Lower respiratory tract infections in the intensive care unit: consequences of antibiotic resistance for choice of antibiotic

Microbiology and Clinical Outcome of Hospital-Acquired Respiratory Infections in an Italian Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Study

The burden, microbial etiology and clinical impact of hospital-acquired respiratory infections (HARIs) were determined at an Italian teaching hospital over a 12-month period. For this purpose, overall ordinary hospitalizations ≥ 2 days of subjects over 18 years old with discharge from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 were examined by cross-referencing demographic and clinical data from hospital discharge forms with microbiological data from the computer system of the Microbiology Unit. We identified 329 individuals with HARIs (96 females and 233 males; median age 70 years, range 18−93), who represented ¼ of the total hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in the period. The inpatient setting was medical and surgical in similar proportions (169 vs. 160, respectively) and the mean hospital stay was 38.9 ± 33.6 days. One hundred and forty patients (42.6% of the total sample) were suffering from one or more chronic diseases. A total of 581 microorganisms (82 antibiotic-resistant and 499 non-resistant) were detected in HARI patients. The most common isolated species were Staphylococcus aureus (16.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.3%), Pseudomonas spp. (12.6%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10.5%), followed by Enterobacter spp. (5.3%), Escherichia coli (5.2%) and Enterococcus spp. (4.8%). One hundred and sixty-seven individuals (49.0% of the total) had polymicrobial infections. One hundred thirty-one patients (39.8% of the total) underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation and 62.6% of them died, compared to 17.7% of the non-intubated patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed a positive correlation between death and increased age (p = 0.05), surgical MDC (p = 0.007), number of microorganisms over the sample mean (p = 0.001), the presence of chronic diseases (p = 0.046), and intubation and mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001). A positive correlation between intubation and antibiotic-resistant organisms (p = 0.003) was also found. HARIs are still a major public health problem and require constant surveillance due to their severe clinical outcome.

Recent developments in antibiotic treatment

Antibiotic resistance of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria remains a major challenge for clinicians treating HAP. Since the recent release of linezolid and QD, treatment options for resistant gram-positive bacteria have improved. The development of new substances continues and it is hoped that some of them will be available soon. Investigation has centered on gram-positive bacteria, although multiresistant gram-negative pathogens, such as A haumanii, S maltophilia, and resistant P aeruginosa, are of major clinical relevance. New treatment options are unfortunately not in sight. No antibiotic, however, is a miraculous magic wand against resistant bacteria. The bugs are smart; they have been on this world far longer than humans. Regardless of how innovative the mechanism of action of new substances is, resistance will emerge. The solution is certainly not a nihilistic approach leading to a fearful restriction in the use of new substances. No antibiotic, regardless of its potency, can free the clinician from keeping the difficult balance between individual undertreatment and general overtreatment.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy for bacterial infections

The authors discuss the latest findings regarding the use of one or more antimicrobial drugs for a variety of infections. They offer suggestions for treatment based on a host of considerations, including the synergy and antagonism of specific drugs, type of infection, potential toxicities, and cost.

Epidemiology and risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia. Emphasis on prevention

VAP is a complex nosocomial infection, the disease expression and resulting patient outcome of which is dependent on host factors, the causative organism, the timing and adequacy of treatment, and the presence of intrinsic or inducible antibiotic resistance. Significant improvements have been achieved in our ability to reduce the occurrence of VAP in the hospital setting. Clinicians caring for mechanically ventilated patients should strive to develop focused programs for the prevention of VAP, other nosocomial infections, and the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant infections at their institutions. The benefits of such programs are well demonstrated. The components of a PDSA (Plan-Do-STUDY-Act) model that can be simply employed to develop a VAP prevention program are as follows: Stages Plan: 1. Identify potentially modifiable risk factors for VAP at the institutional level. 2. Develop a strategy to modify or prevent the occurrence of these risk factors. [figure: see text] Do: 1. Carry out the planned intervention strategy. 2. Identify problems in the implementation of the designed intervention. 3. Update the intervention with solutions for the identified problems. 4. Collect basic data (e.g., VAP rates, severity of illness).

STUDY

1. Analyze data. 2. Summarize the results. Act: 1. Determine the overall success or failure of the intervention. 2. Identify potential modifications to improve the intervention strategy. 3. Prepare for next PDSA cycle. Inherent in the development and application of such programs is the concept that they are continuous processes striving to improve clinical performance over time (Fig. 3). At any given institution, the most likely approach to the prevention of NP and VAP will be a multifaceted one, employing interventions aimed at reducing the occurrence of aerodigestive tract colonization with pathogenic bacteria and aspiration. To be successful, such quality improvement programs must be embraced at the institutional level. Only in this way can hospitals hope to successfully reduce their rates of VAP and sustain or improve upon those efforts over time.

Nosocomial pneumonia in the critical care unit

Nosocomial pneumonia poses a major threat to the recovery of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. In addition, nosocomial pneumonia is often difficult to diagnose. This article examines the extent of the threat and some of the difficulties facing the critical care physician when diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia.