, techniques have been developed more recently to evaluate the lymphatic vascular system and associated pathologies. Especially the introduction of magnetic resonance, and even more recently computed tomography, lymphangiography with water-soluble iodinated contrast agent has furthered our understanding of complex pathophysiological backgrounds of lymphatic diseases. This has led to an improvement of treatment approaches, especially of nontraumatic disorders caused by lymphatic flow abnormalities including plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, and nontraumatic chylolymphatic leakages. The therapeutic armamentarium has also constantly grown and diversified in recent years with the introduction of more complex catheter-based and interstitial embolization techniques, lymph vessel stenting, lymphovenous anastomoses, as well as (targeted) medical treatment options. The aim of this article is to review the relevant spectrum of lymphatic disorders with currently available radiological imaging and interventional techniques, as well as the application of these methods in specific, individual clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus C Pieper
- From the Division for Minimally Invasive Lymphatic Therapy, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn; and Center for Rare Congenital Lymphatic Diseases, Center of Rare Diseases Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee E, Biko DM, Sherk W, Masch WR, Ladino-Torres M, Agarwal PP. Understanding Lymphatic Anatomy and Abnormalities at Imaging. Radiographics 2022; 42:487-505. [PMID: 35179984 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Lymphatic abnormalities encompass a wide range of disorders spanning solitary common cystic lymphatic malformations (LMs) to entities involving multiple organ systems such as lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Many of these disorders are rare, yet some, such as secondary lymphedema from the treatment of malignancy (radiation therapy and/or lymph node dissection), affect millions of patients worldwide. Owing to complex and variable anatomy, the lymphatics are not as well understood as other organ systems. Further complicating this is the variability in the description of lymphatic disease processes and their nomenclature in the medical literature. In recent years, medical imaging has begun to facilitate a deeper understanding of the physiology and pathologic processes that involve the lymphatic system. Radiology is playing an important and growing role in the diagnosis and treatment of many lymphatic conditions. The authors describe both normal and common variant lymphatic anatomy. Various imaging modalities including nuclear medicine lymphoscintigraphy, conventional lymphangiography, and MR lymphangiography used in the diagnosis and treatment of lymphatic disorders are highlighted. The authors discuss imaging many of the common and uncommon lymphatic disorders, including primary LMs described by the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies 2018 classification system (microcystic, mixed, and macrocystic LMs; primary lymphedema). Secondary central lymphatic disorders are also detailed, including secondary lymphedema and chylous leaks, as well as lymphatic disorders not otherwise easily classified. The authors aim to provide the reader with an overview of the anatomy, pathology, imaging findings, and treatment of a wide variety of lymphatic conditions. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| | - David M Biko
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| | - William Sherk
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| | - William R Masch
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| | - Maria Ladino-Torres
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| | - Prachi P Agarwal
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Imaging (E.L., P.P.A.), Interventional Radiology (W.S.), and Body Imaging (W.R.M.), University of Michigan, University Hospital Floor B1, Reception C, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, SPC 5030, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (D.M.B.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.L.T.)
| |
Collapse
|