1
|
Taghlabi KM, Cruz-Garza JG, Hassan T, Potnis O, Bhenderu LS, Guerrero JR, Whitehead RE, Wu Y, Luan L, Xie C, Robinson JT, Faraji AH. Clinical outcomes of peripheral nerve interfaces for rehabilitation in paralysis and amputation: a literature review. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:011001. [PMID: 38237175 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad200f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Peripheral nerve interfaces (PNIs) are electrical systems designed to integrate with peripheral nerves in patients, such as following central nervous system (CNS) injuries to augment or replace CNS control and restore function. We review the literature for clinical trials and studies containing clinical outcome measures to explore the utility of human applications of PNIs. We discuss the various types of electrodes currently used for PNI systems and their functionalities and limitations. We discuss important design characteristics of PNI systems, including biocompatibility, resolution and specificity, efficacy, and longevity, to highlight their importance in the current and future development of PNIs. The clinical outcomes of PNI systems are also discussed. Finally, we review relevant PNI clinical trials that were conducted, up to the present date, to restore the sensory and motor function of upper or lower limbs in amputees, spinal cord injury patients, or intact individuals and describe their significant findings. This review highlights the current progress in the field of PNIs and serves as a foundation for future development and application of PNI systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled M Taghlabi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Jesus G Cruz-Garza
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Taimur Hassan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX 77807, United States of America
| | - Ojas Potnis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- School of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Lokeshwar S Bhenderu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX 77807, United States of America
| | - Jaime R Guerrero
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Rachael E Whitehead
- Department of Academic Affairs, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Yu Wu
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
| | - Lan Luan
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
| | - Chong Xie
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
| | - Jacob T Robinson
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
| | - Amir H Faraji
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Clinical Innovations Laboratory, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
- Rice Neuroengineering Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pellot-Cestero JE, Herring EZ, Graczyk EL, Memberg WD, Kirsch RF, Ajiboye AB, Miller JP. Implanted Electrodes for Functional Electrical Stimulation to Restore Upper and Lower Extremity Function: History and Future Directions. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:965-970. [PMID: 37288972 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) to activate nerves and muscles in paralyzed extremities has considerable promise to improve outcome after neurological disease or injury, especially in individuals who have upper motor nerve dysfunction due to central nervous system pathology. Because technology has improved, a wide variety of methods for providing electrical stimulation to create functional movements have been developed, including muscle stimulating electrodes, nerve stimulating electrodes, and hybrid constructs. However, in spite of decades of success in experimental settings with clear functional improvements for individuals with paralysis, the technology has not yet reached widespread clinical translation. In this review, we outline the history of FES techniques and approaches and describe future directions in evolution of the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel E Pellot-Cestero
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Neurological Institute, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Eric Z Herring
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Neurological Institute, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Emily L Graczyk
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - William D Memberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Robert F Kirsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - A Bolu Ajiboye
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Neurological Institute, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardoso LRL, Bochkezanian V, Forner-Cordero A, Melendez-Calderon A, Bo APL. Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:66. [PMID: 35773733 PMCID: PMC9245887 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01043-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recovery of hand function is crucial for the independence of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Wearable devices based on soft robotics (SR) or functional electrical stimulation (FES) have been employed to assist the recovery of hand function both during activities of daily living (ADLs) and during therapy. However, the implementation of these wearable devices has not been compiled in a review focusing on the functional outcomes they can activate/elicit/stimulate/potentiate. This narrative review aims at providing a guide both for engineers to help in the development of new technologies and for clinicians to serve as clinical guidelines based on the available technology in order to assist and/or recover hand function in people with SCI. Methods A literature search was performed in Scopus, Pubmed and IEEE Xplore for articles involving SR devices or FES systems designed for hand therapy or assistance, published since 2010. Only studies that reported functional outcomes from individuals with SCI were selected. The final collections of both groups (SR and FES) were analysed based on the technical aspects and reported functional outcomes. Results A total of 37 out of 1101 articles were selected, 12 regarding SR and 25 involving FES devices. Most studies were limited to research prototypes, designed either for assistance or therapy. From an engineering perspective, technological improvements for home-based use such as portability, donning/doffing and the time spent with calibration were identified. From the clinician point of view, the most suitable technical features (e.g., user intent detection) and assessment tools should be determined according to the particular patient condition. A wide range of functional assessment tests were adopted, moreover, most studies used non-standardized tests. Conclusion SR and FES wearable devices are promising technologies to support hand function recovery in subjects with SCI. Technical improvements in aspects such as the user intent detection, portability or calibration as well as consistent assessment of functional outcomes were the main identified limitations. These limitations seem to be be preventing the translation into clinical practice of these technological devices created in the laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas R L Cardoso
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Vanesa Bochkezanian
- College of Health Sciences, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Arturo Forner-Cordero
- Biomechatronics Laboratory, Escola Politecnica, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alejandro Melendez-Calderon
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Antonio P L Bo
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fonseca L, Guiraud D, Hiairrassary A, Fattal C, Azevedo-Coste C. A Residual Movement Classification Based User Interface for Control of Assistive Devices by Persons with Complete Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2022; 30:569-578. [PMID: 35235517 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3156269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Complete tetraplegia can deprive a person of hand function. Assistive technologies may improve autonomy but needs for ergonomic interfaces for the user to pilot these devices still persist. Despite the paralysis of their arms, people with tetraplegia may retain residual shoulder movements. In this work we explored these movements as a mean to control assistive devices. METHODS We captured shoulder movement with a single inertial sensor and, by training a support vector machine based classifier, we decode such information into user intent. RESULTS The setup and training process take only a few minutes and so the classifiers can be user specific. We tested the algorithm with 10 able body and 2 spinal cord injury participants. The average classification accuracy was 80% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION The proposed algorithm is easy to set up, its operation is fully automated, and achieved results are on par with state-of-the-art systems. SIGNIFICANCE Assistive devices for persons without hand function present limitations in their user interfaces. Our work present a novel method to overcome some of these limitations by classifying user movement and decoding it into user intent, all with simple setup and training and no need for manual tuning. We demonstrate its feasibility with experiments with end users, including persons with complete tetraplegia without hand function.
Collapse
|